[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any EJB Server for Linux currently Available.
>
An excellent open source EJB server is JOnAS from Bullsoft.
It's pure java and I use it on big Sun iron at work and on my wimpy
laptop under linux.
Check it out at www.bullsoft.com/ejb
-mike
--
OK, I've now seen the rumor mentioned three times... can anyone point to
an IBM source of where this might be comming from? -=Chris
p.s. Without trying to spread it, the rumor I'm refering to is the one
that IBM will be OSS'ing their Linux VM in the 1.3 time frame
cabbey at home dot net <*
Dear gentlemen,
Glad to hear about the release of J2SE for linux.
Do u know what is the plan/status of a J2EE port for linux?
Sorry if my question is obvious/stupid, but can't find any
info on Sun's site... Only thing i can find is the J2EE
reference implementation for WinNT and Solaris via S
Interesting stuff, when small mailing lists become fodder for media
stories. The Sun screwup is explained, along with a good summary of
the conversation here, at
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/zd/19991209/tc/19991209113.html
Personally, I think Sun has apologized fairly gallantly and I take
I was actually trying to make a reference to the fact that I have not
yet seen a mention of Red Hat in our discussions of who should be
driving Java on Linux. Why is that?
Jim
Tony Dean wrote:
>
> Jim,
>
> There is such an organization. Its called the Opensource movement. You
> only
> have to
http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-1484634.html?tag=st.ne.ron.lthd.1003-20
0-1484634
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've done a couple installs of Oracle 8i on RH6.0 and 6.1. There are some
interesting gotchas, if this isn't too far off topic.
Using a newer jre than Oracle's recommended 1.1.6v5 will often (not
always) work as far as installing the software itself, but for me the
install program would then bomb
All applications can listen on sockets on the localhost for ports 1024
and up. In addition I gave all files on my machine to connect and
resolv on localhost. If I try to do a Naming.lookup() from another
machine it will succeed, even though I didn't give rmiregistry accept
permission for anything
Dimitrios,
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
Tony Dean wrote:
> I presented a paper on using JNI with Linux at
the Atlanta Linux
> Showcase and the feedback
> ran from one guy telling me this was exactly what he needed to someone
> else wanting to
> rewrite the entire Java class library with JNI and
Jim,
There is such an organization. Its called the Opensource movement. You
only
have to look as far as Linux to see the potential. Linux is more stable
and generally
performs better than Win NT and there is plenty of resources behind
NT. look at Perl and
gcc/g++ to see what can happen. The Opens
I'm getting this too. rmiregistry prints it out whenever something calls
Naming.rebind() and any program prints it out when doing Naming.lookup().
I'm using 1.2.2 rc3. Everything does appear to work though (mostly).
Santos Jha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was trying to learn RMI using JDK1.2.2. I am u
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Seesh. Read more carefully, will you?
>
> We look forward to continued collaboration with Blackdown with the common
> goal of providing the Java 2 platform to the Linux community."
>
>
>
> Blackdown.org continues to be a valuable source for Java technology for
> Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I hate to waste mailing list bandwidth this way, but I've been asked for
> the URL for an article I read recently that quoted an IBMer making some
> statement about J2EE vs. WebSphere. I believe it was an article on
> linuxgrrl but I can't track it down there as the
I hate to waste mailing list bandwidth this way, but I've been asked for
the URL for an article I read recently that quoted an IBMer making some
statement about J2EE vs. WebSphere. I believe it was an article on
linuxgrrl but I can't track it down there as the home page doesn't seem to
be doing a
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
> Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
> http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
>
> However, how should someone interpret:
> "Blackdown.org continues to be a valuable source for Java technology for
> Linux, including JDK 1.1.x release
Any way to get in touch with this guy ? i keep getting Remote host said: 550 This
domain is banned.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Are there any EJB Server for Linux currently Available.
>
you can use any 100% pure java ejb server like weblogic (expensive),
ejipt or orion
check the javasoft ejb page for a list of servers and urls.
if you're just evaluating, you can try the free jonas server
wh
Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> It looks like they forgot to connect it to the rest of the site -
> even search of their web site does not find it.
Odd, maybe some browser/script trickery messing it up???
When I connect to
http://java.sun.com/
It's right near the top; the first "Headline & Featu
This was posted yesterday. I asked Ken if I could repost it here
and he said yes.
Ken Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - SMI Software Development wrote:
>
> Ah, what a day.
>
> I've been working this issue pretty hard and here is the scoop from
> here:
>
> The press release was messed up.
Gee, fellas,
Its too bad u didn't feel this way when SUN gave u an exclusive license to
do a COMMERCIAL license. I'd invite u to my life-boat, but there just isn't
enough room.
gat
juergen Kreileder wrote:
> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press release
> is a slap in th
It's right there on http://java.sun.com -- the first link under
"Headlines & Features."
Jim Caley
--
Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> It looks like they forgot to connect it to the rest of the site -
> even search of their web site does not find it.
>
> Jacob
>
> Wolfgang HOSCHEK wrote:
> >
> > Any oth
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> > no schedule information,
>
> Well, blackdown doesn't exactly have a manager or a PR department to make
> press releases for the development roadmap :-)
Yes, yes, there are always reasons for everything. But the bottom line
was the consi
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Mark Christiaens wrote:
> I'm not familiar with this benchmark. What is better? Higher or lower
> values? Can these benchmarks also be run on a 1.1 JVM? I'm especially
> interested in the IBM machine which is 1.1.8.
We have results from IBM's 1.1.8 somewhere around here,
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
> http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
>
> However, how should someone interpret:
> "Blackdown.org continues to be a valuable source for Java technology for
> Linux, including JDK 1.1.x rele
> ...
> But there's an awful lot of evidence that
> mounting a serious Java environment effort is not really possible
> without the financial resources to feed and clothe a small army of
> full-time developers.
>
> Nathan
If only there were a Linux organization/corporation with those kind of
fi
It looks like they forgot to connect it to the rest of the site -
even search of their web site does not find it.
Jacob
Wolfgang HOSCHEK wrote:
>
> Any other Sun page linking to that page? Couldn't find one.
>
> Wolfgang.
>
> Jacob Nikom wrote:
> >
> > I was able to get in - it looks like it
Since Kaffe came up on this list, let me add a few comments about it:
>
> Kaffe is a clean room implementation to the spec but they have expanded the
> language in some interesting ways. I seem to recall they used the MS alternative
> to JNI but maybe they put in JNI as well.
Kaffe fully supp
Tony Dean wrote:
>
> Nathan,
>
> It is a bit daunting and possibly impossible as there is enough gray
> area in the spec
> as to implement a language that is not capable of passing the Java
> validation suite of tests and
> that is the only thing I can think of that could be used to verify the
>
Any other Sun page linking to that page? Couldn't find one.
Wolfgang.
Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> I was able to get in - it looks like it exists.
>
> Jacob Nikom
>
> Robbie Baldock wrote:
> >
> > Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
> >
> > > Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
>
Oh it is there...
Pooh Bear -- "I am just a bear of little brain"
On Thu, 9 Dec 1999, Robbie Baldock wrote:
> Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> > > That URL doesn't appear to exist...
> >
> > huh?
> > How do I manage to see it, without using a proxy/cache? :-)
>
> I get a 404 from the Sun si
I was able to get in - it looks like it exists.
Jacob Nikom
Robbie Baldock wrote:
>
> Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> > Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
> > http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
>
> That URL doesn't appear to exist...
>
> Robbie
>
> -
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
> > That URL doesn't appear to exist...
>
> huh?
> How do I manage to see it, without using a proxy/cache? :-)
I get a 404 from the Sun site.
> Anyway, here is a dump of the page
Thanks for that.
Robbie
--
Robbie Baldock wrote:
> Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> > Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
> > http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
>
> That URL doesn't appear to exist...
huh?
How do I manage to see it, without using a proxy/cache? :-)
Anyway,
here is
Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote:
> Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
> http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
That URL doesn't appear to exist...
Robbie
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Tony Dean wrote:
> Of course once we enter the standards process we can do anything from
> start with
> a clean sheet of paper up to (more or less) Java.
>
> I presented a paper on using JNI with Linux at the Atlanta Linux
> Showcase and the feedback
> ran from one guy telling me this was exactly
Nathan,
It is a bit daunting and possibly impossible as there is enough gray
area in the spec
as to implement a language that is not capable of passing the Java
validation suite of tests and
that is the only thing I can think of that could be used to verify
the user has implemented
the spec. (hmm
Wrong mailing list. Send to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexnder
On Thu, Dec 09, 1999 at 03:23:00AM -0200, Rodrigo Gidra wrote:
> Is there a way to pass a Complex Object from java to legacy code using jni?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Apparently, sun has made an apologetic announcement. Check out:
http://java.sun.com/features/1999/12/linux.html
However, how should someone interpret:
"Blackdown.org continues to be a valuable source for Java technology for
Linux, including JDK 1.1.x releases."?
Hopefully, it doesn't imply "Than
I had a similar problem running node-local RMI apps. I was able to get past
the security problems by adding the following file to my home directory:
$ cat .java.policy
grant codebase "file://-" {
permission java.security.AllPermission;
};
I don't know if that's your problem or not.
Ma
[CANCEL]
I remember that JDK1.1.x has problems obtaining FQDN of the server hostname of
the machine in question. Directly specifies the system property
``-Djava.rmi.server.hostname=localhost'' works with appletviewer and netscape.
I thinks this is in the RMI FAQ
pilgpe@poppy [154] > java
-Djava
On 1999-12-08 08:29:04 -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> It's called Borland JIT :). Seriously the latest JIT is included in the
> Sun/Inprise JDK but you can use it with any other JDK 1.2 if you want.
> At present time there are no plans to port the JIT to other architectures
> than Intel.
Can I us
"Sun announced several course corrections today. For one thing, the company will
remove licensing and royalty payments for the desktop version of the software,
Java 2 Standard Edition, beginning Jan. 31."
gee, maybe i'll be back in the alpha/linux porting business again.
gat
Scott Murray wrote:
I am having serious problems with `java.rmi.server.codebase'
I discovered that JDK1.1 does not allow *.jar or mutliple
directories. These are new features only in JDK 1.2 ! ARRRGHH!!!
So I tried to the HelloWorld example to try
isolate the problems I am having.
I download the RMI Example and
Hi!
On Thu, 09 Dec 1999 Nathan Meyers wrote:
>Tony Dean wrote:
>> 1) Sun owns the Java trademark. They have published the VM spec and
>> the language spec. They permit rogue ports from the specs.
>
>There is already an excellent "rogue port" in the Kaffe project,
>although "cleanroom implemen
Hi!
On Wed, 08 Dec 1999 Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>With all the recent news regarding Java/Linux (and being hit by the
>idea that there really isn't any useable open source Java engine), I
>became interested in the general topic of JITs, Hotspot-type engines
>(what's it called .. dynamic compilatio
Ok. Are the numbers in seconds or is a higher number better?
/Jesper
Patrick LAM wrote:
> I ran a few benchmarks to compare the different JVM's out there, on the
> SPEC benchmarks plus two of our internal benchmarks, sablecc (a parser
> generator), and soot, a frozen version of our analysis fra
At 13:05 12/9/99 +0700, you wrote:
>FYI, I've already installed JRE 1.1.6v5 in /usr/local/jre directory
um... try a *current* version. For a x86 box running RH6.1 I'd highly
recommend either blackdown's 118v1 or IBM's 118. -=Chris
cabbey at home dot net <*> http://members.home.net/cabbey
47 matches
Mail list logo
