Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

1999-06-28 Thread Anonymous
Anand Palaniswamy wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700 > > From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree? > > > > > > Many of them are going into 1.3. > > > > People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3? > > Yes, 1.3. T

Re: action command

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
It is? Our code uses action command fairly extensively and the 1.2 compiler doesn't seem to complain. Can you show a sample output of javac with the -deprication option on? -rchit R MUTHUSWAMY wrote: > > hi all, > > i got some code where the event handling is done using the command > a

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Juergen thanks for following up on this: > > Sergio Antoy writes: > > Sergio> Here is a trace of what happens on my machine > > Sergio> gray:/tmp[501] export PATH=/home/antoy/java2/jdk1.2/bin:$PATH > Sergio> gray:/tmp[502] export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH >

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-26 Thread Anonymous
Uncle George wrote: > > u really r stupid. No, actually, I'm not. > The topic was porting issues, and ur notion that the .java jdk/source code cannot be >altered to fit the port. Do i really need to say more. > gat I only said the platform-independent portions of the jdk source code cannot

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Sergio Antoy wrote: > > > > You write: > > > > > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on > > > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this > > > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is > > >

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I don't see why you need a security manager at the server end. (The server may want to check its clients, but that seems to be another issue entirely). I don't set a security manager at the server, and therefore get the default security manager - i.e null, so the server can do anything. See docs/

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Actually, you need to set the security manager at both ends. The tricky part to all of this, which the RMI docs I've seen don't explain, is that you have to have a .java.policy file in your home directory granting permissions to the "untrusted" codebase (any code that's not in the bootstrap classp

Re: Policy tool not working correctly

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
I've been having this problem as well, even with the "-green -Djava.compiler= " flags. --Jeff Mark O'Donohue wrote: > > Hi > > I've been tracking through the java 1.2 tutorial on certificates and > security, it all seems to work, up to the point where I have to use the > policytool program. >

Re: Java threading

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) > Technically, there is only one semantic for Threads in Java. In theory > Java is a completely specified runtime, ... Not at all! Java is _NOT_ completely specified. In fact, some things, such as many details of threading, are explicitly _un_specifie

java-linux@java.blackdown.org

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> From: Robert McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Wait a minute! Didn't Microsoft argue and win the point in the Apple > case that Look and Feel cannot be copyrighted or otherwise subject to > proprietary limitations? Is this another case of the big bully wanting > to have his cake and eat it too?

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> Sergio Antoy writes: Sergio> Here is a trace of what happens on my machine Sergio> gray:/tmp[501] export PATH=/home/antoy/java2/jdk1.2/bin:$PATH Sergio> gray:/tmp[502] export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH Sergio> gray:/tmp[503] ls -lt /usr/lib/libc.so.6

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Juergen, thanks for the suggestion: Juergen> > Nagaraj S B writes: Juergen> Juergen> Nagaraj> I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) Juergen> Nagaraj> loaded on 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 Juergen> Nagaraj> (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this Linux machine.

Java IRC client and available source code

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Does anyone know of an Java applet IRC client implementation whose source is also available? I want to see how others have skinned this cat before trying it myself. Thanks, Antonio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Nathan writes: > > Sergio Antoy wrote: > > > > You write: > > > > > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on > > > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this > > > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is > > > givi

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Sergio Antoy wrote: > > You write: > > > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on > > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this > > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is > > giving following error : for 'java' :

Re: JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
You write: > I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on > 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this > Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is > giving following error : for 'java' : >

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Nelson Minar wrote: > >> I ran the same piece of code on jdk1.1.6 in linux, and on jdk1.2 in > >> NT. But the behaviour is quite different. In both cases the server > >> and the client waits. Is it a porting problem or a feature? > >Well, you've got me beat now! I've never seen rebind() wait on a

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
>> I ran the same piece of code on jdk1.1.6 in linux, and on jdk1.2 in >> NT. But the behaviour is quite different. In both cases the server >> and the client waits. Is it a porting problem or a feature? >Well, you've got me beat now! I've never seen rebind() wait on any OS >or any JDK !! I have.

Re: JDBC in POSTGRESQL (HELP ME)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
> My problem is using JDBC(ODBC) in POSTGRESQL. My machine has Red Hat >Linux 5.2. In the Howto Postgres document it is written that JDBC driver >is supplied with this CD. I created Database and tabels using psql >interactive prompt. Then I wrote one java program to access the tabels >created bef

Re: JDBC in POSTGRESQL (HELP ME)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Sitanshu Bhusan Nanda wrote: > Hi > My problem is using JDBC(ODBC) in POSTGRESQL. My machine has Red Hat > Linux 5.2. In the Howto Postgres document it is written that JDBC driver > is supplied with this CD. I created Database and tabels using psql > interactive prompt. Then I wrote one java pr

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
The original statement I made was 1) source for free, 2) JCK not so free, and 3) distribution not so free. the issue with the majority of ur correspondence, was ur inability to understand that u cannot do a port if ur not allowed to modify the '.java' source code. U apparently misled some folks

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Calvin Austin wrote: > I would just like to set some facts straight. > > 1. Anyone can get the full java 2 source for research, evaluation and > internal use (which roughly equates to the previous non-commerical license > before). You couldn't get the full source without this license before > Jav

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi, Well, you've got me beat now! I've never seen rebind() wait on any OS or any JDK !! Nick. Pratip Kar wrote: > Hi Nick, > > Thanks again. Your suggestion worked. Is it due to the green-thread implementation ? > I guess, here the server is spawning a new thread and coming out. Even in the cl

Re: Policy tool not working correctly

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Mark O'Donohue wrote: > Hi > > I've been tracking through the java 1.2 tutorial on certificates and > security, it all seems to work, up to the point where I have to use the > policytool program. > > It runs and brings up a main screen. When I choose the add policy > > entry (menu or pushbutton)

JDBC in POSTGRESQL (HELP ME)

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi My problem is using JDBC(ODBC) in POSTGRESQL. My machine has Red Hat Linux 5.2. In the Howto Postgres document it is written that JDBC driver is supplied with this CD. I created Database and tabels using psql interactive prompt. Then I wrote one java program to access the tabels created be

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
You have no methods in the interface ITTestRMI. There is nothing to do, so maybe the server is "smart enough" to terminate. Normally one defines one or more methods in the remote interface, then they are implemented in the server and then called by the clients. ... larry Pratip Kar wrote: > >

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi, Two points: (1) You shouldn't exit main() ! One way is just to sleep forever. Another way is to wait for stdin after the rebind(), something like: LineNumberReader in = new LineNumberReader( new InputStreamReader( System.in )); while( true ) { try {

Re: Policy tool not working correctly

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999, Mark O'Donohue wrote: > I've been tracking through the java 1.2 tutorial on certificates and > security, it all seems to work, up to the point where I have to use the > policytool program. solution: don't use the policytool program, but rather just edit the policy file direc

Re: Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi, Thanks for your reply. This is the code snippet for my server. public class TestRMI extends UnicastRemoteObject implements ITestRMI { public static void main(String args[]) { System.setSecurityManager(new RMISecurityManager() ); try

Policy tool not working correctly

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
Hi I've been tracking through the java 1.2 tutorial on certificates and security, it all seems to work, up to the point where I have to use the policytool program. It runs and brings up a main screen. When I choose the add policy entry (menu or pushbutton) a new screen (which has the right si

download jdk1.2

1999-06-25 Thread Anonymous
hi all, I want to download JDK1.2 can any of you tell me the url where i can download the software for linux. Any help would be useful. bye, MUTHU. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject

JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi all, I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is giving following error : for 'java' : --

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> To: bryan vold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Jun 1999 01:58:33 +0200 > > bryan> What is uncertain is whether or not Sun > bryan> will incorporate some of the constructions that are a part

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > I don't know for sure since, as I said, I haven't done a lot of > multi-threaded programming. I've run a few third-party Java apps, but > have no idea on the whole how thread-intensive any of them are. > > These two classes are a couple of stupid little things I wrote to se

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > OK... so one other question you haven't answered. Are you sure you've > got two threads staying busy? Most of Java's threads spend most of their > time sitting around and waiting. If you've really got two threads > spinning and you're not seeing 100% load, something's str

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> bryan vold writes: bryan> At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little bryan> about some of the delays. What I got as one of the main bryan> problems was a very difficult problem of Linux native bryan> threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said that

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK > > > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it > > > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads, > > > it only

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK > > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it > > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads, > > it only seems to use a single CPU for runni

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
"Hopple, Michael R (CRD)" wrote: > > Rachel - > > I also am running an SMP kernel with a RedHat 5.2 installation. I have found the >same observations > that you did regarding native and green threads. Unfortunately, green thread with >no JIT is really a > pain. Well, as it's all I had under

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Sinz wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: > > >Cees de Groot wrote: > >> > >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > >> a dual PII box. Green

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
bryan vold wrote: > At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little about some of the > delays. What I got as one of the main problems was a very difficult > problem of Linux native threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said > that they are not only just porting, but also trying

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > > > Dan Iuster wrote: > > > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > > the uniprocessor version on m

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 12:47:17PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Dan Iuster wrote: > > > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues wit

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> Dan Iuster wrote: > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ? I'm curious

RE: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Rachel - I also am running an SMP kernel with a RedHat 5.2 installation. I have found the same observations that you did regarding native and green threads. Unfortunately, green thread with no JIT is really a pain. My observation about native threads and JIT on a multiprocessor system is th

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> Dan Iuster wrote: > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ? > > Any fee

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: >Cees de Groot wrote: >> >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on >> a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native t

RE: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I use the free version of JRun. http://www.livesoftware.com Rob > -Original Message- > From: Jason Proctor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 1:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ServletEngine for linux > > >I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Cees de Groot wrote: > > Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native threads seem > to be less stable than the same on a single process

JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.   Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ?   Any feedback would be greatly appre

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Things will improve -- they've already started to improve -- but not as >fast as you'd like. The reality of the Linux revolution is that manning >the barricades gives you the responsibility to help make things better >and forfeits you the right to bitch and moan about the

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native threads seem to be less stable than the same on a single processor box (which is a mobile Pentiu

Re: Re:Re: ServletEngine for linux : THX

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Thanks for your help. Mark -Original Message- From: Steve Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 8:59 PM Subject: Re:Re: ServletEngine for linux >Try mySQL. It also has JDBC type-4 suppo

sunWJit

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi, has anybody tried sunwjit with blackdown 1.1.7 ? I tried it and it seems that blackdown with this JIT is slower then without it. Has anybody any ideas whats going on ? Thanks Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: Off Topic: Instalation of Visual Age

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
I have also unziped/untared it in /usr/local and then chown -R user where user is the user you want to run it under, then move the vajide script to ~user/bin and edit that script to give the full path to /usr/local/dir_where_you_put_vaj. Here is my edited script: #

JDK 1.2 and RedHat 6.0

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Whenever I try to run any of the demos in demo/jfc/*, such as SwingSet, I get the following error: Error loading L&F: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Raster IntegerInterleavedRaster: width = 64 height = 64 #Bands = 3 #DataElements 1 xOff = 0 yOff = 0 dataOffset[0] 0 is incompatible with Color

JDK 1.2 and RedHat 6.0

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Whenever I try to run any of the demos in demo/jfc/*, such as SwingSet, I get the following error: Error loading L&F: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Raster IntegerInterleavedRaster: width = 64 height = 64 #Bands = 3 #DataElements 1 xOff = 0 yOff = 0 dataOffset[0] 0 is incompatible with Color

Re:Re: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Try mySQL. It also has JDBC type-4 support and works beatifully as well. Of course Apache JServ is beatiful too. Steve Nguyen KBMail Software & Service Provider http://www.kbmail.com Original message Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 03:19:20 +0100 From: Rachel Greenham <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Jaco de Groot wrote: > > Mark Minnoye wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a java-developer. I'm looking for a > > good (and cheap) servletEngine for Linux. Could you be so nice to give me > > some advise please? > > I'm also looking for some (native if possible) J

Re: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Mark Minnoye wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a java-developer. I'm looking for a > good (and cheap) servletEngine for Linux. Could you be so nice to give me > some advise please? > I'm also looking for some (native if possible) JDBC-drivers for > M$SQL-server, Sybase

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Wed, 23 Jun 1999 10:19:13 -0700 (PDT), Calvin Austin wrote: > >I would just like to set some facts straight. > >1. Anyone can get the full java 2 source for research, evaluation and >internal use (which roughly equates to the previous non-commerical license >before). You couldn't get the full

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
I would just like to set some facts straight. 1. Anyone can get the full java 2 source for research, evaluation and internal use (which roughly equates to the previous non-commerical license before). You couldn't get the full source without this license before Java 2. SCSL means that you can use

Re: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
>I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a java-developer. I'm looking for a >good (and cheap) servletEngine for Linux. Could you be so nice to give me >some advise please? I've been using JServ on Linux and NT for about 6 months now. It's free and stable, and the community support via the mailing

idltojava for Linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Seems that Sun isn't really on the Java bandwagon yet. `idltojava' is only available as sparc or Windows binaries and is actually written in C++, yacc, and lex. Makes it real difficult to do anything with Sun's CORBA implementation on Linux ;^( -- Jon Olson, Modular Mining Systems 3

Re: sunwjit

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > "Nolte, Holger" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell > > > me where to get it ? > > > > Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2. > > However, it continues to not be detected

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Jim Jensen wrote: > > Check to make sure the permissions of jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so are > 0775 - it appears that some of the glibc2.0 jdk1.2pre2 did not have > this set properly (see mail attached below). I wasn't on the list at that time, but earlier today I figured that out myself, and it's

Re: sunwjit

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > "Nolte, Holger" wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell > > > me where to get it ? > > > > Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2. > > However, it continues to not be detected

Re: sunwjit

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > "Nolte, Holger" wrote: > > > > Hi, > > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell > > me where to get it ? > > Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2. However, it continues to not be detected during startup. -- Rachel

Re: JNI to choose? 1.0 or 1.1 JDK

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I cannot answer your questions directed to the porting team, but I would strongly recommend the 1.1/1.2 JNI model (there are some small extensions in 1.2). There are two major reasons: 1. libraries using the 1.1 model are to some extend portable between platforms and should be fully portable

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Check to make sure the permissions of jre/lib/i386/libsunwjit.so are 0775 - it appears that some of the glibc2.0 jdk1.2pre2 did not have this set properly (see mail attached below). -Jim - Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 05 Jun 1999 15:44:45 -0700 From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL

Re: sunwjit

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
"Nolte, Holger" wrote: > > Hi, > what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell > me where to get it ? Yes. It's bundled with JDK1.2/JRE1.2. Nathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Mark Minnoye wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a java-developer. I'm looking for a > good (and cheap) servletEngine for Linux. Could you be so nice to give me > some advise please? LiveSoftware's JRun can be used freely for noncommercial purposes (and will be included

java-linux digest

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Did the digests for this mailing list get nuked while I wasn't looking? I haven't gotten a digest since Volume 99 : Issue 222 last Friday? Later, Ted -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Please return a long/64 bits Window address. Lemme know what gets stored in in the java int valiable "lets_store_a_32_bit_address", which has the capacity to store 32 bits. I'm sorry, I thought a fairly simply program sample would demonstrate it best. While ur pondering this porting delima, may

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
I'd much perfer that you private porting club become public. Ur hiding behind the NDA, just makes u appear to be in the marketeering pockets os SUN. This can be exemplified by the way that the JDK 1.2 release announcement was made by SUN before any announcements on the normal channels at blackdow

JNI to choose? 1.0 or 1.1 JDK

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hey all, This is particularly aimed at people in the porting team and others with source access. Does anyone know how AWT performs callbacks? Particularly of interest is the API used. Is this the JDK 1.0 or JDK 1.1 JNI model being used. I never got the 1.1 JNI callbacks to work but the 1.0 works

idl2java

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi, I would like to jdk1.2 to CORBA programming. But I cannot find any sign of the idl2java compiler. Does it exist? And if yes, where can I find it? Sincerely Marton ZSENEI -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999 07:01:05 -0400, Uncle George wrote: >1) I am not a member of java-linux-porting@blackdown. They are a private > porting club. You have been invited to be part of the effort. The "private" part comes from the fact that we had to sign NDA/Contracts so that we could start wor

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Jeff Galyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And your point is...? That you're an asshole with a long signature -- Jan-Henrik Haukeland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Con

RE: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi Mark, give jo! (http://www.webapp.de) a try! jo! is a small but powerfull web server with servlet-engine. It was the first web server that supported the Servlet API 2.1. Regards, Michael --- E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Mark Minnoye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] S

ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi All, I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a java-developer. I'm looking for a good (and cheap) servletEngine for Linux. Could you be so nice to give me some advise please? I'm also looking for some (native if possible) JDBC-drivers for M$SQL-server, Sybase, oracle & informix. Any help would b

sunwjit

1999-06-23 Thread Anonymous
Hi, what is sunwjit ? Is it a jit compiler like TYA for linux ? Can anybody tell me where to get it ? Thanks Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTE

Bug in setResizable() ?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
It seems that issuing setResizable(false) on a JFrame() causes the GUI to flash for a moment but disappear: JFrame jFrame = new JFrame("setResizable bug?"); Dimension d = new Dimension(400, 300); jFrame.setSize(d); jFrame.getContentPane().setLayout

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Nick Lawson wrote: > > Paul Mclachlan wrote: > > > --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK > > > 1.2.2 > > > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems > > > with my > > > apps on linux, where I don't with

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Rachel Greenham wrote: > > I get, when I run Java: > > > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > > > Yes, also on the SMP box. > > > > $ java -version > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > java version "1.2

Re: [off-topic] stop bashing!

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Uncle George wrote: > > 1) I am not a member of java-linux-porting@blackdown. They are a private porting >club. Then you should be talking to Sun, not java-linux. > 2) I have been porting the Javasoft's non-commercial JDK source for a number of >years.. But just for for alpha/linux. And your

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > I get, when I run Java: > > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > > Yes, also on the SMP box. > > $ java -version > Warning: JIT compiler "sunwjit" not found. Will use interpreter. > java version "1.2" > Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-r

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Paul Mclachlan wrote: > --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK > > 1.2.2 > > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems > > with my > > apps on linux, where I don't with the other os. > > No, this is pretty muc

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Paul Mclachlan wrote: > --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK > > 1.2.2 > > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems > > with my > > apps on linux, where I don't with the other os. > > No, this is pretty muc

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Rachel Greenham wrote: > > > > I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web > > servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help > > with. Briefly: > > > > Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking >

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Rachel Greenham wrote: > > I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web > servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help > with. Briefly: > > Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking > all processor time and memory. This

Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
I recently (this weekend) attempted an upgrade to Java 2 on our web servers, and came across a few problems someone might be able to help with. Briefly: Java 1.2 green threads won't start on one system: It just hangs taking all processor time and memory. This is a Dual PII machine with SMP runnin

Re: msqljava implementation

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi Jens, the reason for the failures are clear: The sandbox strikes back. Different browsers impose different restrictions on the execution of unsave operations. But again, there is not enough info to tell exactely what's happening. To give concrete advice, I need to know more: Which in the the s

ANNOUNCE: Manager/Factory utility in java using CORBA

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Generic Manager/Factory implementation needs: JacORB, >jdk1.1.x Making a distributed system i had the need of having somehow something that would allow to start on a network of machines distributed process. I was told to use the factory paradigm, which means having on each machine of the network

Re: Servlet / AWT question

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
"Schlackman, Robert (APP INF)" wrote: > > I am using RedHat 6.0 with the 1.1.7 V3 JDK. I have some charts that get > created from within servlets. Does anybody know if I am required to have a > user logged in with X running for AWT to work? It seems that the user who > starts the servlet engin

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
--- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK > 1.2.2 > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems > with my > apps on linux, where I don't with the other os. No, this is pretty much what I'd expect. Windows has a lot m

Re: Servlet / AWT question

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
> APP INF writes: APP> I am using RedHat 6.0 with the 1.1.7 V3 JDK. I have some APP> charts that get created from within servlets. Does anybody APP> know if I am required to have a user logged in with X running APP> for AWT to work? It seems that the user who starts the

Servlet / AWT question

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
I am using RedHat 6.0 with the 1.1.7 V3 JDK. I have some charts that get created from within servlets. Does anybody know if I am required to have a user logged in with X running for AWT to work? It seems that the user who starts the servlet engine, JRun, must stay logged in an have X up? This

RE: msqljava implementation

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi Matthias thanks for your quick response. I tried some things in between and the problem moved. My Applet is connecting to a database using port 1114 and using mslqjava 1.2.8. I found the right place to locate the classes and comilation works fine. I copied the Applet1.class file and another Ap

Re: msqljava implementation

1999-06-22 Thread Anonymous
Hi Jens, let me say that you made the typical beginner's error. I don't mean your problem with java or linux - all of us have such problems from time to time, even experts. The real error is to not give us enough information to help you. Perhaps you just made a typo when setting the CLASSPATH: we

  1   2   3   >