On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:12:32PM +0800, Yang Yue Xiang wrote:
> Who can tell me the location of the enviroment files of JBuilder4.0?
What do you mean with "environment files" ?
--
Paolo
2K1 RoadStar
ISRA #: 4773
VROC #: 5264-R
On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:16:39AM +0200, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> http://jakarta.apache.org of course 8^).
Of course, force of habit.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team http://homepages.borland.com/pciccone
--
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 09:56:44PM -0300, Efraim Wainerman wrote:
> Thank you, Paolo, the problem was in the configuration files of the JBuilder
> that not point to the correct JDK version.
Great.
About your Apache/JServ question I cannot give you much help but I did
install Tomcat, the
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:258)
> at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:68)
>
>
>
> I know that it requires jdk1.2.2 but I probed various JVM´s and get the
> same exceptio
it's not really
> meaningful to anyone besides Sun and their licensees.
Scott, I disagree with that since I saw the term used in several companies
in the industry.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team http://homepages.borland.com/pciccone
On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 01:44:15PM -0500, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> Thank you for your message - it really helped to know
> that I have to run X. I thought that all necessary stuff
> is in the install.bin which is really huge - more than
> 10MB. Why it is so large
ily switched to another JDK.
> I cannot use VisualAge since they support only 1.1.8. I did not try
> DDD - soes it work with GNOME? I heard that it works only with KDE.
BTW, I tried JBuilder with Blackdown's RC4 and it seems to work.
Congratulations to the team. It's still early to con
ase will have the bug fix.
Glad to see RC4, I'll give it a try with JBuilder tomorrow.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> utilization is practically nill, and the GUI is extremely responsive.
The Sun/Inprise JDK is not cerified for native threads, the green
threads implementation has been tested for performance so the result
you obtain is the expe
Stephen,
great job with the FAQ, thanks for putting this together.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7;re using JDK
1.1 the CLASSPATH is handled in a more complicated way than 1.2 so you
should add the current directory to the CLASSPATH to run classes in the
default package:
java -cp .:$CLASSPATH MyClass
Hope this helps,
--Paolo
---
un's
> (libsunwjit.so)? I suppose Sun JIT does not and Inprise
> JIT may possibly do. If Inprise JIT does not, JBuilder
> should suffer it. Or is debugging possible as far as JIT
> is disabled?
I'll forward the qu
ly JDI requires an additional JAR file
> named jpda.jar, which contains the following packages.
Check.
> Only JVM itself can provide JVMDI functions. I
> understood it is the reason why Inprise guys decideed to
> develop their JDK.
One of them.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
-
ed som esort of tool to make this task
a little easier).
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 01:57:01AM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Paolo> Does anybody know if installing the URW fonts fixes the
> Paolo> problem ?
>
> Yes, but you have to restore the original '.1' entries in
> font.properties too.
I believe this is th
correctly.
Does anybody know if installing the URW fonts fixes the problem ? If yes,
than it could be a requirement for the JDk and it just could be mentioned in
the README.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To
nprise JKD has been tested with glibc 2.1.1.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
n Carmak if he uses a
64Mb PC to write Quake III. I don't think so :)
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
applications written with JDK 1.1.x+JFC while apps written with 1.2.2
seem to be ok.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s because we had to deal with Java code (designer,palette,
compiler and others) interfacing Delphi code (editor, IDE menu
etc). With Foundation we don't have to have the JVM and the Delphi RTL
in memory at the same time, one single heap is better.
--
Paolo Ciccone
more optimized and Hotspot make a difference,
especially for big applications. All this has been promised to change
with JDK 1.3.
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mmed as much it was possible without
sacrifying functionality. Java 2 1.3 is expected to sensibly reduce the
memory footprint.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
. The performance when using swapping might be
quite bad. You can probably run the IDE in 64Mb but for heavier tasks, like
running or debugging your app in the IDE you need 128. JDK 1.3 is supposed
to have a sensible optimization of memory but I doubt it will make a huge
diffe
ns
> > ok except for a few little annoyances. [...]
>
> Is there a downloadable version of JBuilder 3 for Linux? Can one get
> it for free?
The answer to both questions is : yes => http://www.borland.com/jbuilde
Java. Just write a script or
makefile to call the compiler with the correct amount of memory. If you're
using Java 2 you might want to take a look at JBuilder for Linux (free
download at http://www.borland.com/jbuilder). It includes a compiler with
automatic dependency checker and it's muc
#x27;t kill it, Microsoft did :)
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 02:03:16PM -0700, Jeff Galyan wrote:
[deletia]
> Just my two cents.
Superbly exposed, Jeff.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
ficially appointed by Sun as the official porter. For a
lot of companies this is more than enough.
As I said many times before, we turned to the JDK to fix a specific need. We
knew that JDK 1.3 was going to be ported by Sun but w
you weren't part of the linux community. My raising issue
> with you means that you're a peer in this community. If I felt
> otherwise I would let you know directly.
>
> Would appreciate it if you would consider addressing my main point,
> which is that fracturin
bad". I don't think so, let us contribute to this community, we are
doing our best and you'll judge if it's worth your attention and money
or not. In the case of JBuilder Foundation, as you ca see, we are
giving it away for free.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
1.2 patches, in
parallel. Witness is the different path taken in supporting some
features : we tried the native threads approach and left it behind
because the need for updated version of glibc. Other decisions where
made in similar fashion.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 07:14:11PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >>>>> Paolo Ciccone writes:
>
> Paolo> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >> What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever contact o
id you contact SUN about what has happened and far more important about what will
>happen in the future (JDK 1.3) with the blackdown-port?
>
> Maybe you can get Inprise to let them distribute javacomp with RC4 (Paolo?), since
>both ports are SUN-ports.
Our JIT has been free for d
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 06:54:44PM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:29:04AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 08:55:25AM +0100, Jan Buchmann wrote:
> >
> > > What I don't understand is: Why didn't Inprise ever
ou want.
At present time there are no plans to port the JIT to other architectures
than Intel.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 09:28:45PM -0800, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> The drama never ceases. This is not a business for the faint of heart
> :-).
Not ideed :) Great post Nathan.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
---
even acknowledged in the press
> release. Can you understand why people are a bit annoyed?
I can understand it and I have been in the chorus with all the others
screaming and being ridiculized because of that. It's the story of my life,
some of us are just born wired to swim upstream :)
My c
> price.
Why there should be money involved ? We've been licensing JDK from
version 1.0. The port was done using the publicly available patches
posted by Blackdown and the source of the Solaris JDK we get for being
licensees.
ave been the first to
port Java to Linux. I personally mentioned your JDK in all the demos I
have done of JBuilder for Linux at our user conference (~3000 people)
in Philadelphia and during the LWCE. I hope also the interviews with
the credit to your work will appear soon.
> Paolo> As I s
leases of the JDK will be ported to Linux together with the
other two main versions: Windows and Solaris. This is a big
improvement and is another key factor in evaluating Linux as a viable
platform. The MacOS still today has no Java 2 support, for what I
know.
Trying
at the same time. Other problems were addressed by Sun for the
AWT/Motif side. We also did a lot of testing for International
support.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
in time we would gladly have saved the time :)
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
code and we saw that some of the early patches are included in the
standard 1.3 code. At the same time IBM announced their porting
effort.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev.team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 04:39:07PM -0500, Derek Glidden wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 03:47:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I though the current 1.2.2 rc was 3, not 1? Have Sun picked up an older copy
> > > to releas
t; I'm downloading it anyway to see if it works on 2.2.13...
It works with 2.2.x, don't worry. I tested on Mandrake 6.1. I believe
the 2.2.5 is just because we didn't test it with anything older than
RedHat 6.0.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team
-
nd the performance is good. Now, I understand that
some applications need native threads but a many others can run ok with
green threads today.
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:15:14PM +0100, Robb Shecter wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> > ... this version
> > includes JPDA and several Swing bugs that we found ...
>
> Do you mean "bug fixes?"
Yeah, I still have to
/Inprise port is actually the latest codebase
from Sun and includes several fixes to Swing that were found in the stock
1.2.2 release.
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
is available...
Besides extensive testing (full JCK) and performace tuning, this version
includes JPDA and several Swing bugs that we found while developing JBuilder
Solaris edition.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team
--
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:58:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > > Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
>
> The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it
> wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I could not compile my
> program (
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 10:11:06AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
>
> When we switched to 10% Java code we actually reduced the memory footprint.
Of course this was "...100% java code..." :)
--
Paolo
--
To UN
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:56:07AM -0600, Greg Tomalesky wrote:
> Hi Paolo:
>
> That Solaris edition must be way newer than the demo CD I have:
Yes it is, we actually officially announced it few days ago. PrimeTime, the
code name for the Solaris edition, is a new codebase for JBui
problems since we only use a
JVM. It's still a big program, we address a lot of development needs, but
it's much more usable and stable.
> using it as a straight editing IDE, though, I've found it to be excellent. :)
Thanks, I believe you&#
suggestion
about JBuilder or other Borland products please send us feedback, we have
set up a community website just for this, see http://community.borland.com
or http://www.borland.com
Regards,
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team
---
value of the Display variable.
> at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.initDisplay(Native Method)
> at sun.awt.X11GraphicsEnvironment.(X11GraphicsEnvironment.java:62)
> ...
If you have X running than it could be a matter of access rights. From
another terminal window type &qu
at ANTLR (http://www.antlr.org), it's a parser generator
written in Java that outputs Java and has a Java grammar available in
the package. ANTLR is quite different from Lex/Yacc and, among other
things, uses EBNF, generates tree walkers and tree transfo
s about your OS config. Are you
using KDE ? Anyway, your locale seems to be set incorrectly. Check the
value of the locale variables (LANG,
LC_ALL,LC_TYPE,LC_COLLATE,LC_MONETARY, LC_NUMERIC, LC_TIME). You might
also want to chek the correct names for the the lo
tent like crazy and I could
> easily see this think working on 20 panes in a tab pane all at once. Without
> a JIT it could be SLOW.
The Borland JIT is available for free at:
http://www.borland.com/about/press/1999/jitlinux.html
--
Paolo
re of temp files created byt the VM.
> Q5: Is there any JRE for Linux like the one for NT?
Yes. Just download the JRE archive.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team. Borland/Inprise.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
used for MessageFormat than the story
is different. In that case you need to escape "{" with single quotes and use
double single quotes to escape a single quote.
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
to know more
details about icomaptibilities or bugs. After all that's the purpose
of beta testing :)
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 11:18:43PM +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote:
> Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:49:58AM -0700, Dan Iuster wrote:
> > > RedHat has just released the 6.1 version of Linux. I am curious if
> > > anyone has had any experi
e to know if there are any known pitfall introduced by the new
> kernel. I believe 6.1 is based on the 2.2.12 kernel.
I don't know about RH 6.1 but I'm using Mandrake 6.1 with kernel 2.2.13 and
JDK 1.2 works normally.
--
Paolo
ou users . If you statically
link the Motif library the whole issue goes away. That's what
Netscape does.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
of your applications. The javac
compiler is itself a Java application, using a JIT will improve
compilation time as well.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to discuss bugs, so if you
find any please post how to reproduce them.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the package dependedncies and the set of files that
need to be recompiled. If you are in the Primetime (JBuilder for Unix)
beta you can look at the bcjbmj.jar file. Otherwise you can use wine
to run the bmj.exe included with JBuilder.
--Paolo
JBuilder development team.
Inprise corp.
-
is is a shameless plug but we just finished showing
publicly the first beta of JBuilder on Linux, scheduled to be released
just after the Solaris version. It's 100% Java and runs on JDK
1.2. See http://www.inprise.com/about/press/
d for everything so we
need a standard in order to do JDK switching in a easy and safe way.
SM> For the application I work on, we package the JRE to avoid the
SM> hassle of finding a known "good" VM to run with on a given
SM> system.
Yep, same here.
--Paolo
is version of JBuilder and we could not find a
defined JDK standard location.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "RR" == Ron Resnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RR> You wouldn't happen to know if JBuilder on Linux might also
RR> mean an imminent release of Oracle JDeveloper on Linux, which
RR> is itself heavily based on JBuilder?
Sorry,
annoucing the product several weeks ago we
demoed JBuilder for Linux last week at the shareholders' meeting
(together with our C++ compiler for Linux). Expect to see it soon in
other computer shows and conferences.
--Paolo
-
Solaris *and* Linux.
As many of us know Java is "write once test everywhere" and there are
indeed differences in the way it works between Solaris and
Linux.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a very big Java app with extensive UI and it works fine, must
be something in your configuration.
--Paolo
>>>>> "SM" == Samuel McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SM> Just downloaded and installed pre-v2. When I recompile old
SM> java code an
Steve,
I just wanted to say that you guys are doing and awesome work.
The new JDk is visibly faster and better.
Thank you a lot.
--Paolo
>>>>> "SB" == Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> We're trying to get
I disagree, given the nature of the announcement I found thjis
extremely interesting. The post was short, to the point and about a
free software. Given the interest expressed in the past by several
people about Java and 3D I think this was appropriate.
Regards,
--Paolo
>>>>>
Thank for this fix it worked beatifully.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think this support works for classes store in a Jar file, does
it ?
--Paolo
>>>>> "JM" == Jani Mikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> Linux kernel has support of "Misc executables" and Java
JM> executables. With both
Well, look at javac, it's a so called "self-executable" and it's
basically Java. You can take a look at the code downloading the
Solaris JDK. It's basically a C program that parses the command-line,
starts the JVM and passes to it a given class to run.
--Paolo
>>
in these
PC> days i make an error...and now i ask to you: what is
PC> difference between green_thread and native? If you use native
PC> is faster? and green is a special library?
Native threads are implemented by the OS and use the
They are probably talking about HotSpot.
--Paolo
>>>>> "Riyad" == Riyad Kalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Riyad> [1 ] The following is complete
Riyad> here say, but none the less interesting:
Riyad> A professor of a friend of mine went to
Why does it have to be
CA> Sun?
Again, because they announced it.
It's not like they're developing Java in a total vaccuumm
CA> (how do you spell that word anyway?
Vacuum
CA> Which is always a good thing... but how many
>>>>> "BK" == Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BK> Paolo Ciccone writes:
>> I'm personally disappointed by Sun's reaction.
BK> While I enjoy Sun bashing as much as anybody (in my case, I
BK> have the 7+ years of
Java development on Linux.
--Paolo
>>>>> "RK" == Riyad Kalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RK> [1 ] My intent here is not to
RK> stirr up emotions or cause an argument. But after 12
RK> unanswered emails I feel I have a right to comment. And I
r.
Sorry to contradict you but bzip2 is an option in the RH 5.x installer
together with all to other compressors and MC handles bzip2 files just
like other archives.
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
You can find the oracle jdbc driver on your Oracle CD
or you can downloand it from http://www.oracle.com
It works wery well with java 1.x on Linux.
Bye
Paolo Comitini
On 24-Mar-99 Chien-Lung Wu wrote:
> Dear firends:
> I am a newbie of the JAVA and Oracle. However I have to insta
e? I've tried using the
Where did you get the jdk ? All the mirror sites I tried didn't have
it yet.
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NTLR is the way to go. It's a parser generator with EBNF and
automatic generation oj ASTs. Javasoft copied the idea with JavaCC but
their implementation is not as complete. http://www.antlr.org
--
Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
care about
GG> java-linux.
Still, seeing a change of status in the chart is an indication of
things improving and I believe that everybody prefer to see that
things are moving instead of waiting for the end result.
--
Paolo
---
ving that page with the table that shows the progress is
quite valuable for me and other people in my company (borland.com). We
licenced the JDK long ago and we have knowledge of what's in
it. Seeing what remains to be tested with JCK gi
them few undreds of
email complaining. After all they announced Java 2 for Linux at the
beginning of November, this is ridicoulous, how we are supposed to do
our job if we are half year behind ?
--Paolo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "SB" == Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SB> I'll do something that I'm going to no doubt regret in the
SB> fullness of time: disclose my plans ahead of time.
That's great, thanks.
--Paolo
Your link at JDK 1.1.6
Linux Port Status has some trouble.
Please check.
Paolo ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
. Many file systems don't support Unicode encoding in the
names and that's way is usually ok to use Unicode in identifiers
except class and package names.
--Paolo
assign
names to identifiers that are easier to remeber using his/her native
language. In Japanese, for example, you could use Hiragana characters
for the class name and using the nativetoascii tool convert the source
to the \u notation.
--Paolo
rification
CARZ> error java.lang.VerifyError: proy3/Applet1
CARZ> Thanks! Carlos Alberto Roman Zamitiz Departamento de
CARZ> Ingenieria en Computacion, Facultad de Ingenieria UNAM
CARZ> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paolo
Kevin,
thanks you all for your effort and for letting us know.
--Paolo
ring one of our basic civil rights. A society, any form of
society, without freedom of choice is in fact a dictatorship.
--
Paolo
ervlet,Javabean support.
- OpenTools architecture to extend the IDE with add-ins.
- Extensive on-line help.
- Available for Solaris now, Linux very soon.
--
Paolo Ciccone
JBuilder dev. team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
