[ANNOUNCE] Blackdown Java-Linux Java2 SE v1.3.1-14-FCS for Linux on PowerPC

<>The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of the Java 2 Standard Edition v1.3.1-14-FCS for Linux on PowerPC. J2SE v1.3.1-14-FCS can be downloaded from ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/JDK-1.3.1/ppc/FCS/ and our FTP mirrors (see http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirror

Java2 on iPaq

Dear java-linux...     I have a question regarding the ARM version of J2SE 1.3.1 which I use on a Compaq iPaq.   I would like to know which format of BufferedImage's Raster is the fastest on this platform. I am displaying a large image (about 800x1000) with a transform so that only a portion

Re: Will there be any further development of Java2 on Sparc/Linux?

On 11 Jul 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Ted Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've sent this question to the main list multiple times, with no > > response. What I'm wondering is whether or not the J2SDK and > > J2EESDK are still under development for Sparc/Linux.

Re: Will there be any further development of Java2 on Sparc/Linux?

Oddly enough, about a half hour after I sent the original message I found the 1.3.0-FCS build on ibiblio.org. My face is red... Thanks for the response and the work towards supporting Linux/Sparc. On 11 Jul 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Ted

Re: Will there be any further development of Java2 on Sparc/Linux?

On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Ted Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've sent this question to the main list multiple times, with no > response. What I'm wondering is whether or not the J2SDK and > J2EESDK are still under development for Sparc/Linux. The release(s) > for this architecture seem to hav

Will there be any further development of Java2 on Sparc/Linux?

I've sent this question to the main list multiple times, with no response. What I'm wondering is whether or not the J2SDK and J2EESDK are still under development for Sparc/Linux. The release(s) for this architecture seem to have stopped moving forward after the RC4 release of J2SDK1.2.2, and that

[ANNOUNCE] Java2 SE 1.3 (i386, PPC); Java3D (PPC); Java2 SE 1.2.2 (S/390)

The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of Java2 SE v1.3.0-FCS for i386 and PPC, Java 3D 1.2 for PPC, and Java2 SE v1.2.2-FCS for S/390. Java2 Standard Edition Version 1.3.0 FCS for Linux on i386 and PPC

[ANNOUNCE] Blackdown Java2 SE 1.3; Debian packages for Java2, Java3D, JAI

The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of the release candidate 1 of Java2 SE v1.3 and Debian packages for Java2 SE v1.3, Java3D 1.2 and JAI 1.0.2. Java2 Standard Edition Version 1.3 RC1 == Don't confuse the Blackdown RC1

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

What does the Blackdown JDK offer by comparison with the Sun JDK? On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Nelson Minar wrote: > >The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the availability of > >the final release of Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2 FCS, and JAI 1.0.2-beta. > > congratulation

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the availability of > the final release of Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2 FCS, and JAI 1.0.2-beta. > At last, some great news. Well done guys! -- dimitris mailto:[EMA

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Schröder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On 2000-08-02 06:41:39 +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote: >> The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the >> availability of the final release of Java2 v1.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

On 2000-08-02 06:41:39 +0200, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the availability of > the final release of Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2 FCS, and JAI 1.0.2-beta. Wonderfull. How difficult would it be to port the jre to Linux 2.0.x? Best regards

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

>The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the availability of >the final release of Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2 FCS, and JAI 1.0.2-beta. congratulations! That's terrific. [EMAIL PROTECTED] . . . ..

[ANNOUNCE] Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2, JAI 1.0.2-beta

The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is proud to announce the availability of the final release of Java2 v1.2.2, Java3D 1.2 FCS, and JAI 1.0.2-beta. Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading: http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html Java2 Version 1.2.2 FCS

Re: [Re: Java2 & Alpha]

Well unless it is put up on the ports page nobody will know about it. Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha /gat Jo Uthus wrote: > Ilya wrote: > > | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha? > > I recently attended a seminar

Re: Java2 & Alpha

I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha /gat Jo Uthus wrote: > Ilya wrote: > > | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha? > > I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing > Linux-work. > > The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready fo

Java2 security exception in icebrowserbean (IceSoft)

I am getting a security exception in the IBM jdk 1.3 for Linux when trying to set a JWindow that contains an html rendering component from IceSoft. The exception appears to be generated from the browser component's own security manager. All classes for the component are contained in a jar file.

Re: Java2 v1.3 RC1

OTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2000 2:40 PM Subject: Java2 v1.3 RC1 > from the homepage: > > "The Blackdown team has been licensed to have access to the Java2 v1.3.0 > source code. The code builds and runs but has no yet been tested with > the JCK." > > but wha

Java2 v1.3 RC1

from the homepage: "The Blackdown team has been licensed to have access to the Java2 v1.3.0 source code. The code builds and runs but has no yet been tested with the JCK." but what does that mean? When will a RC1 be out? -- Mvh Jan Agermose http://www.a

Re: Java2 & Alpha

I have done a port. gat Ilya wrote: > Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha? > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Java2 & Alpha

Uncle George wrote: | I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the | beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the | middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or | offer any other in its place. | gat | | /http://ww

Re: Java2 & Alpha

I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or offer any other in its place. gat /http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/Java.html Jo

Re: Java2 & Alpha

Ilya wrote: | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha? I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing Linux-work. The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready for Alpha late December, although this is _not_ stated anywhere on their website

Java2 & Alpha

Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Java2 (1.2.x) plugin ?

Hi Gang: Has anyone heard about the availability of the 1.2.x plugin for Linux? Thanks,Greg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Where can I get information about Corba/Java2

Hello: I'm student of the "Universidad Politecnica de Valencia". I would like to get information about Corba with java2 (no with visibroker,...). Can you tell me where could I get it from? Thank you very mu

Re: Platform dependence of Java2 source ...

>Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have >arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past >messages regarding technical difficulties in the port. You mostly quoted back my own speculation. Please understand, it was only speculation -

Re: Platform dependence of Java2 source ...

On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:02:09 -0700 (PDT), Gerald wrote: > >Hi all. > >Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have >arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past >messages regarding technical difficulties in the port. There seem t

Re: Platform dependence of Java2 source ...

Gerald wrote: > > Hi all. > > Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have > arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past > messages regarding technical difficulties in the port. There seem to > be several main ones: Perhaps an

Platform dependence of Java2 source ...

Hi all. Alright. In order to gain a good understand of the issues that have arisen during the port of Java2 on Linux, I have read over the past messages regarding technical difficulties in the port. There seem to be several main ones: - Linux threads are screwy and the Java2 source (J2S) uses

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

Anand Palaniswamy wrote: > > > Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700 > > From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree? > > > > > > Many of them are going into 1.3. > > > > People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3? > > Yes, 1.3. T

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 21:17:37 -0700 > From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree? > > > > Many of them are going into 1.3. > > People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3? Yes, 1.3. If you were at JavaOne, the Java 2 SE roadmap

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

> Steve Byrne writes: Steve> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes: >> Java hits threads very hard. In particular, the native threads port of >> Java stresses the glibc threading framework (and the kernel!) more >> than most systems. So you have to contend not just with portability >> prob

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

road? If the kernel team were to work with you on fixing these issues, how much easier would the port be to do? That's it for now, take care! -Riyad Steve Byrne wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes: > > > > > >Why has it been so difficult to por

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

Steve Byrne wrote: > > The Blackdown folks seem to be adding a lot of value back to the Java > > port. How many of their patches have gone back into the Java tree? > > All told (from the 1.1.x days), a lot. Many of them are going into 1.3. People are talking about 1.3? Not 1.2.3? Does this imp

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nelson Minar) writes: > > >Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? > > I have no specific knowledge - I'm not part of the Blackdown team, > have never seen the JDK sources, etc. But I can guess :-) > > > The

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

>Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? I have no specific knowledge - I'm not part of the Blackdown team, have never seen the JDK sources, etc. But I can guess :-) The port is a spare-time effort with non-open source. Java2 is a hell of a lot of code.

Re: What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

Gerald wrote: > > Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? I > was under the impression that > > a) Sun isolated their platform-dependent parts, > b) all the rest of the code is in portable, standard C, and > c) the source code is fairly we

What's so platform dependent with Java2 source?

First, no I haven't read the source; my views are based on my thoughts. Why has it been so difficult to port Sun's Java2 source to Linux? I was under the impression that a) Sun isolated their platform-dependent parts, b) all the rest of the code is in portable, standard C, and c)

Re: More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

blems with Java2 and Redhat6.0 Call me stupid! Last post i made was made in haste. I did check that all java binaries runs properly and console "hello world" executes normally, what i didnt check was AWT based programs. Now the problem is in 'em. AWT based programs seems to c

Re: More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

Read README.linux You need greenthread and nojit Paul At 02:02 PM +0300 05/03/99, Jani Mikkonen wrote: >Call me stupid! Last post i made was made in haste. I did check that all >java >binaries runs properly and console "hello world" executes normally, what >i didnt >check was AWT based programs

More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

Call me stupid! Last post i made was made in haste. I did check that all java binaries runs properly and console "hello world" executes normally, what i didnt check was AWT based programs. Now the problem is in 'em. AWT based programs seems to crash for no reason. First, ofcourse, java reported er

Re: Redhat60 and Java2

Jani Mikkonen wrote: > > I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to > RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary > file ive tried. > > So, what might cause the problem and how to fix it. At the same moment, i pushed se

Re: Redhat60 and Java2

Jani Mikkonen wrote: > > I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to > RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary > file ive tried. We have tried here RH 6.0 and all versions of JDK. For the moment , only JDK 1.1.6 is working fi

Redhat60 and Java2

I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary file ive tried. *** panic: GC: getStickySystemClass failed: java/lang/ref/Reference CLASSPATH may be incorrect SIGABRT 6* abort (generated by

printing in java2

Hi all, forgive me if this has been asked before as i am just new to the list. in java 1.1.7 when you print a page, if there is any text not going horizontaly across the page (i.e. virtically) the text is printed at screen resolution and looks realy terable. The same goes for any line drawn that

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

hit: http://www.cdrom.co.jp i bought it in japan when i had a vacation i'm at mountain view, ca how about users-side? http://www.users-side.com or install an english readhat at first, and then install pje. -h. yasu > Hi, > > Execuse me for the off-track question again. > > > > >japan

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

Hi, Execuse me for the off-track question again. > >japanese redhat linux 5.2 is released > I went to the RedHat site but could not find anything like that. As I live in Sydney, I don't have much Japanese local info. I searched for it using www.goo.ne.jp search engine but nothing called Japane

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

> Hi Haruhide-san, > > My question is a bit off-track for this ml. Excuse me if you're annoyed. > > > > >i cannot display japanese correctly. > >does anyone succeed to display japanese? > >i updated my linux to japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2.

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

Hi Haruhide-san, My question is a bit off-track for this ml. Excuse me if you're annoyed. > >i cannot display japanese correctly. >does anyone succeed to display japanese? >i updated my linux to japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2. Just curious. How did you upgrade y

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

japanese redhat linux 5.2 already has fonts: /usr/X11R6/lib/fonts/URW /usr/share/fonts/TrueType -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

hi, again thank you mr. kazuki. i could display japanese font correctly. to display japanese correctly with java2 on linux, it's neccessary to add fonts. (see http://java-house.etl.go.jp/ml/archive/j-h-b/024378.html, it's just japanese) I transrated it into English. JDK1.2's JV

Re: japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

Hi, In message <00b901be7bb1$5bc94ee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Haruhide Yauskawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > i cannot display japanese correctly. > does anyone succeed to display japanese? I can display and input japanese. See . --

japanese font problem japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2

hello, i cannot display japanese correctly. does anyone succeed to display japanese? i updated my linux to japanese redhat linux 5.2 & java2. kernel 2.0.36 glibc2(libc6) jdk 1.2 pre-v1(java 2) http://www.blackdown.org kinput2 LESSCHARSET=japanese-euc LANG=ja_JP.

Java2

I'd like to say thanks and well done to the porting team. Keep up the great work guys. Chris Dynamic Solutions Pty Ltd http://www.dynamic.net.au/christos 414 Gilbert Road [EMAIL PROTECTED] Preston, Victoria 3072 61 3 94718224 - voice Australia 61 3

Re: installing Java2 "on top of" 1.1.7 on Linux?

.7 and > JSDK 1.2 installed. By our Linux guy, who's outta town this week (@#$%^$%! spring break :-) > (It had a $CLASSPATH which I unset.) I downloaded the preview Java2 > from one of the Blackdown mirrors to /usr/local/jdk1.2pre-v1. When I > run .../bin/java I get >&g

installing Java2 "on top of" 1.1.7 on Linux?

I'm a new Linux user. I used Ultrix and Solaris (with tcsh) for several years, but I've been using NT almost exclusively for about a year. I'm using an RH5.2 box that already has a working JDK 1.1.7 installed. (It had a $CLASSPATH which I unset.) I downloaded the preview Java2

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

Artur Biesiadowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > - these passwords aren't

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

Cees de Groot wrote: > Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > > > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > > - these passw

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

Artur Biesiadowski wrote: > I don't think that signing electronic license would stand in any court. > With old licensing scheme, you had to sign it on paper and fax/mail it - > and this oligate you to something, but anybody can click license for me > - these passwords aren't very secure, are they

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote: > Oliver Fels wrote: > > > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > > available to the developer community. > > > > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

This makes very good sense. On Fri, 26 Feb 1999, Cees de Groot wrote: > Oliver Fels wrote: > > > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > > available to the developer community. > > > > Yes, but *please*

Re: Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

Cees de Groot wrote: > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun! > > I hope it is clear that the second you agree to their license, you can forget > about contributing to Japhar, Classpath, Kaffe, etcetera - the real Open Source > alternatives to Sun's JDK. If your compan

Don't download JDK1.2src! [Was: Re: JAVA2 source code]

Oliver Fels wrote: > Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: > > Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform > available to the developer community. > Yes, but *please* think twice before committing your soul to Sun! I hope it is clear that the second you ag

JAVA2 source code

Just for your interest and in case noone has mentioned it yet: Sun is now making the source code to the Java® 2 platform available to the developer community. Further information is available via http://www.javasoft.com/communitysource/ and http://www.sun.com/software/communitysource/java2

java2?

Hi! Anybody working on porting java2 to linux? Plans or whatever? Greetings, Ben -- http://surf.to/anTiX

Java2 Port

Hello, I am new to the Linux platform but I have enjoyed developing Java on it. I have been watching the site for the past month or so waiting for the Java2 port to be released. I am very anxious to use it as soon as I can. I have two projects that may use Java on Linux if I can get proof of

Re: Linux Java & the Java2 ORB, and how to use shared memory from Java

> 2. Is there a Java API for using shared memory? >There doesn't seem to be one in JDK 1.1, but > is this in Java2? I would be stunned if there were (ever) a Java API for using shared memory directly. There isn't one now. A mechanism whereby the allocators of seve

Linux Java & the Java2 ORB, and how to use shared memory from Java

I have a couple of questions, one Linux-specific, one not. 1. Has anyone written simple instructions on how to extract the Java2 ORB and retrofit it into JDK 1.1.7 on Linux? Or does anyone have any experience in this area they would like to share? Do I need to use idl2java from

Re: Java2

Jim Waldo - SMI Software Development wrote: > > Hi folks -- > > Any words on when the Java 2 (aka 1.2) port is available? I would love to get > a port of Jini out on Linux early (and often), but we are completely 1.2 > based. > > Any words you could give would be a help. > > Thanks, > > Jim W

Java2

Hi folks -- Any words on when the Java 2 (aka 1.2) port is available? I would love to get a port of Jini out on Linux early (and often), but we are completely 1.2 based. Any words you could give would be a help. Thanks, Jim Waldo