ADM64 release

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, Sorry if this is answered elsewhere and I'm just dumb and unable to find the release plan / roadmap, but any comment on when is the 1.4.2/amd64 final release coming to a cinema near us ? Cheers & thank you, thank you for the g

Availability of the next (1.5) blackdown release on different architectures ?

Hi, Could anyone inform me about which architectures the next blackdown release will cover ? I'm particularly interested if there will be a ppc port (I reckon x86 and amd64 will be there anyway ?). regards, Vincent

Re: 1.4.1 release

Another question concerning this 1.4.1 release: how come the jaxp packag is not included? I know it's just a matter of downloading them from the Sun website but keeping the content of the releases identical would help. m

1.4.1 release

According to http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/java2-status/jdk1.4-status.html blackdown 1.4.1 has been in beta since July. What is holding up the release? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

A Blackdown take on Sun's 1.4 release?

Sun has finally come out with their 1.4 Java release.  What does the Blackdown team think about the Sun VM and 1.4 in general?  How will the Blackdown VM differ from Sun's (on x86 Linux)?  When will a public Blackdown release be made? Thanks all, Jim

1.4 Public Release?

I don't mean to nag the Blackdown developers, they have always produced the highest quality Java VMs for Linux.  In addition I'd like to add how much I look forward to each release as they run better, and with less bugs than Sun's VMs (and IBMs IMHO). So when should we expe

Blackdown 1.4 release schedule?

Sun has announced that there will be at least another beta (maybe RC) in Q4 of their JDK 1.4 product, with a release in early Q1 next year. Does Blackdown have a release schedule for 1.4 yet? I know a beta is supposed to be release pretty soon now, but what about RC's and FCS? I'm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] J-BUDS release 1.0

On Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:35:30 -0700 (PDT), Scott C. Best wrote: >Dan: > Heh. :) The best reason I've heard of why unix-IPC >sockets aren't supported in Java is that it would make >the Java code run-on-Unix rather than run-anywhere. And, >hey, some Windmills should be left alone... > >

JNI and J2SE Runtime v1.3.1 for Linux/ARM Release Candidate

Hello, We are trying to use JNI with the new J2SE runtime on an Ipaq with Familiar 0.4. We run various JNI examples like http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/faq/examples/jni-in-C/. They all return a segmentation Violation. Does someone try to run JNI with Familiar 0.4 and J2SE V 1.3.1 RC 1 ?

Re: [ANNOUNCE] J2SE Runtime v1.3.1 for Linux/ARM Release Candidate

On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, steffen reymann wrote: > Excellent work! > > Has anyone managed to use the JNI on the iPAQ? When I tried the > classic Hello World example the whole thing always crashes on the > iPAQ (see log below). To make the library I use > ># arm-linux-gcc -shared -I/usr/java/jdk1.3/i

Re: JNI and J2SE Runtime v1.3.1 for Linux/ARM Release Candidate

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Laurent Farrugia wrote: > We are trying to use JNI with the new J2SE runtime on an Ipaq with > Familiar 0.4. We run various JNI examples like > http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/docs/faq/examples/jni-in-C/. > They all return a segmentation Violation. Does someone try to run

Re: [ANNOUNCE] J-BUDS release 1.0

Dan: Heh. :) The best reason I've heard of why unix-IPC sockets aren't supported in Java is that it would make the Java code run-on-Unix rather than run-anywhere. And, hey, some Windmills should be left alone... In practice, I use it to connect some ASP pages running on my server

[ANNOUNCE] J-BUDS release 1.0

Heyaz. Been haunting this list long enough, thought I'd put something up. :) This email is to announce release 1.0 of J-BUDS, which provides access to real AF_UNIX sockets for interprocess communications in un*x. It provides a similar interface to the standard java.net.S

[ANNOUNCE] J2SE Runtime v1.3.1 for Linux/ARM Release Candidate

The Blackdown Java-Linux Team is happy to announce the availability of the release candidate 1 of Java2 SE v1.3.1 for Linux/ARM: Please choose one of our FTP mirrors for downloading: http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/mirrors.html Besides the J2RE there's a second file: additional

XML Parser for Java Version 3.1.1 Release is now available

--<<0>>-- XML Parser for Java Version 3.1.1 Release (XML4J-3_1_1) is now available This release contains public and stable support of the DOM Level 1, and SAX Level 1 specifications. It also contains implementations of the DOM Level 2, SAX Level 2 implementations, and partial

JMF2.1 on Linux release

Hi, we wanted to find out when JMF2.1 for Linux FCS will become available. Is there a way we can get early access to a pre-release? We have been anxiously waiting for the release on Linux as JMF2.1 for the other platforms were shipped 5/00. Regards, Nick Herodotou, Entera, Inc. 40971

Tritonus 0.3.0 (developer release) out

converter - runnable with jdk1.3 (MIDI part) You can download it from: http://tritonus.sourceforge.net/download.html If you work with this release, it is recommended that you subscribe to the tritonus-devel mailing list to take part in discussions on the development of Tritonus. At least, you

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

I posted a report to IBM reporting the problem, I've got the response they forwarded the report to the webmaster :-<, may be I will ever get to a download :-) cu patrick p.s. I will check the links again later, may be there was just a server down, may be they us MS servers :-) Julio Cesar Aguil

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

Julio Cesar Aguilar Cabrera wrote: > > > Some of u managed to download the packages?? > > I did download the RPM package (27+Mb) without a problem. > I installed it but had time for nothing else. > Downloaded the tarball version, put it where I wanted it, and tried the Java2D demo. After the

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

> Some of u managed to download the packages?? I did download the RPM package (27+Mb) without a problem. I installed it but had time for nothing else. -- Julio Cesar Aguilar Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] Laboratorio Nacional de Informatica Avanzada Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico. ---

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

Thanks to IBM for getting a 1.3 out. But that registration procedure really sucks. >Would realy like to know if they had there links ever working Yep, I managed to download it. Haven't even opened it up yet. [EMAIL PROTECTED] . . .

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

Some of u managed to download the packages?? I managed to register me, give them all my infos :-( and after loosing time I came across this ugly page filled up with broken links. Would realy like to know if they had there links ever working thanks patrick -- -

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Bob Love wrote: > Try http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/linux130/ > does this contain HotSpot 2.0? How does early testing against the Sun JDK 1.3 beta look? > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Their "porting plans" page indicates that the full

Re: IBM 1.3 full release

Try http://www.ibm.com/java/jdk/linux130/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Their "porting plans" page indicates that the full 1.3 release of IBM's JDK > is supposed to be available, however, the URL it links to is nonfunctional. > > The link I'm seeing is http

IBM 1.3 full release

Their "porting plans" page indicates that the full 1.3 release of IBM's JDK is supposed to be available, however, the URL it links to is nonfunctional. The link I'm seeing is http://www6.software.ibm.com/dl/dklx130/dklx130-p but that is 404. Is anyone on the list able to fin

Re: official linux j2ee sun release

> That's great, only you follow their links to find the download page which > hasn't been updated in months, hence, no linux download > That's funny. I went there two days ago and downloaded the following: j2sdkee-1_2_1-doc-linux.tar.gz : 4466923 bytes j2sdkee-1_2_1-linux.tar.gz: 10

Re: official linux j2ee sun release

ilable, and simply not advertised anywhere? It isn't, and isn't going to - at least, that's what sources (oooh. Doesn't that sound mysterious) in IBM told me. Anyway, the current planning is for a WAS 3.5 (NT/AS400/AIX) release somewhere in Q3 or 4, and a 4.0 release somwhere next y

Re: official linux j2ee sun release

se Edition for Linux, and he said that a 3.5 release of WebSphere would dovetail with a new release of VisualAge in the late July/early August timeframe, and that Linux would be fully supported. -- =

Re: official linux j2ee sun release

That's great, only you follow their links to find the download page which hasn't been updated in months, hence, no linux download I don't suppose anyone out there has any idea when IBM's WebSphere application server version 3 *advanced* is going to be made available for linux... Or is it not

official linux j2ee sun release

http://java.sun.com/features/2000/05/j2eelinux.html -- dimitris mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

gt; Will the HotSpot VM have a JIT compiler? I'm pretty sure that the Classic VM included with the 1.3 release candidates for Windows does not include a JIT. Since the default VM is HotSpot, which has their dynamic compilation technology in it, that won't be a problem for most people. Howe

Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

Juergen Kreileder wrote: > IBM has its own JVM. Our 1.3 will have Sun's HotSpot VM. Is the forthcoming Blackdown JDK 1.3 based on the source code of HotSpot VM available under SCSL ? I infer the answer is no. The archive containing the sourcecode (hotspot1_0_1-src.tar.gz) seems to contains only

Java-LinuxPPC (was: Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release)

ut there isn't one for 1.2.2 or 1.3 yet and Metrowerks hasn't given any indication one way or another as to if they plan to release another one in the future. I actually just had a conversation with Kevin Hendricks, who did the original port of the blackdown JDK to PPC, and he's

Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

>>>>> Nelson Minar writes: >> IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: >> http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk Nelson> This is awesome! Nelson> Has Sun given the Blackdown group access to JDK1.3 yet? Yes. Nelson>

Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

On Wed, May 03, 2000 at 10:53:35PM +0100, Dimitrios Vyzovitis wrote: > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: > > > > http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk > > Any ideas about the conjenctured open-sourcing of

Re: IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

>IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: >http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk This is awesome! Has Sun given the Blackdown group access to JDK1.3 yet? Things are getting interesting here, trouble is brewing between IBM and Sun. I don't mind being

IBM has posted 1.3 pre-release

IBM posted their pre-release JDK1.3 for Linux yesterday: http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/linuxjdk Nathan Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe"

new release TYA1.6 now mirrored in Europe

Hi, while announcing my new JIT compiler TYA 1.6 release I wrote about some mirror sites, and now Jens M Andreasen informed me that tya16.tgz can now be downloaded from: http://www.dsv.su.se/~jens-and/tya/tya16.tgz For next days also Ivo Panacek has annonced to build an rpm archive. You&#x

IBM press release

Someone sent this URL to me. I haven't read it yet, but it might be of interest to people on the list... http://www.ibm.com/developer/features/ibm_commitment.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject o

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

These are good and reasonable suggestions, but I hope we don't get into a game of could-of/should-of/would-of w.r.t. Blackdown project communications. The team communicated news when there was news, and did have to deal with a lot of persistent "when is it coming?" questions they could not answer.

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Mike Ajemian wrote: > > > Let me suggest a motive that makes sense. Inprise makes IDEs. IDEs > > > include debuggers...Connect the dots. > > > > This was the point, Einstein. Inprise relies on its brand. I didn't > > think I had to spell this out to the nth degree

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Mike Ajemian wrote: > > Agree with you, simple is good. This is getting a little blown out of > proportion. My points are as follows: > > 1. Inprise JBuilder, sitting on top of JDK that Inprise authored. > Good brand. Not involving Blackdown as the market might perceive > that as a d

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 08:50:21PM -0800, Ted Neward wrote: > For my money, I'll download the Inprise product (I have a particular beef > with Borland as a company--why'd you kill OWL just before my OWL books came > out?--but that's neither here nor there) We didn't kill it, Microsoft did :)

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 02:03:16PM -0700, Jeff Galyan wrote: [deletia] > Just my two cents. Superbly exposed, Jeff. -- Paolo Ciccone JBuilder dev.team -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscr

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

On Sat, Dec 11, 1999 at 03:07:36PM -0500, Mike Ajemian wrote: > 1. Inprise JBuilder, sitting on top of JDK that Inprise authored. > Good brand. Not involving Blackdown as the market might perceive > that as a dilution (I know finance folks who would view the > relationship as a major

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

that question. I could be wrong, but if I am, I'd like to know why. > > My opinions are based on years of working in the industry and being > involved in discussions involving brand representation and issues of > brand dilution. To me, Inprise had no incentive to involve blackdown

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Like many things being offered by SUN, it may very well that the Java Platform Debugging Architecture (JPDA) was never licensed to Blackdown. I would also suspect ur argument would be more meritorious if it wasn't for the fact the all platforms have to be compatable ( as far as JCK is concerned )

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Jeff Galyan wrote: > Someone suggested that Sun is trying to "fracture" the Linux Java > community. How does that make any sense? Do you really think Sun cares > in the least whose VM you're using? All Sun cares about is that *all* > implementations of Java conform to the spec - otherwise compati

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

windows environment, and most of them expect to find an IDE for their efforts (this can be easily inferred from past list postings), Inprise's move gives them an incredible market boost and brand recognition in this particular class of developers.   I tend to believe what Paolo Ciccone has poste

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

m exceptionally well on Windows/DOS. Does Inprise have their own "brand" of Java? Absolutely not. Java is Java is Java. That's the point of the JCK, the specification, the required core libraries. I tend to believe what Paolo Ciccone has posted regarding the why and how of the Sun

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Agree with you, simple is good. This is getting a little blown out of proportion. My points are as follows: 1. Inprise JBuilder, sitting on top of JDK that Inprise authored. Good brand. Not involving Blackdown as the market might perceive that as a dilution (I know finance folks who w

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Mike Ajemian wrote: > > Let me suggest a motive that makes sense. Inprise makes IDEs. IDEs > > include debuggers...Connect the dots. > > This was the point, Einstein. Inprise relies on its brand. I didn't > think I had to spell this out to the nth degree (I mean, who in this > discussion doesn'

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

11:48 PM Subject: Re: another possibility wrt the press-release. > Mike Ajemian wrote: > > My opinions are based on years of working in the industry and being > > involved in discussions involving brand representation and issues of > > brand dilution. To me, Inprise had n

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

> Well, there doesn't seem to be any dispute that Inprise contacted > Blackdown repeatedly and was ignored. Really? I thought this was in dispute. > I'm sorry you object to the term "conspiracy theory", but one of my > criteria for using the term is when I see motives being assigned that > make

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Mike Ajemian wrote: > My opinions are based on years of working in the industry and being > involved in discussions involving brand representation and issues of > brand dilution. To me, Inprise had no incentive to involve blackdown > in their release, so they didn't involve

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

ve to field that question. I could be wrong, but if I am, I'd like to know why. My opinions are based on years of working in the industry and being involved in discussions involving brand representation and issues of brand dilution. To me, Inprise had no incentive to involve blackdown in thei

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

-Original Message- From: Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Paolo Ciccone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Mike Ajemian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date:

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

Paolo Ciccone wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 02:43:47PM -0500, Mike Ajemian wrote: > > > to our postings" crap). The community will suffer as 2 products that > > should be on the same code base are now completely separate products > > (which Inprise likely wants since it doesn't dilute thei

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

On Fri, Dec 10, 1999 at 02:43:47PM -0500, Mike Ajemian wrote: > to our postings" crap). The community will suffer as 2 products that > should be on the same code base are now completely separate products > (which Inprise likely wants since it doesn't dilute their product with > an Inprise-Blackd

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

> "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by > stupidity." (Hanlon's Razor?) > PR folks working for large organizations typically don't have two > clues to rub together - not only about techical details and > development politics, but also about what is really important. I

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: another possibility wrt the press-release. > Resent-Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/1974 > X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: another possibility wrt the press-release.

y is now a direct competitor with companies that > are close partners. it would make sense, with a simple omission of fact in > an initial press-release, to create an air of suspicion around sun -- being > the bigger, more visible company they would of course take most of the heat >

another possibility wrt the press-release.

just picked up two tools companies and has bcm a competitor. this is an interesting scenario since the owner of java technology is now a direct competitor with companies that are close partners. it would make sense, with a simple omission of fact in an initial press-release, to create an air of susp

Re: Testing RMI with New release

I'm getting this too. rmiregistry prints it out whenever something calls Naming.rebind() and any program prints it out when doing Naming.lookup(). I'm using 1.2.2 rc3. Everything does appear to work though (mostly). Santos Jha wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to learn RMI using JDK1.2.2. I am u

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Jan Buchmann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote: > > Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of >RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing >ANYTHING about an RC1. > > > > But anywa

Testing RMI with New release

Hi, I was trying to learn RMI using JDK1.2.2. I am using different examples given in Java Network Programming(2nd edition). My rmiregistry command runs successfully. However when I give java DateServerImpl it gives me /usr/local/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/rt.jar Bad file Discriptor. Do you have any hint

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! "Illegal instruction"

Yes. I get the same Illegal instruction error on a Pentium MMX 233 running Debian potato (refreshed last night), glibc-2.1.2. -Peter Paul Bowman wrote: > > The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native > code > which is dependent on a Pentium II or new

RE:NEW JDK RELEASE

Hello, I would like to put my two cents worth and say that I also have a AMD K6-2 350 and I also get illegal instruction and that is after upgrading my glibc from 2.1-1 to 2.1-2 by downloading a rpm of Glibc2.1-2 from rpmfind.net(The file is from another distro) but so far I have noticed a

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! "Illegal instruction"

Hallo Jan, I'm running an AMD K6-3 400... do egcs (or gcc, whichever was used to compile the JDK) support Pentium-specific operations (as opposed to pentium-specific optimizations)? JB>I tried to run it on a AMD K6-2 450 and it didn't even start up because JB>of the same error. Maybe, as you sa

Re: [rachel@linuxgrrls.org: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!]

Hallo Nathan, NM>It's clear that the actual bugs prevent the JDK from being fully NM>supported on the guilty glibc versions (as well they should), but NM>having some way to I just want to point at the fact that the actual bug mentioned by me ("Internal error") happens on a current *Debian pot

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! "Illegal instruction"

On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 02:43:17PM -0800, Paul Bowman wrote: > The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native > code > which is dependent on a Pentium II or newer processor. > > The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release runs out of the box on a Pentium II - 266Mhz >

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! "Illegal instruction"

The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release appears to have been built with some native code which is dependent on a Pentium II or newer processor. The JDK-1.2.2rc2 release runs out of the box on a Pentium II - 266Mhz processor using Slackware 7, which is based on glibc-2.1.2. Trying the same JDK release on a

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

I got mine last night from ftp.tux.org John Louis wrote: > Hi, > I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell >me where to download. > I download rc1 from this address: > ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/ > > John >

Re: [rachel@linuxgrrls.org: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!]

t the JDK from being fully supported on the guilty glibc versions (as well they should), but having some way to run with the older libraries can be a stopgap for those users having trouble keeping up on the glibc release treadmill. Nathan On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 03:07:34PM -0500, Michael Sinz wro

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 07:50:31PM -, John Louis wrote: > Hi, > I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell >me where to download. > I download rc1 from this address: > ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/ Look at the mirrosites at

Re: [rachel@linuxgrrls.org: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!]

Jan Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! > >Jan Buchmann wrote: >> >> Hi Ekkehard, >> >> I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported >glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your box

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Hi, I read the mail and your guys said there is a rc2, but I cant find it, pls tell me where to download. I download rc1 from this address: ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/java/JDK-1.2.2/i386/rc1/ John ôèPԔ ‘ ÿzf¢–Ú#jöÿ–)îÇúު笷øÚ½¯

[rachel@linuxgrrls.org: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!]

86) X-Accept-Language: en To: Jan Buchmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: NEW JDK RELEASE! Jan Buchmann wrote: > > Hi Ekkehard, > > I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported >glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your bo

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

On Sat, Nov 27, 1999 at 11:26:49AM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote: > Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of >RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing >ANYTHING about an RC1. > > But anyway, you might try RC1 since i

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

y RC1 since it might be compatable with older versions of >Glibc, or upgrade glibc I suppose. RC1 was a release that did not last long - right after the release some people noticed a major problem with swing on 24 and 32 bit X displays. RC2 has that problem fixed. (It was a last minute fix t

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Interestingly enough, on some of the sites I was crossing last night in search of RC2, I saw that RC1 was on some. When was RC1 released? I don't ever remeber seeing ANYTHING about an RC1. But anyway, you might try RC1 since it might be compatable with older versions of Glibc, or upgrade glibc

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Hi Ekkehard, I get the same error in SuSE 6.2. SuSE 6.2 has glibc2.1.1 iinstead of the supported glibc2.1.2 so maybe it's the same problem on your box (installation). If not, I would be interested to get some information about running JDK1.2.2 on a glibc2.1.1 system. Are there any RC-builds pl

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Odd, no mine worked fine right off the bat. It seems a bit faster to me, but other than that I can't tell a difference (I don't do the hardcore-coding you all do). Best wishes, -Riyad Ekkehard Kraemer wrote: > Hallo Riyad, > > RK>New release of JDK 1.2.2! > > Aft

Re: NEW JDK RELEASE!

Hallo Riyad, RK>New release of JDK 1.2.2! After downloading the 20 MB and installing it (I wonder why it doesn't come as standard .tgz, but never mind), I just get "Illegal instruction" (without any other output) when running java oder appletviewer. I'm running a up-to-da

NEW JDK RELEASE!

WOOHOO New release of JDK 1.2.2! -- [ Riyad Kalla ] [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ CS - Major ] [ University of Arizona ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubs

Re: Release

hsoftware.com > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 6:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Release > > Hello Blackdown team, > I need to ask a tedious question, and I know you can't give

RE: Release

ems remain". George Sexton MH Software, Inc. Voice: 303 438 9585 Fax: 303 469 9679 URL: http://www.mhsoftware.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 1999 6:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Release Hello Blackdown team,

Release

Hello Blackdown team, I need to ask a tedious question, and I know you can't give me a precise reply, but I would appreciate very much some sort of reply even if it is very informal. About when is the next release planned to be on the street ? Thank's -- Ramiro Díaz Trepat [EMAIL

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

This is really great news! I am looking forward to the 1.2 release. I am currently developing a new Open Source desktop shell based on 1.2. I currently have a limited version running on windows and NT as well as 2000 and am just waiting for the linux release to debut the product source. It

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

Ted Neward wrote: > > I thought I downloaded pre-v3 just a few weeks ago; "java -version" still > reports itself as v2, though. THe FTP site still only goes up to pre-v2. -- Rachel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

Ted Neward wrote: > > I thought I downloaded pre-v3 just a few weeks ago; "java -version" still > reports itself as v2, though. > > BTW, there's a libsunwjit.so file in my java distribution, but it's not > marked executable; do I have to make it executable myself to take advantage > of it? ("jav

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

On Tue, 7 Sep 1999, Mark Wielaard wrote: > I saw that the status page says that there have been some big improvements > in the recent Blackdown port. > > > > > Big news! > > We've made significant progress with the problems p

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

t; To: Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 6:22 AM Subject: Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!) >Mark Wielaard wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I saw that the status page says that th

Re: Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

to test this new version. Odd, I thought pre-v2 was the version that was already out. I think that's what I've been running for months... java version "1.2" Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2, green threads, nojit) Hmm. Someone's made a boo-boo.

Where/When is a new release? (Big News!)

Hi, I saw that the status page says that there have been some big improvements in the recent Blackdown port. > Big news! > We've made significant progress with the problems plaguing the native > threads implementation. Some

Re: Windows and All-platorm JAVA release

All-platforms does do some audio. I have had the SimplePlayer (one of the examples with JMF1.1) playing back an AU file and a MOV file (with audio) with JDK 1.1.7 v3. The problem was more with custom DataSources that the JMF and appletviewer couldn't seem to find, even though the directory s

Windows and All-platorm JAVA release

have also tried putting the DataSource and SourceStream files in the JMF.JAR file. Again, this works fine with the Windows release, but the All-Platforms release still returns with NoDataStreamException. I am using Windows NT 4.0, with the paths and classpaths setup as far as I can gather (as

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Humanoid 0.3.2.32 bugfixed release

Hi Mark Your are absolutely right, THANKS My auto-distribution builder is seriously ph**ed up! Instead simply substitute this quick fix: peterp@xenonsoft > cat clean-java-class.sh #!/bin/sh echo "Purging all Java class files:" find xenon -type f -name "*.class" -print | tee | xargs /bin/rm -f e

[ANNOUNCE] Humanoid 0.3.2.32 bugfixed release

ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE ANNOUNCE Xenonsoft, South London, England is very pleased to announce the availability of: Humanoid, version 0.3.2 `Humanoid' is an arc

announce: TYA 1.4 new release

Hi, the new TYA JIT release 1.4 is out there!! I've just uploaded 135200 bytes to ftp://gonzalez.cyberus.ca/pub/Linux/java/tya14.tgz What's new? This is pasted from README: --quote-- .. 3. SOME RELEASE NOTES ===== This release should show some general good

  1   2   >