IMHO RelaxNG could be the tool to get grip with thiss issue.
bax
Am 15.11.2003 um 06:25 schrieb Ricardo Argüello:
Why not use JAXB, or BEA's XMLBeans?
Since in J2EE 1.4 deployment descriptors are specified in XML Schema,
it should be very easy to get an object model from that, using any
mmmhm, RelaxNG is a superset for XML Schema. It could be handled W3C
Schema compliant and could generate standardized XSD from its own
Schema. AFAIR via XSLT.
I would suggest it because of the comfortable, easy and short way to
_get_grip_. I know of no other XML Application which could go
hi adrian,
I am also interested in working in the JACC area.
I propose this roadmap:
0) Make JBoss with run with a security manager config that does not
assign all authority to all classes!
.. and i thought i was a lonely caller in the wild, or rather a catcher
in the rye :-))
thumbs up
bax
Hi all,
During my fresh and enduring experiences of porting the
3.0.4/3.0.8/3.2.1/3.2.2 to AIX 4.3.3 I have the feeling there should by
a seperation between the TBB - to be build and tested - cycle, the
configuration cycle and the lifecycle of the productive JBoss System as
a whole: the
semantics on the same XML
content (XSD _is_ an XML Application). You are able to create and
transform vocabularies into each other.
Worth thinking and doing.
bax
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote
?
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
...
Scott's posted some of the requirements in the past, e.g.
removing all the xml fluff. Let the container deal with the
metadata as objects.
Mhhhm
Thanks for pointing me at this :)
I rather think of the special JBoss.org (in my case the
not-JAAS-JavaSecurity, JMX, Service and Adapter parts) metamodel
additions. Maybe sometimes a XSLT of the spec xsd will do the trick
;-)))
thanks
b/readingax
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 06:36:33 -0800, Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Give me an example of this meaningful description of an applied security
model
that needs to be mapped into a declarative j2ee security descriptor.
The security of the whole system, where j2ee is only a part of, is less
Am 04.11.2003 um 17:22 schrieb Bill Burke:
Posting to jbosxs-dev. Let's keep it there please!
Bill
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment
Am 05.11.2003 um 02:53 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment
Am 05.11.2003 um 02:53 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should not be maintaining past versions of deployment
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:11 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:08, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whole stuff defined
in
XSD and throuw the ugly DTD's away?
Then one is able to appy XSLT on the XSD's and all migration things
belonging
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:08 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 01:53, Juha Lindfors wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Holger Baxmann - bitwind wrote:
Bill Burke wrote:
LETS TAKE THESE DISCUSSIONS TO JBOSS-DEV PLEASE!
Yes, IMO, migration should be a separate distinct tool/step. We
should
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:25 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:22, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
Am 05.11.2003 um 03:11 schrieb Adrian Brock:
On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 02:08, Holger Baxmann @ mac wrote:
When does JBoss.org have the meta-model of the whole stuff defined
in
XSD and throuw the ugly
... and will be open sourced until then ...
bax
Am Donnerstag, 23.10.03 um 23:25 Uhr schrieb Ken Sipe:
http://www.borland.com/news/press_releases/2003/
10_21_03_borland_launches_jb
uilderx.html
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The
anonymous login o.k.
co jboss-all timeout
bax
Am Donnerstag, 02.10.03 um 23:53 Uhr schrieb Adrian Brock:
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more
-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
/
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
Vom-Stein-Str. 29
+49 2133 537747
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
The Definitive IT and Networking Event
PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
HB Holger Baxmann - bitwind e.K.
HB 41539 Dormagen/NRW/Germany
HB Vom-Stein-Str. 29
HB+49 2133 537747
HB ---
HB This SF.net email is sponsored by:
HB
The real question is: Does JBoss _require_ 1.4?
I hope the answer will be 'no'.
bax
Am Freitag, 28.02.03, um 15:36 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb Jeff
Haynie:
What's the reason to support JDK1.3 -- just asking, not against it.
We've been using 1.4.1 for a good while now and it seems to be
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ofbiz/
is my bet
bax
Am Sonntag, 02.02.03, um 04:46 Uhr (Europe/Budapest) schrieb jora:
OK
This is a list I'll check:
http://drools.org/index.html
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clipscpp
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jeops/
HB the remote debugging line on page 7 in the pdf docs should read:
HB -Xdebug
-Xrunjdwp:transport=dt\_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=10250
I wrote the first version of the guide with latex and I forget to
remove
the \.
me t... arrrgh - but it works with the '\'
HB without any spaces
thanks a lot for the great work.
on macosx i have had difficulties to setup the remote connection
connection to the vm revoked.
the remote debugging line on page 7 in the pdf docs should read:
-Xdebug -Xrunjdwp:transport=dt\_socket,server=y,suspend=n,address=10250
without any spaces and
I did not read SD with article, but I've browsed their code
source a lot and I can say that :
They are using mysql as RAM, why ?
1.PHP cannot share variables between scripts.
2.A variable lifecycle last during one request.
iirc, we have had a c++ kernel for some messagepassing mechanics
thank you, this will sum up my expiriences over the last three years with
these php guys, they have to taken seriously, because of their market
position ...
bax
Von: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 17:53:48 -0500
An:
thanks you julien for your explanation - now i see clearly ...
;-)
bax
Von: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 14:52:35 +0100
An: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] My fuck up
you can explain that by the fact
hi scott,
here in germany no problems at all:
holgerbaxmann@Holger-Baxmanns-Computer:~ $ uname -a
Darwin Holger-Baxmanns-Computer.local. 6.3 Darwin Kernel Version 6.3: Sat
Dec 14 03:11:25 PST 2002; root:xnu/xnu-344.23.obj~4/RELEASE_PPC Power
Macintosh powerpc
\!
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:08 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Anyone able to access cvs
with the Servlet server, the latter by the Java
extension.
at: http://php.benscom.com/manual/kr/ref.java.php
bax
Von: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:57:31 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
I thought about
.
let's do both
bax
Von: julien viet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:14:23 +0100
An: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
we already tried to investigate that way a couple of month ago.
but servlet and PHP
hi all,
with the php thing we are back to my favoured item:
how do i describe and call a native method in the jboss semantic. same
procedure as in the embedded world.
any suggs?
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge
PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of julien viet
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 6:27 PM
To: Holger Baxmann
Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct
DB would still be used and slowness would still be there, PHP
db functions would be mapped to JDBC
:27 PM
To: Holger Baxmann
Subject: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
I thought about it, but that wouldn't solve the case. Direct
DB would still be used and slowness would still be there, PHP
db functions would be mapped to JDBC.
The problem is not PHP, it's the way PHP guys code.
Anyway
. It will speed www.jboss.org speed by ten.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Holger Baxmann
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] PHP
mmmmmm, i am not talking
anybody thought about integrating php (and this way the cms-whatever-this-is
thingy) into the the containers? maybe by calling the zend engine natively?
layer rules ...
just an idea ..
bax
Von: Bill Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:34:10
I really don't like the idea of
non-technical clash on jboss-developement.
should one open a new discussion board about this issue ?
to prevent future invention of this uncomfortable stuff unconveniently.
couldn't resist too
bax
Regards,
Michael Bartmann
, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:30 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] lookup the unknown
What do you mean by the jboss jndi tree other than enumeration
hi,
is there a possibilty to lookup the jboss jndi tree via javagroups or
similar mech from the 'client'?
if - how?
any hint, readings, pointings, regulations concerning
will be appreciated
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek
, in this case the jndi root
bax
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev
than enumeration of the
InitialContext.lookup() recursively? JavaGroups does not know anything
about JNDI.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED
just found a new name: j2e3 cacoepy unknown
java 2 embedded enterprise edition
-2ct
bax
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Order your Holiday Geek Presents Now!
Green Lasers, Hip Geek T-Shirts, Remote Control Tanks, Caffeinated Soap,
MP3
whau, great. let us invent a gui.
this is simply bull-shit. explicit and implicit bull-shit.
german: bullenscheisse.
bax
Von: Peter Fagerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 01:56:52 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev]
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 00.41 skrev Holger Baxmann:
btw: who is talking about jboss-client? i will have clustering across a
whole fabrication line, a whole plant over highspeed i/o ports or
similar
ieee implementations.
Utility Communications Architecture (UCA)
Generic Object
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 16.01 skrev Holger Baxmann:
embedded systems constits normally of many - some 1...k - devices,
clustering comes to my mind ...
Yes - but lets try break embedded down some, to devise's that use a
Mobile Phone Wire and device's using a SBC
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 17.28 skrev Dain Sundstrom:
I personally only want one build for the powerful handhelds.
oki - so We have embedded devices in a range of
- Phones
- PDA's
- SBC (Single Board Computers)
i do not know the structure of this bullet list is, what the
On Thursday, December 12, 2002, at 12:02 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
btw: what means 'powerfull'? i have a fpga device here (call it sbc)
which
is able to generate a throughput of 1..2.8 Gbits/sec with rijndael
block
cipher. is this powerfull?
I would define a powerful PDA as any PDA
torsdagen den 12 december 2002 kl 18.54 skrev Holger Baxmann:
according to the laws - yes, murphys too - the cpu/mem/bandwith problem
doesn't influence the progress of things: it is envolving independend.
what i am talking about is that a jboss-client should run on any
halfway
intelligent
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
emboss was being mentioned by marc back in april. but it is an dna
sequencing software name too.
The project should look into investing in DASH-O Pro to compress the
binary
it is late in the night 2:50am, but i have the idea: why not embedded jboss?
-- ejboss --
ok, going fishing some sleep...
bax
JBossME is maybe not the best project name ? ME being Micro Edition
Maybe JBossEE (Embedded Edition) ? or EMBOSS ?
The project should look into investing in DASH-O
.
So far I know 2 guys wants run jboss on embedded devices.
Lennart and I hear from Holger Baxmann that he work in a releated area.
bye
Stefan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn
my work is more targeted to the small 1..16mbyte devices, like ajile,
ds80400 and ez80. should be possible to port the cvm to this ones.
bax
Von: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 09:33:20 -0600
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW:
Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME project?
just working in this direction - need a secure device for a mobile pki ca/ra
with some java ibuttons. my constraints are:
- no os, no fs
- only jboss 4.0 - weboss kernel
- ca. 100mhz clk
- 1..16mbyte
- headless
- jca arch for
, and handheld.
-dain
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 01:56 PM, Holger Baxmann wrote:
Are any of you guys interested in working on a JBossME project?
just working in this direction - need a secure device for a mobile pki
ca/ra
with some java ibuttons. my constraints are:
- no os
i understand 'it would be great, but we shouldn't do it.'
bax
Von: Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:09:46 -0600
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
Once again Peter I have no idea what you mean.
-dain
On
)
== IEC61850
protocols:
DNP3, IEC870-5 available in the luciol project at sourceforge.net
bax
Von: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antworten an: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:14:00 +0100
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBossME
i understand 'it would be great
I didn't know you could do that. What spec/library is this in? I want
to read it.
uPnP ?
just a thought
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Are you worried about
your web server security? Click here for a FREE Thawte
Apache
http://www.opencores.org/articles?cmd=view_articleid=6
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
To learn the basics of securing your web site with SSL,
click here to get a FREE TRIAL of a Thawte Server Certificate:
Number of tests run: 899
Successful tests: 849
Errors:43
Failures: 7
[time of test: 6 September 2002 10:1 GMT]
[java.version: 1.4.0_00]
[java.vendor: Sun Microsystems
it would be interesting to have a eclipse workspace with
compilable[ant/xdoclet]/testable[junit]/debuggable[eclipse] where the
sources still reside in cvs HEAD :-)
bax
- Original Message -
From: Marius Kotsbak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 4:29
witch depend on them.
bax
- Original Message -
From: Marius Kotsbak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 4:47 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss modules as eclipse projects
On Sat, 2002-08-17 at 16:41, Holger Baxmann wrote:
it would be interesting
- Original Message -
From: Holger Baxmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 8:09 PM
Subject: Re: [JMX-FORUM] JMX GUI
will try to crosspost this into the jboss-dev, because clue(bax) = 0
bax
- Original Message -
From: Westerfeld, Kurt
(BTW, this is for 4.0)
is HEAD the way to 4.0 in cvs ?
bax
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
... and he is missing the most importend point - and is in a wondrous
manner right here - with the business jboss group llc is doing, we have
some totaly unequal revenue models then the rest of the industry.
so, we all are srewing up the old economic determinists.
they are not better off than
... already blown away
will check if it possible to do this with the ibm j9 vm and the tini
boards and eventually with java card 2.0
Am Don, 2002-03-07 um 14.18 schrieb marc fleury:
Coolness...
|Let me know if you find any problems or typeos in the docs... once they
|get updated. I
Am Son, 2002-03-03 um 12.09 schrieb Juha Lindfors:
The spec already defines an export policy descriptor that should be used to bind a
handle of the MBean to JNDI. If an MBean has objects it controls and wants them to be
bound to JNDI then it should do this by itself or delegate the task to
another thought:
is anybody aware of the adavntages of xsd instead of using dtd's ?
somebody is then able to use xsl for changing the underlying metadata
(i.e. jboss.xsd - xslt - jboss-ejb-jar.xsd - xslt -
any-believeable.xsd - xslt - my-prefered.xml).
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 02.58 schrieb Jason
we are dealing
with.
On 2002.02.28 09:30:58 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 14.43 schrieb David Jencks:
I haven't had any problems using xsl without xsd, and am planning to
rework
the jboss deployment process based on extensive use of xsl
transformations,
so
My experience with native libraries is limited, thankfully. The one I have
to experiment with appears to load ok with the current code. I hope
someone else who knows more and has some will find out if anything needs
improvement.
peep pep
i just working on the integration of the rxtx
Am Don, 2002-02-28 um 20.24 schrieb David Jencks:
On 2002.02.28 13:45:03 -0500 David Jencks wrote:
On 2002.02.28 13:19:44 -0500 Holger Baxmann wrote:
My experience with native libraries is limited, thankfully. The one
I
have
to experiment with appears to load ok with the current
Am Sam, 2002-02-16 um 09.34 schrieb Sacha Labourey:
Hello Jason,
I don't know if I well understand your problem. So I will give an answer to
*a* question, hoping it was yours ;)
Situation: when you are in the folder of a particular module (let's say
jboss-all\build) and you type
On Mon, 2002-01-28 at 18:05, marc fleury wrote:
I remember scott stark putting out a list of todos to make the embedable
main real, like no reliance on filesystem necessarily, passing streams to
deploy etc etc
what would be the requirements to make JBoss totally embeddable in
Hi all,
If sombody is interested in working/testing jboss on s390/linux:
I have managed a setup of an JBoss installation on a
S390 Linux Community Development System
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/os/linux/lcds/
@ http://l012038.zseriespenguins.ihost.com:8082
(please use
Hello tbone,
Wednesday, December 05, 2001, 2:12:40 PM, you wrote:
tfb Yess, but i want to known wath are doing,
tfb So what does have an auction application need,
tfb hmm,
tfb 1) goods: some things that are for sel (query,details)
tfb 2) calendar: what is for sell when (with notification)
tfb
75 matches
Mail list logo
