on 1-09-14 21.21, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I been wanting to start hsql(db) differently - would We be faster ? if We
> injected direct into it instead of throught JDBC from DefaultDS ??? ...
THINK - I got it now - hmmm - just realising, into mindshare, has great
It looks like problem with GC (Garbage Collection) while playing with JMX
hotdeploy ? ... i am not sure ! but wanted to ask ? if it is seen somewhere
else ? ...
That is -the state of a thread in a JMX MBean is stale -and when I try to
reimplement it ... the VM still has reference to last -allth
What OS, Version, Hardware(yes, cvs command do You use ?
/peter_f
on 1-09-17 00.50, Dean Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I did another cvs update, and the problem still exists.
>
> Basically, I'm kind of getting a bit frustrated with this group. No one has
> answered or FAQ'ed even sim
on 1-09-17 00.50, Dean Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> sh build.sh
cgwin on NT ???
What version checked out ???
with what command ???
>BTW, the claim that source comes with the 2.4.0 and 2.4.1 package is false.
h ... do U have a filter applied inbetween ... what Country do U
downl
on 1-09-17 02.44, Julian Gosnell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [JettyService] Initialized
> [JettyService] Starting
> [Jetty] start HttpServer version Jetty/3.1.RC9
> [JettyService] Stopped
> java.net.BindException: Address already in use
> at java.net.PlainSocketImpl.socketBind(Native Method)
>
on 1-09-17 04.46, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can you be very specific about how to reproduce this problem? I have
> wondered if something like this would show up but haven't seen it yet.
Not sure if it is me or the autodeploy or a GC thingy yet ... I need to
refactor some more b
on 1-09-17 20.36, Dean Anderson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I downloaded from 2.4.1 and 2.4.0 (plain, not Jetty or Tomcat) from
> Sourceforge. (src dir, no build environment, nothing like jboss-all)
Yes - BuildMagic _happens_ to evolve into RH (jboss-all = jboss3.0.0alpha) -
before was another
et
thread (ServerSocket.close()) - there seems to be a hack that solves it -
right now that part is kind of solved - I am just trying to stabilise it -
before ...
/peter_f
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> |F
Right now hsql starts and then the datasource -when- undeploying hsql close
and then ds - h ... shouldent ds close before hsql ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-d
A jboss hsql embedded patch is submited ...
- would like to move to hsqldb in RH ? and submit to hsqldb ? ... I have
tested hsqldb with RH & red hat -- bank_stress is happy ! ...
/peter_F
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://l
on 1-09-23 21.17, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. No limit/offset or cursors.
>>> In a word searches. If you are tring to search for
>> something you display
>>> a list of current values based on a selection criteria. What happens
>>> when the list is 100,000 records. With
on 1-09-23 22.02, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The blueprint
> (http://java.sun.com/j2ee/blueprints/design_patterns/page_by_page_iterator/i
> ndex.html) applies to client access of the result set. The problem is the
> blueprint assumes that then entire result set of the query can
on 1-09-24 05.36, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe I am stupid, but I have have no idea what this means.
I do not think so ! ... it is me being unclear -perhaps ... -this means, A
pattern is great, and especially so, if there is a good implementation
"template" I can use, and c
on 1-09-26 22.33, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Anyways, the class loader stuff is nice, as it makes it easy to pull in
> files, but it sucks when you really need to work with a set of files. We
> can build a system to make accessing such a set network transparent
> (based on http,
Anybody have any ideas concerning synchronising hsqldb'd in a cluster ? ...
hsqldb could be a convenient resource/properties lookup in a distributed
environment ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourc
on 1-10-04 01.06, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on 1-10-04 00.59, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hr?
>>
>> --jason
>>
>> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>>
>>>> We can setup a J
The shutdown hook started in the org.jboss.system.Shutdown(MBean) works
correct while invoking it throught ctrl-c ... invoking throught :8082 either
with a browser or jboss_init_redhat.sh using org.jboss.shutdown is failing
since the call is unreferencing the caller -chain while
stopping(/destroyi
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/19 08:36:15
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Shutdown.java
Log:
Added debug messages trying to understand the (un)dependencys
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +119 -27 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Shutdown.java
Index: Shutdown.java
on 1-10-19 17.26, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There seem to be a fragmentation in how We behave in our MBeans with
> stop/destroy/unload and naming semantics...
> MQ seems to do some clean up in destroy and referencing Mbeans that then has
> already stopped/destr
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 04:12:32
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system ServiceController.java
Log:
uncommeted out destroy for now - since that code is in the shutdown class enabeling
filtering out some services - seems cleaner having that logic there for now
Revision Chang
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 04:40:08
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Shutdown.java
Log:
added a flag for verbose name messages
Revision ChangesPath
1.5 +42 -33jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Shutdown.java
Index: Shutdown.java
===
User: peter_f
Date: 01/10/20 06:36:12
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/system Shutdown.java
Log:
trying to submit a formated file - sorry
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +164 -227 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/system/Shutdown.java
Index: Shutdown.java
=
on 1-10-20 19.25, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have one under the developer links, I think it could go back under the
> user links.
>
> One of the problems is that few people maintain it so it tends to get out of
> whack.
>
> If you have some time you could prune it and I will g
on 1-10-21 02.34, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about a wiki?
Yes or get these linguistic kids to play ... becouse here is content ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists
on 1-10-21 03.57, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> "abstract metadata repositories" in broken machine translation.
http://193.14.119.195/ljud\sexydollar.mp3
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
on 1-10-23 21.04, Andreas Schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At the end a cluster is a special form of a farm !!
How about a *Matrix* of jboss instances where cluster and farm is a
configuration thereof ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing
Please be specific : when being specific ;-) ;
OS, VM, jboss_version
goodfridayisrealysoonnow ...
/Peter_f
on 1-10-24 23.19, Ferguson, Doug at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So I am using the XADataSourceImpl wrapper in connection pool.
>
> After jboss has been running for awhile, I start getting
on 1-10-26 06.30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> JBoss daily test results
>
> SUMMARY
>
> Number of tests run: 130
>
>
>
> Successful tests: 121
>
> Errors:4
>
> Failures: 5
>
>
on 1-10-29 22.19, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The rendering of msgs logged is independent of the logging. There is an
> XML appender that can generate an XML view of the msgs. For what your
> talking about a database appender would make more sense to allow one
> to query log msgs
Sorry - revolver(=revolve=rotate) should read as (a round robin) queue or as
a fixed size spooler so the db do not grow bizarre but has auto flushing ...
the imagined db adaptor, when size indicates full, would flush to dev null
or to a file ? ...
/peter_f
(matrix = cluster/farm/node)
-have a
//mozilla.org/projects/tinderbox/ ) (or
> |> |similar) route seems the way to go - that is, a
> |> central server for
> |> |results and then various servers for
> |> generating/submitting results.
> |> |It provides lots of info on when builds break and
> |> can highlig
on 1-11-12 03.59, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where did you find the NoTransDS ref, or for that matter which vm the tests
> were run on? I put NoTransDS in yesterday for the jbossMQ jdbc pm.
on lubega.com server.log for blackdown nojit green threads
> For me, here, shutdown wor
Once the classes are generated (written to file) they can be included in
client code ? ... or did I miss something here ? ...
The Together IDE as a ex. "hides/Autogenerates" from the implementation Bean
code ... since it is only stubs ! ...
/peter_f
on 1-11-12 18.16, Aaron Mulder at [EMAIL PROT
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/15 03:44:44
Modified:hsqldb/hsqldb/lib hsqldb.jar
Log:
updating jar
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +223 -95 thirdparty/hsqldb/hsqldb/lib/hsqldb.jar
<>
___
Jboss-development mailing
quot; HSQLDB 1.61 Hypersonic
database in-VM.
+ * http://sourceforge.net/projects/hsqldb/
+ * @see HypersonicDatabaseMBean
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Rickard Öberg
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Scott Stark.
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";&g
I been playing with reading in the server.log to hsqldb ...where i create a
table LOG with {id,stamp,service,type,message}, it is really cool to do a
SELECT * FROM LOG WHERE MESSAGE LIKE '%jmx%' ORDER BY SERVICE
I also glanced at log4j's SocketAppender and SocketNode ...
There is a log4j client c
1) There is a setting in log4j to re-read properties at set intervall
2) thats is the way to go
-since log4j is logging before the MBean server is started
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/
on 1-11-16 22.50, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) There is a setting in log4j to re-read properties at set intervall
> 2) thats is the way to go
> -since log4j is logging before the MBean server is started
Well not really :-) log4j is started as a MBean after the MB S
can You Please specify Your environment in full !? ...
HW
RAM
Disk
OS
VM
aso.
Thanxs
/peter_f
on 1-11-18 01.05, Joel Boehland at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> Since I'm the one who opened this bug, I'm obviously biased, but I
> repectfully disagree with Andreas's assertion that this isn't
on 1-11-18 03.28, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -400MHz, 196MB RAM
I say You do not have mem to play this game ? ...
What do U think ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.
Why is the *slow* Java par with c/c**, in execution at times ? ...
Becouse it is
machinecocetranslatedjustintimewhateverthatmeansforUandYourbrother();
Word up ...
/peter_f
on 1-11-18 03.33, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> on 1-11-18 03.28, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTEC
I am about to remove all references and idb files - oki ? ...
The xa test has been broken in default cvs for a while since the DB2 ==
InstantDB is not bound !!! ... should the xa XATest have a common net xa DB
bound ? ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-developme
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjaws.xml
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +1 -65 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjaws.xml
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Removed: varia/src/main/org/jboss/jdbc InstantDBDatabase.java
InstantDBDatabaseMBean.java
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAI
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Modified:jbossbuild.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.51 +1 -5 build/jboss/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
R
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:28
Modified:variabuild.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +1 -16 contrib/varia/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/resources/dbtest/META-INF jaws.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.12 +0 -63 jbosstest/src/resources/dbtest/META-INF/jaws.xml
Index: jaws.xml
=
User: peter_f
Date: 01/11/26 16:15:30
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/jaws/deployment
defaultjaws.xml
Log:
Removed InstantDB references and files
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +0 -64
jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/j
Mmmm ... cool ...
and x-tra so -when it emulation enables my athalon linux to say that i am
running on a p4 with w2k ... ,-)
Thanxs
/peter_f
on 1-11-27 07.15, Andreas Schaefer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> User: schaefera
> Date: 01/11/26 22:15:28
>
> Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management
While pooking around i found and :
Uncommented body of deleteObject(pooledObject) - line 71 of
org/jboss/resource/connectionmanager.ManagedConnectionPoolFactory.java
(it seems this is called when the pool shrinks or is shut down.
some test -is shrinking the pool to [0/0/10] and as a effect the
placeholders ... for stealth reasons ... ;-)
I changed my local copy to reflect -preference :
AS/400 - with 3000 Virtual Linux instances ...
Thanxs for the option
/peter_f
* 4.3 MB "Stockholm Contemporary" 1998 by ZKH *
http://www.ipagents.com/humanerror.mp3
on 1-11-27 07.53, Peter Fagerl
exception rather than a NPE.
>
> If there is no particular reason we are doing this then I will (try) to
> change the code so we don't do this!
>
> Guidence from someone who is familiar with this code would be appreciated,
> else I am going to bang on by myself and can
on 1-11-29 21.57, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> and it is happening because our resource and pooling
> code decides to destroy the connection when a statement
> from the connection throws an error.
could it not be left open ? ... that is :
-there is a connention from pool to db .
With David's fix - I just run-testsuite : result 182 tests with 1 error (XA)
Thanks
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 1-11-30 04.59, David Maplesden at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I got an improvement in the testsuite as well, but not quite that good. I
> guess we still have platform differences.
ahhh ... how so ? ...
Could You check it in with a runtime OS check ? ...
/peter_f
__
on 24-02-2 06.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and
> metrics?
on 24-02-2 06.45, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging.
I envision a new Statistics - Appen
on 13-03-2 14.42, marc fleury at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> rc1-rc6 has been in Unix for 20 years, so let's stop fucking around
A understandeble order there ... mmm - I can not help thinking of a observer
pattern design for the dependency and deploy order. Together with a
interface registry laye
on 15-03-2 22.05, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> My opinion still is that handling this automatically is the best solution,
> by converting every kind of dependency into an mbean dependency. If we get
> people used to numbering their files, then they will have a delightful
> opportun
on 17-03-2 21.21, Marius Kotsbak at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I get this stacktrace when the bean with container managed JMS is
> passivated:
Yes - Protocol - is protocol :
Whatever mind U HAVE over there is welcome !
/p
>
> INFO [STDOUT] AbstraktSender.ejbPassivate
> 21:13:03,098 ERROR
On Thursday, Aug 28, 2003, at 23:43 Europe/Stockholm, Bill Burke wrote:
Yes, it was a PAIN! My fingers hurt from typing in my CVS password so
many times.
Besides the PAIN! ... cool call ...
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Wel
on 23-03-2 03.23, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I was just looking through this, answered a couple, but damn this is a
> mess... not really what I expected to find under a FAQ listing... its
> half FAQ-like entries and then half lame user questions...
I deployed a big fat war called
on 25-03-2 00.25, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I should be more specific, if there is a lock which persists for an
> extended period of time let us know...
We did - di We not ?
Should We have to do that ?
___
Jboss-development mailing
on 25-03-2 01.07, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> y35 j00 D1d. =P
thats pearl ?;) or BuildMagic lingo ?
While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
to extend and build with an
on 25-03-2 21.38, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> While on topic of BM can U please explain what it does that ant task's can
>> not do ? and WHY do We have a top level BlackBox instead of a 'standard' way
>> to extend and build with ant ! ... ? ...
> If you can make Ant do what the c
on 25-03-2 23.42, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 1) Provides pseudo-late-binding for properties.
> 2) Provides helper tasks to set system properties, plus a few other
> utilities .
> 3) Provides a mechanism to hook up multipule sub-projects based on
> property configuration.
>
> Perh
on 25-03-2 23.58, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What about CVS do you want integrated?
dont know just freeflowing
- maybe a do a checkout and build - test cycle - ftp report to IP(lubega).
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
on 27-03-2 15.33, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + db/hypersonic/default.script as martin has written.
whats that ? where ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-developme
on 27-03-2 16.18, Vesco Claudio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> modify passord in Default Db
have You tried " " instead of "" ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
on 27-03-2 15.15, Ken Sipe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know the level of JSR 77 support at this time in JBoss and hadn't
> thought about it.
look in test.managment.test
a servlet talking to the MEJB might be a good start ? i thought there was
one allready ?
/peter_f
___
on 28-03-2 00.25, Yannick Menager at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> keep the flame throwers away :)
Listen - .
..
..
Once
-I was young
- a long time ago
- true
- when co
on 28-03-2 11.42, Chandan S Pansare at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is real urgent.
try :
http://www.hp.com/products1/unix/java/java2/sdkrte1_3/index.html
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/li
on 04-04-2 03.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Where are the patched sources for the JBoss HSQLDB? Does anyone know if
> the 1.7.x version is flexible enough to use it out of the box? If not,
> could whoever patched it in the first place try to get those changes
> commited... assu
Maybe a central listener factory could hand out listerner objects to
services and from there also manage multiple instance detection plus
migration of services depending on A-VM going down while B-VM are using for
example A-VM's JNP.
/peter_f
___
Jbo
he maintenece... which I would like to have fixed.
You can get it from the sf.net/hsqldb patch area ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> on 04-04-2 03.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Where are the patched sources for t
the same SS
when it comes back up ... maybe even with que'ed requests ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> Maybe a central listener factory could hand out listerner objects to
>> services and from there also manage multiple instance dete
on 05-04-2 05.08, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Do you have a design for such a component?
I do not have a full understanding of the requirements ...
> There will always be components which don't support this so we need to
> provide another option as well,
Then just register the l
on 07-04-2 09.30, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> If one uses ones own ServerSocket and connection threads that use the
>> hsqldb.Database class directly - then We do not need to touch the hsqldb
>> code and have more controll over the listeners in JBoss ... this is how the
>> Avalon p
Did a clean CVS co and the build.xml complains at line 530 about FNFE
docbook-xsl - I do not eaven have a thirdparty/oasis/ folder ??? ...
I go for a espresso meanwhile ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.s
on 07-04-2 16.10, Peter Fagerlund at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did a clean CVS co and the build.xml complains at line 530 about FNFE
> docbook-xsl - I do not eaven have a thirdparty/oasis/ folder ??? ...
>
> I go for a espresso meanwhile ...
did a -dP and got it now - sorry .
on 07-04-2 23.48, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It growed on me to be able to have all listerners
>> (NAME:PORT) registred in a component for easy access
>> by other components, to be able to understand
>> what ports are running in the WM and be JMX intra-machine
>> negotiation capa
Cool - I really like the screen visuals ... will dload in the morning (CET)
and try out live ... cool ... let us know of anything You need furthering
this ... like "Money for nNothing and Girls for Free" ... ;-)
/peter_f
on 08-04-2 01.35, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> In the proje
CVS co jboss-all yesterday (20020804-16.39.05) after runing the
"run-basic-testsuite" CPU keeps pegging at close to MAX for hours.
I am on RH 7.2 using Blackdown 1.3.1
Anybody else se this ?
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECT
Maybe this tool could be extended for management
screenshoot :
http://pollo.sourceforge.net/sitemap1.png
sf.net :
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pollo/
beutiful for ant and *-service.xml files allready,
not so happy with BM xml files tho ;-( ... yet ? ...
/peter_f
on 08-04-2 23.30, Mac Rinehart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Haven't actually checked out the CPU usage,
Ahhh ...
> And I've also noticed "slowness" in other applications after
> running the testsuite.
Could You please check Your CPU before and after running the testsuite ? ...
/peter_f
__
did a clean cvs today (13.45.20 CET) and after completion of
run-basic-testsuite cpu is normal ...
yesterdays cvs (16.39.05 CET) behaves differently and hangs somewhere after
completion of run-basic-testsuite ...
/peter_f
___
Jboss-development mailing
on 09-04-2 20.36, cepage at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> t invocation to be scheduled. This is still not a perfect solution, but IMHO
> it is much better than the current situation.
Please submit this as a patch at :
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=22866&atid=376687
This way all contrib
on 09-04-2 23.01, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to make an overview of JBoss 2.4.4 with hints to 3.0. I'll link you
> to the results when I'm done.
> So in the next few days, I'll be posting some questions on clustering,
> caching, etc.
cool
> But first: has anyone already made
Are We ready to make a Demo folder in jboss-all/ that BM would copy into
output/*/* where I could with an ant build.xml file build and copy to deploy
... and once in deployed in deploy as a webapp I could edit some source -
save - *bong* - cool ...
/peter_f
_
aybe a folder for cluster and the like called extended ?
... The deployer would need to be aware and ant triggable ...Yes - We talked
about it some while ago and the concencus was - cool ;-) if that is not
final . then . Ahhh ...
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>&g
mpiles / deploys -huh ...
I am dreaming - so I should go to bed and continue ;-)
later
/peter_f
> --jason
>
>
> Peter Fagerlund wrote:
>
>> on 11-04-2 01.21, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Do you mean a demo or example configuration f
on 11-04-2 03.47, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> After a bit more thought I think that a "minimal" server config is
> really pointless, though I do think we need to document it somewhere.
Could the configuration folders named default also contain a simple
default_conf_doc.war that wo
on 10-04-2 10.46, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I'm looking for something like
> http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/notes/issues.html#1056662, but then for JBoss
> 2.4.3/4 and 3.0.
Yes - very good - I think this could be collected from a wide variety of
sources like sf.net / forum
on 10-04-2 14.34, Pieter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> http://www.jboss.org/online-manual/HTML/ch13s98.html links to
> http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/1.2/docs/javadocs/index.html. Does this
> mean the full JavaMail 1.2 API is implemented?
Yes - there is a handle availible to the full Jav
on 10-04-2 16.22, Dain Sundstrom at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> File size or memory foot print.
and after a DashO Pro I guess 30% less in File size ?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jbo
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about "deployables" in the root of the distribution tree.
close but ...
> Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using
> a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can
> be
scenario: when U dload . one wants instant gratification
( I know Me want ) ...
So HOW ARE U GOING TO DO THAT JASON ... without help ?
***
The People that trained me said -> it is ready when it is ready ...
> I am willing to work on something like this (for 3.1, not 3.0!!!) if
> there is any
on 10-04-2 18.50, Andrew Scherpbier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How about "deployables" in the root of the distribution tree.
close but ...
> Also, to follow up on Peter's message in a different thread about using
> a default.war to document things... I really like that idea. It can
> be
> but what?
>
> Maybe "available-services" or "possible-services"
Ahhh ... no ... no ... and then Yes of course ...
Your "deployables" is quite Queen'ish :-)
it is of some importence how and why we choose a certain word to give
meaning of purpose ... a "word is a container of a concept" ... the
I thank You for the invitation to crack You open ... but I have to pass and
give You a raincheck for now ...
;-)
on 11-04-2 03.06, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>
>> Your "deployables" is quite Queen'ish :-)
>> it is of some importence how and why we choose a certain word to gi
on 11-04-2 23.46, Mac Rinehart at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ok, I just finished running the testsuite. And with about 10 minutes passed
> I am still seeing my CPU maxed out at 100%. Review of active processes shows
> that java.exe is the primary consumer. This is a Win2k system with a PIII
> pro
101 - 200 of 299 matches
Mail list logo
