This is great stuff claude.
I am a bit fuzzy on the use of the synchronous call. What would be the use case for
that?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831618#3831618
Reply to the post :
well Scott is talking about just an abstract keyword (thread local) to identify a
given configuration. Is that what you are talking about.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3831621#3831621
Reply to the post :
this is great work adrian,
Bill, I think what I hear you say is that we can now deploy a self contained aspect.
The aspect knows where he wants to be bound. The aspect could export its pointcuts,
he knows he wants to listen on set* etc. It will make for superior deployment formats
for
I hear you on the usage of Subject. I saw it is the way the GOF named it. I still
prefer Observable.
Getting at the state is done by passing the reference to the subject in your
implementation. It makes for a great and simple implementation. If we could pass
some metainformation as to
So I am looking at the code,
1- well done Adrian this is kick ass stuff
2- Why do we call it the Subject? why don't you call it observable.
3- We need to start talking of aspects. I realize we apply the observable aspect
and introduce that behavior. That we introduce it on set is irrelevant,
it is a great idea :)
I am delighted to see the activity around nukes. 3 active guys is in fact really
good.
You guys would be proud, the only ovation I got yesterday at the JUG talk in Austin
was when I demoed nukes live, people love the stuff
View the original post :
Oy!
This pisses me off, we NEED TO HAVE THIS ONLINE as the forums start getting
out of sync.
Claude
1- please stop using u when you mean you.
2- contribute and get RW if you will
3- repost this online
4- bill please use the FORUMS to answer, just click on the link
marcf
-Original
is M7 working with plugins? that was totally broken and JBoss IDE relies on it. It
was buggy in Eclipse.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3822473#3822473
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3822473
eusdart,
want RW on CVS? submit some code
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3822474#3822474
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3822474
---
my read is that we need someone full time on JBossIDE. JBoss Professional Open Source
is bringing someone on board when the project is taking off. We haven't so far but we
should, the hippy open source model (contribute when you can) seems to be braking
down here.
View the original post :
Patrick,
High end JTA with all the bells and whistles is one of these things that is used by 20
people in the world and they are eager to pay for it since they got the money.
Open Source satisfies the masses. Proprietary fills those expensive niches.
Arjuna's business and sole focus is that
btw LRCO strikes me as a small benefit, almost a hack.
So in the case ONE resource doesn't support XA the XA protocol still works if that
resource is last. (woo hoo!)
but heck if we can implement it for cheap why not
View the original post :
zapa, the stuff works, how do I know? I use it. But you need to follow the steps in
the getting started book, you seem to have not done it. I have done it and it
works.
I was experiencing the same problem you report because I had gotten cute on the
filters in the task definition and
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821777#3821777
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821777
hey I am really glad to see a thread like this one. There is a lot of work to be done
and I liked the
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821778#3821778
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821778
RFE on sourceforge are a bit too obscure. I prefer the acoliver wiki approach on the
website. Also
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821792#3821792
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821792
I went through that myself recently and it actually works.
Basically you can find the eclipse file from
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821794#3821794
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821794
interesting, I was reading about RFID in scientific american and it is one of these
simple things where
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821223#3821223
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821223
One more thing that will throw off HotSpot is the Advisable interface since it
essentially says that the
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821224#3821224
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821224
Right,
we need the notion of regions. Do you have cycles to code this?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3821344#3821344
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3821344
I was going to RTFM but do we have an TFM?
in other words did you find any doco on the cache page yet?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820786#3820786
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820786
RTFM
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820810#3820810
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820810
thanks siandty,
Julien is currently onsite working on a large RFP ;). When he comes back he will be
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820811#3820811
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820811
heiko,
can you pay for your seat? if not let me know directly.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820647#3820647
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820647
on the topic of return interceptors.
Try catch is ok but the important point is interceptor variable
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820452#3820452
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820452
That is kind of interesting really. People where bitching about the hit they were
taking with the object
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820322#3820322
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820322
this is exactly the kind of situation we would take under the for-pay contracts.
Very few people use
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820347#3820347
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820347
this is great stuff
we need you to do a BLOG entry about this to give some visibility and order on the
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820235#3820235
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820235
yeah yeah yeah come and help come and help.
marcf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820236#3820236
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820236
rythos,
get RW will you?
---
The SF.Net email is
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3820249#3820249
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3820249
this is how we recruit.
ooo we see the eye in you..
nah bullshit, just code a ton and
Guys,
We got an advanced training coming up in Houston Texas. Feb 16-19 2004.
We cover the latest 3.2.x series and you get primo insights into the
advanced material with 4.0. Whether you are going to production and you
want to understand how to optimize JBoss, want to learn about the latest
Isn't that already part of the AOP framework or are you talking about a
servlet filter?
narcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:51 AM
To: Jboss-Dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] URL based
Link please :)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Morrison
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 5:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] What are you doing that is cool on JBoss?
I've built an adult site around
Actually I should mention.
We power playboy.com (for real). I have a check from christie heffner
on my wall in the office (for real). We never cashed it, I never washed
the hand that took the check out of the envelope.
The funny part (for real) is that WE COULDNT FIND ANYONE TO GO ONSITE,
Danch is still alive, amazing,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of danch
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Fwd: ASF JIRA Installation is available
you _are_ joking,
And, no Marc, this isn't relegated to just JMX as Bill
demonstrates with AOP Remoting. This should be used for JMS,
EJB and all the other subsystem layers. ;)
That is great, the AOP remoting part is the future. But the best of
this will come as the invoker layer for proxies of EJB
Thanks jeff,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jeff Haynie
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX 1.2, remoting, and jmx-remoting
commited to 3.2 branch
OK, I
Nice job tom,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Elrod
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 11:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] One way invocations in remoting added
I have added the ability to do true
Bua...
AOP and EJB a la carte. Dude, why I love EJB's was the deconstruction of
EJBs to reoffer them a la carte. We are there, almost, and so beyond in
many ways. I just read a paper for AOSD that introduces STREAM semantics as
aspects for EJB like constructs, meaning POJOS :)
He he snort.
- Hopefully we'll have a JB 3.2.3 bundle with Tomcat 5 :)
Yep
Marcf
--
x
Rémy Maucherat
Senior Developer Consultant
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
x
---
This SF.net email is
Yes
:)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stefan Arentz
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 4:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Hibernate Integration
Is the JBoss group going to add 'official' support for
Good job,
But a clear job for AOP in JB4. The cache product is DYNAMITE.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 6:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Guys,
denver is sold out,
marcf
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
AndresSent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 3:22 PMTo: 'The
Core'Subject: [Core] Sys Admin Denver Sold OUT
We have hit our
cut-off of 28 attendees registered for sys
He he
It is SNOWCRASH the known computer virus that when seen turns you into a zombie. It
really reprograms your brain to give us all your earthy belonging to us and attend LA
bootcamp.
Sorry you are having such a horrible experience,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
by Bill Burke in person (JB4), don't miss it.
We hope to see you there, these are the boom times
Regards
marcf
x
Marc Fleury, Ph.D
Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
x
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] And another JBoss fork
LOL
marcf
Yes, much fun. And like computers: they give cryptical error reports
:-)
Well done tom :)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Elrod
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] commit of jmx package done
(I sent this last night be never showed up in my
Won't introducing the same code require an incompatible
change to the current datasource jboss-service.xml schema?
Given the hideous nature of 3.0 format I can't say this is a
bad thing.
I am glad the clowns responsible for this configuration mess self-flushed
themselves to apache
oh my god, here goes the business. They are barely
out of the womb and already they want to rule the world! Take our business away
and ruin us too many forks, they are happening like rabbits.
My twins will kick the butt of your deamons
:)
well done to everyone, babies are always good
PROTECTED] Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 1:21 PM
To: 'Private list for internal JBoss Group discussion';
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [jboss-group] FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-643739
]unknown-pk?missing in jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0
Let's get laurent on board, it seems
Let's get laurent on board, it seems our bravo ta bite comment made it
through, he buys it :)
Cool, Sacha keep a close eye on this guy he is good,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sacha Labourey
Sent: Friday, October 10,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adrian Brock
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] CVS
Anybody else having problems connecting to cvs?
Regards,
Adrian
--
- Generalization of the proxy factory framework to loose the
ejb specific items
manifestly showing up in the
org.jboss.proxy.GenericProxyFactory which should be
a more generic metadata representation. The only difference
between the http
proxy factory and jrmp proxy factory is a
Keyo,
InvocationException extends Invocation
InvocationResponse extends Invocation
So you get the original context in both cases
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 11:34 AM
to see Marc is still on the remoting is tied to JMX
kick which is completely and utterally incorrect. ;)
Remoting has nothing to do with JMX, except that as a
convenience the connectors serve as MBeans.
- Original Message -
From: marc fleury [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Just one word...
Why can't the connection listener be stored in the Managed
Connection?
I'd like to remove this contention. OptimizeIt has this at
32.9% in my
little test on a dual CPU machine with 10 threads in contention.
Wow
Marcf
Marc Fleury, Ph.D
Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
x
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL
You guys are talking about a 3.3 proxy talking to a 3.2 server?
If that is the case, it is not really relevant as most proxies are
dynamically generated. Or are you talking about portability of
interceptors working on the Invocation objects?
The stability of 3.2 and its performance are
It is a good name :)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bela Ban
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:14 PM
To: JavaGroups; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JavaGroups: name change
Hi everyone,
Phew,
I am glad we are done, that was what about 2000 emails on cvs-commit?
Wow
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
And OTP is a runtime somewhat similar to OTP.
That's a relief.
marcf
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to
We are going to be working on these very soon, Julien Viet is tasked
with making this happen and thanks for the twiki idea. I have been
wrestling with the multithread part. I wanted to do blog on top of
discussions (mt discussiosn are great when you are in the flow but suck
when it comes to one
.
Until next time, PLgC
Marcf
x
Marc Fleury, Ph.D
Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
x
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums
The forums IS the place where it was developed. Julien is in Paris at
the moment doing consulting, he won't be responsive. The nukes project
is 100% funded by JBoss Group at this point so we would welcome input
and code for advanced functionality. You are welcome to build modules
for it as
Yes, obviously thanks bill
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Nukes Proposal
marc fleury wrote:
distribution
We will be working with webm and ROB to include these reports on the
www.jboss.org to aggregate all of our platform builds. Stay tuned as we
work out the kinks. Yes murphy's law second addendum is that it always
raises its ugly head at the worst possible moment.
Thanks for your patience, it is
Title: Message
sunny
do me a favor, either post to forums for user help or take out a contract for
direct developer support.
Asking
for user help on the dev list is not appropriate,
sorry,
marcf
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
As you may know, we are going in a different direction with
JMS than
the original architecture coded by Norbert Lataille. We
are doing a
rewrite
I guess I had it good. Norbert made a good start. At least
basic pub/sub worked. That's better than starting from scratch.
Enough
Good idea, consider it done,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Steve Lewis
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 2:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: Jboss-development digest, Vol 1
#5702 - 9 msgs
Can we get a
Tears in my eyes =*)
- JBoss AOP XDoclet Integration. JSR-175 in the present with JDK
1.4 and JBoss AOP. From the hard work of Andy Godwin.
- 1st iteration of JDO. Thanks to Alex Loubyansky.
- 1st iteration of JMS rewrite. Not full-featured yet, but will
run JMS over multicast
Remember to take out the gloves as you type,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Juha-P Lindfors
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] lock errors on commit attempts
On the marketing front...
Reloaded for the matrix is a great idea but will have too short a
shelflife :) plus what we are doing is truly revolutionary so... Start
hooking your wagon on that marketing speed train,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I am worried that it is in JMX. It should be an MBEan with SARS.
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 11:00 PM
To: Jboss-Dev
Subject: [JBoss-dev] anybody want to integrate JBoss
1) POJO pojo = new POJO();
pojo = (POJO)Versioned.makeVersioned(pojo);
That is really pretty tho :) You need to define the pojo as aspectable
(advisable).
or
2) Define a constructor-pointcut on the POJO class (I will
implement this
today.)
nice,
marcf
Agreed. A remote proxy
If you use versioning on a POJO that is a the top of
an object graph, will the children objects also be
versions when they are modified???
I assume No. But I think it would make sense for your
correct.
Versioning interceptor to wrap up children objets with the
versioning proxy also
Digging throught that thread and the bela discussion of cache.
There is only one proxy, but you are correct. For each
transaction, a full snapshot is taken of the real object.
All access to the object is done through one proxy.
The point being made was that there is another way to do this
\
What would really help is a forum2email gateway to relay new messages
to an email address.
I know that begging for features is not allowed here :) so if it an
option to add that as a module to the new nukes stuff then I can help
out with that.
OK :)
marcf
S.
,
JBoss 4.0 stability en route to a Developpers Release 1 (DR1).
Please think long and hard and fast about your modules. Many of you are
involved in core modules that need to move fast in the coming weeks.
Don't be afraid to talk and say who needs help etc.
PLgC
marcf
xx
Marc
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 4:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I think you are delusional if you think JB4 will be ready for
version are you planning to support
in JBoss 4.0? J2EE 1.4 is not final as far as I know...
-Original Message-
From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sourceforge. Net
Subject: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26
I gave up on victor about a year ago...
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 6:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] How do I clean up these hsqldb
shutdown
nice :)
I think we should also provide massive defaults and provide a
application
security config=appUser/
/application
:)
so we can build some indirection in all this configuration stuff
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
I can bend jasper compiler to compile JSP to java classes,
I've already done that.
there you go then,
However compiling classes is a CLASSPATH nightmare. That's
why I would like an in memory compiler. Not anymore.
Stop being such a choupette, it is anoying. Where is the can-do
attitude?
which is Scott's long winded way of saying negative
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott M Stark
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss web-site issues
The 1.3 release of
time with one guy but we need more help,
marcf
xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
President, Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
xx
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [JBoss-dev] php5 is coming
I'd really prefer JSP integration or integration with some
other popular
why don't we bring them on then?
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Burke
Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] hsqldb options
-Original Message-
From:
cool, it could help for module or block scripting in Nukes,
i.e get code class - fully generate class - compile it -
generate xmbeam - deploy it
pluggable resource loader is very helpfull, I don't know if
we can have bytes of class through unified classloaders but
that would help.
We
julien,
why don't you try to bring some of these guys in to do the compiler for
NUKES? JSP like writing for advanced programmatic modules?
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 2:06 PM
I will be contacting the hosters it seems the network is a bit screwed
up
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lennart Petersson
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 6:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Re[2]: [JBoss-dev] Regarding
hey hey, let's take it online new site is up with NUKES and it rocks,
you can see who is on and stuff
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of julien viet
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:11 AM
To: Bill Burke
Subject: Re[2]:
is online, julien delivered and the stuff is running.
it is stable and fast. Our machine is sitting at 2% utilization with
cached permissions and stuff. Nukes on JBoss is real and will be a
fantastic project
marcf
xx
Marc Fleury, Ph.D.
President, Founder
JBoss Group, LLC
Points taken on the website.
Do you prefer the look though? we are trying the more pro approach. I
think it sucks but ben my sales guy is all excited about it... what do
you think? we just released NUKES, the forums were switched and yes we
lost a couple of hours of posts. Apologies and thanks
it to the rest of the
stuff. Layout is bad, needs a complete redesign (mostly ads).
-- Juha
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote:
Points taken on the website.
Do you prefer the look though? we are trying the more pro
approach.
I think it sucks but ben my sales guy is all
saying rethink how you lay them out -- having them
appear all over the place (top, bottom, several on both
sides) like they are now doesn't look very good.
its a layout issue, it sucks
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, marc fleury wrote:
you are saying get rid of the ads?
that is not going
I just want to give credit to Julien Viet as well who pitched that idea
when he was in ATL,
kudos Bill, you are in orbit, the pings in your head, the code in CVS,
let them fight, let's move
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
second revolution,
I just can't say how excited I am.
We are doing magic, critical mass.
Julien goes I got a silly idea..
bill makes it real, there is war..
we are doing RAW stuff, and rarely
was I that excited about it all...
you ain't seen nothing yet wankers
PLgC
marcf
So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it?
bla bla bla bla
marc fleury wrote:
do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very
obvious
enough wasted time in the U.N. Time for some good ol' action
marcf
The story about the flees was pretty good though, but kind of irrelevant
:)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned
That is precisely correct Dan,
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of danch
Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?
I have never heard any of the
1 - 100 of 2123 matches
Mail list logo
