>>>So Jmol will certainly *not* draw turn/random coil as square.
>>>
>>Miguel, You are right. The idea of having the turn/random coil as
>>square is not a good. A cylindrical shape would be a better
>>representation of the coil.
>
> I agree.
Resolved
>>The standard secondary structure types are
vivek sent (2004.05.15 at 2.12a [+0800gmt]) :
>Hi Miguel,
>
>On May 15, 2004, at 01:04 am, Miguel wrote:
>
>>Jan wrote:
>>
Q: Do you like the fact that turn/random coil is square?
>>>nobody likes this, therefore the application menu command renders
>>>this part as trace 100
>>>:-)
>>
>>Ac
Hi Miguel,
On May 15, 2004, at 01:04 am, Miguel wrote:
Jan wrote:
Q: Do you like the fact that turn/random coil is square?
nobody likes this, therefore the application menu command renders this
part as
trace 100
:-)
Actually, I had no idea that a *menu* even existed :-)
So Jmol will certainly
Miguel schrieb:
Jan wrote:
[snip]
I like the rocket alternative
Are you saying that you prefer the rocket over the boxy ribbon for cartoon?
no, I like to have an alternative
Regards, Jan
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sou
On May 14, 2004, at 11:12 AM, Miguel wrote:
Q: Should the word 'cartoons' be reserved for something that is
(essentially) RasMol/Chime compatible?
yes
essentially... but I see no problem with 'tweaking' the standard
cartoon
to make it more appealing, visually.
I just looked at the RasMol cartoon
Jan wrote:
>>Q: Do you like the fact that turn/random coil is square?
>>
> nobody likes this, therefore the application menu command renders this
> part as
> trace 100
> :-)
Actually, I had no idea that a *menu* even existed :-)
So Jmol will certainly *not* draw turn/random coil as square.
[sn
Miguel schrieb:
Q: Should the word 'cartoons' be reserved for something that is
(essentially) RasMol/Chime compatible?
yes
essentially... but I see no problem with 'tweaking' the standard cartoon
to make it more appealing, visually.
I just looked at the RasMol cartoon ... the
>>>Q: Should the word 'cartoons' be reserved for something that is
>>>(essentially) RasMol/Chime compatible?
>>>
>>yes
>>
> essentially... but I see no problem with 'tweaking' the standard cartoon
> to make it more appealing, visually.
I just looked at the RasMol cartoon ... the last time I looked
Jan Reichert sent (2004.05.14 at 3.24p [+0200gmt]) :
>Miguel wrote:
>
>>I would like feedback from people regarding the cartoon rendering
>>in Jmol.
>>
>>The rockets/arrows rendering that is currently in Jmol was intended
>>to be temporary.
>>
>>(Note that the rockets for helix representation are
Miguel wrote:
I would like feedback from people regarding the cartoon rendering in Jmol.
The rockets/arrows rendering that is currently in Jmol was intended to be
temporary.
(Note that the rockets for helix representation are in the wrong position)
At some level, I would like to be RasMol/Chime
I would like feedback from people regarding the cartoon rendering in Jmol.
The rockets/arrows rendering that is currently in Jmol was intended to be
temporary.
(Note that the rockets for helix representation are in the wrong position)
At some level, I would like to be RasMol/Chime compatible ...
11 matches
Mail list logo
