I unicasted Matt, but for anyone else looking for the same:
https://store.filtrationgroup.com/UAF/electronics-cooling-air-filters-by-manufacturer-juniper
-evt
On 10/27/20, 9:00 AM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Matthew Crocker"
wrote:
I’d like to do some PM on my MX480s and
We ran into this, too. We signed up to beta test at the beginning of this year
and nowhere, not even in discussions with our SE (who also wasn't told by
Juniper), was it mentioned it was a DC-only device. Imagine my surprise when I
received the box and it was DC only. Such a disappointment.
On 1/22/20, 10:08 AM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Mark Tinka"
wrote:
According to Juniper, it's targeted as an IP/MPLS router for the Metro
and similar applications.
It is meant to compete with Cisco's ASR920 and NCS540 boxes, as Juniper
have no plans to develop a lite version
This used to be possible by setting the "net.pfe.transit_re" (or similar) value
using sysctl, but I'm not sure if it still works on newer Junos versions:
https://www.kumari.net/index.php/networking/tips-and-tricks/14-
I would not do this on production router, though. If you need to reach your
On 9/19/19, 1:05 AM, "juniper-nsp on behalf of Phil Reilly"
wrote:
MX104's are the dual brain unit of the 204. Though a 204 has 40/100G
capabilities. If I read your original request correctly about ip
routing. Not sure the 104/204 is grunty enough to deal with multiple
On 7/19/19, 3:40 PM, "Gert Doering" wrote:
That sounds a bit weird... why should the device care how the other
end balances its packets? Never heard anyone state this, and I can't
come up with a reason why.
*sigh*
I'd been focusing way too much on the config portion of the
Hi all,
I need to bring up a 2x10G LAG between an MX204 and a customer's ASR 1002-X and
I want to make sure the links get load balanced as closely and reliably as
possible. Junos docs say, "The hash-computation for the forward and reverse
flow must be identical." They go on to detail how to
Hi all,
I've been reading the much better information about Inline J-Flow in the
Juniper MX Series O'Reilly book and there's a table in there that shows various
sampling rates for MX sampling configurations (Page 770, Figure 8-5). It says a
valid input-rate should match the formula: input-rate
book by Doug Hanks, Harry Reynolds and David
Roy. If only the Juniper docs would mention this fact somewhere, or at least
somewhere more obvious.
-evt
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp On Behalf Of Eric Van
Tol
Sent: Monday, October 8, 2018 7:06 AM
To: Tim Jackson ; Alexander
>Looks like you get 12 queues per MX80/104 for ingress shaping. Doesn't seem to
>be tied to QX at all. Egress you get per unit on the MIC slots though.
>
>https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos/topics/task/configuration/cos-configuring-ingress-hierarchical-cos-on-trio-mpc-mic.html
>
Hi all,
I've looked at the docs and can't find this, so maybe someone can point me in
the right direction here. What are the limitations/restrictions on using input
scheduling and shaping on the MX80 MICs? I have the 'traffic-manager mode
ingress-and-egress' configured for the PIC and the
> Beware the bundle upgrades on the MX104 – when we looked at these in 2016,
> for some reason that our VAR couldn’t explain it was cheaper to just throw
> the MX104-MX5-AC away and buy a brand new MX104-40G-AC-BNDL bundle rather
> than purchasing the MX104-MX5-40G-UPG license.
Yes, it's
> Seems odd they would choose the same form factor for incompatible
> designs, but that explains why the 2-port card is more expensive.
Also seems odd the 4-port MIC is listed as compatible on the MX80/MX104 on the
Hardware Compatibility List. This is why I put zero trust in these sorts of
> I do see where it looks like an export policy was applied but there is
> nothing in it
>
> "set routing-options forwarding-table export exp-to-fwd"
>
> show configuration policy-options policy-statement exp-to-fwd (no output)
>
>
> show configuration | display set | match exp-to-fwd (only
> Is the correct interface and unit number specified inside the logical-system
> on both sides?
Yes - the issue isn't basic connectivity. I can see the inbound tcp syn on LS1,
but it doesn't respond back. I have even deleted every lo0 filter on the router
because that's the most obvious
> Have you tried enabling BGP traceoptions to see if that logs more useful
> diagnostics?
Yes, per my first message:
>I also see absolutely nothing when I enable traceoptions on the
>peer in LS1 and with MX2 attempting to contact LS1
Nothing helpful in those, with all flags enabled, both sides
Hi all,
To Aaron - Yes, that map is correct.
> I have 40+ logical systems in a 4 chassis lab, all speaking
> BGP withloads of families negotiated.
I've never had this problem with logical systems before except with this one
router (MX1). It happened a couple years ago - the exact same thing -
Hi all,
Since I've now run into this issue a second time, I figured I'd reach out to
the community to see if anyone else has experienced this. I'm working on a pair
of MX960s, running 13.3R6.5.
I have a pair of logical systems (LS1, LS2) configured in each MX960 (MX1, MX2)
and both MXs are
> Is the J-NSP list broken? I haven't seen a post since Tuesday.
I think the entire network engineering community is on vacation, as even the
high-traffic cisco-nsp list has only had about a half dozen messages in the
past two weeks. :)
-evt
___
Hi all,
Can anyone verify whether RFC2544 reflect mode is supported on MX80 with a
20x1GE MIC installed, running 17.1? The documentation is ambiguous - some
references say MX80 and MX104, while others state just MX104. Maybe the MX80 is
implied when mentioning the MX104, I don't know.
As a
> 'no route to host' normally means 'did not get an
> arp reply, could not deliver packet'.
"no route to host" normally indicates that the route does not exist in the
routing table, not that an ARP response isn't coming back.
Are all your interfaces operationally up, including the IRB?
-evt
> Yeah YMMV indeed, as your approach works only in one of the three cases
> below:
> 1) Your network is not connected to the Internet.
> 1) Your network is connected to the Internet, but all traffic on your
> network is best effort.
> 3) Your network is connected to the Internet, but the sum of
> > I use ACX5048
> >
> Fantastic, and good to hear from you again Aaron! Currently we're used to
> that sort of behaviour as our PPPoE LNS dumps /32 routes for each
> subscriber. But thanks for the heads up and mention of your usage!
>
Will ACX5048 operating temperature limitation work in a
> Can't actually picture what you are really trying to achieve here with an
> irb and multiple vlan tags, but did you try configuring `vlan-id-list` under
> the logical unit? That or vlan-id-range might be useful.
>
> If what i just said was totally irrelevant to you, please elaborate the
>
> It would seem that vMX is still in the quite early stages. When I looked
> at it a few months ago, the documentation was lacking lots of details. In
> the end, I just didn't feel like it was ready for production in the role
> that I wanted to use it in. The lack of VMWare support at the time
> I don't. We have a bunch of LX-4032T-001 from 2012 running 5.3 and
> happily talking to EX4200 switches. I know we had to replace some
> older MRV that lacked the memory for the firmware upgrade. I no
> longer remember the model numbers.
>
> Rich
Thanks again. We found out from our MRV rep
> We have seen this several times. It is apparently a firmware issue
> on the MRV, and it affects EX4200 and EX4500 consoles, but not SRX
> or MX or anything else that we own. You need to be running firmware
> version 5.2 or higher on your MRV console server.
>
> Rich
Wow, thanks! Do you know
d plug it into anything else and it
works fine, so I’m stumped as to why any EX doesn’t work.
-evt
From: Will O'Brien - NOAA Affiliate [mailto:will.obr...@noaa.gov]
Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:04 PM
To: Eric Van Tol <e...@atlantech.net>
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject
> -Original Message-
> From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Jérôme Nicolle
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2015 12:20 PM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 console port woes
>
> The default console speed on the EX4200 is
Hi all,
I have been struggling for the past day to get my EX4200 console ports to work
on an MRV LX4000T console server and something is just not right. I'm hoping
someone else may have come across this or tell me where I'm being stupid.
I'm using a rolled cable that works fine with the SRX and
interfaces {
ae0 {
aggregated-ether-options {
lacp {
active;
}
vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 10 {
encapsulation vlan-ccc;
vlan-id 10;
}
unit 20 {
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Phil Bedard
Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2014 11:41 AM
To: jjs...@aol.com; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] experience with modeling tool
Junosphere doesn't do that type
Be aware that modifying the 'table-size' parameters will cause the tfeb to
reboot. You will want to do this during a maintenance period if this is a
production router.
-evt
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Scott Granados
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Tinka
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 1:06 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 anti-spoofing filter
That's what we do.
Mark.
+1. We have a 'bgp-customers'
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Tinka
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2014 7:48 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Move traffic to strict-priority-queue on MX
I'd suggest spending some time reading up on
-Original Message-
From: Phil Bedard [mailto:phil...@gmail.com]
Maybe vMX is the answer to a 1U MX at this point, depending on the
throughput you really need.
How do you stuff a minimum of 12x1G and 4x10G interfaces into a 1U server that
needs to have a maximum 26 depth and 100F+
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
If you're trying to make a router out of something that
looks like a switch, the Cisco ME3600X is hard to beat.
ME3600X is wonderful, but very expensive once you get the full feature
set. We are waiting (rather
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote:
On Monday, October 20, 2014 03:36:53 PM Jerry Jones wrote:
As long as DPC are the only line cards should work well.
I am reluctant to mix with MPC in a single chassis.
This should, apparently, be fixed in later code.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Scott Granados
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:13 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Question about inline flow sampling on MX 480 / Treo
based interfaces
What's the
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Gavin Henry
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 7:28 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Feature difference between latest Junos 12 and 13
Found it:
Hi all,
I'm trying to clear something up that's been bothering me for some time and
that is the MPC1/MPC2/MPC3E actual bandwidth specs. I know from various
sources that the MPC1 has a single Trio chipset, MPC2 has two Trio chipsets,
and the MPC3E has a single enhanced Trio chipset.
The
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Jerry Jones
Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 7:57 AM
To: Victor Sudakov
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Limitations of MPLS support on EX4200
My favorite place to go
Hi all,
We have a lot of J2300/J4300 routers in educational labs.
Suddenly (this weekend) on all of them all the interfaces (both embedded
and on line cards) disappeared.
This was just released:
http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=contentid=TSB16366
Junos License Certificate Expired
ast.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
it's a nice-to-have, maybe? but this sounds more like an opportunity for
you to sell some JNCIA courses. i mean, how long has junos been around
now?
Confusing comment, since this enhancement isn't about CLI inexperience. It
doesn't matter how long Junos has been around or how experienced
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
You should be just fine with 12.3. Can you share some of your config
related to the H-QoS?
I'm barely at the testing phase right now. The config I was using is below,
but using this config, I was unable to ping
-Original Message-
From: sth...@nethelp.no [mailto:sth...@nethelp.no]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 1:05 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] H-QoS support
H-QoS is supported on the MICs, because these connect to the Q side of
the switching ASIC. It is *not* supported
-Original Message-
From: Alex Arseniev [mailto:arsen...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 8:08 AM
To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] RSVP neighbor sequence changes
Duplicate IP on this shared segment?
Just my guess...
HTH
Thanks
Hi all,
Two sets of routers in my network keep logging the following message:
rpd[1559]: RPD_RSVP_NBRDOWN: RSVP neighbor x.x.x.x down on interface ae0.1
nbr-type Direct, neighbor seq number change
The interface is different on the two sets of routers, obviously. All other
RSVP sessions seem
The successor for the J series is the ACX series but you need to skip the
lower end models as for some weird reason they come with E1 interfaces
stuck on them.
Where did you hear this? The ACX is purpose-built for mobile backhaul and
lacks many features that both the J-Series and SRX have
One thing to keep in mind about these boxes is that, like the MX5/10/40/80, the
built-in 10G ports do not do hierarchical QoS (per-unit scheduling). I'm
confused as to why this is, considering they are Trio-based routers, but I
digress. I personally don't think that the astronomical cost to
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Will Orton
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 2:28 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] MPLS PEs out in the last-mile
Is there some way to have a PE hanging out in the breeze
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
Johan Borch
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:57 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Connecting two spanning-tree domains
Hi!
I need to connect two spanning-tree
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:04 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Saku Ytti
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Mixed Cisco/Juniper MPLS network
If Cisco had a command that
Hi all,
We've had MPLS running on our network for years using JUNOS and until only very
recently, we haven't had to deal with any of our Cisco equipment needing MPLS.
That changed when we started purchasing ME3600X switches so we could provide
VPN services in our metro fiber rings.
I'm trying
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Saku Ytti
Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 12:34 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Mixed Cisco/Juniper MPLS network
I'd only use separate blocks if I specifically
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Abdullah Al Faruque Mullick
Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 10:56 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Getting High Latency and Slow browsing Issue in
Juniper M7i with
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp [mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf
Of Andrew Gabriel
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 8:41 AM
To: juniper-nsp; Phil Mayers
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX Reliability
Hi Phil,
Thanks, we are mainly looking at basic FW, VPN, and
I have started collecting information regarding DOM support for 3rd party
optics.
I am primarily interested in support for MX and EX series.
Brief search of list did not reveal much information.
We've had good luck with SolidOptics in both MX and EX, both the Juniper-coded
and Cisco-coded 1G
Hi all,
Has anyone ever experienced this error message on MX960 with a single DPC-E and
a single MPC2-3D? The MPC has a single MIC in it, a MIC-3D-4XGE-XFP. The DPCE
is a DPCE-R-20GE-2XGE. JUNOS version 10.4R8.5. The configuration that causes
the issue appears to be a VLAN-bundled logical
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve Stevens
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 7:56 AM
To: Juniper NSP
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX80 port numbering
This is so funny... I am exactly the same... I'm
-Original Message-
From: Alex Arseniev [mailto:alex.arsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 11:05 AM
To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] VLAN bundles in CCC
2 things:
1/ add family ccc under ge-1/2/0.2
2/ add encapsulation ethernet under
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Menzies
Sent: Friday, March 08, 2013 1:03 PM
To: Andy Litzinger
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX upgrade procedure -ready for
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Shafer
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 2:40 PM
To: The Drifter
Cc: Juniper TAC
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] large subnet/no memory
The Drifter writes:
Sounds
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Menzies
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 7:04 AM
To: Eugeniu Patrascu
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Quick way to delete multiple
Your post almost gave me a heart attack, as we just purchased two of these
specifically for UAC. Our Juniper reps were about to get an earful from me.
:-)
-evt
From: Mark Menzies [mailto:m...@deimark.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 9:09 AM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: juniper-nsp
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 9:23 AM
To: 'Per Granath'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] EX Switch Question
Thanks but this is
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Riccardo S
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:04 AM
To: jackson@gmail.com
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Riccardo S
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2013 9:36 AM
To: je...@atlantech.net
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper equivalent to Cisco 3800X
Hi all,
I'm trying to get SNMPv3 configured with v2c (polling only, no traps) support
for a legacy NMS and I am obviously doing something wrong. I know it's
something stupid, but I'm not sure what. Could someone look at my config below
and slap me with a clue bat? Thanks in advance.
-evt
-Original Message-
From: Mikkel Mondrup Kristensen [mailto:m...@one.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2012 7:00 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX240H Cluster SNMP
Hi Eric,
I had the same issue on my srx240 cluster and a friendly soul
All,
Is there a version above 11.2 where SNMP works properly in a cluster? Seems
that when running various versions (11.2R7.4 and 11.4R4.4, so far) on a 240H
cluster, SNMP doesn't work properly and starts spitting out 'noSuchObject'
errors on perfectly valid queries like when querying the
, from what I can tell, as both the production cluster and
the lab cluster exhibit the same behavior.
-evt
:w
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Eric Van Tol e...@atlantech.net
wrote:
All,
Is there a version above 11.2 where SNMP works properly in a
cluster? Seems that when running
Hi all,
Does anyone know if port mirroring is supported on the SRX3600 and if so, what
are the caveats? Can I support two different analyzers? Finding information
on this is sparse, which leads me to believe that it's not supported.
-evt
___
Hi all,
Is anyone having issues with 10.4R8.9 reporting weird results for the 64-bit
interface traffic counters? We have some Gig subinterfaces that are shaped at
low rates like 10Mb/s or 3Mb/s and we're seeing spikes on our NMS graphs of
over 100Mb/s at various times. I know this version of
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Rodriguez [mailto:packetjoc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 4:37 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Logical tunnel encapsulation
If my memory is correct, 11.x supports IPv6 with lt.
Sent from my
Hi all,
Is frame-relay encapsulation not supported on the MX80 logical tunnel
interfaces? I'm on 10.4R8.5 and need to configure IPv6 on an lt- interface:
Interface on the default instance:
# show interfaces lt-0/0/10
unit 1 {
encapsulation frame-relay;
dlci 128;
peer-unit 1;
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:38 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Does a L3VPN RR require routing-instance for each
VRF?
As
Hi all,
With chassis clustering enabled on a pair of SRX240s, is MPLS packet-based
possible, using Selective Stateless Packet Based forwarding? I can't seem to
be able to find a full list of actual unsupported features once chassis
clustering is enabled.
TIA,
evt
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of vaibhava varma
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 7:30 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] Juniper-MX-960-Using the same Ge-Port as L2 and L3 !
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Clarke Morledge
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 11:07 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] snmp count for arp policer?
On an IP interface (on a
-Original Message-
From: Stacy W. Smith [mailto:st...@acm.org]
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 12:34 PM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: 'Juniper-Nsp'
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN Active Route Selection
Do you have anything configured under [edit protocols bgp path-
selection]? Specifically, do
Hi all,
I'm wondering what, if any, interaction the 'traceoptions' for ISIS has with
the running protocol on the router. I've troubleshot two odd problems in ISIS
in the past six months that were miraculously fixed simply by enabling
traceoptions. The first time, I thought that it was merely
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephane JAUNE
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:50 AM
To: 'Juniper-Nsp'
Subject: [j-nsp] EX2200 series and q-in-q (802.1ad)
Hi all,
Does
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of cjwstudios
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:50 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: [j-nsp] M7i
Hello Juniper folks :)
I'm setting up a remote metro
Hi all,
Probably a dumb question, but when configuring Ethernet Ring Protection, do all
nodes on the ring need to support ERP?
-evt
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Stephane JAUNE
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:50 AM
To: 'Juniper-Nsp'
Subject: [j-nsp] EX2200 series and q-in-q (802.1ad)
Hi all,
Does
Hi all,
Probably a stupid question, but if I have an Ethernet-to-Ethernet or
TDM-to-Ethernet P2P L2VPN, is there a way to classify the layer 3 traffic
contained within it and schedule/queue based upon that traffic? For instance,
customer is running some voice across their L2VPN and they want
to an Ethernet over Copper L2
CPE to the transport provider. Basically, all their traffic is sent to us over
a single tagged VLAN.
From: Herro91 [mailto:herr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Eric Van Tol
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN CoS
Hi,
If memory
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Giuliano Cardozo Medalha
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 8:41 PM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] router recommendation
MX80 - 40 Gbps (48
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with an L2VPN customer at the moment. They need to be able
to pass 1500-byte IP packets between two locations connected via an ethernet
encapsulated L2VPN. I am able to ping from PE to PE with 1500-byte sized
packets with the df-bit set without a problem. The L2VPN
-Original Message-
From: Diogo Montagner [mailto:diogo.montag...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 6:51 AM
To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN MTU Issue
Hi Eric,
Can you check the mtu negotiated by the l2vpn ? (Use traceoptions)
What kind
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 6:19 AM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: [j-nsp] L2VPN MTU Issue
Hi all,
I'm having an issue with an L2VPN customer
-Original Message-
From: Dermot Williams [mailto:dermot.willi...@imaginegroup.ie]
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 10:43 AM
To: Eric Van Tol; juniper-nsp
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] L2VPN MTU Issue
Hi Eric,
Unless it's sensitive, would you mind sharing how you arrived
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Eric Van Tol
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 2:57 PM
To: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN MTU Issue
Well, primary credit goes to JTAC, but doing some
-Original Message-
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mti...@globaltransit.net]
Sent: Sunday, September 05, 2010 12:54 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: Eric Van Tol
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Inter-Area MPLS TE
Are you trying to setup TE tunnels between different levels
across a link
Hi all,
Sorry if this info is readily available, but I couldn't find it in the Juniper
docs. Does JUNOS support inter-area MPLS traffic engineering for ISIS? I see
that setting the 'expand-loose-hop' works for OSPF, but is it the same for
ISIS, or does ISIS simply support this functionality
Hi all,
I noticed this morning that all my IPv6 BGP neighbors have what appear to be
thousands of messages in the 'OutQ'. It's only IPv6 neighbors. The numbers
continue to climb and I'm curious as to why. I'm not dropping sessions and I
can't imagine that the v6 route table fluctuates so
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of David DeSimone
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 11:09 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] bgp summary outq
I think this is just a
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp-
boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Keegan Holley
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2010 11:03 AM
To: Brendan Mannella
Cc: juniper-nsp
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Single Fiber SM SFP
Have you tried Juniper? I
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
