Re: [kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

On Monday 11 November 2013 10:10:56 Thomas Zander wrote: Could you please explain to those that don't immediately spot it how the before and after are functionally different? Of course. There's two halves to the access model: * All KDE contributor accounts must have direct write access.

Re: [kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

On Monday 11 November 2013 10:54:52 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: iow, it has solved nothing. No, I believe you're actually overlooking a broader point here. Codifying the access model is a lot less about actual ACL, and more about the implications it has for *people*, both existing contributors, but

Re: [kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

On Monday 11 November 2013 11:12:12 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: so if the ONLY clause was somehow intended to address the “second class citizen” issue, it should be evident how it can not do so in its current form and also remain consistent with KDE’s current, consensus culture. It's not evident to

Re: [kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

On Tuesday 12 November 2013 16:43:27 Cornelius Schumacher wrote: When I read the suggestion and this explanation I wonder why we don't just say what is meant: The canonical version of the project is hosted on KDE infrastructure? This doesn't cover the part that all KDE contributors have

Re: [kde-community] Proposal: KDE Manifesto wording revision

On Tuesday 12 November 2013 22:53:18 Thomas Zander wrote: All these may actually exclude the stuff that is used to create the deliverables. If you use gimp to draw, the gimp file is imporant, but the asset and deliverable is typically used for the png you export. So I'm assuming we want the

Re: [kde-community] KDE Manifesto Revision (round 2)

+1 from me, too, though iirc native speakers requested 'writable by' :) Cheers, Eike PS.: On vacation and off email until Tuesday. ___ kde-community mailing list kde-community@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community

Re: [kde-community] Translating the KDE manifesto

Translations are always a bit 'risky' of course but I think in the spirit of inclusiveness and internationality they're a great idea. I'd volunteer to work on a German translation over the holidays unless anyone else has a stronger urge. This kind of thing needs careful peer-review of course but

Re: [kde-community] Plasmoids and Apps - was - Re: Applications in KDE Generation 5

My 2 cents on this: I agree that Albert's original phrasing here wasn't great, and I wouldn't have ignored it myself. Assuming good intentions has to go both ways, and reacting to a *question* (like Should we do these as Plasmoids?) with You're going to kill my baby seals, I know it! is exactly

Re: [kde-community] QtCurve

On Monday 20 January 2014 17:13:47 Yichao Yu wrote: QtCurve (although being not very polished) is already stable and have made several releases that are packaged by a number of distributions. Is there anything I am missing here? I think Kevin just wanted to point out there's an additional wiki

Re: [kde-community] QtCurve

Hi, we get to welcome QtCurve to KDE today. \o/ The migration is done, the code now resides in kde:qtcurve and Bugzilla and ReviewBoard have been set up as well. The KDE i18n crew is currently working on integrating the existing translations into their infra and letting scripty loose on them.

Re: [kde-community] Closing the kde-core-devel mailing list

On 26.08.2014 22:05, Milian Wolff wrote: That would leave kde-devel for what it's been used for the past 15 years: discussing development of applications that are tightly integrated with KDE's desktop environment (i.e., Plasma desktop). I like that suggestion! My 2 cents: KDE is a the name

Re: [kde-community] Closing the kde-core-devel mailing list

On 27.08.2014 07:11, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: The way I've seen the goal for years is something like this: * applications should run great everywhere they can * applications deliver an even *better* experience when paired with Plasma You know, a little both/and :) +1, yeah :) Cheers, Eike

Re: [kde-community] Using software created by KDE and KDE-related communities/companies for KDE infrastructure

On 15.09.2014 14:58, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: Where we don't use many of our own products, though, is on the infrastructure side. That's not actually true, btw: - identity.kde.org is us - ballot (the e.v. voting software) is us - commits.kde.org is us - our commit hooks are us - ditto the

Re: [kde-community] FOSDEM Organisation

On 12/08/2014 11:33 PM, Laszlo Papp wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: As Valorie said, if you want more female talk submissions, I am afraid that I am personally not yet sure whether I wish that. I am not going to those places and events to see

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 08:58 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > Even using a review tool in the first place is something that the maintainer > asks people to do. No. We advertise ReviewBoard (and later Phab) as a general interface to throw code at our maintainers. "I don't look at ReviewBoard" is not a

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 08:43 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > Well, the github side review will make the job of the KDE contributor who > brings the patch into KDE a lot easier, because when they put the patch up > for > review as "their" contribution, most of the things that the contributor knew > about

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 09:55 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > Exactly. > So why would one continue to do the prelimiary review in addition to the > required one? > As soon as there is a stream of patches from a new contributor, that > contributor will be asked to get an account of their own. > Need for

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 09:13 PM, Jaroslaw Staniek wrote: > Could you mention at least one KDE git repo that belongs to multiple > projects? And thus maybe multiple even multiple groups of maintainers? I have previously in the thread: Different subfolders in plasma-desktop.git have different maintainers,

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 09:36 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > So, right now, a maintainer is expected to check reviewboard even if they are > content with all holders of commit accounts to push directly. > But that as soon as there is a second option, then not checking reviewboard > becomes acceptable?

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 08:13 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > I am afraid my understanding of the technical background of this is still too > hazy. > How would review "move" from KDE to github? > If review on reviewboard is required (per project's unwritten social > contract), it cannot not happen. > If it

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 08:25 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > Saying "I don't look at the KDE review tool" would be like saying "I am not > interested in your patch". Saying "My personal productivity and efficiency matters more to me in the long-run than your patch, so please use the tool I prefer to reach

Re: [kde-community] Renaming KScreenGenie

On 09/01/2015 10:08 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > Ladies and gentlemen, I'll take a decision on this in the next couple > of days. As it stands now, Pixie is a universal favourite but we can't > use it for copyright reasons. > > Kapture seems to have the most number of votes, so if nothing

Re: [kde-community] Renaming KScreenGenie

On 09/18/2015 08:47 PM, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > While it is a bit late now (the repository rename was done yesterday), > I'm still in love with the word Selfie (for the above reasons and > more). I'm heavily considering requesting another rename to Selfie. FWIW I feel bad about causing more

Re: [kde-community] Official KDE mirror on github

On 09/18/2015 09:12 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > Yes. I'm against. And I'm also against mirroring on github, but I didn't > voice my opinion by that because it was said that issues and pull > requests are not to be enabled. > > We should not proprietarize our development workflow. We should not

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/20/2015 01:31 PM, Anne Wilson wrote: > Hehe! Only on a KDE list could an exhortion to stop bikeshedding become > the latest bikeshed! The Debian community is currently having a bikeshed over whether to call a new community tool Bikeshed. We can't hope to compete. > Anne Cheers, Eike

Re: [kde-community] Write our own pull request bot?

On 09/20/2015 02:26 PM, Loïc Grobol wrote: > Let's try not to be extreme. If someone was able to post a pull > request, they should be able to switch to Phab if they want to > participate when notified. Let's not be naive, either. People are lazy. That's been one of the arguments for enabling

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 02:12 PM, Myriam Schweingruber wrote: > Some of you wanted the mirror on Github because apparently there are > developers out there who are too lazy (or too dumb) to learn to use > new tools. Are those developers we want? Developer recruitment should be our #1 problem for the next

Re: [kde-community] Official KDE mirror on github

On 09/19/2015 11:35 AM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > Then we will deal with them on a case-by-case basis. Lets not take > blanket bans on new ideas just because of their potential destructive > power. Each action of ours has positive and negative benefits. How > about we focus on the positive? You're

Re: [kde-community] Renaming KScreenGenie

On 09/19/2015 07:32 PM, techie.raj...@yahoo.in wrote: > I search apps on google all the time, some time in youtube to see a demo of > it.. Searching for selfie will result in all the smartphones, all the > different > selfie related stuff which is currently viral among the masses. Yeah. And

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 07:52 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > You mean that a KDE project would ignore your review request it it comes from > reviewboard/phabricator? I think that's a realistic, even likely concern. We already know that some devs don't like using multiple code review sites concurrently from

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 10:32 PM, Kevin Krammer wrote: > I don't see there this github review is coming from. Review is an interactive process where you ask for changes and iterate. Once you open the door to doing it on GitHub, you will: * Have a hard time making some contributors understand why they

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 06:22 PM, Martin Graesslin wrote: > And how do we do that? Can we enforce this technically or will that be > weakened over the time the same way as we just turned the mirror into "let's > accept pull requests"? This wishy-washy stuff is nonsense. The sole argument for enabling

Re: [kde-community] What is a GitHub pull request exactly?

On 09/19/2015 06:53 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Saturday, September 19, 2015 06:44:24 PM Martin Graesslin wrote: >> No reality would be that it slowly moves code review from KDE to github. And >> I think we have here quite some people in the discussion who would love to >> see that > >

Re: [kde-community] Official KDE mirror on github

On 09/19/2015 06:57 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: >> The topology of 'project' is not a match to our repository >> topology, which is incidental and an implementation detail. >> It's not possible to cleanly turn GitHub on or off along >> the - ever-shifting - social boundaries involved. >> >

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 05:54 PM, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > while rejecting them autmatically isjust a great way to drive potential > contributors away... Which is a good reason why the mirror shouldn't have happened - regret being on vacation during that time. Cheers, Eike

Re: [kde-community] Bikeshedding - our strength apparently *sigh*

On 09/19/2015 05:58 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote: > We already use some other forms of code review - > > * IRC > * Email > * IM > * Google+ Hangouts (Just discussed some things related to the Baloo > KCM a week ago) > * Knocking on David's door and screaming "I need you to look at some code" I

Re: [kde-community] A new home for Mozilla Thunderbird at KDE?

On 04/27/2016 01:58 AM, Teo Mrnjavac wrote: This, so much. I see no reason not to expand our presence in different segments of the e-mail clients market, if Thunderbird wishes to join us. The more, the merrier. I'm not sure they're a good fit for us, unless they bring significant

Re: [kde-community] [Kde-pim] A new home for Mozilla Thunderbird at KDE?

On 04/27/2016 06:36 PM, Daniel Vrátil wrote: I like the idea of having Thunderbird in KDE. It shows that we are an open community and welcoming towards "outside" projects and of course it would be also a good PR for both sides. No, it wouldn't. The message wouldn't be "KDE community is open

Re: [kde-community] [Kde-pim] A new home for Mozilla Thunderbird at KDE?

On 04/27/2016 10:13 PM, Jos van den Oever wrote: Looking at the commit logs of Thunderbird, the programs certainly does not seem dead at all. Last month there were on average two commits per day by 18 authors. Have a look at the actual commit logs. There's a gap between December '15 and

Re: [kde-community] A new home for Mozilla Thunderbird at KDE?

On 04/27/2016 04:02 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: I would even go further claiming that many (most?) KDE projects have never made it to that level, so for me, Thunderbird as a project is something to look upon even if it is currently having issues to be resolved. Yes yes, I get you're very eager to

Re: [kde-community] A new home for Mozilla Thunderbird at KDE?

On 04/27/2016 03:20 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote: Given how respected, appreciated and well-used Thunderbird has been in my experience, including industrial environments (only dream for certain KDE subprojects?), I would suggest having a bit more good faith at this point. Such early conclusions have

KDE's 20th Birthday in Seoul, Korea

Some badly sorted (it's too late and we're tired!) impromptu impressions from our birthday get-together at the Han river! Event prep: http://imgur.com/a/zB5Tu Main event: http://imgur.com/a/1w7sg Cheers, Eike

Re: Happy 20th Birthday, KDE!

I'm proud of: * Collectively making tons of software that has real users. I consider my profession as an engineer to be a tool-maker who enables others; our line of operation is to build civilization and facilitate culture. Making and shipping software that people use is the most concrete way we

Re: Changes to the bugzilla workflow: 2 proposals

On 12/12/2016 07:27 PM, Elvis Angelaccio wrote: > On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Luigi Toscano > wrote: >> I would introduce an ASSIGNED state so that developers that want to mark that >> they have acknowledged it and they are going to work on it can do it. > >

Re: Proposal: Have the Community Set Ambitious Goals for Itself

On 08/15/2017 07:47 AM, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Mirko Boehm - KDE wrote: >> I have seen only agreement and support for the porposal. What would be the >> required steps to make an official announcement, and encourage people to >> participate? >

Re: Collecting requirements for a KDE-wide instant messaging solution

On 08/09/2017 07:19 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Must-have: - dfaure is there so I can ask KIO questions (IRC fails that currently.) Cheers, Eike

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

I've given some more thought to Matrix as a contender and I'm increasingly liking this option among the available contenders. The available Matrix clients are currently not quite as polished as their competition (specifically Slack/Discord), but Matrix does have their features in its scope,

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

On August 11, 2017 4:22:04 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: >On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 20:38:11 CEST Christian Loosli wrote: >> Am Donnerstag, 10. August 2017, 20:31:22 CEST schrieb Thomas >Pfeiffer: >> > On Donnerstag, 10. August 2017 18:40:34 CEST Christian

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

On 08/12/2017 04:22 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > On Fri, 11 Aug 2017, Boudhayan Gupta wrote: > >> Here's a radical proposal: why don't we just work towards improving the IRC >> protocol, make the protocol available over WebSockets, and try to push the >> whole thing as a W3C informational RFC?

Re: Telemetry Policy

On 08/14/2017 05:30 PM, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > While I do see the point behind 'off-by-default', I think it will ruin > the purpose since nobody will turn it on. > > I'd propose having it on by default (at least) for pre-releases. I'm not convinced. KDE publically runs on a platform

Re: Conservative proposal: let's work with Kiwi IRC

On August 16, 2017 6:58:35 PM GMT+09:00, Ilmari Lauhakangas wrote: >I want to note that I was intrigued by Eike's mail about a possible Qt >Quick -based Konversation reboot. I suggested I could try and gather >funding to get it to a releasable state, but he

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

I guess as KDE's "IRC guy" (I maintain Konversation) I should chime in here. I like IRC. I regard IRC as important. I think without IRC none of the past 20 years of KDE would have happened, and the reasons for IRC being a successful technology for us and many others start with "chatting is nice"

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

FWIW, I didn't keep up with Matrix to well in recent times, but I remember having a look at it back when it made its first splash (the LWN article at all) and at the time I considered it the most promising-looking IRC replacement attempt yet. It had some of the traits of other attempts that

Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat

On 08/09/2017 01:16 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote:> We have an alternative already working, which bridges IRC (freenode.net and > OFTC): matrix.org. > I don't know how many times I should repeat this, but many people are already > using successfully (I monitor few channels, for example). > > So -1

Re: Collecting requirements for a KDE-wide instant messaging solution (was: Re: radical proposal: move IRC to Rocket.Chat)

FWIW, I moderate a ~300k subscriber subreddit on the side, and that community substantially migrated away from Snoonet to Discord. I see that a lot on reddit now. Cheers, Eike -- Plasma, apps developer KDE e.V. vice president, treasurer Seoul, South Korea

Re: github, phabricator: a new threadZ

On August 9, 2017 9:10:15 PM GMT+09:00, Jos van den Oever wrote: >Op woensdag 9 augustus 2017 13:50:46 CEST schreef Harald Sitter: >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Boudewijn Rempt >wrote: >> > On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: >> >> This is

KDE at Qt World Summit (QtWS) 2017 final update: Info pad

etc.) Team Kit * Crew shirt - please wear whenever doing KDE duties (booth, room) * Name tag - affix to shirt Team Communication Telegram group: https://telegram.me/joinchat/Azsz2AFTa7HE0h8CLPzFpQ Team Coordinator Eike Hein <h...@kde.org> IRC: Sho_ Telegram: @eikehein Phone: +821028995948 B

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

On September 5, 2017 8:15:47 AM GMT+09:00, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: >Here are the results of the survey: >https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ >Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the

Re: KDE at Qt World Summit 2017 - let's make it the best yet!

Heya, Paul opened a Phab task on the KDE Promo workboard which I think we can use to coordinate content: https://phabricator.kde.org/T6840 I've added a few people there and seeded the ticket with a recap of what I think we need to communicate to the audience at QtWS. If you're interested in

Re: QtWS 2017 update: team rally call; asset prep; Telegram group

On 08/21/2017 06:13 PM, Paul Brown wrote: > We'll co-ordinate with Jens so that the content matches the format of the > flyer. Here's the Phab task used for coordination: https://phabricator.kde.org/T6840 Everyone interested in working on flyer/demo content or expecting to do booth duty and

Practical Goal: Modern and Global Text Input For Every User (Input Methods, Emoji, Touch)

Hi everyone! Text input is the foundational means of human-computer interaction: We configure or systems, program them, and express ourselves through them by writing text. It's how our software is made, and it's how it's consumed. It's how users and developers connect with each other. Yet text

QtWS 2017 update: team rally call; asset prep; Telegram group

Hi! I decided to start a new thread because no one reads monster threads :) Things to talk about: (1) QtWS KDE team Currently I have gotten responses from: * Eike (yes I talk to myself) * Helio * Rohan * Adriaan * Aleix * Sune * Mirko * Leinir * Boud * Bhushan * Scarlett That's 11 people,

Re: QtWS 2017 update: team rally call; asset prep; Telegram group

On 08/25/2017 05:05 PM, Clemens Toennies wrote: > Hi, > > I know I'm late, but if it's of interest I could bring an Odroid C1+ ARM > board and ARM64 Pinebook with latest Plasma for demonstration purposes > at the booth. Not late at all! We still have several slots for people we can bring. If

Re: Survey for prioritization of requirements for an IM/chat solution for KDE

On 09/05/2017 08:15 AM, Thomas Pfeiffer wrote: > Here are the results of the survey: > https://sessellift.wordpress.com/2017/09/05/results-of-the-requirements-survey-for-a-kde-wide-chat-solution/ > Now it's time for us to find a solution that fits the profile! Here's some thoughts from the

Re: Input on privacy goal

I'm planning to continue my work to modernize the user interface of Konversation and adding Matrix support. Based on the IM Survey we did recently spearheaded by Thomas Pfeiffer, we know the community has a problem with the increasing fragmentation and migration of KDE's comm channels to

Plasma sprint in Berlin, Germany: April 21st-27th 2018

Hi, I'm happy to announce we're going to have another Plasma sprint in a few months, from April 21st to April 27th in Berlin, Germany. Join the sprint to make all things Plasma even better in an intense-but-fun week of planning, designing and hacking! The sprint will be held at the offices of

Re: Twitter access

On 07/19/2018 09:25 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > As I say I am aware of the process and the need for restrictions. But > I have access to KDE social media and have done since we started > having any. But for some reason I am being blocked from this one > account. Nobody has yet said who by

Re: Twitter access

Hi, I agree the "unnamed" and not having good docs (hello again, topic) on this is bad. There's a long history of the web presence being treated in a special way, though. Even in the good old CVS/SVN days, you needed a special permission bit to be able to commit to www/ doled out by sysadmin

Re: What could be helpful to get contributor training on?

Hi Boud, I think the main missing context here is that this email doesn't mean this is the only thing we are considering spending resources on, nor does it indicate priority. We've collected a lot of ideas from all over the community and are analyzing them and investigating them. In the case

Re: Discourse

On 10/29/18 1:31 PM, Jonathan Riddell wrote: > More coverage on last week's LWN > https://lwn.net/Articles/768483/ > > Discussing it in person it was pointed out that we do already use > Phabricator Workboards for much discussion and it might well overlap > there, although I don't think that

Qt World Summit 2018

Hi, Qt World Summit 2018 is coming soon - this year it'll be a smaller-scale, single-day event. Again in the bcc in Berlin, on December 6th. Last year we managed to significantly raise the bar of KDE's presence at the event, with a coordinated visual theme backed by assets such as crew shirts,

Re: KDE now has its own Matrix infrastructure

Hi, of course "being insulted" is very much in the eye of the beholder. I'm very tired of this accusation being thrown around, so let's do real talk and summarize the situation according to my best knowledge of events: Jonathan Riddell sold KDE mechandising (t-shirts) at FOSDEM to attendees.

Re: kde.modular.im: "I am at least 16 years old. "

Hi, the e.V. board will definitely discuss this issue as well in this week's call, to put some thought into the legal side vis-a-vis GDPR compliance. I think the community will here is clear and non-controversial, we collectively just need to think about how to do it properly. We'll report

Re: kde.modular.im: "I am at least 16 years old. "

On 2/21/19 6:56 AM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: * Matrix now logs #krita on freenode (well, it has been doing so for quite some time, since the first bridge user appeared) * We have always tried to make sure #krita has no permanent logs; we don't want that. It's possible in the channel

Re: KDE now has its own Matrix infrastructure

On 2/21/19 8:46 PM, Filipe Saraiva wrote: 2. What are the reasons to use a server owned by a company, not by us? I don't want to start a flamewar, just know the reasons and motivations. Hosting a Matrix server currently requires a quite beefy box, and is also somewhat

Re: kde.modular.im: "I am at least 16 years old. "

On 2/21/19 6:59 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Do you know how I can do that? I have no idea myself... 1. Log into Matrix, join #krita:kde.org 2. Log into your freenode nickserv account from Matrix - upon doing #1 you'll have gotten an automatic private chat called "Freenode Bridge Status"

Re: KDE now has its own Matrix infrastructure

On 3/18/19 6:38 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: I'm sure people are working hard on fixing things up, but right now webchat.kde.org just does not work. If I look in at the Krita channel on webchat.kde.org, the last message is from 23:01 yesterday. The Matrix folks told us they're working with

Re: kde.modular.im: "I am at least 16 years old. "

On 2/20/19 7:04 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: There's the https://kde.modular.im/_matrix/consent?h=6fc7fefb99181b28ffdf2be32225ead05a8cd6c148da23482edbcc4b08ce7ddd=boud page you need to agree to before one can join. And it asks people to confirm that they're older than 16. Why do we have

Re: kde.modular.im: "I am at least 16 years old. "

On 2/20/19 7:14 PM, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: Maybe the text could be changed to "You're over 16 or have parental permission" ? Matthew @ Matrix says since it's our own server the legal responsibility can pass on to us, and it's possible to set any age threshold we want. So we can do it;

Re: Shutdown of paste.kde.org

Maybe we could do a static mirror and keep it up read-only? Cheers, Eike On February 3, 2019 6:29:49 PM GMT+09:00, Kenny Duffus wrote: >On Sunday, 3 February 2019 09:25:32 GMT Kenny Duffus wrote: >> On Saturday, 2 February 2019 19:45:40 GMT Ben Cooksley wrote: >> > We'll be shutting this

Re: Anonymous contributions

I'm a bit conflicted about this. Random drive-by patches are one thing, but when I engage with new contributors, my hope is they'll be coming back and walk a path to a dev account and a long-term commitment to the KDE developer community. To me, the KDE developer community is one built on

Re: Invent/gitlab, issues and bugzilla

I think this discussion has sort of strayed, if understandably so. Maybe this helps: - A lot of projects currently use Phabricator tasks and rely on them heavily. - The GitLab equivalent are Issues. - We're trying to replace Phabricator with GitLab. - If Issues are disabled, we can't import the

Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed

ate a category for it and allow to filter, as we >already >allow to filter by language. > >Kind regards, > >Christian > >Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2019, 13:36:36 CET schrieb Eike Hein: >> If and when the Planet becomes majority political content, that's a >prob

Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed

against reading a cycling trip in Europe (just an >example >from the past) which is not so divisive as politics and Brexit in >particular. > >On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 12:36 PM Eike Hein wrote: > >> If and when the Planet becomes majority political content, that's a >> probl

Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed

Hi, Let's remember we had this debate before and it lead to the rules in the "Add Your Blog" popup, under which this blog post is currently fine. If you want the rules changed you need to make a good case for why the situation is different and warrants reevaluation, otherwise you're tilting at

Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed

But they don't, so your calculation is about solving a problem that doesn't currently exist. Cheers, Eike On December 5, 2019 1:21:08 PM GMT+01:00, Christian Loosli wrote: >For me it's a rather simple calculation: if every contributor on planet >would >post as many articles on politics as

Re: Please don't make planet.kde.org into a politics feed

with something. Cheers, Eike On December 5, 2019 1:26:58 PM GMT+01:00, Christian Loosli wrote: >Am Donnerstag, 5. Dezember 2019, 13:24:30 CET schrieb Eike Hein: >> But they don't, so your calculation is about solving a problem that >doesn't >> currently exist. > >I conside

Re: Issues with the issue tracking system

feigning concern. This strikes me as agitated and emotional at best, and destructive and immature behavior at worst. This is not the venue for mudslinging of this kind, and if you want to have a productive discussion of your topic you should own up and apologize for it before engaging further.

List of available sprint venues for 2020 and beyond

Dear community, Happy new year! Recently, we've gotten approached a few times with offers of venues for KDE events/sprints. One such case was the MBition office, which resulted in the recent Frameworks 6 sprint held there. Another is the foss-north 2020 Community Day, which Adriaan sent an

Re: List of available sprint venues for 2020 and beyond

4, 2020 6:06:50 PM GMT+01:00, Nate Graham wrote: >Could this large venue suffice for Akademy? > >Nate > > >On 1/4/20 7:01 AM, Eike Hein wrote: >> Dear community, >> >> Happy new year! >> >> Recently, we've gotten approached a few times with o

Re: Qt, Open Source and corona

to navigate this complex situation together. We've had opportunities to be invited to some of the KFQF meetings and participate directly, which we would like to thank the entire KFQF for. The update reflects our shared view on the subject. Best regards, Eike Hein - KDE e.V. Vice President

Re: Qt, Open Source and corona

since I wouldn’t be pulling the load this should be treated as “random > dude talking”. > > Sent from Phone, hence short mail > >> On 9 Apr 2020, at 16:27, Eike Hein wrote: >> >>> Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. >> >> This

Re: Qt, Open Source and corona

Even in the best of times, it's always a good idea for stakeholders in the open Qt ecosystem to maintain open lines of communication. The KDE e.V. board can be reached at kde-ev-bo...@kde.org and is happy to receive meeting inquiries. Best regards, Eike Hein - KDE e.V. Vice President

Re: Qt, Open Source and corona

will continue to do what we do best - work closely together in the open for the benefit of Qt and its users. That is to say to others -- Qt Open Governance has been a collaborative and coordinated effort with close communication and will continue to be. Best regards, Eike Hein - KDE e.V. Vice President

Re: Qt, Open Source and corona

> Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater. This is very true. The KFQF with all representatives remains actively working on the issues with the same mission state- ment, too. Cheers, Eike - KDE e.V. Vice President

Open Source Firmware Conference 2020

Hi everyone, As announced during the board report at Akademy, one of the board's goals for 2020 is to support an open source-friendly hardware ecosystem, spurned by the KDE community's successful foray into more hardware partnerships over recent years. In this context, we'd like to point out

Re: Fundraising in KDE

reports[0] or to reach out to me directly. 0 = https://ev.kde.org/reports/ev-2019/ Cheers, Eike Hein - KDE e.V. Vice President, Treasurer

Announcing KDE e.V.'s two new contractors to work on KDE's technical documentation

Hi everyone, Some time ago, KDE e.V. decided to contract work to help the KDE community with its efforts to maintain and improve KDE's technical documentation, broadly similar to how KDE e.V. also contracts work within the KDE Promo community already. Juan Carlos Torres was hired to set the

Re: All About the Apps Goal

for the discussion and (b) doesn't welcome it when it comes. Best regards, Eike Hein - KDE e.V. vice president, treasurer

MBition is hiring Linux desktop/Wayland expertize

on our website: https://mbition.io/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=full_job_ad_page=9575277 If you have any questions about the position or the company, please feel free to get in touch. Cheers, Eike Hein - Principal System Architect, MBition GmbH PS.: I'm also very happy to be able to announce

  1   2   >