- Original Message -
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.38 - New General Release Build - 25 April 2010
Anyone who conects to any Royals, has at least 15000 documented
I've started directing my backup files to my Dropbox folder. I don't
normally back up the multimedia files when I backup my Legacy file, but
did so when I started this habit just so there was a copy there for
safekeeping (as well as other backups elsewhere). Having the files in
Dropbox means
Rich,
I don't think that they are any different from any other family, except that
their trees are more readily available. The number of descendants which one
has available depends on how many generations one goes back and which
non-direct line ancestors one wishes to include.
Status is not
Hello Graham, It is very easy to exceed 20,000 if you do an extended family
lines tree instead of a pure bloodline. Reg oh isn't genealogy fun.
From: Graham
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:13 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.38 - New General Release
I agree completely. I have in the past been put down by someone who implied
that I had too many people, I MUST have cheated somehow. (Their words)
Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 4/27/10, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
From: Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: Re:
Yes
On 28 April 2010 16:34, Belinda Cohen belindaco...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I am new to Legacy, and this might seem like a silly question, but is this
release build like an upgrade which should be downloaded?
Belinda Cohen
From: Ken McGinnis
This is corrections and additions to the program. It is never required to do
the download each time. Some people wait a few days to see if it had new
problems ( not as often as in the past), or wait until the list of changes
gets too long, or affects what you use most. Each update includes ALL
Same thing could be said for many Irish Catholic families also, and
I'm not just talking about 100 yearrs ago. 2 people I was in school
with in the 1970s/1980s came from large families, one of 16 siblings,
the other of 14 siblings. In fact, the guy from the larger family was
an uncle of the guy
As Stan Megraw has stated, the colour of the font for husband and
wife is a pale blue
Attempts to change this either do nothing or change more than just
husband and wife.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:18 AM, stan megraw smeg...@hotmail.com wrote:
The latest fix corrected a problem where the font of
- Original Message -
From: Reg SHERLOCK
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.38 - New General Release Build - 25
April 2010
Hello Graham, It is very easy to exceed 20,000 if you do an extended
family lines tree
Thank you - I wondered because some people seemed to be having problems with it.
Belinda
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES fourpa...@verizon.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, 28 April, 2010 5:07:58 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7.4.0.38 - New General
All of you are in another league from me. I have 1000 names, and was
surprised to have so many. My ancestors all flew below the radar. Very
few owned property, none left wills, and most moved all over the place.
I have 15 Philadelphia addresses for one grandfather, plus 2 Trenton
ones, and he
You can think of it that way if you want. The developers are always
striving to correct anything users report wrong plus they will make
some improvements along the way.
You don't have to download them, but it is often best if you do.
Legacy is a real stable problem, but if you are worried about a
I have direct ancestors, Zacharia Rice (1731-1811) and Abigail Hartman
(1742-1789), who had 21 children, all well documented. Guestimating at only
two children each, every twenty years would produce 21,504 people today.
That's all from only ONE family. It's very easy to have a huge database.
I assume that was a freudian slip, Robert, and you meant to say that
Legacy is a real stable program and not Legacy is a real stable
problem ;-)
Regards,
Dermot.
--
Try out Legacy Family Tree Software today! It's FREE!!
http://www.legacyfamilytreestore.com/?Click=1440
On 28 April 2010
Brian:
I sent you the following, with screenshots, to your e-mail:
The easiest way to see this is via screen shot. Please see attached.
For the person attached I entered the birth information, hit ALT+2 to
record the Master Source. Prompt for Detail is enabled, so the
Source Clipboard
OUCH!!! I did mean to say Legacy is a real stable
program. Apologies to the Millennia group on my slip-up; it was
not intentional. And apologies to the group for the confusion.
Thanks for catching that, Dermot.
Robert
At 2010-04-28 08:52 AM, you wrote:
I assume that was a freudian slip,
We have a new build. Here is a list of changes:
http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/RevisionHistory7.asp
Thanks
Ken McGinnis
Millennia Corporation
kenmcgin...@legacyfamilytree.com
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Interesting how we humans do that:
My baby walked at nine months - MY baby walked at eight months!
My child read before kindergarten - MY child was reading at birth!
My genealogy has 10 million people - I may have only 1 million, but they all
are documented by original sources (the actual
Thanks Ken,
I have installed the newest update, I ran the set Relationships function, it is
now working properly.
My thanks to the Millennia staff for their quick response to correct the
problem.
Leo
From: kenmcgin...@legacyusers.com
To:
Ken,
Thanks. Now I can run Set relationships but I still get one duplicate in
Relationship Calculator every time, 2nd and 3rd are always the same path.
--
Richard Van Wasshnova
http://www.gencircles.com/users/vanwasshnova
http://gw.geneanet.org/vanwasshnova
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Ken
I see a message from you was received on 26 Apr and is in the queue to be
handled by one of our support techs.
You should hear back from someone fairly quickly. During the first part of the
week it takes a little longer since we need to go through the weekend emails
before we get to the
OK, Elizabeth Shown Mills fans ... while I like Mills' book a lot, it
still seems a little light on information found online.
I can find no information on how to properly cite family trees and
GEDCOMs files published to the web. ProGenealogists provides
guidance, but beause Legacy Source
Evidence Explained should not be viewed as a cook book where one can find an
example of each and every type of citation one would ever encounter. It should
be used to learn the principles of citation. Very rarely do I find I can just
copy an example (or use a Legacy template) exactly. On p.
Hi Scott,
Doing a search in the SourceWriter templates for gedcom there is a gedcom
template that even references Mill's _EE_. However, this template does not
address online family trees, but rather addresses actual gedcom files
obtained from another researcher.
I believe that for the online
Does the Mary Hill color theme mean anything in Descendency charts?
Or is that only applicable to Pedigree charts?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Dave,
You can use the Mary Hill color scheme in descendant charts. The only
people who will appear in color, however are those who are ancestors of
the starting person for the Mary Hill scheme. you cannot apply the Mary
Hill color scheme to descendants of a person.
Brian
Customer Support
Is it just me or has the search string changed again?
I am now getting an error message that says:
Too many results were returned from the search to be displayed
Donald E. Paden
don...@padenfamily.org
www.padenfamily.org
Legacy User Group guidelines:
28 matches
Mail list logo
