Dave,
One of the reasons I suggested that you test is because there are two programs
involved, Legacy and TNG. Whilst my main method of publishing my data is on
websites I do not like TNG, much preferring the Legacy Pedigree pages. What one
needs to consider is not only whether Legacy is
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Allen Prunty
Allen Prunty
Security Supervisor at Frazier International History Museum
Louisville, Kentucky Area
Confirm that you know Allen Prunty
https://www.linkedin.com/e/isd/1341809898/6csTUSNE/
--
Testing
Arlene
DT Team Member http://www.paperimagerydesigns.com
My Blog http://alteredbyme.blogspot.com
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
Ron,
For both problems (source details missing, and source fields scrambled), the
test need go no further than the GEDCOM file produced by Legacy. The first
problem is entirely a Legacy bug. The root cause of the second problem is the
GEDCOM standard, although Legacy might be able to mitigate
Anyone know if this is possible?
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Scott Hall seh0...@gmail.com wrote:
Following up to an earlier thread I started, I use one Source Writer
template for my master source and created a number of detail citations
attached to it throughout my file. After more
Update:
I just updated my (Deluxe) build from 7.4.0.30 to 7.4.0.39 and got a different
result. (Somehow I missed or overlooked the notice of a newer build.) The
detail information is once again present in the GEDCOM file and likewise in the
Source Detail fields in the re-imported family file.
Scott,
On the list if someone doesn't answer then usually it is because nobody
knows, or at least nobody knows how to do it. I don't think it can be done,
but didn't answer just in case somebody did.
However, since you are posting in HTML instead of the specified Plain Text
Only for this list, I
On 2010/05/28 18:51, Ward Walker wrote:
I just updated my (Deluxe) build from 7.4.0.30 to 7.4.0.39 and got a
different result. (Somehow I missed or overlooked the notice of a newer
build.) The detail information is once again present in the GEDCOM file
and likewise in the Source Detail fields
Ward,
As I said, one should always test, and I should have added and make sure one
is using the cirrent version. I was and my source details were exported, but
My Heritage didn't put them in the correct place. No surprise there then!
Ron Ferguson
PS. Please post in Plain Text, as per the list
Scott,
I didn't reply yesterday because I was hoping someone who knew for sure or
could explain it better would answer.
As far as I know, no, you can't do this within Legacy (unless you're replacing
a citation made with the same template). I don't know if Dennis Kowallek's
LTools would help
Connie,
The reason is now clear, he had not updated Legacy!
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
And the Fergusons of N.W. England
One of the reasons I had to reboot was because there was an odd window with the
message Message File record #13296 not found along the top. Each time I
clicked on it the number would change. You could click inside of it and
actually type a message, but you couldn't get the window to go away;
Ward,
You are quite right, my reply to Dave was in html, like you say, I also
occasionally miss converting html to plain - apologies to all! Ind you I do
find that constantly having to manually convert a post from html to plain
text something of a pain.
I haven't looked into where my Source
I am sorry for the linked in e-vite that was sent to the list.
I am BetaTesting Outlook 2010 and it was something that was automated and
accidental. I did not mean to cause any problems and for the few people who
have sent me such warm and nasty wishes I especially apologize. And for
those
Thanks Ron. I understand everything you say. It has to be exported by the
source and imported by the destination ... and each have to recognize the
tags and then know what to do with them (or at least do something with
them).
I've viewed in detail the gedcom being exported by Legacy - SW and
Sorry if I was overly confusing. The issue I was talking about was Problem 1
below. If that's a Legacy Bug (I sure thought it was/is) has it been noted
by Legacy? In the past I've submitted bugs and they've been noted but I
never know if or when they'll be addressed.
That's the only thing I was
[converted to Plain Text format]
Dave,
Sorry my first test was on the next-to-latest build. I hope you saw my
'Update' e-mail, which explains that the latest build does export the
detail. The target system might 'hide' such detail, as Legacy does by not
automatically turning on the appropriate
Dave,
As I have said previously, I do not know whether all Source Writer sources
behave in the same way, and I also keep the details to a minimum, especially
for censuses, so I cannot really comment on these. In any event we have
specific English Sources for censuses so they may not behave in
As I may have noted recently, I am finally going through my sources and
putting the citation information down as needed.
Obviously, if I have the information on the birth of an individual, I
would click on birth and then click on the Add or Edit Source Citations
logo to fill in the
Howland,
How about under Emails?
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
And the Fergusons of N.W. England
On 2010/05/28 21:39, Ward Walker wrote:
I see your point. Although, I'll have to take your word for it that the
standardization process is truly dead for this standard. I seem to recall
someone questioning that when we last discussed this problem.
It's my understanding that the GEDCOM
wrote
My question is when the source has nothing to do with specific
information, to what do I attach the citation? In this case, way back
in August 2002, I got a trial membership with Ancestry.com and got some
information from an individual's database. I wrote him asking what his
When creating an Ancestor Book Report (with Insert Underlines for Missing
Given and Surnames checked), how can the wording be changed from Mary Smith
married someone to Mary Smith married __
I searched the archives but no luck.
Thank you for any help.
Lincoln Mulkey
Lincoln Mulkey wrote:
When creating an Ancestor Book Report (with Insert Underlines for
Missing Given and Surnames checked), how can the wording be changed
from Mary Smith married someone to Mary Smith married __
I searched the archives but no luck.
Thank you for any
I can eliminate the wording somone but I cannot get the desired blank
lines when there is no spouse and Insert Underlines for Missing Given and
Surnames is checked under options for the Ancestor Book. I'm using build
7.4.0.39
- Original Message -
From: Ron Ferguson
Have you tried adding an [:IF [Address] structure much like you use for
the Notes to add Other residents were when notes exist?
On 25/05/2010 10:38 PM, David wrote:
Has anyone used the Legacy sentence variable [Address]?
I wanted to use something like [Name] resided [fromDate] at [Address]
26 matches
Mail list logo
