Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r10605 - branches/systemd/BOOK/chapter01

On June 29, 2014 7:35:09 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Armin K. wrote: On 29.6.2014 22:48, DJ Lucas wrote: On 06/29/2014 11:30 AM, kre...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: krejzi Date: Sun Jun 29 09:30:00 2014 New Revision: 10605 itemizedlist

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS-systemd - creating static /etc/resolv.conf

On 02/26/2015 08:01 PM, Armin K. wrote: On 27.2.2015 2:44, DJ Lucas wrote: Armin, when creating /etc/resolv.conf, need to remove the existing symlink first. -- DJ It's rather one or other. If you want the static one, don't create the symlink. Shoot, sorry, it was a jhalfs run and I

[lfs-dev] Creative Commons License Update

Should the book be updated with latest version of CC license? It's currently at: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.txt I realize that this is probably near the very bottom of the todo list, if

[lfs-dev] FHS note in both books and systemd /usr merge

In section 6.5.1, ran across these while digging intothe merged /usr for systemd. > The FHS also stipulates the existence of|/usr/local/games|and|/usr/share/games|. This is not entirely true. /usr/share/games is listed as optional now (though it might be required for games in BLFS).

[lfs-dev] Autoconf test suite failures

Currently, I am getting the expected 501 failure for the newer version of libtool, along with 503 which is due to new perl syntax. Because I'm just being really, really picky, there is a patch for this in the repo. Not sure what current status is WRT patching test suites for the book, but the

Re: [lfs-dev] Why chapter06 made some order changes

On 1/1/2016 9:25 AM, xinglp wrote: What did I missed? And the systemd even installed before kmod, that made initramfs unable to load any kernel modules. Shoot! I missed that one when I backed out the deps changes locally. By chance missing /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/80-modules.rules? Index:

Re: [lfs-dev] Why chapter06 made some order changes

On 1/1/2016 2:51 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 1/1/2016 9:25 AM, xinglp wrote: What did I missed? And the systemd even installed before kmod, that made initramfs unable to load any kernel modules. Shoot! I missed that one when I backed out the deps changes locally. Sorry. I had thought I had

Re: [lfs-dev] unable to build gettext-0.19.7

On 1/1/2016 5:36 AM, xinglp wrote: 2016-01-01 19:21 GMT+08:00 Pierre Labastie : On 01/01/2016 11:50, xinglp wrote: Log is below: Looks like "-lm" is missing in the command above (all missing refs are from the libm library). Don't know whether it commes from

Re: [lfs-dev] unable to build gettext-0.19.7

On 1/1/2016 2:53 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 1/1/2016 5:36 AM, xinglp wrote: 2016-01-01 19:21 GMT+08:00 Pierre Labastie <pierre.labas...@neuf.fr>: On 01/01/2016 11:50, xinglp wrote: Log is below: Looks like "-lm" is missing in the command above (all missing refs are from

Re: [lfs-dev] FHS note in both books and systemd /usr merge

On December 22, 2015 11:37:12 PM CST, DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > > > Looks like at least Arch > >and Fedora, are including graphite (ISL has replaced CLooG and PPL, and > >it builds in-tree), dropping SSP That should read libssp. -- DJ --

Re: [lfs-dev] FHS note in both books and systemd /usr merge

On 12/14/2015 12:14 PM, Douglas R. Reno wrote: That said, I will experiment with it, but I have no guarantee of when I can say anything about it. I will be more than happy to hear your results as well. I wish I had more man-hours to dedicate to LFS, but I am so busy right now that it is hard.

Re: [lfs-dev] Optional additions to our tool chain

On 1/10/2016 1:57 AM, John Frankish wrote: Isn't this the same as compiling with CC="gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin.."? If so, maybe just this could be mentioned. Nope, two completely different animals. gold is a new linker that was introduced to binutils in 2008. LTO (Link-time

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.48. Systemd-230 typo

On 06/10/2016 09:12 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Hi, In the second sed command, there is a typo. It has SUBSYTEM rather than SUBSYSTEM. Regards, Wayne. Thanks brother. Will be fixed later this evening. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ:

Re: [lfs-dev] Merged trunk and systemd sources

On 05/24/2016 05:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Excellent work! Thanks for getting the ball rolling here! What I need right now is to get some other eyes on the output. If someone could carefully compare the following and see if there are issues I've missed, it would help a lot. Working

Re: [lfs-dev] E2fsprogs-1.43 Tests

On 05/28/2016 06:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: Can one of you guys look at one of your test logs for e2fsprogs-1.43 please? I am getting a ton of failures here, and no idea whats causing them yet. I would have to have a browser/mail

Re: [lfs-dev] merge is the new trunk

On 05/29/2016 05:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: On 05/29/2016 03:43 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have moved the merge LFS branch to be the new LFS/trunk/BOOK in svn. For most users it will make no difference. For editors, the work should be a lot easier as only a few pages

[lfs-dev] Coreutils intermittent test suite failure

Just a note that there is a race with inotify in tail (coreutils-8.24) that sometimes causes tests/tail-2/assert.sh to fail. New patch in repo coreutils-8.24-ulink_notification_race-1.patch that fixes tail. Patch allows the test to pass as well. IIUC, it is hardly a serious problem, but

Re: [lfs-dev] Coreutils 8.25 i18n patch breaks cut

On 2/7/2016 10:27 PM, Chris Staub wrote: I just tried using jhalfs with a current CLFS system (using a few things from LFS) as a host, and it failed attempting to download packages. Specifically, basename complained about an extra parameter, which happened to be the package's md5sum. After a

Re: [lfs-dev] Coreutils 8.25 i18n patch breaks cut

On 2/7/2016 10:27 PM, Chris Staub wrote: The problem is that the "cut" program isn't giving the expected output. After some further experimentation, and checking with William Harrington in IRC who got the same results, this problem only occurs when using Coreutils 8.25 with the i18n patch

Re: [lfs-dev] Coreutils 8.25 i18n patch breaks cut

On 2/8/2016 10:26 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I'll go with your recommendation, but we need to settle on it soon. I plan on releasing LFS 7.9-rc1 on Sunday. After that we will be in a package freeze until we can release a stable LFS/BLFS stable 7.9. I like 1 on the surface, but it needs to

Re: [lfs-dev] Change proposal - move external build directories - part 2

On 1/28/2016 1:01 PM, xinglp wrote: 2016-01-29 0:30 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs : xinglp wrote: The install ... ../glibc-/xxx ... should be changed to install ... ../xxx ... Where? What are you talking about? Sorry, I'm talking about systemd branch.

Re: [lfs-dev] Change proposal - move external build directories

On January 22, 2016 12:54:50 PM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >I'm thinking about changing the way we build packages in separate >directories. What we do now for tool chain packages is: > >mkdir -v ../binutils-build >cd ../binutils-build > >../binutils-2.25.1/configure ... >

Re: [lfs-dev] Change proposal - move external build directories

On January 22, 2016 1:08:45 PM CST, William Harrington wrote: >On Fri, January 22, 2016 18:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I'm thinking about changing the way we build packages in separate >> directories. What we do now for tool chain packages is: >> >> mkdir -v

Re: [lfs-dev] pcre

On January 26, 2016 5:29:10 PM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >Should we add pcre to LFS? Yep yep. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.23

On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when my full build completes in the next hour or so. I did look at the test failures: XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b FAIL: posix/tst-getaddrinfo4 FAIL:

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.23

On 2/19/2016 8:04 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:51:43PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: On 2/19/2016 3:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I've built the new glibc in my sandbox and will start doing a -rc2 when my full build completes in the next hour or so. I did look at the test

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.23

On 2/20/2016 11:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: The first time I built LFS in qemu I thought I did something wrong. From 'power on' to login prompt was about 2 seconds. I have found that building LFS in qemu takes about 150% of the time on HW. I don't know if I set things up properly or not.

Re: [lfs-dev] Upcoming glibc

On 2/14/2016 11:33 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I just found out this morning that glibc-2.23 is to be released soon. Looking at https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.23, it looks like most of their objectives for the release have been made. Right now I'm building a full LFS at -j1 for size

[lfs-dev] DMARC policy changes coming from Google

adopted this format, so as not to hide the original sender from its users, but still address the DMARC filtering: From: "DJ Lucas" (d...@gmail.com) <blfs-...@linuxfromscratch.org> From Thunderbird, I didn't even notice the change until I attempted to respond to an OT message off-l

Re: [lfs-dev] Failure to build from Fedora

On 03/04/2016 11:16 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have no problems with Debian based distros, but naturally I tend to use prior LFS builds. I've most recently used Arch as a build host (except for previous LFS). It's been a couple of weeks, but very minimal install is required. --DJ --

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff

On 05/23/2016 05:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: On 05/22/2016 01:31 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: I might have missed the first message here. I had a minor issue with my mail filter (after moving my mail host last week) and it was right around the time the second

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff

On 05/22/2016 02:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: akhiezer wrote: From: "Douglas R. Reno" Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 20:04:32 -0600 Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff On 5/20/2016 12:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: . . Also

[lfs-dev] MPFR download link broken

www.mpfr.org not working... http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/mpfr/mpfr-3.1.4.tar.xz works, but couldn't find a homepage, or I would have just fixed it. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] Preparing for 7.10 package freeze

On 08/12/2016 01:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have just committed an update to LFS that clears all the tickets for the book. The package freeze is scheduled for two days from now and I know of no impending upstream releases between now and then. If anyone has any changes that need to be

Re: [lfs-dev] Preparing for 7.10 package freeze

On 08/12/2016 05:50 PM, DJ Lucas wrote: On 08/12/2016 01:12 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have just committed an update to LFS that clears all the tickets for the book. The package freeze is scheduled for two days from now and I know of no impending upstream releases between now

Re: [lfs-dev] Binutils >= 2.27 and seg fault when using glibc pass 1

On 08/05/2016 04:34 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Romain Geissler wrote: On the other side, the LFS guidelines stricly force you to configure glibc pass 1 with the argument libc_cv_ctors_header=yes. If you dig more in the configure script, you can actually notice that this is directly linked to

[lfs-dev] Killing the /lib64 symlinks (Was: Re: [blfs-dev] [blfs-book] r17603 - in trunk/BOOK: . general/prog introduction/welcome x/installing x/lib)

On 07/24/2016 06:03 PM, Chris Staub wrote: On 07/23/2016 05:25 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: That symlink dates back to when 64bit Linux was first introduced to LFS, and made a good deal of sense at the time. The toolchain used to be a PITA WRT changing the default lib search paths

Re: [lfs-dev] Killing the /lib64 symlinks

On 08/07/2016 04:17 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: +-e '/MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES/s@,../lib\)@)@' \ And yet again, a mistakeall three instances of this should not have escaped the close parentheses... '/MULTILIB_OSDIRNAMES/s@,../lib)@)@' May be that this is too delicate and the original

Re: [lfs-dev] Killing the /lib64 symlinks

On 08/07/2016 03:17 AM, John Frankish wrote: That symlink dates back to when 64bit Linux was first introduced to LFS, and made a good deal of sense at the time. The toolchain used to be a PITA WRT changing the default lib search paths. Not so much anymore. We should probably take a look at

Re: [lfs-dev] Killing the /lib64 symlinks

On August 7, 2016 2:29:29 PM CDT, William Harrington <kb0...@berzerkula.org> wrote: >On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 12:53:38 -0500 >DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: > >> Is there any reason we modify the linker configuration for all >targets >> and arch? R

Re: [lfs-dev] Development LFS, Chapter 6.12 File-5.28 configure error

On 08/07/2016 06:08 PM, Peng HG wrote: The configure file runs /usr/bin/file around line 7592 to effect a test, and then says /usr/bin/file can't be found. Should those lines be changed to /tools/bin/file? It appears to be harmless, not sure why file's configure is checking for itself. In

[lfs-dev] Systemd - KillUserProcesses=yes (Was: Re: [blfs-dev] Two hints about building firefox-47.0.1 and using screen with systemd-230)

On 07/31/2016 01:06 PM, Tim Tassonis wrote: On 07/31/16 17:48, DJ Lucas wrote: On July 30, 2016 8:55:40 PM CDT, "Douglas R. Reno" <ren...@linuxfromscratch.org> wrote: I'll make the change to /etc/systemd/logind.conf with the update to systemd-231 that I am working on.

Re: [lfs-dev] gold

On 02/04/2017 10:58 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 12:07:55AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: Interesting, I had just suggested to Bruce (the other day on IRC) that we go ahead and do it. I've seen absolutely no failures with bfd as the default linker with both big DEs installed. I

Re: [lfs-dev] gold

On 02/07/2017 09:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 07:28:24PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: On 02/04/2017 10:58 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 12:07:55AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: Interesting, I had just suggested to Bruce (the other day on IRC) that we go ahead

Re: [lfs-dev] gold

On February 3, 2017 9:51:29 PM CST, Ken Moffat wrote: >I'm increasingly starting to think that I'm going to stop building >the gold linker (it will save me a little time in /tools by not >building bison, and rather more time in the binutils tests in >chroot). > >This

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11190 - trunk/BOOK/chapter06

On 02/24/2017 10:12 AM, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: bdubbs Date: Fri Feb 24 08:12:41 2017 New Revision: 11190 Log: Text clarification Modified: trunk/BOOK/chapter06/coreutils.xml Modified: trunk/BOOK/chapter06/coreutils.xml

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.13. Binutils-2.27 tests

On 02/28/2017 02:41 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Hi, I noticed that during the 'make -k check' the whole gold test suite (240+ tests) is skipped due to an error. from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/8.0/i7-4700MQ/test-logs/080-binutils-2.27 make[6]: Leaving directory

Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited

On September 8, 2016 6:31:09 AM CDT, lf...@cruziero.com wrote: > > >The patch appears to not address fully standards-conformance >(fhs/lsb/): should it? Yes, for items not already covered in BLFS, it should. Also, while this side steps the libtool archive issue, and the symlink issue for

Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited

On September 8, 2016 9:58:51 AM CDT, Tim Tassonis <st...@decentral.ch> wrote: >On 09/08/2016 08:53 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 08/09/2016 07:53, DJ Lucas wrote: >>> Okay, now that 7.10 has released, time to bring this up again. This >>> gets rid of the &quo

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s

On 11/26/2016 11:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dubbs <bruce.du...@gmail.com> wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: Correct, this was resolved in SVN a couple of weeks ago. Should only affect 231 and 232. For someone who does not use s

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME???s

On November 27, 2016 5:42:40 PM CST, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Nov 27, 2016 5:10 PM, "Bruce Dubbs" wrote: akhiezer wrote: D-Bus next to be 'integrated' into sysd? : https://lwn.net/Articles/705479/ -- Nov. 2016 --

Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode

On 11/21/2016 10:17 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 8:18 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Eric Stone wrote: Unless I made a mistake following the book, it seems 7.10-systemd installations are unable to boot into linux single-user mode

Re: [lfs-dev] Doing without libXfont - more possible breakage

On 11/21/2016 09:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I forgot to add that, since I would very much like to deprecate all the old xorg core fonts, when I get to the end of building everything which I think *might* break without core fonts, I hope to add minimaal core fonts (libXfont, bdftopcf, adobe 100

Re: [lfs-dev] Editors only: stable vs development

On 10/31/2016 02:58 PM, Samuel Tyler wrote: I have a few questions for the editors: For your main (production) system, do you use a stable build of LFS or the development build? And why? Thanks, Samuel Define main system. :-) If you are referring to the laptop that I use most,

Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package

On 11/01/2016 11:48 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:52 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: Suggestions are welcome, but I'd prefer something more explicit. The ones that really stand out to me are Acl, Attr, Coreutils needs these if you

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10-systemd DNS issue with CNAME’s

Correct, this was resolved in SVN a couple of weeks ago. Should only affect 231 and 232. On November 26, 2016 9:12:30 PM CST, Eric Stone wrote: >There is an open bug in systemd [0] that creates a bad experience for >LFS >users that do not create a static /etc/resolv.conf .

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

On 12/17/2016 03:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 17/12/2016 07:46, d...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: dj Date: Fri Dec 16 22:46:18 2016 New Revision: 11154 Merge nosym branch. [...] There is a note in "6.10. Adjusting the Toolchain", telling: "On 64-bit systems, the path

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

On 12/17/2016 11:37 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Pierre Labastie wrote: On 17/12/2016 17:22, DJ Lucas wrote: On 12/17/2016 03:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 17/12/2016 07:46, d...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: dj Date: Fri Dec 16 22:46:18 2016 New Revision: 11154 Merge nosym

Re: [lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0

On 12/31/2016 08:37 AM, John Frankish wrote: I've followed LFS to build a toolchain several times, except that I built gold and used isl as a dep. With all of the toolchains, wherever other packages automatically use gold (libreoffice and others) compilation fails for different non-obvious

[lfs-dev] Test

Test -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0

These have been brought up before, but figured it's a good time to revisit them with a new major version on the horizon. One, we've bounced around gold a few times on this list, always with the caveat that bfd remains the default linker, but gold is available for packages that know about it

Re: [lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0

On 12/30/2016 09:01 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I don't have a problem with adding gold as you propose, but I do wonder what the benefits are for using it. As best I can tell, it would only be useful in speeding up the link phase for some large projects. Is that right? If so, what are some

Re: [lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0

On December 31, 2016 5:53:15 AM CST, John Frankish wrote: >> >I've followed LFS to build a toolchain several times, except that I >built gold and used isl as a dep. > >With all of the toolchains, wherever other packages automatically use >gold (libreoffice and

Re: [lfs-dev] Two changes to consider for 8.0

On 12/31/2016 02:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: I haven't got round to testing build times with the two linkers. Too much else going on. What I did notice a while ago (forget when) was that a particular kernel version (hopefully, -rc but maybe not) didn't link with gold. Yes, this is known.

[lfs-dev] Binutils and zlib

Suggestions sent by John Frankish are correct. I'm rebuilding now (without chapter 5 bison) to confirm and went ahead and did m4 and zlib while I'm at it. Unfortunately, zlib is on github now. This breaks jhalfs as is. I was thinking about just grabbing from github an putting on anduin, but

Re: [lfs-dev] lfs binutils missing configure switches

On 10/19/2016 04:44 AM, John Frankish wrote: Ref: Linux From Scratch - Version SVN-20161010 Chapter 6. Installing Basic System Software 6.13. Binutils-2.27 The "--with-system-zlib" configure switch is missing - without this switch, binutils will build against the version of zlib included

Re: [lfs-dev] A method to build 32bits lfs on pure 64bits host

On December 22, 2016 11:25:43 AM CST, xinglp wrote: >Since there's fewer and fewer linux distro that has 32bits support, >and also we rarely use it. >But there's one situation for me to use 32bits linux: use wine to run >32bits win apps (64bits wine need multilib(lfs don't

Re: [lfs-dev] A couple of small notes

On 03/11/2017 07:41 PM, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello, I was just going through the latest book again as a reference/review. Nice job on keeping it up to date and valid! There were just a couple of small things I noticed which could possibly be improved. In section 5.5, Gcc pass 1, the

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS commit 11279.

On 08/14/2017 06:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:40:33PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have just committed the latest tool chain to LFS svn. The packages now in the book are probably the final package versions for LFS-8.1. I intend to create lfs-8.1-rc1 tomorrow. At that

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc 7.2.0 released

On August 14, 2017 4:42:35 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 11:44:29AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>> I also removed --enable-obsolete-rpc but I need to investigate more. >>> >> Doesn't that break nss ? >> >> Or, see Armin's

Re: [lfs-dev] Building from an old system

On 08/16/2017 11:29 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: After the discussions about newer minimum versions in glibc-2.26, I've given 8.1-rc1 a try on my oldest system (LFS-7.6 with gcc-4.9.1, binutils-2.24, glibc-2.20, kernel 3.18.20). It has now got through LFS, and into the BLFS essentials. I saw more

Re: [lfs-dev] Future LFS issues

On July 13, 2017 6:32:54 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >systemd-234 has been released. In the NEWS file they now want to go to >a >meson build and eliminate autotools. I took a look at meson.build file >on >the new systemd. The file is 2528 lines long. This is supposed to

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-234 build failed

On July 20, 2017 5:49:25 AM CDT, xinglp <xin...@gmail.com> wrote: >2017-07-19 13:25 GMT+08:00 DJ Lucas <blfs-...@lucasit.com>: >> >> >> On 07/19/2017 12:19 AM, xinglp wrote: >>> >>> Log is: >>> GPERFsrc/core/load-fragment-gperf.c &g

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-234 build failed

On July 20, 2017 10:38:16 AM CDT, xinglp <xin...@gmail.com> wrote: >2017-07-20 21:17 GMT+08:00 DJ Lucas <d...@linuxfromscratch.org>: >> >> Can try setting >PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/usr/lib/pkgconfig:/tools/lib/pkgconfig" and see if >that works around it. >

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd-234 build failed

On 07/20/2017 06:06 PM, xinglp wrote: That's OK. Thanks a lot. Okay, it's now fixed. All files have been updated. Thanks for sticking with this. PKG_CONFIG_PATH should not be needed now. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

Re: [lfs-dev] Future LFS issues

On 07/19/2017 04:04 PM, Richard Melville wrote: So it looks like you might be able to limit parallel builds with -j, but I'll admit it's not clear. Yes, either form works too. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

Re: [lfs-dev] Future LFS issues

On 07/30/2017 03:34 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On Mon, 2017-07-17 at 18:41 +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On Thu, 2017-07-13 at 18:32 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: systemd-234 has been released. In the NEWS file they now want to go to a meson build and eliminate autotools. I took a look at

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-7.2 delayed.

On August 9, 2017 6:51:44 AM CDT, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 08:15 +0200, Thierry Nuttens wrote: >> 2017-08-09 7:00 GMT+02:00 Bruce Dubbs : >> > Ken Moffat wrote: >> > >> > > ĸen, beginning to think building from scratch is

[lfs-dev] higgs going down for maintenance

I'll be stopping httpd on higgs for 10 minutes this afternoon to make some configuration changes. Expected downtime will be from 20:05-20:15 UTC. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] Ch6 build order flaw in 7.10 (8.0?)

On May 15, 2017 12:41:51 PM CDT, Paul Rogers wrote: >I've been double, triple checking for /tools contamination, and found >another. (I fully understand and can fix my autom4te issue now.) >Libtool depends on dd which, in coreutils, isn't built until much >later. >The

Re: [lfs-dev] meson and ninja

On 09/18/2017 08:47 PM, Armin K. wrote: On 19.9.2017 0:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: NOTE: Please trim when replying. With the above info, the question is how to incorporate it into LFS/BLFS. To install meson/ninja into LFS requires four new packages: libffi, python3, ninja, and meson. I've

Re: [lfs-dev] lfs-multilib question

On September 7, 2017 10:52:07 PM CDT, Ken Moffat wrote: >On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 02:12:05PM +1100, evanation wrote: >> Can I recompile other libraries as needed, but not in the >installation process? >> > >Please don't top post on LFS lists - it makes it much harder to

Re: [lfs-dev] New packages in LFS

On 09/23/2017 05:32 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have not changed systemd. I ask either DJ or renodr to make changes and test the systemd build using meson/ninja. Done. Of note, we will no longer be producing our own tarball in favor of using upstream directly. We will provide only the man

Re: [lfs-dev] systemd using meson and ninja

On October 12, 2017 9:36:32 AM CDT, John Burrell wrote: >I installed systemd using the dev version of the systemd book. > >When starting LFS for the first time I get a message that: > >systemd-user-sessions.service fails > >This is because the file: >

Re: [lfs-dev] Ridding LFS/BLFS of libtool archives

Moved to LFS-Dev. On 12/02/2017 10:31 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: As a few of you know, following the move to meson for glib and a couple of upgrade issues for people using Porg and some homegrown PMs, I've been working on ridding us of the libtool archives in a local copy

Re: [lfs-dev] Dangling symlinks left after LFS build completion

On 10/28/2017 08:43 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 19:32 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: On Sat, 2017-10-28 at 11:52 +0200, NicP wrote: Hi, Just finished LFS 8.1 systemd stable version. I noticed 4 dangling symlinks pointing to the /tools directory :

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc-8.1

On May 5, 2018 4:43:49 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >I've updated the LFS book with the following: > >Update to gcc-8.1.0. >Update to linux-4.16.7. >Update to man-pages-4.16. >Update to meson-0.46.0. >Update to shadow-4.6. >Update to tzdata-2018e. >Update to xz-5.2.4. > >It

Re: [lfs-dev] [PATCH v2] Use "utf8" mount option for MS filesystem instead of "iocharset=utf8"

On May 16, 2018 12:01:58 AM CDT, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >On 2018-05-15 10:56 -0500，Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> On 05/15/2018 02:49 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote: >> > "iocharset=utf8" makes the filesystem case sensitive. We can >replace it >> > with "utf8" option which tells the kernel to

Re: [lfs-dev] Bug in fs-bootscripts-20170626

On 06/03/2018 01:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I think I like this better: echo "Press s for a shell or any other key to continue" [ "${HEADLESS=0}" = "0" ] && read -n1 ENTER if [ "${ENTER}" = "s" ]; then   echo -e '\nType 'exit' to continue'   PS1='$ ' /bin/sh fi One minor problem is that

Re: [lfs-dev] ld-2.27.so.dbg broken ?

On June 29, 2018 10:51:46 PM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > >On 06/29/2018 10:12 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >> I'm trying to get the BLFS tests for libinput to run. Among the >> instructions is a commented hunk about valgrind needing debugging >> symbols: >> > >> >> BUT running >> >> ln -svf

Re: [lfs-dev] cannot support boot from encrypt root system

On June 29, 2018 11:30:02 PM CDT, William Harrington wrote: >On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 23:14:39 -0500 >Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> You are right about the purpose of LFS, but I also know of several >> instances of LFS systems >> successfully used in production mode. >> >>   -- Bruce >> > >Thank you

[lfs-dev] Fwd: Re: LFS-SVN systemd v236 manpage missing on anduin

On 12/23/2017 12:49 PM, Alain Toussaint wrote: Hello, I am starting to download and regenerate LFS & BLFS svn (since reporting md5 checksum to the list) and it turn out that the wget-file include that link: http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS/systemd-man-pages-236.tar.xz Yet, the package

[lfs-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Re: libstdc++.la (and others)

Grr... Forwarded Message Subject: Fwd: Re: [lfs-dev] libstdc++.la (and others) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:40:43 -0600 From: DJ Lucas <blfs-...@lucasit.com> Reply-To: d...@linuxfromscratch.org To: BLFS Development List <blfs-...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org> Who

[lfs-dev] Fwd: Re: another can of worms? OpenRC

On 02/21/2018 10:07 PM, A. Wan wrote: Is there even one other compelling reason for using systemd? Many. To name a few, simple replacements for logging (journal), cron (timers), sntp, dhcp, resolver, on-demand daemons, etc. Simplified management of services, auto dependency resolution for

Re: [lfs-dev] Fwd: Re: another can of worms? OpenRC

On February 22, 2018 8:59:08 AM CST, "A. Wan" <j...@mokwan.com> wrote: > > > >On Wed, February 21, 2018 21:52, DJ Lucas wrote: > >> On 02/21/2018 10:07 PM, A. Wan wrote: > >> > >>> Is there even one other compelling reason for using systemd

[lfs-dev] RC1 security issues

Discussion was requested in bug to see if security issues should be fixed before or after release. There are two low severity security issues in OpenSSL-1.1.0h currently in rc1. My thoughts, there is a low probability of breakage, and since we need to do kernel and headers again (again, I

Re: [lfs-dev] Fwd: Re: RC1 security issues

On August 16, 2018 10:44:47 AM CDT, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >OK, I'll release -rc2. I do not think we need to invalidate the tags >we >have already done in BLFS. Of course, it's always a concern, but in this case I can't see anything that is made available to the dependent packages. I sure as

Re: [lfs-dev] RC1 security issues]

g >Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] RC1 security issues >User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) >Message-ID: <20180816133102.GA19024@milliways.localdomain> > >On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 12:57:22AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote: >> >> Seriously, after better review, update in place seems fi

Re: [lfs-dev] Multilib patch

On 08/25/2018 12:13 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: One more thing, need to add lib32 paths to remove-la-files.sh. I, thus far, have not messed with lib32x. I used a separate path for  files in /usr/lib32. Same for /usr/lib32/pkgconfig and /usr/local/lib32/pkgconfig. On second thought

Re: [lfs-dev] Multilib patch

On 08/14/2018 05:54 AM, Thomas Trepl wrote: Hi, for those who are interested in doing {,B}LFS with multilib support, here is a patch on the LFS book adding some instructions to build the LFS core system with multilib support. Apply the patch to the LFS sources and run "make ARCH=multilib".

  1   2   >