Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] [LFS Trac] #3552: GCC-4.9.0

Le 28/04/2014 20:25, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Charles Johnston wrote: >> On 04/22/14 14:10, LFS Trac wrote: >>> #3552: GCC-4.9.0 >>> + >>> Reporter: Krejzi | Owner: lfs-book@… >>> Type: task| Status: new >>> Priority: normal |

Re: [lfs-dev] Kernel configuration for systemdy

Le 01/05/2014 01:53, Ken Moffat a écrit : [...] > > 8. Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists > and > 9. Tmpfs extended attributes > > These are both required by systemd-logind so that a user can access > nodes in /dev (e.g. for audio, video) without being either root or a > member of a group which ha

Re: [lfs-dev] r10560 - in trunk/BOOK: . appendices bootscripts bootscripts/lfs/init.d chapter01 chapter03 chapter05 chapter06

Le 11/05/2014 18:03, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 11-05-2014 12:02, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: >>> Author: bdubbs >>> Date: Sun May 11 08:02:47 2014 >>> New Revision: 10560 > >>> +For x86 machines, the limited number of registers is a bottleneck >>

Re: [lfs-dev] r10560 - in trunk/BOOK: . appendices bootscripts bootscripts/lfs/init.d chapter01 chapter03 chapter05 chapter06

Le 11/05/2014 19:07, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 11/05/2014 18:03, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : >>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>>> Em 11-05-2014 12:02, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: >>>>> Author: bdubbs >>&g

Re: [lfs-dev] kernel build failure on current lfs-dev

Le 21/05/2014 16:51, Ken Moffat a écrit : (Third attempt - the first time I attached my .config, but that made it too big for this list. The config is now at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~ken/tmp/config-3.14.4 And then I mistyped the to: address) This is on LFS-svn-20140514 (r10564) wit

Re: [lfs-dev] Test failures in current svn

Le 25/05/2014 20:28, Ken Moffat a écrit : Now that I've run them on i686 I see failures from 'setfacl' (Operation not supported) - for 8 out of 24 tests. Looks as if these tests are only likely to work if the partition is mounted with 'acl'. ĸen From current LFS svn: "The Acl tests need to be

[blfs-dev] Udev vs Eudev page

Hi, I am wondering whether we should change the title of the Udev-extra page. Now, we use eudev, which has a different version scheme from udev, so there could be a version number in the title (as for other packages). Also, we now reinstall the whole package. So the page layout could be much close

Re: [blfs-dev] Udev vs Eudev page

300 > De: Fernando de Oliveira > Responder a: BLFS Development List > Para: BLFS Development List > > Em 07-06-2014 08:24, Pierre Labastie escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> I am wondering whether we should change the title of the Udev-extra page. >> Now, >>

Re: [lfs-dev] resolv.conf ?

Le 26/06/2014 13:28, Denis MUGNIER a écrit : Hi, I build LFS-svn, and with the current version of the LFS-svn, there is no instruction to create the resolv.conf file. Is this normal , or an error of rewritting ? Looks like the section on resolv.conf has been commented out together with th

Re: [lfs-dev] [blfs-book] r13349 - trunk/BOOK/general/prog

Le 06/07/2014 20:16, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : pie...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: pierre Date: Sun Jul 6 01:25:15 2014 New Revision: 13349 Log: typo Modified: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc-java.xml Modified: trunk/BOOK/general/prog/gcc-java.xml ===

Re: [lfs-dev] libblkid required for e2fsprogs

Le 10/09/2014 22:17, Roger Koehler a écrit : > Bruce, > > LFS-7.6-rc1 fails for me at 6.28. E2fsprogs-1.42.12 due to libblkid not > being installed: > > ./base_device: error while loading shared libraries: libblkid.so.1: cannot > open shared object file: No such file or directory > > This librar

[lfs-dev] Minor nitpick (GCC chapter 6)

I read: -- As in Chapter 5, fix a problem identified upstream: sed -i 's/if \((code.*))\)/if (\1 \&\& \!DEBUG_INSN_P (insn))/' gcc/sched-deps.c First fix a problem identified upstream that causes some programs to fail: patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.9.1-upstream_fixes-1.patch -- For me "First

Re: [lfs-dev] grub-2.02~beta2

Le 02/10/2014 17:27, Dan McGhee a écrit : > On 10/02/2014 07:17 AM, Dan McGhee wrote: >> On 10/02/2014 02:28 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> If you write the hint, I'll be glad to review it, but I probably won't test >>> it. I don't want to re-enable uefi on my laptop. I have no use for it. >> Thanks fo

Re: [lfs-dev] grub-2.02~beta2

Le 12/10/2014 16:10, Dan McGhee a écrit : > > On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:51 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: > >> [...] > Pierre, this is really, really helpful. Thanks. > > As soon as I can get all my computer things ironed out, I’ll be able to > finish the hint. It’s o

Re: [lfs-dev] suse as a host when using jhalfs

Le 29/10/2014 19:06, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > I ran into a curious issue last night. I was demonstrating jhalfs to a > student using suse as a host. I got a complaint that the wget program was too > old. Upon examination, it appears that the version there has the version > number stripped out fro

Re: [lfs-dev] suse as a host when using jhalfs

Le 30/10/2014 15:45, David Brodie a écrit : > On 29/10/14 22:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> >>> The version checks in jhalfs are fragile, because they depend on an >>> expected >>> behavior or the excutable. Actually, the tested

Re: [lfs-dev] suse as a host when using jhalfs

Le 30/10/2014 23:18, Bruce Dubbs a écrit : > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Le 30/10/2014 15:45, David Brodie a écrit : >>> On 29/10/14 22:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'll try a VM machine with S

Re: [lfs-dev] Slightly Off Topic: What has happened to cross-lfs.org?

Le 10/11/2014 18:06, Mattias Schlenker a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > does anyone of you know what happened to cross-lfs.org? I know it is a rather > independent project that moved away from a linuxfromscratch.org subfolder to > their own domain. I am still curious because one of my pet projects is

[lfs-dev] Mixing installation and configuration in eudev

Hi, I am trying to update the "package management" (rather DESTDIR install + call to packager) part of jhalfs, and it breaks in 6.27 Eudev because of the instruction: -- udevadm hwdb --update -- just after "make install". The reason is that after a DESTDIR install, udevadm is not i

Re: [lfs-dev] Aid to the builder

Le 03/12/2014 23:58, Paul Rogers a écrit : At one time, maybe 10 years ago, there was an effort to put the packages in alphabetical order, but take into account dependencies. That is why vim is last and less is sort-of in the middle. So it appears. But is that sufficient reason for it remaining

Re: [lfs-dev] SEARCH output in chroot 6.10 (Adjusting the Toolchain)

Le 04/02/2015 03:04, Ken Moffat a écrit : On 24th Jan, on -chat, somebody called C A queried this - Quoting from http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-chat/2015-January/028737.html So, when adjusting a toolchain after compiling dummy.c as part of testing, when running: grep 'SEARC

Re: [lfs-dev] SEARCH output in chroot 6.10 (Adjusting the Toolchain)

Le 04/02/2015 19:17, Ken Moffat a écrit : > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 12:04:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>> Le 04/02/2015 03:04, Ken Moffat a écrit : >>>> >>>> So, what am I missing ? In general, people do not complain tha

Re: [lfs-dev] 'ls -l' segfaults on Athlon XP

Le 22/02/2015 17:08, Christoph Feikes a écrit : > Hello, > > I'm trying to build LFS according to current 7.7-rc1. > 'ls -l' on a non-empty directory segfaults on Athlon XP as soon as a ls > linked against glibc-2.21 gets installed. When using glibc-2.20 on the > Athlon, all other parameters uncha

Re: [lfs-dev] 'ls -l' segfaults on Athlon XP

Le 22/02/2015 19:00, Pierre Labastie a écrit : > Le 22/02/2015 17:08, Christoph Feikes a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I'm trying to build LFS according to current 7.7-rc1. >> 'ls -l' on a non-empty directory segfaults on Athlon XP as soon as a ls >> link

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.21 failed tests and minor fix

Le 02/03/2015 02:16, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : 5.7. Glibc-2.21: s/Fix is regression/Fix regression/ 6.9. Glibc-2.21 Seven failures in the tests. Following three not in the book. FAIL: grp/testgrp FAIL: posix/globtest FAIL: pwd/tst-getpw Problem seems to be the necessity of /etc/passwd

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.21 failed tests and minor fix

Le 02/03/2015 03:08, Douglas R. Reno a écrit : I just did a build on an i686 box, a P4 with 1.5GB of RAM. Most of the tests I have fail are in GCC, where several execution tests and Torture Tests fail. It could be HW related, so if someone could confirm this, it would be great. The system ope

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.21 failed tests and minor fix

Le 02/03/2015 11:37, Pierre Labastie a écrit : Le 02/03/2015 03:08, Douglas R. Reno a écrit : I just did a build on an i686 box, a P4 with 1.5GB of RAM. Most of the tests I have fail are in GCC, where several execution tests and Torture Tests fail. It could be HW related, so if someone could

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.21 failed tests and minor fix

Le 02/03/2015 11:53, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : On 02-03-2015 07:30, Pierre Labastie wrote: Le 02/03/2015 02:16, Fernando de Oliveira a écrit : 5.7. Glibc-2.21: s/Fix is regression/Fix regression/ 6.9. Glibc-2.21 Seven failures in the tests. Following three not in the book. FAIL: grp

Re: [lfs-dev] Security fix for grep

Le 05/03/2015 10:11, Klaus Wulff a écrit : Sorry! I've sent this from another address first. Please keep this and destroy the wrong twin. LFS-Book SVN-20150303: Shouldn't the security fix for grep (ticket #3760) be applied in chapter 5.24 too? Regards K. Wulff The chapter 5 packages are only b

Re: [lfs-dev] EFI

Le 22/03/2015 21:06, Paul Rogers a écrit : > I read this morning M$ is making the disable-UEFI option optional in > Windows-10 compatible computers, with the suggestion some mfrs will > just take it out and force all botting to be with UEFI. Is LFS going > to provide instructions/sources to enabl

Re: [lfs-dev] Should kmod-20 lsmod be installed in two dirs?

Le 29/03/2015 18:36, Alexey Orishko a écrit : > Hi all, > > In the previous kmod version lsmod was installed in /bin/lsmod only. > In the current svn book instructions it is included in the 'for' loop > above and old 'ln -sv' is also kept. > > Should lsmod be in both /sbin/ and /bin folders? > >

Re: [lfs-dev] gcc --with-glibc-version

Le 30/03/2015 19:48, Douglas R. Reno a écrit : > Regarding the Glibc version on my boot disk for building systems > (SystemRescueCD with Texinfo and Bison added), that uses 2.19 so I am set. > > Douglas R. Reno Normally, there are tools in jhalfs (iterative comparison analysis ICA), which allow t

Re: [lfs-dev] Getting close to the 7.8 package freeze

On 15/08/2015 02:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > We are getting pretty close to the package freeze for LFS-7.8. I am currently > waiting for util-linux-2.27 which should be released very soon. > > Doe anyone know of any other LFS packages that have imminent releases of new > stable packages? > > -- B

Re: [lfs-dev] Getting close to the 7.8 package freeze

On 15/08/2015 18:38, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 15/08/2015 02:41, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> We are getting pretty close to the package freeze for LFS-7.8. I am >>> currently >>> waiting for util-linux-2.27 which should be released very

Re: [lfs-dev] Ncurses 6.0 compile error on latest LFS dev systemd with fix

On 16/08/2015 15:24, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Rick Houkes wrote: >> For me the result is for awk --version | head -n1 is: GNU Awk 4.1.1, API: >> 1.1 (GNU MPFR 3.1.2-p11, GNU MP 6.0.0) >> So it looks like I did replace mawk with gawk on the Kubuntu host. However >> I did notice mawk is still present on

Re: [blfs-dev] Doxygen instructions

On 08/09/2015 14:56, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 08-09-2015 08:45, Pierre Labastie escreveu: On 08/09/2015 12:56, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 08-09-2015 04:31, Pierre Labastie escreveu: Thanks for the answer Fernando, I understand better: instructions for installing manpages are needed

Re: [lfs-dev] Discovered a small error in 7.8-rc1

On 11/09/2015 13:27, Emanuele Rusconi wrote: Other small issues, ordered by chapter: 5.9. Binutils-2.25.1 - Pass 2 Misalignment of '\'. --- 6.1.1. About libraries deciding which programs (and the procedures needed to do the linking) may not even be known. Is this correct in English? I read

Re: [lfs-dev] Discovered a small error in 7.8-rc1

On 11/09/2015 21:43, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Emanuele Rusconi wrote: >> Other small issues, ordered by chapter: >> >> >> 5.9. Binutils-2.25.1 - Pass 2 >> >> Misalignment of '\'. >> >> --- >> >> 6.1.1. About libraries >>> deciding which programs (and the procedures needed to do the linking) may >>> no

Re: [lfs-dev] Problem with libxml2 [solved]

On 13/09/2015 21:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > FYI > > I ran into a problem when generating the nochunks version of the book. The > xsltproc instruction in the Makefile was producing about 50 "errors" like: > > element a: validity error : ID version-check already defined > > However the nochunks ver

Re: [lfs-dev] Using Glibc xattr for ATTR and ACL

On 27/09/2015 07:04, William Harrington wrote: > On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:24:04 -0500 > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >>> GLIBC provides the xattr components. Use them rather than use >>> libattr. We already install attr without overwriting man pages which >>> GLIBC installs. Start using the xattr code GLI

Re: [lfs-dev] Using Glibc xattr for ATTR and ACL

On 27/09/2015 13:31, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 27-09-2015 08:02, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: >> Em 27-09-2015 04:31, Pierre Labastie escreveu: >>> On 27/09/2015 07:04, William Harrington wrote: >>>> On Sat, 26 Sep 2015 23:24:04 -0500 >>>> Bruc

Re: [lfs-dev] Coreutils test suite access rights problem

On 28/09/2015 00:51, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ferdinand Thiessen wrote: Sorry I meant: #as the books says: chown -Rv nobody . #/sources needs to be read and executable chmod a+rx Still this command cannot work, because it lacks the directory or the file to which you want to apply the chmod. Do you

[lfs-dev] About LVM test hanging

As noted in ticket #6931, one test (test/shell/lvcreate-large-raid.sh) hangs forever and may even trash the system, which then needs a hard reboot. I've found the explanation, but really upstream is too "fedora-centric" (see below why). In file test/lib/aux, there is this function: ---

Re: [lfs-dev] About LVM test hanging

On 26/10/2015 21:52, Pierre Labastie wrote: > As noted in ticket #6931, one test (test/shell/lvcreate-large-raid.sh) hangs > forever and may even trash the system, which then needs a hard reboot. > [...] Sorry, wrong list. Moving to blfs-dev. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org

Re: [lfs-dev] 7.current others are too, appendices

On 27/10/2015 21:07, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Craig Garner wrote: >> Index: dependencies.xml >> === >> --- dependencies.xml(revision 10967) >> +++ dependencies.xml(working copy) >> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ >> available in order to run

[lfs-dev] /bin vs /usr/bin choice

Hi, While running OpenJDK tests, I realized that one test was failing because it expected to find "uptime" in /usr/bin, but we install it in /bin, as we do for all procps executables (One could complain that tests shouldn't hard code paths, but it is not my point). This raises the question of what

[lfs-dev] Man pages for attr conflict with those of man-pages

Hi, When building LFS with a package manager, I got an error because the man pages of the attr package (section 2 and 5) would overwrite those of the man-pages package. I am not sure what to do, but it seem that the pages from the man-pages project are more accurate than those of attr. Should

Re: [lfs-dev] Man pages for attr conflict with those of man-pages

On 30/11/2015 16:34, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, When building LFS with a package manager, I got an error because the man pages of the attr package (section 2 and 5) would overwrite those of the man-pages package. I am not sure what to do, but it seem that the pages from the

[lfs-dev] Fix xz for running with valgrind

Hi, I got an error when running dovecot tests in BLFS (please read ahead before thinking it is the wrong list): ==18302== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==18302==at 0x526A170: lz_encoder_prepare (in /lib/liblzma.so.5.2.2) ==18302==by 0x526A802: lzma_lz_encoder_i

Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Custom unit tests for each part of the current stable book (LFS 7.8)

On 15/12/2015 21:27, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 07:00:15PM +, Read, James C wrote: >> >> At this stage I can only make suggestions as I don't know enough about the >> correct assertions to make. But what about running this after each build >> from the second pass of binutils

Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Custom unit tests for each part of the current stable book (LFS 7.8)

On 19/12/2015 03:29, Ken Moffat wrote: > [...] > Ran my normal build up to gcc pass 2, then tried manually building > tcl without the correct environment. > > I've now got a script, tools-check.sh: > > - - - > #!/bin/sh > > # first check that /bin/sh is not dash > /bin/sh --version >/dev/null

Re: [lfs-dev] Compiler name on 32-bit x86 ?

On 20/12/2015 17:57, Ken Moffat wrote: > I'm getting close to making some specific suggestions to try to > reduce the number of errors that we see from new builders. One of > those is a script to be run as-desired in chapter 5 to look for > programs and libraries linked to the host system (see my

Re: [lfs-dev] unable to build gettext-0.19.7

On 01/01/2016 11:50, xinglp wrote: > Log is below: > > gcc -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DBISON_LOCALEDIR=\"\" > -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DUSEJAVA=0 -DUSEJEXE=0 > -DGETTEXTJEXEDIR=\"/usr/lib/gettext\" > -DGETTEXTJAR=\"/usr/share/gettext/gettext.jar\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib\" >

Re: [lfs-dev] Change proposal - move external build directories

On 23/01/2016 03:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > William Harrington wrote: >> On Fri, January 22, 2016 18:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> I'm thinking about changing the way we build packages in separate >>> directories. What we do now for tool chain packages is: >>> >>> mkdir -v ../binutils-build >>> cd ../b

Re: [lfs-dev] Change proposal - move external build directories

On 23/01/2016 18:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 23/01/2016 03:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> William Harrington wrote: >>>> On Fri, January 22, 2016 18:54, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>>>> I'm thinking about changing the way we build p

Re: [lfs-dev] kernel messages during gcc tests

On 03/02/2016 15:08, William Harrington wrote: > On Wed, February 3, 2016 04:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> I just updated several packages in LFS and did a complete LFS build >> including all Chapter 6 tests. One thing I noticed that I haven't seen >> before is a ton of error messages in /var/log/kern

Re: [lfs-dev] Failure to build from Fedora

On 05/03/2016 21:31, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:46:40PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Ken Moffat wrote: This time, I took a look at the Makefiles (in build/), but AFAICS only the toplevel Makefile defines install-libs, as install-libs-re

Re: [lfs-dev] Failure to build from Fedora

On 06/03/2016 08:50, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I brought up a live version in qemu. Came up fine. Installed > version-check.sh and then all needed programs. Worked fine. Installed > docbook, subversion, xslt, etc and fetched lfs-svn. Tried 'make' and it > instantly crashed and took the terminal wi

Re: [blfs-dev] LXQt needs setting QT_XKB_CONFIG_ROOT

On 06/03/2016 18:33, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On 05/03/2016 21:59, Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tagged LXQt although I have one issue: For being able to input anything >> from >> the keyboard, I need to export QT_XKB_CONFIG_Root=/usr/share/X11/xkb before

Re: [lfs-dev] hwclock

On 07/03/2016 17:43, Roger Koehler wrote: The new Linux kernel (4.4.2) can't talk to my hardware clock. I used the exact same .config file I used for LFS 7.6, which works fine. I first noticed this when building LFS 7.9_rc1 (Linux 4.4.1). I'll try again with the latest kernel (4.4.4). Really the

Re: [lfs-dev] hwclock

On 07/03/2016 18:16, Roger Koehler wrote: On Mar 7, 2016 10:09 AM, "Pierre Labastie" <mailto:pierre.labas...@neuf.fr>> wrote: > > On 07/03/2016 17:43, Roger Koehler wrote: >> >> The new Linux kernel (4.4.2) can't talk to my hardware clock. I used >

Re: [lfs-dev] Failure to build from Fedora : Solved!

On 07/03/2016 05:28, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:46:48AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> >> Eventually, I found a make bug report : /dev/pts needs to be mounted >> (well, duh!) with an upstream commit. I'm sure you will remember >> that my bind mounts did not work [ after user ken

Re: [lfs-dev] Failure to build from Fedora : Solved!

On 07/03/2016 22:40, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 07/03/2016 05:28, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 12:46:48AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>>> >>>> Eventually, I found a make bug report : /dev/pts needs to be mounted &g

Re: [lfs-dev] 7.9 & dev: extraneous markup - kernel headers pages.

On 08/04/2016 19:14, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > The reason is that we use jhalfs to extract the first > as a non privileged command and the remap="install"> as privileged. > > I suppose that this is not needed since everything in Chapter 5 is done as > user lfs and as root in Chapter 6. > I think

[lfs-dev] Wrong URL for util-linux-2.28

https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.27/util-linux-2.28.tar.xz Change to: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux/v2.28/util-linux-2.28.tar.xz Regards Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See

[lfs-dev] LFS partition size

Hi, The "Creating a new partition" page tells that a partion of about 4GB is enough for building LFS. It seem that it is no longer true. A jhalfs build I've done to answer a question from Douglas, run out space during GCC tests on a 5.8 GB partition. I am not sure exactly what is needed, but at le

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS partition size

On 15/05/2016 09:29, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The "Creating a new partition" page tells that a partion of about 4GB is >> enough for building LFS. It seem that it is no longer true. A jhalfs build >> I've done to answ

Re: [lfs-dev] script to do the LFS tools build and then after chrooting into the system doing the rest of the build

On 15/05/2016 11:54, Nick Gawronski wrote: > Hi, Looking in the download area I find the wget-list that is very useful to > download all needed packages and patches. One thing if users were wanting to > follow the book and see how fast the LFS system would run on their system for > users who might

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff

On 22/05/2016 23:18, DJ Lucas wrote: On 05/22/2016 02:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: akhiezer wrote: From: "Douglas R. Reno" Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 20:04:32 -0600 Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff On 5/20/2016 12:57 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Douglas R. Reno wrote: . . Als

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS systemd-specific stuff

On 24/05/2016 03:03, Bruce Dubbs wrote: DJ Lucas wrote: You'll also need to do that at on days when there is only an entry for one or the other book. First instance of this will possibly be in a few days...still holding on systemd-230 for a few more days at least, waiting to see if upstream han

Re: [lfs-dev] Merged trunk and systemd sources

On 25/05/2016 06:03, Bruce Dubbs wrote: How doese jhalfs work with this version? It doesn't yet. This is a work in progress. -- Bruce I'll have a look at that. But I need to decide how to enter the choice between systemd and sysvinit. Note that you do not need to know the internals of

Re: [lfs-dev] Merged trunk and systemd sources

On 25/05/2016 20:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 25/05/2016 06:03, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>>> How doese jhalfs work with this version? >>> >>> It doesn't yet. This is a work in progress. >>> >>> --

Re: [lfs-dev] Merged trunk and systemd sources

On 25/05/2016 20:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 25/05/2016 06:03, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> >>>> How doese jhalfs work with this version? >>> >>> It doesn't yet. This is a work in progress. >>> >>> --

Re: [lfs-dev] Merged trunk and systemd sources

On 26/05/2016 01:31, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: I have created a new branch in svn for merged LFS trunk and systemd sources. If you have a current full repository that you checked out with svn co svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/LFS you only need to go to the extraction point an

Re: [lfs-dev] Packages hyperlinks

On 18/07/2016 09:58, Eldridge, Greg wrote: FYI The links on the All Packages do not work for these two: Attr (2.4.47) - This results in a 404 Page not found Should be http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/attr Check (0.10.0) - This says check has moved to http://libcheck.github.io/check or h

Re: [lfs-dev] Packages hyperlinks

On 18/07/2016 19:09, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> On 18/07/2016 09:58, Eldridge, Greg wrote: >>> FYI >>> >>> The links on the All Packages do not work for these two: >>> >>> Attr (2.4.47) - This results in a 404 Page not found

[lfs-dev] Makefile for merged book

Hi, Here is a patch to improve wget-list and md5sums generation. Note that it gives the same result as before for md5sums (but the information given while running make is improved, and the target depends on the correct stylesheet). For wget-list, it also fixes the content of wget-list, which

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - url broken

On 30/08/2016 11:56, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The follow url in both LFS-7.10-rc1 and LFS-7.10-systemd-rc1 books are broken http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/7.10-rc1/ Fixed. Thanks. Note that 7.10 and 7.10-systemd have the same log... Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/li

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.17. GCC-6.2.0 - purpose of the -k parameter in make -k check

On 30/08/2016 11:28, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Hi, I'm curious on what the intent of having the -k parameter in make -k check. To this point in time I always thought it was to continue with the tests even after unexpected test failures. But after removing the -k, the only error I got early on wa

Re: [lfs-dev] typo

On 06/09/2016 18:18, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Julien Lepiller wrote: Hello, In changelog, there is "[bdubbs] - Update to gcc-6.2.0.tar.bz2. Fixes #3979.". Ticket number link and text do not match. Thanks. Both should be 3970. Will be fixed later today. -- Bruce While you are at it, I suspect

Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10 test issues in jhalfs

On 06/09/2016 20:26, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > Last night I did a jhalfs run of LFS to get timing data fo 7.10 (and to > check gcc failures (they were OK)). > > What I got was a hang in coreu

Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited

On 08/09/2016 07:53, DJ Lucas wrote: Okay, now that 7.10 has released, time to bring this up again. This gets rid of the "seems to be moved" messages, as well as a most tests for arch=x86_64. The /lib64 directory remains for LSB (and other binary) compatibility. Requires changes to a few CMake

Re: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited

On 08/09/2016 11:47, akhiezer wrote: From: DJ Lucas Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 00:53:08 -0500 Subject: [lfs-dev] Removing /lib64 symlink and /usr/lib64 revisited Okay, now that 7.10 has released, time to bring this up again. (Is it a little unseemly to jump on this again so immediately after new-r

Re: [lfs-dev] Suggestion: Add a rationale section for each package

On 02/11/2016 05:48, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 3:52 PM Bruce Dubbs wrote: Suggestions are welcome, but I'd prefer something more explicit. The ones that really stand out to me are Acl, Attr, libcap and These three are also present because a very l

Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode

On 22/11/2016 10:14, akhiezer wrote: From: DJ Lucas Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 20:00:09 -0600 Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] 7.10-systemd issue: single user mode On 11/21/2016 07:25 PM, Eric Stone wrote: Unless I made a mistake following the book, it seems 7.10-systemd installations are unable to boot int

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS and 32-bit systems

On 11/12/2016 18:29, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Do any of you still have a 32-bit Intel system that you use to test/run LFS? > > I am thinking about rewriting the LFS preface section on architecture to say: > > The primary target architecture of LFS is the AMD/Intel x86_64 (64-bit) CPU. > In addition i

Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing

On 13/12/2016 17:36, Bruce Dubbs wrote: akhiezer wrote: From: Bruce Dubbs Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 20:02:22 -0600 Subject: Re: [lfs-dev] LFS 7.10: 2.2. Host System Requirements: Perl version OK: module missing Kevin Buckley wrote: Hi there, am currently building a 7.10 from a very basic Ub

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

On 17/12/2016 07:46, d...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: dj Date: Fri Dec 16 22:46:18 2016 New Revision: 11154 Merge nosym branch. [...] There is a note in "6.10. Adjusting the Toolchain", telling: "On 64-bit systems, the path above will be /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.2.0/.

Re: [lfs-dev] [lfs-book] r11154 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter05 chapter06

On 17/12/2016 17:22, DJ Lucas wrote: On 12/17/2016 03:18 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 17/12/2016 07:46, d...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote: Author: dj Date: Fri Dec 16 22:46:18 2016 New Revision: 11154 Merge nosym branch. [...] There is a note in "6.10. Adjusting the Tool

Re: [lfs-dev] font issues

On 25/01/2017 05:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I just finished a new install of Xorg using the current instructions in the > book. Unfortunately I get several warnings about fonts. In Xorg.0.log I > have: > > (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in > "/opt/xorg/share/fonts/X11/misc/". > (WW) `

Re: [lfs-dev] font issues

On 25/01/2017 10:25, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 25/01/2017 05:37, Bruce Dubbs wrote: I just finished a new install of Xorg using the current instructions in the book. Unfortunately I get several warnings about fonts. In Xorg.0.log I have: (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in

Re: [blfs-dev] RFC - Remove WebKitGTK+-2.4.11

On 01/02/2017 20:26, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs > wrote: > > I am proposing the removal of WebKitGTK+-2.4.11. > > Currently it is only referenced in two places: midori and gimp. > > In the midori instruct

[lfs-dev] Typo in /etc/vimrc (?)

Current instructions: |if (&term == "iterm") || (&term == "putty") set background=dark endif Shoudn't "iterm" be changed to "xterm"? Pierre | -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

[lfs-dev] typo in bzip2 chapter 06

"Required disk space: 0/bz2.9 MB". Dunno what the correct figure is. Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [lfs-dev] glibc-2.25 compile error

On 23/02/2017 16:02, Vladislav Dembskiy wrote: Dear colleagues, I decided to rebuild glib-2.25 according to current development version of LFS Book systemd using kernel headers 4.9.11 I have got the following error during compilation: /sources/glibc-2.25/build/posix/sched_cpucount.o.dt -MT /

Re: [lfs-dev] 6.13. Binutils-2.27 tests

On 01/03/2017 05:05, DJ Lucas wrote: On 02/28/2017 02:41 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: Hi, I noticed that during the 'make -k check' the whole gold test suite (240+ tests) is skipped due to an error. from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/8.0/i7-4700MQ/test-logs/080-binutils-2.

[lfs-dev] Proposition for the network systemd page

Hi, In order to use jhalfs with systemd, I'd like to propose a few changes to the systemd "General Network Configuration" page. Note that it shouldn't change the rendering of the page (apart from a typo fix), but it would allow to generate a script which would install a static network with st

Re: [lfs-dev] Proposition for the network systemd page

On 03/03/2017 21:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Pierre Labastie wrote: Hi, In order to use jhalfs with systemd, I'd like to propose a few changes to the systemd "General Network Configuration" page. Note that it shouldn't change the rendering of the page (apart from a typo fix)

Re: [lfs-dev] Proposition for the network systemd page

On 03/03/2017 23:11, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Pierre Labastie wrote: >> >> >> On 03/03/2017 21:45, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Pierre Labastie wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> In order to use jhalfs with systemd, I'd like to propose a few chan

Re: [lfs-dev] ***SPAM*** A couple of small notes

Hi, On 12/03/2017 02:41, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello, I was just going through the latest book again as a reference/review. Nice job on keeping it up to date and valid! There were just a couple of small things I noticed which could possibly be improved. In section 5.5, Gcc pass 1, the fo

  1   2   3   4   >