Hello,
Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and rebooted.
Then got a kernel panic.
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:15 PM, bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone recommend some resources for troubleshooting a kernel panic.
I have been built LFS 6.8 on a USB stick, and moved it to a disk
partition using 'dd'. I modified the grub.cfg file and rebooted.
Then got a
there in the past
for different messages, I can understand how it feels (even editing
is a pain when the error messages interfere). I don't know how you
have things set at the moment, nor what level of severity these
messages are coded at, so the following might not help. But for me
it has
these
messages are coded at, so the following might not help. But for me
it has been useful on occasion - in /etc/rc.d/init.d/sysklogd, change
the line which starts klogd to
loadproc klogd -c 4
There is also a built in solution without editing the boot script and
the value is set in sysinit
] (20101013/evgpe-503)
I guessed that the first was CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL, but I was deterred
from disabling it by the help text.
I had a quick Google on your error message and it seems you're not
alone:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=564529
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fedora/+bug/376367
] ACPI Exception:
AE_NOT_FOUND, while evaluating GPE method [_L1C] (20101013/evgpe-503)
I guessed that the first was CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL, but I was deterred
from disabling it by the help text.
I had a quick Google on your error message and it seems you're not
alone:
https://bbs.archlinux.org
messages, I can understand how it feels (even editing
is a pain when the error messages interfere). I don't know how you
have things set at the moment, nor what level of severity these
messages are coded at, so the following might not help. But for me
it has been useful on occasion - in /etc/rc.d/init.d
was deterred
from disabling it by the help text.
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL:
This driver supports ACPI thermal zones. Most mobile and
some desktop systems support ACPI thermal zones. It is HIGHLY
recommended that this option be enabled, as your processor(s)
may be damaged without it.
Here are my PM
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
There is definitely something wrong. On a production LFS system running
in a virtual envronment, I get:
real 0m18.514s
user 0m8.984s
sys 0m2.697s
I'm still having the same problems after recompiling the
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:53:18 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a dead? project out there (kcheck, kautoconfig, autokernconf)
all the same I think.
Yeah, I found this old thread
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 9:43 AM, bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
It seems that there is a script in the kenel src tree that may do this
(./scripts/kconfig/streamline_config.pl), I will report back when I
have tried it.
I followed the steps indicated in the header comments of the script
seem to make any difference.
Any help would be appreciated.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
at a normal rate. I've tried a
few different kernel options but none seem to make any difference.
Any help would be appreciated.
I wouldn't expect the kernel config to make a lot of difference.
The whole system is 64-bit ? It rather sounds like you might have
masses of memory on a 32-bit
Dave Hajoglou wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Dave Hajoglou dhajog...@gmail.com wrote:
To list,
I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some
slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host
(5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 19:53:18 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a dead? project out there (kcheck, kautoconfig, autokernconf)
all the same I think.
Yeah, I found this old thread http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/16/290 that
mentions autokernconf and a couple of other scripts but I've
I also had an idea some time ago somehow related to what you are
saying. I used to compile the kernel several times with different
configurations, so every time I compile it, I wanted to know how long
will it take beforehand. So I think about compiling a small program as
a reference, and then use
Thanks for replys. Currently re-reading kernel configuration chapters
of lkn
(http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/linux_kernel/kernel_configuration).
My host is Ubuntu, and it does not have config stored in kernel, but
i did find one in /boot.
Anyone try using configuration targets
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:09:14 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
One would think that there would be a script that could make a config
from a running system.
That's an interesting idea for an open sourced project. It wouldn't
have to be perfect, as long as it booted the user could fine
On Friday 08 April 2011 15:44:12 Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:09:14 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
One would think that there would be a script that could make a config
from a running system.
That's an interesting idea for an open sourced project. It wouldn't
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:58:26 -0400
Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
If the specific kernel option is enabled, one can 'zcat /proc/config.gz' to
obtain the config used to build the running kernel.
Yes, but it's a chicken and egg situation. The first time you compile a
kernel on a
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:58:26 -0400
Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
If the specific kernel option is enabled, one can 'zcat /proc/config.gz' to
obtain the config used to build the running kernel.
Yes, but it's
On Friday 08 April 2011 19:54:08 Andrew Benton wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 16:58:26 -0400
Neal Murphy neal.p.mur...@alum.wpi.edu wrote:
If the specific kernel option is enabled, one can 'zcat /proc/config.gz'
to obtain the config used to build the running kernel.
Yes, but it's a chicken
Hello,
Can anyone help determine what may be wrong with kernel config.
The last message is:
[ 15.448606] [c16c5079] ? 386_start_kernel + 0x79/0x7b
It looks like several drivers have loaded as I noticed SDA, USB and
ATH5K related messages were displayed.
There are no error messages
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:55:35 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone help determine what may be wrong with kernel config.
The last message is:
[ 15.448606] [c16c5079] ? 386_start_kernel + 0x79/0x7b
It looks like several drivers have loaded as I noticed SDA, USB
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 07:53:59PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:55:35 -0700
bsquared bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Can anyone help determine what may be wrong with kernel config.
The last message is:
[ 15.448606] [c16c5079] ? 386_start_kernel + 0x79/0x7b
Hello,
I got this error when building coreutils.
expr.c:54:18: fatal error: gmp.h: No such file or directory
As far as I can tell this file is not in the archive. The only
reference to it has been in 5.10. I don't recall this issue from book
6.7.
These are the exact commands I entered:
grep -3 gmp config.log
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/tools/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.2/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /sources/gcc-4.5.2/configure --prefix=/tools
--with-local-prefix=/tools --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-shared
--enable-threads=posix
I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it
failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the
toolchain adjustment has any effect. I may have to wipe /tools and
start over.
I was able to recreate the gcc-build directory, and the build still
failed with
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38:03AM -0700, bsquared wrote:
I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it
failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the
toolchain adjustment has any effect. I may have to wipe /tools and
start over.
I was able to
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ken Moffat k...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:38:03AM -0700, bsquared wrote:
I tried to recreate the directory per ch. 5.10 instructions and it
failed complaining about gmp.h also. However, I don't know if the
toolchain adjustment
There are also a host of things that we do in pass 2 of gcc, but my
guess is that you missed something in the second pass of binutils.
You are correct sir.
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2
Thanks for your help!
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
frank@spx.com wrote:
Hi,
I was following LFS book source version 6.7. Completed steps before
step 5.10.
In 5.10, I need compile Gcc - pass 2. Got a fatal error ac_nonexistent.h
no such file or directory, details please see config.log below,
It sounds like you do not have autotools
/2011 11:01 AM
Please respond to
LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
To
LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
cc
Subject
Re: Help! GCC 4.5.1 pass 2 compilation failed.
frank@spx.com wrote:
Hi,
I was following LFS book source version 6.7. Completed steps
frank@spx.com wrote:
Please do not top post.
It doesn't have the autotools requirement.
I am using lfslivecd have autoconf version 2.61 and automake 1.10.
You shouldn't need autotools for LFS. From my log:
checking libelf.h usability... no
checking libelf.h presence... no
checking for
lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote on 03/02/2011 12:54:27
PM:
frank@spx.com wrote:
Please do not top post.
sure.
It doesn't have the autotools requirement.
I am using lfslivecd have autoconf version 2.61 and automake 1.10.
You shouldn't need autotools for LFS.
In
frank@spx.com wrote:
It doesn't have the autotools requirement.
I am using lfslivecd have autoconf version 2.61 and automake 1.10.
You shouldn't need autotools for LFS.
In your first reply, you said It sounds like you do not have autotools
installed in your host. I thought it may be
what version of LFS book and LFS source you are using?
As stated below, I use version 6.7.
LOL. SVN.
I am using LFS liveCD 6.3 with source files update to 6.7 and followed
book version 6.7.
I assume liveCD6.3 also works for 6.7, maybe that's wrong. I will try to
restart the task
indicates no attempt to
install them. They were built. I ran them from the
'shadow-n.n.n/src' directory. Now I'm not sure about the state of the
environment. I realized I had an issue when I attempted the command
to disable mailbox creation.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian
I have
-n.n.n/src' directory. Now I'm not sure about the state of the
environment. I realized I had an issue when I attempted the command
to disable mailbox creation.
Any help is appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian
I have attached the logs, file list, patches and build script.
shadow_build_files.tar.gz
the result is 2.
This is my third attempt, thinking I had missed something, so I have
scripted everything. I do not think I have missed any steps on this
attempt, but I may fall short on Package Users Hint - prerequisite 2
;-)
Any help is appeciated thanks,
Brian
If you take a close look
If you take a close look at the Package Users hint you will see in the
first two paragraphs of Section 6 some information about installing 'su'
in Chapter 5 of the book. In Chapter 5.17 of the book, Coreutils-8.5,
the last paragraph and the last command deal with this. There are a
number of
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Brian Winfrey bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
I could not get past 'make check' before (also needs to be run as root
with Package Users), but happily I am now. However, it appears that I
have issues with 'make install' this is the error log. (complete log
is
missed something, so I have
scripted everything. I do not think I have missed any steps on this
attempt, but I may fall short on Package Users Hint - prerequisite 2
;-)
Any help is appeciated thanks,
Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Brian Winfrey bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
I am unable to get passed 6.12 Binutils due to expect -c spawn ls
returning the ptys error.
This is normal when using the package users hint, due to the fact that
the PTY's are incorrectly premissioned in the chroot
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 6:23 PM, William Immendorf
will.immend...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 7:57 PM, Brian Winfrey bwcod...@gmail.com wrote:
I am unable to get passed 6.12 Binutils due to expect -c spawn ls
returning the ptys error.
This is normal when using the package users
I read a thread on linux questions that recommended 'chmod a+rw
/dev/pts/0'. Does that sound like a reasonable work around?
Did not appear to work.
I wonder why this is not mentioned in the hint, or did I miss it?
Thanks.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
# Begin /etc/inittab
id:3:initdefault:
si::sysinit:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc sysinit
l0:0:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 0
l1:S1:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 1
l2:2:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 2
l3:3:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 3
l4:4:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 4
l5:5:wait:/etc/rc.d/init.d/rc 5
I believe all of those questions are answered in the gcc build step 1 of the
book. It shouldn't matter what version of the tools you have as long as the
script says it works.Give us the output of the failed ./configure or
make after you follow the correct steps
On Oct 14, 2010 4:26 AM, Alois
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 01:18:28PM +0200, Alois Seifl wrote:
BTW is it possible to build GCC for a different platform e.g. a crosscompiler
for x86 to x64 or x64 to arm?
Sorry, missed this question when you posted it.
I think the correct answer is it all depends ;-)
If all you want to
Hi,
I'm a newby and tried to build gcc about over a half a year, but for some
reasons it fails everytime.
Would you please be so kind to give me any recipe or could you please provide
me a small how to?
Do I need GCC 3.x to build 4.x?
Is it possible to use another GCC except the one that
Hi,
I've already tried the script but the weird thing is that everything seems to
be ok, but trying to build gcc fails.
Any ideas?
Thank you for your response :)
Alois Seifl
--
Sicherer, schneller und einfacher. Die aktuellen Internet-Browser -
jetzt kostenlos herunterladen!
Hi,
I'm a newby and tried to build gcc about over a half a year, but for some
reasons it fails everytime.
Would you please be so kind to give me any recipe or could you please provide
me a small how to?
Do I need GCC 3.x to build 4.x?
Is it possible to use another GCC except the one that
Le jeudi 14 octobre à 13:17, Alois Seifl a écrit :
Hi,
I've already tried the script but the weird thing is that everything seems to
be ok, but trying to build gcc fails.
In your first message you spoke of gcc-3.x and lfs 6.7 requires gcc-4.1.2.
--
Ph. Delavalade
--
hi al,
i have finished installing the entire system.. i am in chapter-8.4 of
LFS-6.7...when i try to run the command
*grub-mkdevicemap --device-map=device.map
cat device.map
*it gives the output as
*(fd0) /dev/fd0
it doesnt show my hard disk
please help.
*
--
http
vignesh kumar wrote:
hi al,
i have finished installing the entire system.. i am in chapter-8.4 of
LFS-6.7...when i try to run the command
*grub-mkdevicemap --device-map=device.map
cat device.map
*it gives the output as
*(fd0) /dev/fd0
it doesnt show my hard disk
please help
end
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any
mistakes.
I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone
for LFS.
I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i
am using /dev/sdb (without a specific partition) to save
On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote:
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any
mistakes.
I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone
for LFS.
I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive, so i
am using
l...@ubuntu10-clean:/mnt/lfs/tools/glibc-build$ make
I am also new to LFS, the book says we should always work in
directory /mnt/lfs/sources and install temporary tools in
directory /mnt/lfs/tools. So, the right build place of glibc-build
pass1 should be /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build.
--
Andrew Benton wrote:
On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote:
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any
mistakes.
I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone
for LFS.
I am compiling onto a SanDisk Cruzer 4gb portable USB flash drive,
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:57:21 Mike McCarty wrote:
Andrew Benton wrote:
On 29/06/10 11:50, Saxon Landers wrote:
Hi there, im new to the mailing list, so please correct me if i make any
mistakes.
I have used linux for some time, and wanted to make my own, so ive gone
for LFS.
I am
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Tuesday 29 June 2010 12:57:21 Mike McCarty wrote:
[about partitions]
The mount command should be able to mount anything with a file system
in it. CD-ROMS don't have partitions, nor do native USB sticks,
[...]
An explicit example: 'mount -t ext3 /dev/sdb /mnt'. Oh,
about how to build perl couldn't
help, even google and company didn't help.
the problem arises with some life-distors, but does not on others. as i
was not able to see WHY, i just switched over to a distro which didn't
screw up chapter 5.
the perl built in chapter 5 compiles fine, but in chapter 6
On Thursday 03 June 2010 00:30:58 Chris Staub wrote:
I just built Perl in Chapter 5, and I do have gdbm installed (this is on
a couple-week-old LFS svn host system). I get gdbm.h NOT found.
during Configure, and it doesn't look like anything in Perl tries to
link to libgdbm.
Dig deep. Perl's
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 02:39 -0400, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 00:30:58 Chris Staub wrote:
I just built Perl in Chapter 5, and I do have gdbm installed (this is on
a couple-week-old LFS svn host system). I get gdbm.h NOT found.
during Configure, and it doesn't look like
Neal Murphy wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 04:08:33 Simon Geard wrote:
Can you be more specific about the problems you're seeing? Does the perl
executable fail to run at all, unable to link to libgdbm.so? Or is it
something less obvious?
Simon.
[...]
That's when I dug into perl's
On 06/03/2010 11:33 AM, Neal Murphy wrote:
On Thursday 03 June 2010 04:08:33 Simon Geard wrote:
Curious... like Chris, I routinely build LFS from a host with gdbm
installed (i.e LFS itself), and never observed any problems relating to
perl. Indeed, even on completed LFS install, /usr/bin/perl
people into spinning their wheels, but rather to help make LFS better, more
correct, and more bullet-proof.--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Some time back (LFS 6.4), I discovered that perl's configure program can
poison the build; it is designed to be extremely helpful by ferreting out
features of the host system to support. Specifically in my case, because it
found libgdbm on the host system, it configured perl to include support
Neal Murphy wrote:
Some time back (LFS 6.4), I discovered that perl's configure program can
poison the build; it is designed to be extremely helpful by ferreting out
features of the host system to support. Specifically in my case, because it
found libgdbm on the host system, it configured
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 20:02:31 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Thanks for the report Neal. I wonder if the extra commands are needed
now that gdbm is built in Chapter 6 before Perl.
The extra options may be needed if perl is used in the build process before
gdbm is built.
N
--
On 06/02/2010 05:22 PM, Neal Murphy wrote:
Some time back (LFS 6.4), I discovered that perl's configure program can
poison the build; it is designed to be extremely helpful by ferreting out
features of the host system to support. Specifically in my case, because it
found libgdbm on the host
Mag Gam wrote:
I am trying to compile gzip using icc. I tried following these
instructions,
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/intel-c-compiler.txt
But I keep getting,
isnan.c(132): error: floating-point operation result is out of range
static memory_double nan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Any help?
Sorry, can't really help you, as I've never used the Intel C compiler.
What version of the Intel C compiler are you using?
--
William Immendorf
The ultimate in free computing.
Messages in plain text, please, no HTML
I am trying to compile gzip using icc. I tried following these
instructions,
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/intel-c-compiler.txt
But I keep getting,
isnan.c(132): error: floating-point operation result is out of range
static memory_double nan = { L_(0.0) / L_(0.0) };
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 09:44:43 am lux-integ wrote:
/bin/sh: --slave: command not found
make[2]: *** [cantor/src/backends/R/rserver/CMakeFiles/rautoloads] Error
127 make[2]: Leaving directory `$SOURCES/kdeedu-4.4.2/build'
make[1]: ***
On 4/14/10, lux-integ lux-in...@btconnect.com wrote:
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 07:53:42 pm Trent Shea wrote:
Also,
/opt/kde/share/apps/cmake/modules/FindX11.cmake which gets installed by
kdelibs - not really sure if both files get used...
all to no avail.
I do not know if the 'name' used is
On Monday 12 April 2010 11:03:57 pm William Immendorf wrote:
Hmm... You might want to try this:
ln -sfv $XORG_PREFIX/lib/libXi.so /usr/lib
Thanks for the advice, ( It compiles to 100%) with a symbolic link of libXi.so
to /usr/lib, But I have invested quite a bit (ensuring that paths are
Good day. Please excuse my English.
Thanks for the help Andy and Chris.
I ask help to understand this, if it possible: $LFS_TGT-gcc
-print-libgcc-file-name, from:
ln -vs libgcc.a `$LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name | \
sed 's/libgcc/_eh/'` (5.5. GCC-4.4.3 - Pass 1)
Sincerely, fuf.
--
http
On 4/12/10, lux-integ lux-in...@btconnect.com wrote:
could this be related and does anyone have any ideas for swift resolution
I don't have libxklavier and it built.
Going off topic:
I don't like the giant balloon tooltips over the panel.
I like it better with this patch for kdelibs even
On 12 April 2010 20:36, AOL fufl...@aol.com wrote:
Good day. Please excuse my English.
Thanks for the help Andy and Chris.
I ask help to understand this, if it possible: $LFS_TGT-gcc
-print-libgcc-file-name, from:
ln -vs libgcc.a `$LFS_TGT-gcc -print-libgcc-file-name | \
sed 's/libgcc/_eh
hi all,
i have a boot code like below and i would like to add e820 bios call to
print memory information to screen. first i add 0xe8 to ah then 20 to al and
i call int 0x15 but it gives error on int. does anyone has any idea? or
guide me?
regards
--
Yasin Yenidünya mac...@gmail.com
code;
On 03/28/2010 09:29 AM, Yasin Yenidunya wrote:
hi all,
i have a boot code like below and i would like to add e820 bios call to
print memory information to screen. first i add 0xe8 to ah then 20 to al
and i call int 0x15 but it gives error on int. does anyone has any
idea? or guide me?
Good day. Please excuse my English.
I am trying establish LFS, my host-system is gNewSense.
Apparently it's enough (gNewSense), but there didn't have Bison-1.875
and Gawk-3.0, required in Chapter vii. Host System Requirements,
Linux From Scratch - Version 6.6
Synaptic Package Manager offer:
On 28/03/10 15:02, AOL wrote:
Good day. Please excuse my English.
I am trying establish LFS, my host-system is gNewSense.
Apparently it's enough (gNewSense), but there didn't have Bison-1.875
and Gawk-3.0, required in Chapter vii. Host System Requirements,
Linux From Scratch - Version 6.6
On 03/28/2010 10:02 AM, AOL wrote:
Good day. Please excuse my English.
I am trying establish LFS, my host-system is gNewSense.
Apparently it's enough (gNewSense), but there didn't have Bison-1.875
and Gawk-3.0, required in Chapter vii. Host System Requirements,
Linux From Scratch - Version
Hello all,
I'm trying to install player/stage program in mac..But I'm getting
the following as my output when I run 'make install' command.
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
Making install in doc
Making install in images
make[3]: Nothing to be done for
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 14:02:41 +0530
Sathya Narayana.R sathyan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I finished my LFS 6.5 along with package user system. After
completing the installation of grub and everything, i booted into the
new system.
It shows the following errors...
/sysmount: only root
On 03/13/2010 03:32 AM, Sathya Narayana.R wrote:
Hello,
I finished my LFS 6.5 along with package user system. After
completing the installation of grub and everything, i booted into the
new system.
It shows the following errors...
/sysmount: only root can do that
grep: /proc/mounts: No
Hello,
I finished my LFS 6.5 along with package user system. After
completing the installation of grub and everything, i booted into the
new system.
It shows the following errors...
/sysmount: only root can do that
grep: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory
Failure:
Unable to create devices
Matthew Burgess wrote:
Glibc which provides its own copy of getline() now. The easiest way
around this is something like:
sed -i -e 's/getline/get_line/g' texk/web2c/lib/tangleboot.{c,h}
I suggest you to use the following patch to fix all errors at once:
Hello,
First, thanks for creating this project. I have been looking for
something like this for some time now. I am eager to show people this
project once I get this to work for myself.
* I am using version 6.5 of the book
* All the software packages used are exact MD5SUM matches as in the
. It says they have been removed but the
directories remain. I have tried the same commands as root, and gotten the
same result. please help.
-Kyle Rush
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
--ignore-non-empty-errors (I think that's
right) and every other combination. It says they have been removed but the
directories remain. I have tried the same commands as root, and gotten the
same result. please help.
On your extra directories type:
rm -rf gcc-4.1.2 replace with correct
) and every other combination. It says they have been removed but the
directories remain. I have tried the same commands as root, and gotten the
same result. please help.
First, there are better places to start then LFS for 'a total newbie to
Linux'. I'd suggest one of the many HOWTO or Getting
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: Help
Sam Vivacqua wrote:
The problem is that when I type the comand In -sv $LFS/tools / I
get the output: -bash: In: comand not found
It's a lowercase L, not an uppercase I. The command is ln, not In.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
Sam Vivacqua wrote:
The problem is that when I type the comand In -sv $LFS/tools / I
get the output: -bash: In: comand not found
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com
mailto:ch...@beaker67.com wrote:
On 09/12/2009 02:26 PM, Sam Vivacqua
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Baho Utot
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 12:27 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: Help
Sam Vivacqua wrote:
The problem is that when I type the comand
The problem is that when I type the comand In -sv $LFS/tools / I get the
output: -bash: In: comand not found
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:01 PM, Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com wrote:
On 09/12/2009 02:26 PM, Sam Vivacqua wrote:
Hi,
For the comand ln -sv
101 - 200 of 429 matches
Mail list logo
