2014-04-23 13:55 GMT+08:00 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com:
xinglp wrote:
2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com:
On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
not found.
There's only
svn
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
not found.
There's only
svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
not found.
There's only
svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault.patch
Patches get copied when online book
2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com:
On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
not found.
There's only
svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils-8.22-shuf
xinglp wrote:
2014-04-23 11:39 GMT+08:00 Armin K. kre...@email.com:
On 04/23/2014 05:15 AM, xinglp wrote:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/coreutils-8.22-shuf-segfault-1.patch
not found.
There's only
svn://svn.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/trunk/coreutils/coreutils
Heya,
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links. Had to download it through the book, Chapter
3.
Regards,
Daniel
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
loki wrote:
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links.
I see that it is missing in the tarball, but which download link are you
referring to?
It does appear to be missing from the 7.5 md5sums and wget-list files
also. I'll fix
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 15:41 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
loki wrote:
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links.
I see that it is missing in the tarball, but which download link are you
referring to?
It does appear to be missing
loki wrote:
On Sat, 2014-04-19 at 15:41 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
loki wrote:
the patch for glibc in Chapter 6 is missing in the tar package as well
as in the download links.
I see that it is missing in the tarball, but which download link are you
referring to?
It does appear
Em 08-01-2014 09:31, akhiezer escreveu:
Hi Fernando,
If ever being added to the book - it's
low-maint - then probly 'good form' to drop the author a wee thanks note or
similar (eml-addr via foot of proj homepage). (Disclaimer: I don't have any
vested interest in the software, or know
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:52:41 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
Em 07-01-2014 10:23, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Em 07-01-2014 09:39, akhiezer escreveu:
Date
From: akhiezer
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:31 AM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
Hi akhiezer,
Thanks for your reply.
Is writer/name an empty file, or what? Can you post:
$ tree -apugsDF old new
Both writer and name are directories. The result
Em 07-01-2014 08:14, Parmenides escreveu:
From: akhiezer
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 1:31 AM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
Hi akhiezer,
...
Is writer/name an empty file, or what? Can you post:
$ tree -apugsDF old new
Hi, akhiezer,
I do
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:50:24 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
.
.
I do not have tree in my system. It is nice having it. Did I miss it
during some
Em 07-01-2014 09:39, akhiezer escreveu:
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:50:24 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
.
.
I do not have tree in my system. It is nice having it. Did I miss it
during some wrong install
Em 07-01-2014 10:23, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
Em 07-01-2014 09:39, akhiezer escreveu:
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 08:50:24 -0300
From: Fernando de Oliveira
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
.
.
I do not have tree in my system. It is nice
From: Parmenides mobile.parmeni...@gmail.com
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01:10:55 +0800
Subject: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
Hi,
I am not sure whether I should ask this quesiton here. I am trying
'diff' and 'patch', and have encounter
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 17:31:39 +
From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Patch delete a directory
From: Parmenides mobile.parmeni...@gmail.com
To: lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 01
Baho Utot wrote:
I have just built the book after updating from svn and it doesn't have
the tar man page patch in the wget-list nor in the md5sums files.
OK, thanks. I'll investigate.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have just built the book after updating from svn and it doesn't have
the tar man page patch in the wget-list nor in the md5sums files.
OK, thanks. I'll investigate.
Needed a minor change to the Makefile. Please update and retry. You
should only need
On 09/01/2013 09:57 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Baho Utot wrote:
I have just built the book after updating from svn and it doesn't have
the tar man page patch in the wget-list nor in the md5sums files.
OK, thanks. I'll investigate.
Needed a minor change to the Makefile
The Systemd branch (snapshot SYSTEMD-20130504) of the book makes use of
glibc-2.17-fhs-1.patch to avoid a non FHS compliant directory.
Do you intend to use it in the main branch (SVN) too?
Klaus Wulff
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
lifrsc.m.klsw...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
The Systemd branch (snapshot SYSTEMD-20130504) of the book makes use of
glibc-2.17-fhs-1.patch to avoid a non FHS compliant directory.
Do you intend to use it in the main branch (SVN) too?
Right now, I don't think so. The only thing in /var/db
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html,
binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
What is this patch for?
*patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch*
2) Since I'm trying to use the most recent package, say binutils-2.23.1,
instead
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 03:55 -0800, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
, binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
What is this patch for?
patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch
2) Since
JIA Pei wrote these words on 12/16/12 05:55 CST:
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html,
binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
snip
2) Since I'm trying to use the most recent package, say binutils-2.23.1,
instead of binutils-2.22
On 12/16/2012 06:55 AM, JIA Pei wrote:
Hi, all:
1) From
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
, binutils pass 1 requires a patch, why?
What is this patch for?
*patch -Np1 -i ../binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch*
It tells you in the book. Try reading
Hi Colleagues,
When i'm executing the patch for Binutils-2.22, i'm getting the below error :
--
lfs:/mnt/lfs/tools$ patch -Np1 -i ../sources/binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch
can't find file to patch at input line 11
Perhaps you
On 13/10/12 20:10, San blue wrote:
Hi Colleagues,
When i'm executing the patch for Binutils-2.22, i'm getting the below error :
--
lfs:/mnt/lfs/tools$ patch -Np1 -i ../sources/binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch
can't find file
San blue wrote:
Hi Colleagues,
When i'm executing the patch for Binutils-2.22, i'm getting the below error :
--
lfs:/mnt/lfs/tools$ patch -Np1 -i ../sources/binutils-2.22-build_fix-1.patch
You are in the wrong directory
Hello,
Thanks bruce and spiky, it works now. i havent untarred the file and trying
to apply patch..
Now it works..
Best regards, Sankar
You are in the wrong directory. Go back and re-read section 5.3. Pay
special attention to the sections labelled important.
-- Bruce
What dir are you
In 6.54. Patch-2.6.1
I ran:
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
make install
Then I realized that I forgot to run:
patch -Np1 -i ../patch-2.6.1-test_fix-1.patch
Is this not a problem since I did not run make check, or should I go
back and redo it, and if so, what method should I use
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:32:40PM -0400, Wayne Sallee wrote:
Then I realized that I forgot to run:
patch -Np1 -i ../patch-2.6.1-test_fix-1.patch
Is this not a problem since I did not run make check, or should I go
back and redo it, and if so, what method should I use to uninstall
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 03:32:40PM -0400, Wayne Sallee wrote:
Then I realized that I forgot to run:
patch -Np1 -i ../patch-2.6.1-test_fix-1.patch
Is this not a problem since I did not run make check, or should I go
back and redo it, and if so, what method should I use
LOL now I reailze that I did not forget to patch it. That's not until
6.54. and I'm still in 5.28.
I normally don't get lost that easily. :-)
I'll be ok ,, really :-)
Wayne Sallee
wa...@waynesallee.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
On Jul 14, 2012, at 15:06 PM, Wayne Sallee wrote:
LOL now I reailze that I did not forget to patch it. That's not until
6.54. and I'm still in 5.28.
I normally don't get lost that easily. :-)
I'll be ok ,, really :-)
Wayne Sallee
wa...@waynesallee.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 5:35 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
=
5.9.1. Installation of Binutils
Create
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/development/chapter05/binutils-pass2.html
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:58，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would that be?
The book doesn't mention any.
http
On 03/29/2012 07:58 PM, xinglp wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:58，Alexander Kapshukalexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:10 PM, xinglpxin...@gmail.com wrote:
在 2012年3月29日 下午11:03，Alexander Kapshukalexander.kaps...@gmail.com 写道：
What patch would
Hello LFS'ers,
I'm running through my first attempt at LFS. I'm using Ubuntu 11.10 for a host
system, running off a live usb. I'm using the current stable version of the
book. I went to apply the glibc-2.14.1-gcc_fix-1 patch, and it resulted in the
following error:
patching file nptl/sysdeps
Adam Del Vecchio wrote:
Hello LFS'ers,
I'm running through my first attempt at LFS. I'm using Ubuntu 11.10
for a host system, running off a live usb. I'm using the current
stable version of the book. I went to apply the
glibc-2.14.1-gcc_fix-1 patch, and it resulted in the following error
-cross_compile-1.patch
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/gcc/gcc-4.6.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
What if it is needed? Is there no patch?
--
Thank you,
-Brian
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hello;
I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
two, but I am not finding any for this one.
LD drivers/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in
reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() to the function
bsquared wrote:
Hello;
I got three different section mismatch warnings. I found patches for
two, but I am not finding any for this one.
LD drivers/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0x10539d): Section mismatch in
reference from the function parport_pc_probe_port() to the
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
All --
I was flowing along nicely with LFS 6.8, until I come to the second pass
of gcc 4.5.2 (after the binutils second pass). Where the book says to patch
it (section 5.10.1) to revert to the old behavior with this command:
patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
This command just
Mark Maurer wrote:
All --
I was flowing along nicely with LFS 6.8, until I come to the second pass
of gcc 4.5.2 (after the binutils second pass). Where the book says to
patch
it (section 5.10.1) to revert to the old behavior with this command:
patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.5.2-startfiles_fix
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's gone wrong? I've downloaded the patches anew twice ... no luck.
--
http
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:37:33AM -0600, Robert Mullin wrote:
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's gone wrong? I've
Mike Hollis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:37:33AM -0600, Robert Mullin wrote:
root:/sources# tar xf bzip2-1.0.5.tar.gz
root:/sources# cd bzip2-1.0.5
root:/sources/bzip2-1.0.5# patch -np1 -i ../bzip2-1.0.5-install_docs-1.patch
patch: Only garbage was found in the patch input.
What's
On Sunday 12 December 2010 17:03:04 Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 12:43 CST:
Suddenly, I suspected that to be the problem ... maybe
not. In any case, I've one terminal and only one tab ... chroot.
Things seem to be going swimmingly ... until this -npl -Npl
Randy McMurchy wrote:
robert wrote these words on 12/12/10 12:43 CST:
Suddenly, I suspected that to be the problem ... maybe
not. In any case, I've one terminal and only one tab ... chroot.
Things seem to be going swimmingly ... until this -npl -Npl moment.
And just for completeness, you
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c.rej
patching file sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386
fastidiously accurate notes as I move through the
build process and will share those areas of vagueness in the future.
Thanks for your attention.
robert
William Immendorf wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:11 AM, robert mullinrob...@gmail.com wrote:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
nptl/sysdeps/pthread
Mike Hollis wrote these words on 11/25/10 09:33 CST:
You are in the wrong directory . You are trying to apply a glibc patch
to the Linux kernel. You should be in the unpacked glibc directory.
I don't think you understand the fundamentals of the install procedure
and a grasp
Mike Hollis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 04:11:57AM -0600, robert wrote:
from within linux-2.6.36.1 directory
$patch -Np1 -i ../glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
yields:
patching file nptl/sysdeps/pthread/pt-initfini.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 45.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
robert wrote:
I have a fairly good beginner's grasp of the compile/build procedure.
And yes, I refer often to 5.3.
Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open.
1. Browser at the bottom of Section 5.3.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 09:58:37AM -0600, robert wrote:
Thanks, Mike. Just a mis-pasted error. I caught it, corrected it, and
now proceed along my way.
And thanks too for the respectful suggestion.
I have a fairly good beginner's grasp of the compile/build procedure.
And yes, I
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
robert wrote:
I have a fairly good beginner's grasp of the compile/build procedure.
And yes, I refer often to 5.3.
Until you get the hang of things, I suggest having three windows open.
1. Browser at the bottom of Section 5.3.
Glibc GCC Build Fix Patch - 2.5 KB:
Download:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/lfs/development/glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
MD5 sum: d1f28cb98acb9417fe52596908bbb9fd
404
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
got it at
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/glibc/glibc-2.12.1-gcc_fix-1.patch
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Using SVN-20100803 at Chapter 5.2, Glibc-2.11.2. Applying the patch
command for glibc-2.11.2-makefile_fix-1.patch failed with No such file
or directory.
The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS
download sites. Is there another way, about which I have forgotten
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Dan McGhee beesn...@grm.net wrote:
The patch is in the wget-list but I couldn't find it on any of the LFS
download sites. Is there another way, about which I have forgotten, to
get it?
Well, I don't know where the heck the patch came from, so I'll just
wait
On 4 August 2010 17:23, William Immendorf Well, I don't know where
the heck the patch came from, so I'll just
wait untill Matt gets the patch ready. But we would like it soon, as
I'm getting impatient for it...
Yeah, I suspect make-3.82 will turn out to be too close to the
bleeding edge
that we should revert to make-3.81 and proceed merrily
from there? Maybe just continue on with the current SVN and document
failures to the list? I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on the
ticket that glibc built fine without the patch.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
fine without the patch.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I'm going with Andy's first suggestion (see the other thread).
ĸen (mightily confused by the gmail interface changes
and there was a note on the
ticket that glibc built fine without the patch.
I'm going with Andy's first suggestion (see the other thread).
ĸen (mightily confused by the gmail interface changes)
I would suggest this sed, it works for me:
sed -i 's/ot \$/ot:\n\ttouch $...@\n$/' manual/Makefile
Run
and document
failures to the list? I'm building x86_64 and there was a note on the
ticket that glibc built fine without the patch.
I'm going with Andy's first suggestion (see the other thread).
ĸen (mightily confused by the gmail interface changes)
I would suggest this sed, it works for me:
sed
Having just installed LFS-6.6 with kernel-2.6.32.7, I thought I'd
look into patching it to the current patch level. OTOH, I'm on a
40Kbps dialup line and a 10MB patch-2.6.33 is big enough to: a)
give me pause before attempting a few hours of downloading, b)
suggest that there's some significant
On 6/20/10, Paul Rogers paulgrog...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Is there someplace where someone writes about what's new in
kernel patches? New and removed features, considerations about
implementation, etc.? Someplace where we can see what's in it,
whether it has anything for us or not?
Kernel
On Sunday 20 June 2010 11:11:01 Paul Rogers wrote:
Having just installed LFS-6.6 with kernel-2.6.32.7, I thought I'd
look into patching it to the current patch level. OTOH, I'm on a
40Kbps dialup line and a 10MB patch-2.6.33 is big enough to: a)
give me pause before attempting a few hours
First off, hello everyone.
I am doing my first build of LFS, and I seem to have hit a little snag.
I am using book version 6.5, and I am up to 5.10: GCC-4.4.1 Pass 2
Up until now, I have had no apparent errors.
I am using Fedora 10 with GCC 4.3.2 and patch 2.6 on a Pentium 4 as my build
Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Thu, Feb 11, 2010 9:49 am
Subject: Re: GCC patch failure LFS 6.5
bchaf...@programmer.net wrote these words on 02/11/10 08:13 CST:
This command: patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.4.1-startfiles_fix-1.patch
fails with the following error:
patching file gcc
What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
try to patch them anyway, it says error on line #, can't find file to
patch
but when I re-run the patch
On 09/02/10 12:48, Kyle Rush wrote:
What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
try to patch them anyway, it says error on line #, can't find
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Kyle Rush k...@cyber-rush.org wrote:
What's up with the gcc-4.1.2-specs-1.patch?
when I run it, it prompts for what file to patch, and it seems to think it
should patch a whole bunch of files, none of which actually exist. If I
try to patch them anyway
zzf...@embarqmail.com wrote:
[...]
I read the post udev-config md5 sum and I don't think I
fully undestand the the part about timestamps and md5sums.
The tarball has information about the files it contains,
including date and time information, so the extracted
file can be touched to reproduce
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Is the md5 sum for gcc 70f5ac588a79e3c9901d5b34f58d896d ?
Does the patch have the sum
799ef1971350d2e3c794f2123f247cc6
?
Did you remove the directory from pass 1 and re-extract
gcc?
I get:
$ patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.4.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
patching file gcc/gcc.c
Hunk #1
zzf...@embarqmail.com wrote:
I read the post udev-config md5 sum and I don't think I
fully undestand the the part about timestamps and md5sums.
The book is rebuilt daily and the udev-config and bootscripts are
extracted from the book's xml source. This causes a daily change in the
tar files
I just completed a build from LFS Version SVN-20100109. I
to tinker a little to get it working, but that is to be
expected with a development build.
My host system is a Live Disk 6.3 - jhalfs build.
When I tried to apply gcc-4.4.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch to
the freshly unpacked gcc-4.4.2 per
zzf...@embarqmail.com wrote:
I just completed a build from LFS Version SVN-20100109. I
to tinker a little to get it working, but that is to be
expected with a development build.
My host system is a Live Disk 6.3 - jhalfs build.
When I tried to apply gcc-4.4.2-startfiles_fix-1.patch
2009/12/19 Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com:
The
usual cause for this is missing perl. Do ls -l /usr/bin/perl and perl
-V.
Jonathan,
also check that you created all of the symlinks in 6.6.
ĸen
--
After tragedy, and farce, OMG poneys!
--
Message: 4
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 01:16:01 -0500
From: Chris Staub ch...@beaker67.com
Subject: Re: Knoppix is missing the patch command
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Message-ID: 4b2b1e21.3050...@beaker67.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
format
2009/12/18 Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com:
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check
/sources/glibc-build/malloc/mtrace
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.mtrace
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check
/bin/sh: /sources/glibc-build/malloc/mtrace: No such file
Hi Chris,
Here's the output after running grep as you outlined above.
-Jonathan
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check
/sources/glibc-build/malloc/mtrace
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.mtrace
/sources/glibc-build/libio/tst-fopenloc.check
/bin/sh:
The information may be outdated (1 year ago), but I managed to build a dev
LFS system from Knoppix 5.1 on a PII with 256mb RAM.
The 3 tricks I remember were:
1. Use a swap partition, the build failed for obscure reasons without any
and it was in gcc too if I remember correctly. *1.5gig has
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:26:31 -0500
From: Dominic Ringuet dring...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Knoppix is missing the patch command
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Message-ID:
f1c8dcc10912170426q41d33b59p5a6d0d6c36b2b...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain
On 12/18/2009 12:56 AM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Dominic and everyone else,
Thanks for the tips. I found patch after refreshing the
synaptic packages, and it installed fine. Now I'm on level 6.9, and
I get these errors when I run the tests on glibc:
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build
remember
that some packages will max out
your memory because they expand.
as for patch, sure. doo this
all the time on livecd's
Justin P. Mattock
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:34 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
I believe you can install extra stuff while using a livecd - just use
whatever its package manager installation commands are (I believe
Knoppix is based on Debian so you should just be able to use apt-get) -
of course you'd have to
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 3:27 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 00:34 -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
I believe you can install extra stuff while using a livecd - just use
whatever its package manager installation commands are (I believe
Knoppix is based on Debian so
Jonathan Wilkes schrieb:
I tried googling for any hints, and checking the archives for this list,
but I'm new to linux so I'm a bit unsure what I'm searching for. Any hints
would be greatly appreciated.
As far as I know most LiveCDs should have a read-write-overlay
filesystem. Which means
Simon Geard wrote:
Can't speak for Knoppix, but no - live CDs often have a read-only root
filesystem.
I've used several, and never encountered one like what you describe.
They use unionfs, aufs, or something similar.
Mike
--
p=p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);};main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
