Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:43:11PM +, Pedro Lino wrote:
What do you mean complete office install?
A dev-install with these configure-flags:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/dev-tools/tree/bibisect/build.sh#n34
So no mozilla/binfilter/help/dictionaries, but most bugs
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 11:36:47PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
So, really, rather than time at which the tinderbox pulled, I argue
that recorded commit time of the HEAD node is a better identifier to
put in tarball names, about boxes, etc. It is really (within a
branch) a proper
Hi all,
I added a bibisecting Howto to the wiki, please try getting started with
bibisecting and report back if you are missing information on how to proceed.
And remember: Bibisecting a bug will make it much more likely that your bug
will be fixed quickly as a bibisected regression is much
Hi Sophie, Cor, QA-List
please see:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2012-February/003745.html
this is an opportunity to get more structured manual testing done on
LibreOffice. Could you have a look if you could help out coordinating this with
our own efforts to get LibreOffice
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:38:36PM +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Yeah, basically don't reopen bugs :-) unless its worksforme or some
other I couldn't reproduce this state and you've figured out a
sure-fire way to reproduce it.
Agree. IMHO FIXED-REOPENED should be reserved for the original bug
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 08:13:46AM +0100, Alex Thurgood wrote:
I have been rummaging around FDO bugzilla trying to find a way to
make myself automatically get CC on bugs filed fot the database
module. As yet, I've not found any easier way to do this than by
querying for all bugs where the
Hi Sophie, all,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:29:32AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
So, I'm ready to work on this, but as underlined by Yifan, it would
be interesting for us to keep also our Litmus system up to date and
synchronized because it's used under several OS and languages so it
has a
Hi Sophie,
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
ok, but I won't install ubuntu, setup an environment on launchpad
and install bazaar (or do I have to? is it mandatory?). So a little
help so that I don't spend all my week-end on this would be:
- is this link the good
)
community testing, communication:
- how do we recruit more QA-interested contributors? (Cor Nouws, Sophie
Gaultier)
- can we have QA-related EasyHacks? Can we explicitly promote those? (all)
regression testing/bibisect:
- how do we broaden the bibisect know-how (Korrawit Pruegsanusak, Bjoern
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:08:03AM +0100, Sophie Gautier wrote:
For Checkbox we are waiting for an experienced/skilled QA member to
write the tests, will we have this person for the call?
I hope both Nicholas Skaggs and Yifan Jiang will be able to join the call so
that we can work out what
Hi Nino,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:42:10AM +0100, Nino Novak wrote:
I'd like to add a typical requirement/wish from an occasional tester:
- to have an easy way to set up an individual collection of test cases which
can be reused (first idea: e.g. by tagging them), so that everybody sees, who
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
I have some explicit ideas on some of the items.
Should we attempt to exchange those before the meeting, or at least
mention them (briefly)?
In general, just mention a new topic as a oneliner to add to the agenda. If its
something
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 02:45:13AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to set up a LibreOffice QA call to streamline our QA efforts. I
propose to make our first call on:
Friday, 2012-03-09 15:00 UTC
[...]
I will post the phone conference numbers later.
Dial
Hi Yifan Jiang,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 10:39:57AM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote:
Hi Bjoern,
Thanks for inviting and coordinating everything ( sorry for the late reply, it
was a busy week ) :) I'll try to join when it is possible, though the time
could be a bit late in China. An obstacle is I am
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 03:18:17PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
IMO, we need a tag for bugs related to experimental turned on/off
See comment https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43869#c24
What is useful? whiteboard, keyword, tag in summary line ?
Whiteboard. Keyword is too much bothering
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:09:24AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
That comes as a consequence of a larger problem: what features are enabled
when you check that box?
If you dont know it, you shouldnt touch it. There is a reason that those
features are in experimental -- they are likely unstable. Unless
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 09:20:40AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
The problem here is that a single check box enables a group of unknown
features.
No, its not. If you need a stable product, the checkbox is not a option anyway
as all its features are instable by definition.
Personally I would be
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 08:25:11PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
A feature is either stable enough to be included even with experimental
enabled or it is not. If you care about macros, help out getting it stable
enough to be moved out of experimental an into the general feature set.
Hmm, macro
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:04:55AM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote:
After thinking about it, I agree. Net result of wiki edits:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=BugReport_Detailsaction=historysubmitdiff=45998oldid=45766
Thanks!
Best,
Bjoern
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 05:32:04PM +, Pedro Lino wrote:
Maybe branch 3.4.x should continue to be updated (in the same way that
Mozilla keeps fixing bugs in version 3.6.x, with x currently at 28, even
though the latest version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions
are
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:04:44PM +0400, Ivan Timofeev wrote:
Perhaps, if you mean the whole team. But note that there are some
lunatic guys like me, who are interested in bug-fixing ~completely.
;)
Take a good look at the last slide of:
Hi Rainer, all,
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 07:21:15AM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
a) Regression Bug 47096 EDITING: Alt + Drag and Drop for complete
rows impossible in particular documents frequently forces me to use
3.4.5.
I had a short look at this one as a exemplary post-mortem (the bug
Hi,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 06:42:45PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
AA- copypaste existing manual test as a one off for 3.5/Precise (Bjoern)
AA- Check if test documents are URLs properly distributed to Checkbox
(Bjoern)
Just discussed this with Nicholas Skaggs, the deadline
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:27:20PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
The first and most important one is: it is behind its own login -- and that
prevents the casual bypasser to get involved and interested. IMHO, we
absolutely need to change that. The testcases should be browsable without a
login
Hi there,
this is the reminder that we have the next QA call on Friday.
2012-03-23 1500UTC
Prototype agenda below, please reply with topics you would like to dicuss and
feel free to join even if you are not explicitly invited (as this is not our
first call, we might have some time for more
Hi Pedro,
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
But adding it to the easy hacks doesn't it mean that it's off limits to
the usual collaborators
No, it only means that these task do not require a particulary deep knowledge
of some arcane corners of the LibreOffice codebase.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:26:49PM +0200, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
For the reference:
* I have a Litmus TODO list at
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus_TODO. I'd be glad if you
added bugzilla links and missing entries to it. As I've mentioned
before, it would be really nice to maintain
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
I don't know, but it may not make sense to keep improving Litmus at that
point. After all, if they settled for a rewrite, you just have to expect it
to be so much better than the old tool, right? :)
That might be the case
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:16:51PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
They already have a staging server, but I cant get into it.
Register mail just took a while. I now can walk around in:
https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org
Its is all looking very nifty and web-2.0-ish. But unlike Litmus, I
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:44:46PM -0700, Pedro wrote:
I thought it was what WE (you , me, TDF, the LO project,etc) are missing.
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
That is already perfectly clear -- as you know we already have a bug for that
-- and thus need no repeating. But punching the codeconductor devs for not
having your pet feature in a prerelease of their free
Hi Petr, all,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 02:44:38PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
I agree with Marcus that often it is not easy to say what functionality
is affected. Various changes might have many side effects.
Still, developers are the ones with the best guess there.
I am a bit scared by adding
Hi all,
Let me take this opportunity to shamelessly plug the LibreOffice Hamburg
Hackfest 2012. The city of Hamburg has throughout history taken its freedom and
independence as a high treasure -- as can be seen from its motto: Libertatem
quam peperere maiores digne studeat servare posteritas.
Hi Rainer,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:38:59PM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I have a question / suggestion concerning EasyHack tags. I do not
know whether there has been an agreement, and the Wiki is some
wishy-washy
We should clarify that then.
I would prefer a standard that
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 04:16:59AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
Your comments make perfect sense. I am available to help with a serious
comparison of Litmus vs Caseconductor.
Did you already have a chance to have a look at:
https://caseconductor-dev.allizom.org/
Hi Rainer,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 06:38:59PM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I have a question / suggestion concerning EasyHack tags. I do not
know whether there has been an agreement, and the Wiki is some
wishy-washy
Which Wikipages dod you find documenting this btw?
Best,
Bjoern
Hi developers, Hi QAers,
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:43:21AM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
My take on this:
- What does make sense, is having indeed a list of areas that can be
clearly pointed at, and to mention them in a sort of standard post
on our official TDF blog. E.g. every two weeks 4 to 8
Hi Sophie,
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:05:24PM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote:
I'm not Pedro or Rimas, but I would have time to have a look for the
end of next week. If you think I'm not enough skilled, no problem.
That would be excellent! And if anything, you would be overskilled as my
primary
Hi Shahar,
here is a suggestion:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 01:38:00AM +0300, Shahar Or wrote:
I would prefer a simple instruction on how to:
1. Have a URL to a list of all RTL bugs. Not just the most annoying ones.
Hi there,
this is the reminder that we have the next QA call on Friday:
2012-04-06 1400UTC
Given that this is a holiday in a lot of places (I realized that too late) we
might end up with only a few people on the call. Hopefully, we can counter that
by discussing everything we missed out on the
Hi all,
here are the minutes for the LibreOffice QA call on:
Friday, 2012-04-06 1400UTC
attending: Rainer Bielefeld, Florian Reisinger, Petr Mladek, Jan Holesovsky
(Kendy), Bjoern Michaelsen
* pending action items
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- Publish Rainers
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:23:46PM +0200, Nino Novak wrote:
the question emerged, if reassigning a NEEDINFO-bug to the presumed info
provider[1] is Good or Bad. Please advise.
Nino
[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/index.php?title=BugTriagediff=prevoldid=42240
IMHO yes, the bug
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 09:53:22AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I believe it is a very bad idea to use that field to show who
should contribute additional information to the bug report, the
Assigned To field should remain reserved for the competent person
person who will fix the bug
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 03:18:41AM -0700, Pedro wrote:
For QA this is mostly useless. The only information you can get from this is
about the core repository...
Which is where 99% of the action is, so please refrain from exaggerations.
LibreOffice 3.5.3.1
Build ID:
Hi Rainer,
you miss some of the most important community mechanics at work here. See
comments below.
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:14:47AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
That's something to what I might agree. But when I ask John Doe to
contribute some more information, I (QA) remain owner. But
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:54:23PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
Nino Novak píše v Út 24. 04. 2012 v 12:14 +0200:
Hi Guys,
can we have a decision in this matter?
So, please, for meritocratic reasons, Bjoern and Rainer, I believe it's up
to
you to decide. (Or is ESC or whatever tdf
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 05:44:29PM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Petr: Yifan setup CC internally, put some sample testcases, played
with it this morning, looks good:
Advantages:
+ easier interface than Litmus
+ most actions are intuitive
+ suite and tags to sort
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:34:56AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
BTW: There was wrongly described Novell bugzilla. In fact, it has the
best solution, I have ever seen, for this particular problem. It has
heavily modified the interface. If you set the state NEEDEINFO, it shows
inputbox where
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
And developers, are they helped with the more precise info?
In less than 1% of the cases, so: no.
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
Hi there,
this is the reminder that we have the next QA call on Friday:
2012-05-04 1400UTC
prototype agenda below. Additions and corrections most welcome.
action item review:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- collect further ideas for spending a dedicated resource
Hi all,
here are the minutes of the QA call on 2012-05-04 1400UTC.
attendants: Cor, Rainer, Bjoern
pending action items:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- collect further ideas for spending a dedicated resource (Cor/Rainer)
- blocked on CC/Litmus choice
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:47:24PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
AA - blog about bug verification (Bjoern)
I had some additional thoughts on this and think we should make that another QA
EasyHack: Twiiter resolved bugs for verification. The task is to set up a
some bot that sends a short
Hi all,
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-05-18 14:00 UTC -- the agenda is
suspiciously empty so far this time (I havnt had too much time to dig through
the list during UDS), additions and topics most welcome!
pending action items:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
Hi Florian,
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:28:37AM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
Which room? ( or is it always the same)
Ups, sorry forget that. Like always:
Dial-in numbers for countries outside Germany can be found at:
http://www.talkyoo.net/main/telefonkonferenz_internationale_rufnummern
Hi all,
here are the minutes of the LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-05-18 14:00 UTC.
attending: Markus, Florian, Rainer, Petr, Bjoern
pending action items:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- collect further ideas for spending a dedicated resource (Cor/Rainer)
-
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 07:38:10PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
- Yifan had good progress setting this up (Petr)
this being MozTrap.
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
But for all people who have a brain working similar to mine that
website is a terrible mess, for me every step was painful, to find
where I can do a click announcing that I am interested in
LibreOffice was more or less
Hi,
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:15:30AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
But for all people who have a brain working similar to mine that
website is a terrible mess, for me every step was painful, to find
where I can do a click announcing that I am interested in
LibreOffice was more or less
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:46:34AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Bugzilla links in OpenHatch lead to the
www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/ environment, what has been created
for use with Bugzilla Submission Assitant.
I do not think that it's a good idea, for example in that
environment your
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 03:19:21AM -0600, Yi Fan Jiang wrote:
We ever had a discussion of switching our case management tool from
Litmus to Moztrap, see:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Litmus-a-proposal-td3845560.html
Now we are very happy to announce the
Hi,
in case you missed it, we are on openhatch with our project and our EasyHacks
now:
http://openhatch.org/+projects/libreoffice
http://openhatch.org/search/?project=libreoffice
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
Hi all,
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-06-01 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
pending action items:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- collect further ideas for spending a dedicated resource (Cor/Rainer)
- blocked on CC/Litmus choice availability
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 08:54:42AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 03:08:55PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
On 01/06/12 15:01, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com
wrote:
* Quality of round-robin patch
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 10:51:25AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
So -- people with commit rights are not the issue:
- can commit directly to master on their own responsibility
(this should be discouraged, except for urgent
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 08:02:43AM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Do I see the beginning of some CWS process here?
BTW, the main trouble with the CWS process was that it required the changes to
completely resolve some random bug description (aka. what some non-developer
dreamed up to be his pet
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 09:02:43AM -0700, bfo wrote:
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote
Crash counter (search for libreoffice-core):
https://errors.ubuntu.com/
Open LibreOffice crasher bugs by most affected users:
Open LibreOffice crasher bugs by bug heat:
This s very cool. Question
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:06:03PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
Hello Rainer, Bjoern, all,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Rainer Bielefeld
libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote:
has already someone tested http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/bibisect/
successfully and can contribute
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:18:00PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote:
So, my proposal: remove bibisected35 if we have *older or *newer.
[...]
Did I missed something or misunderstood something? Please feel free to
tell me :)
Sounds good to me, go ahead. I wonder, if we should get rid of the
resend (updating subject, ccing projects)
- Forwarded message from Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com -
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2012 18:47:37 +0200
From: Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
To: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Indeed -- I will need to fix some dependencies to make in install cleanly. So,
hold on for a bit until that is fixed.
LibreOffice-3.6.0~alpha1~0ubuntu1~precise1~ppa4 from that PPA should now give
you a base for testing. All
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 04:47:28PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 12:11 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Petr Mladek schrieb:
rc should not appear in Help/About, that's an additional info added
to Bugzilla Version like Master.
yes
Could we use the same scheme also in
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 12:26:55AM +0530, dE . wrote:
Are these static builds? Cause when extracting from RPMs, they complained
of missing libpng on Gentoo.
Ubuntu Precise builds are for Ubuntu Precise and nothing else. That being said,
this alpha release contains a packaging bug still that
On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 03:45:11PM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 17:25 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Just as an hint. Ubuntu/Debian would use something like:
3.6.0~alpha1
3.6.0~alpha1+daily20120606
3.6.0~beta1
3.6.0.1
I really like it. I would like to use
Hi all,
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 03:00:43AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Hi *,
for the upcoming new version 3.6.0, we today upload a first beta1
build that is (almost) feature-complete. For further milestones on the
way towards 3.6.0, please refer to our release plan timings here:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 03:59:54AM +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is happy to announce the first beta release of
LibreOffice 3.6.0. The upcoming 3.6.0 will be our fourth major release
in two years, and comes with a nice set of new features. Please be
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:41:50AM +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
yes, that implies that the first actual release is 3.6.1 and there is no
3.6.0 release, but those never work anyway so who cares ;)
Marketing does. 3.x.0 is when all the big news sites report about it and it
will be hard to change
Hi all,
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-06-14 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
@Norbert: Would be great for you to be able to join for gerrit discussion.
pending action items:
- Update/Create active triagers wiki page (Cor/Rainer)
- collect further ideas for spending a
Hi all,
here are the minutes of todays QA call.
attending: Florian, Petr, Rainer, Bjoern
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- Set Cor up with the Community/Forum maintainers at the distros
to better propagate Hackfests, Bug Hunting
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 06:21:07PM +0200, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
AI: - adapt script to new version theme (Markus)
done. The manual solution that is currently implemented is now
adjusted to the new version scheme.
lol, you could beat a high frequency trader bot with your latency.
Thanks!
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 02:10:27PM +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
why is it necessary to have distribution specific builds for testing?
AFAIK Kendy want to get rid of universal builds anyway.
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?type=rpm-x86_64lang=en-USversion=3.6.0
is there a lack of
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 07:38:34AM +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
shows a lot of 3.6.0 and 3.7.0 Bugs without key word regression,
although bugs for these Versions are regressions by definition.
... unless they are about new features ;)
Best,
Bjoern
at:
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen/+archive/libreoffice-precisetest-20120327
the same source package has been pushed to:
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=precise
and will finish building there in some ~5 hours, making it available to all
people who
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:25:40PM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-06-28 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
Hopefully it should be 2012-06-29??
Yes, sorry.
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
- Forwarded message from Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com -
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:25:40 +0200
From: Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com
To: Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA Call 2012-06-28
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
Hi,
please find the minutes of the QA call below. Additions and corrections most
welcome.
attending: Cor, Florian, Petr, Rainer, Bjoern
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- merge 3.5 and 3.6 in one big bibisect repo (Bjoern)
- recheck and
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 06:35:59PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:56:32AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* CXX0X-ABI incompatibility can of worms (Bjoern)
+ gcc 4.7 - cxx0x extension is binary incompatible
+ incompatible stdlib symbols that bust
Hi Noel,
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:04:01PM +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
It would be nice if the gerrit emails had this in the header:
To: libreoff...@lists.freedesktop.org,
SO that my mailing list filters picked it up as belonging to the libreoffice
mailing list.
yes, I saw that -- I
Hi there,
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:13:32PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ firehose gerrit updates to the mailing list
until complaints.
+ quite a number blocked by moderation
AI: + look at gerrit moderation issues / regex's (Thorsten)
This is solved now
Hi Sophie,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Sophie Gautier wrote:
Some information on the bug hunting session in the FR community,
there has been 7 persons participating during the two days (they
even go on on Sunday :).
I'm now collecting feedback to draw a better process for our
Hi QA guys and gals,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51894
--- Comment #4 from Jean Spiteri beimaginativeegr...@gmail.com 2012-07-10
21:54:35 CEST ---
Can you help me, please? Give me the most important questions from
ask.libreoffice.org.
I hope this list is a good audience
Hi all,
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-07-13 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- merge 3.5 and 3.6 in one big bibisect repo (Bjoern)
- recheck and tweak bibisect details (Bjoern)
- research
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:55:50PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ Unique IP's using 3.6.0 betas so far:
+ B1 - 1100
+ B2 - 1000
+ B3 - 220
There is a simple explaination for the huge beta3 dropoff I guess: I never
packaged it in the prereleases
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:21:17AM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 04:55:50PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* gerrit update (David / Bjoern)
+ can we have the patch in the 'new change' mail (Lionel)
+ would be nice !
+ two ways to do mailing -
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 04:50:28PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
* gerrit update (Bjoern)
+ syadmin team for gerrit have an alias:
ger...@otrs.documentfoundation.org
please use sparingly for agreed issues or
service outages.
+ OTRS being deployed
Hi Olivier,
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:32:35AM -0700, Olivier Hallot [via Document
Foundation Mail Archive] wrote:
I actually would like to understand better the scope of the session. For
example, I am one of the pt-BR admins and I think the whole Silverstripe
template should be trashed and
Hi all,
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-07-27 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- Set Cor up with the Community/Forum maintainers at the distros
to better propagate Hackfests, Bug Hunting
Hi all,
here are the minutes of the LibreOffice QA call on 2012-07-27 14:00 UTC.
Additions and corrections welcome.
attendance: Petr, Rainer, Norbert, Bjoern
completed action items:
+ - Invite active bugwranglers to next call/QA list, CC Rainer (Bjoern)
- authorative close of bugzilla
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 09:09:27AM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Do we have an ongoing list of open issues that we keep track of and up to
date?
Yes, its called bugzilla. ;)
If not it might be a good idea to get one going. I think that there
are at least 3-4 things in the past couple
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 08:52:04AM -0700, bfo wrote:
Florian Reisinger wrote
Somehow it seems to me that Bugzilla is down (With some circumstances
only...) http://www.webpagescreenshot.info/img/862641-81201261840PM
Hi.
Seems it is updated to 4.0.7 now and blazing fast atm...
Best
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Actually - that's almost right :-) only the timing is wrong. The
important thing is to stop developers who created a new bug from moving
on to creating another one, first fixing the one they just made ;-)
Incedentally,
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
