On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:12 PM, Paul Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
>> But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or
>> alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with
>> all the classfiles in there I can take
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 05:45:52PM +0100, martin odersky wrote:
> But I need to know how to build lift with a 2.8.0 compiler. Or
> alternatively, if a kind soul can send me a lift 2.8.0 tarball with
> all the classfiles in there I can take it from there.
FYI until you have git you can always dow
Finally! Onward ...
- Indrajit
On 22/12/09 11:29 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, martin odersky
> wrote:
>> I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying
>> again now.
>
> ... and it builds with RC3. Great! So now I have something to work wit
On 22/12/09 11:06 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> wrote:
>>
>> On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
>>> wrote:
Martin,
I think the jetty version is
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:48 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying
> again now.
... and it builds with RC3. Great! So now I have something to work with ...
Cheers
-- Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I found someone who could download the repository with git. So trying
again now.
-- Martin
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:36 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> wrote:
>>
>> On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
wrote:
>
> On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Martin,
>>>
>>> I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
>>>
>>> It should be:
On 22/12/09 10:44 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
>>
>> It should be:
>>
>> org.mortbay.jetty
>> jetty
>> [6.1.6,7.0)
>>
> ..
Must be effect of some scala.version property set somewhere.
do "mvn -Dscala.version=2.8.0.Beta1-RC5" to enforce a different version.
- Indrajit
On 22/12/09 10:43 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
> wrote:
>> Martin,
>>
>> I think the jetty vers
http://www.dridus.com/liftweb-compiled-280.tar.gz
It is still uploading -- it totals 240,976,056 bytes and should be
completely uploaded in 15 minutes.
-Ross
On Dec 22, 2009, at 11:45 AM, martin odersky wrote:
> I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated
> classfiles
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
>
> It should be:
>
> org.mortbay.jetty
> jetty
> [6.1.6,7.0)
>
... and, which test:sample are you referring to?
Thanks
-- Marti
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Indrajit Raychaudhuri
wrote:
> Martin,
>
> I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
>
> It should be:
>
> org.mortbay.jetty
> jetty
> [6.1.6,7.0)
>
> See if that works.
>
But even then I only get a 2.7.7 build, whic
Martin,
I think the jetty version is incorrect in the pom.xml in test:sample.
It should be:
org.mortbay.jetty
jetty
[6.1.6,7.0)
See if that works.
Regards, Indrajit
On 22/12/09 10:14 PM, martin odersky wrote:
> Thanks for all the help. I tried to do
>
> mvn clean
>
I just verified that it did indeed use 2.7.7, because the generated
classfiles still have version 4.1.
My new strategy is to build with the last working RC3, and then
recompile just the failing file with the current compiler and all lift
classes on the classpath. That should work.
But I need to k
Thanks for all the help. I tried to do
mvn clean
mvn install
After upgrading to maven 2.2.1, I got somewhere. It compiled a bunch
of packages including lift-mapper, so it seems it did not in fact take
RC6 as its compiler?
But then it stopped due to a build error here.
Any idea what I need to do
Ok, this one works just fine, and involves least effort among the ones
proposed.
- Indrajit
On 22/12/09 8:11 PM, Heiko Seeberger wrote:
> Martin,
>
> OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven:
>
> 1. step:
> Check out 280_port branch from g...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git
>
> 2. step:
> cd i
Martin/Heiko,
Great if this works.
Alternately, you can also use maven ant plugin to complete avoid doing
the Maven way.
Here is the sequence:
1. Do "mvn ant:ant" at the top level. This should generate all the
requisite files necessary for ant build.
2. Look for the pathelement entry in mave
Martin,
You can download a tarball from:
http://github.com/dpp/liftweb/tree/280_port/
Go to that page and look for the "download" button. You'll be presented
with the option of tar or zip.
I'll also send you the tarball privately.
Thanks,
David
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:12 AM, martin odersky
Kevin,
maven-scala-plugin integrate a workaround (see note of previous mail)
against the line-length limit : arguments of the main class are store in a
file.
/davidB
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 15:45, Kevin Wright
wrote:
>
>
> 2009/12/22 David Bernard
>
> Dirty solutions (If you already have maven
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Heiko Seeberger
wrote:
> Martin,
> OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven:
> 1. step:
> Check out 280_port branch from ...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git
> 2. step:
> cd into liftweb/lift-persistence/lift-mapper and run
> mvn dependency:copy-dependencies
> 3.
2009/12/22 David Bernard
> Dirty solutions (If you already have maven installed and be able to build
> lift with maven) :
>
> 0. replace
> $HOME/.m2/repository/org/scala-lang/scala-compiler/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/scala-compiler-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
> by symlink to the directory with classes result from sca
Martin,
OK, now I got it working (almost) without Maven:
1. step:
Check out 280_port branch from g...@github.com:dpp/liftweb.git
2. step:
cd into liftweb/lift-persistence/lift-mapper and run
mvn dependency:copy-dependencies
3. step:
run the following command
-classpath `find target/dependency
Dirty solutions (If you already have maven installed and be able to build
lift with maven) :
0. replace
$HOME/.m2/repository/org/scala-lang/scala-compiler/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/scala-compiler-2.8.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
by symlink to the directory with classes result from scalac scalac
compilation
1. Or at the e
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Josh Suereth wrote:
> For curiousities sake, if you're building using fsc, are you running scalac
> via an exploded classpath (i.e. not a JAR file?). If so, I'll try to come
> up with a longer-term solution for this.
Yes, exactly. My usual setup is that my output
Another possibility is to specify scala as a system dependency in Lift's
pom:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#System_Dependencies
Then hard code the path that scalac's being built into.
put maven in offline mode as well, and it should be nice a
For curiousities sake, if you're building using fsc, are you running scalac
via an exploded classpath (i.e. not a JAR file?). If so, I'll try to come
up with a longer-term solution for this.
If we allowed you to do the following:
mvn reactor:make -Dmake.artifacts=net.liftweb:lift-mapper -P local
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Josh Suereth wrote:
> I think staying in maven would require the least amount of typing, but the
> most amount of time as you'd have to publish local snapshots of Scala 2.8.0
> to use them in the lift build. I remember how annoying this is ;). Also
> note that d
I think staying in maven would require the least amount of typing, but the
most amount of time as you'd have to publish local snapshots of Scala 2.8.0
to use them in the lift build. I remember how annoying this is ;). Also
note that deploying maven requires a full scala build, but if needed I ca
I'm cc'ing this to the Lift list. Perhaps Indrajit or another Maven guru
can help out.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:32 AM, martin odersky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Heiko Seeberger
> wrote:
> > 2009/12/22 martin odersky
> >>
> >> Annoying... Just to explain what goes on here. Betw
29 matches
Mail list logo
