Thank you, Jacques! That does help.
I work with this system, that creates both printable online files and
downloadable xml files, but lately I have been having formatting issues...
I wish we used something other than MuseScore! (Lilypond is used for a
different part of the project!)
https
, to be submitted to the MuseScore team at
https://musescore.com/user/login?destination=%2Fcas%2Flogin.
HTH!
JM
> Le 30 juin 2022 à 18:50, Kira Garvie a écrit :
>
> Hey all,
> I know this is a bit off-topic but it's on-topic for me... also I don't know
> who else to ask, the mu
On 6/30/2022 11:50 AM, Kira Garvie wrote:
I am having issues exporting an xml file and having it keep its formatting.
Can you further describe the workflow, source and destination of the export?
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA
Hey all,
I know this is a bit off-topic but it's on-topic for me... also I don't
know who else to ask, the muse-score forums aren't very helpful.
I use Lilypond, Musescore, and musicxml files for my work. Please, no
comments on the quality of Musescore, the decision to use it was above my
paygrade
Thanks Jean!
Brent.
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 at 18:52, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
> Le 24/10/2021 à 08:02, Brent Annable a écrit :
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > Can anybody tell me how to actually use the new Leland font in lilypond?
> I
> > went to the GitHub link and downloaded all the files, but as far
Le 24/10/2021 à 08:02, Brent Annable a écrit :
Hi Everyone,
Can anybody tell me how to actually use the new Leland font in lilypond? I
went to the GitHub link and downloaded all the files, but as far as I can
tell there are no Leland-11, Leland-13, Leland-14, etc. files. I downloaded
the
a Lilypond file the
log said 'cannot find Leland-11'. How do I actually do this?
Regards,
Brent.
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 07:56, Xavier Scheuer wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:44, Noeck wrote:
> >
> > FYI: The new MuseScore version 3.6 comes with a new default music font
&g
On Fri, 22 Jan 2021 at 19:44, Noeck wrote:
>
> FYI: The new MuseScore version 3.6 comes with a new default music font
> and text font.
>
> https://musescore.org/de/node/315523
>
> There is a sample image in this article
> https://gnulinux.ch/neue-version-von-musescore
T
FYI: The new MuseScore version 3.6 comes with a new default music font
and text font.
https://musescore.org/de/node/315523
There is a sample image in this article
https://gnulinux.ch/neue-version-von-musescore
Cheers,
Joram
Hi, David!
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:51 PM David Bellows wrote:
> > Ok, everyone. I have finally gotten around to adding data about LilyPond
>
> Excellent work and thank you!
>
My pleasure ;-)
> Lilypond does look good here. I am curious, what are forked stems? You
> have that as a "no" for
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:18 PM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> Am Di., 27. Nov. 2018 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb Malte Meyn <
> lilyp...@maltemeyn.de>:
>
> > „Notes, forked stems“ (l. 109)
> > → should be „yes (fake: rotated stems or custom lines)“
> >
>
> Or like attached pdf.
> Most recent code here (if
Am Di., 27. Nov. 2018 um 00:16 Uhr schrieb Malte Meyn :
> „Notes, forked stems“ (l. 109)
> → should be „yes (fake: rotated stems or custom lines)“
>
Or like attached pdf.
Most recent code here (if someone's interested)
https://archiv.lilypondforum.de/index.php/topic,1176.msg6932.html#msg6932
Am 26.11.18 um 23:36 schrieb Abraham Lee:
Ok, everyone. I have finally gotten around to adding data about
LilyPond. I felt pretty confident in the Notation and Engraving tabs,
pretty solid marks there, but more uncertain about the Playback tab
entries. I'm honestly not sure what they should
> Ok, everyone. I have finally gotten around to adding data about LilyPond
Excellent work and thank you!
Lilypond does look good here. I am curious, what are forked stems? You
have that as a "no" for Lilypond.
Also, I see you used the latest unstable version of Lilypond, did that
make much of a
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:04 PM David Bellows wrote:
> Urs,
>
> >I think it would be good to add our stuff to the chart (not necessarily
> much to the comments section).
>
> If the owner of the spreadsheet allows it, then definitely. I don't
> know them personally so I don't know how they feel
Am 2018-11-20 um 21:03 schrieb David Bellows :
>> find a way to plug the "programmability" aspect (vs. applying plugins
>> after-the-fact),with things like complete extensibility with syntactical
>> means, conditional layout per engraving target ...(Maybe this would even
>> warrant a
So it does everything on that list near as I can work out.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:57 PM Torsten Hämmerle
wrote:
>
> Shane Brandes wrote
> > What do they mean by jazz articulations?
>
> Hi Shane,
>
> I guess they mean doits, falls, shakes, bends…
>
> All the best,
> Torsten
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent
Shane Brandes wrote
> What do they mean by jazz articulations?
Hi Shane,
I guess they mean doits, falls, shakes, bends…
All the best,
Torsten
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
of Lilypond's biggest strengths! Working out meaningful/useful
>> parallels with the other programs would be the issue, I'm guessing?
>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:50 AM David Kastrup wrote:
>>>
>>> Karlin High writes:
>>>
>>>> On 11/20/2018 1
t;
> > > On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote:
> > >> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
> > >> listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico.
> > >
> > > I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond
t; On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote:
> >> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
> >> listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico.
> >
> > I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond to other
>
Karlin High writes:
> On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote:
>> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
>> listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico.
>
> I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond to other
&
Am 20.11.18 um 19:38 schrieb David Bellows:
Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico. While I can figure
out whether Lilypond has some/many of those features (or can "fake"
them), I figured that there are p
Am 20.11.18 um 19:54 schrieb Karlin High:
On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote:
Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico.
I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond to other
software
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:56 AM David Bellows
wrote:
> I'm not the owner which is why I suggested emailing the results to me
> or to post it on Reddit. But I am glad you're willing to contribute
>
I don't think posting it as text on Reddit is the best format (not that I
have an account to do
illing to contribute
and look forward to the results!
Dave
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 10:52 AM Abraham Lee wrote:
>
> Hi, David!
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:39 AM David Bellows wrote:
>>
>> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
>> listing featur
On 11/20/2018 12:38 PM, David Bellows wrote:
Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico.
I remember seeing some past work done with comparing LilyPond to other
software.
<https://github.com/engraving-challenges/m
Hi, David!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 11:39 AM David Bellows
wrote:
> Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
> listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico. While I can figure
> out whether Lilypond has some/many of those features (or can "fake"
Over in the /r/composer sub on Reddit, a user put together a chart
listing features of Musescore, Sibelius and Dorico. While I can figure
out whether Lilypond has some/many of those features (or can "fake"
them), I figured that there are people here who could do this easier
and bett
it's tedious as it sounds
:-((
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/I-was-unable-to-import-an-xml-ogan-file-from-Musescore-update-tp164243p164365.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Hi, some days ago I posted a message to say that I couldn't import an xml
organ file made with Musescore; yesterday I installed Forte 5 basic took
from GAOTD, and at my surprise it read perfectly the xml files I couldn't
made Lilypond read . At this point i could think there is a problem
- Original Message -
From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 11:59 AM
Subject: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update
What can be done? :-(
Please see my reply on bugs to your duplicate message about
On 10/07/14 11:59, Son_V wrote:
Hi, some days ago I posted a message to say that I couldn't import an xml
organ file made with Musescore; yesterday I installed Forte 5 basic took
from GAOTD, and at my surprise it read perfectly the xml files I couldn't
made Lilypond read . At this point i could
Well, the file produced by Musescore:
http://www.freefilehosting.net/prova_1
and the same file imported in Forte Premium demo and re-exported in an xml
file:
http://www.freefilehosting.net/provaii
But what messes me is that the first file, the one produced by MuseScore,
can be imported
On Thu, 2014-07-10 at 09:45 -0700, Son_V wrote:
the one produced by MuseScore,
can be imported in Denemo (BUT it sees FIVE voices!)
well, it sees 5 voices because, bizarrely MuseScore has numbered the
three voices 1, 2 and 5
The two empty ones are harmless (empty) and easily deleted of course
- Original Message -
From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 5:45 PM
Subject: Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update
Well, the file produced by Musescore:
http://www.freefilehosting.net/prova_1
Ok, but how can Denemo load the file that LilyPond can't open, and so makes
Forte?
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/I-was-unable-to-import-an-xml-ogan-file-from-Musescore-update-tp164243p164263.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-was-unable-to-import-an-xml-ogan-file-from-Musescore-update-tp164243p164264.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Original Message -
From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update
Ok, but how can Denemo load the file that LilyPond can't open, and so
makes
Forte
- Original Message -
From: Son_V vincenzo.a...@gmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2014 7:08 PM
Subject: Re: I was unable to import an xml ogan file from Musescore - update
Sorry but I can understand what a tiny example is, but I'm not able to
make
one
2014-07-10 21:52 GMT+02:00 Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com:
See my file attached, all the measures are commented except the first and
the problem is still present.
This is not yet a minimal example. You should dig more. Try commenting
staff 2 and leave only staff one. Be careful to comment
} %End of Movement
HTH Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/OT-Error-importing-Organ-xml-files-made-in-Musescore-tp163601p163671.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user
Hi all, can't understand why I can't import Organ xml files that I make in
Musescore (I find it a lot esaier to write with a direct reading of what I'
doing, then to load the xml files in Frescodaldi to get the graphical
output). I get this error message:
The file couldn't be converted. Error
in
Musescore (I find it a lot esaier to write with a direct reading of what I'
doing, then to load the xml files in Frescodaldi to get the graphical
output). I get this error message:
The file couldn't be converted. Error message:
musicxml2ly: Lettura di MusicXML da /home/vincent/Musica/Cancella
Hey everyone,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before
and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of it
- does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's engraving? Or is it a completely
separate and stand-alone engraving software
Hi Ben.
It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale).
I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond.
Graeme
On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before
and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm
Graeme Lee wrote
Hi Ben.
It's stand-alone (like Sibelius/Finale).
I used it before I knew better, I mean, knew about Lilypond.
Graeme
On 4-Feb 13:08, SoundsFromSound wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore
before
and I've looked
Hi Graeme,
Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance
MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you
/really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on me
I guess.
Ben
Musescore uses the feta font (slightly modified
Graeme Lee wrote
Hi Graeme,
Oh ok thanks! I couldn't quite tell for sure because at a /quick /glance
MuseScore output looks a little like Lilypond, but then again once you
/really /look, not really at all. My eyes were clearly playing tricks on
me
I guess.
Ben
Musescore uses the feta
Il 04/feb/2014 03:09 SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com ha
scritto:
Hey everyone,
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I have never used MuseScore before
and I've looked into it quickly tonight. I'm confused about one aspect of
it
- does it actually /use /LilyPond for it's
Federico Bruni writes:
Some weeks ago it's been reported here a tweet saying that MuseScore
developers will drop the lilypond export and focus on musicxml export.
Yes, I had a chat about that with Thomas Bonte. LilyPond export was
in dire need of some love and the best thing to do with code
On 11/13/2013 12:00 PM, Peter Bjuhr wrote:
On 11/12/2013 09:40 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
the way to go would be MusicXML export.
While this wish has popped up every now and then for years, Peter
Bjuhr has just started to give it an actual try. We don't know how
far this will get, but it will at
Dear community,
is there a way to export lilypond to musescore?
I don't want to give up using lilypond, but when I work with students and
pupils, I've experienced that they have a lot of difficulties in using
lilypond and that they prefer with a gui.
All the best
Stefan
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 09:40 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 12.11.2013 09:06, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
Dear community,
is there a way to export lilypond to musescore?
I don't want to give up using lilypond, but when I work with
students
and pupils, I've experienced that they have a lot
Dear Richard,
I've tried to open a lilypond-file with denemo, but it didn't work,
unfortunately.
On Tue, 2013-11-12 at 09:40 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
* Am 12.11.2013 09:06, schrieb Stefan Thomas:*
* Dear community,*
* is there a way to export lilypond to musescore?*
* I don't want to give
, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 12.11.2013 09:06, schrieb Stefan Thomas:
Dear community,
is there a way to export lilypond to musescore?
I don't want to give up using lilypond, but when I work with
students
and pupils, I've experienced
Thank you -
The comparison with LilyPond is now up on the Denemo website:
http://denemo.org/compareSibelius
altogether, these examples (not selected to favor LilyPond, chosen by
MuseScore and at random from IMSLP) show the benefit of not trying to
typeset note-by-note as the music is entered
- Original Message -
From: Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net
Cc: Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se; lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 5:49 PM
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
Oh
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
Oh, and, of course, it would be good to see how Sibelius gets on
re-importing the attached vocal piece, which was apparently generated on
some version of Sibelius. (It came from searching IMSLP for sibelius
and musicxml
I do have both Sibelius (7) and Finale (2012), if needed ...
cheers
Arne
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Comparing-LilyPond-with-Sibelius-Finale-Musescore-etc-tp148220p148387.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
ok and done, both pdf's are on their way.
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Comparing-LilyPond-with-Sibelius-Finale-Musescore-etc-tp148220p148392.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
lyrics before); if there is any legitimate way of
not drawing attention to this bug I would like to hear about it. Only
MuseScore has difficulty with this bar, and then only slightly.
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Comparing-LilyPond
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 23:20 +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from
published
- Original Message -
From: Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.net
To: Mats Bengtsson mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
Well without considerable expense I can't
Am 23.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If anyone can provide better examples
, Finale, Musescore etc
Well without considerable expense I can't really test Sibelius or
Finale, just report on what others have published in its name. They may
have hopeless skills in music typesetting. Where these comparisons are
strong is where the comparison is between two imports from
:06 PM
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
Well without considerable expense I can't really test Sibelius or
Finale, just report on what others have published in its name. They may
have hopeless skills in music typesetting. Where these comparisons
. A first stab might be simply exporting scores from the
commercial programs in musicXML and then reading them back. I did this
with MuseScore http://denemo.org/compare#Example_2 and the gives a good
insight into how much hand-tweaking is needed in MuseScore. This would
not illustrate the point
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:12 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known
exporting scores from the
commercial programs in musicXML and then reading them back. I
did this
with MuseScore http://denemo.org/compare#Example_2 and the
gives a good
insight into how much hand-tweaking is needed in MuseScore.
This would
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Richard Shann richard.sh...@virgin.netwrote:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 13:01 -0400, Carl Peterson wrote:
This may be what you're getting at with the musicXML idea, but what
about doing what we usually do to demonstrate lilypond...take a
reference score, and set
- From: Richard Shann
richard.sh...@virgin.net
To: Urs Liska u...@openlilylib.org
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:12 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.07.2013 15:09
Sib 7.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: Alex Yoder
To: Phil Holmes
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: Comparing LilyPond with Sibelius, Finale, Musescore etc
Which version of Sibelius? I believe it was Sibelius 7
Am 23.07.2013 19:11, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 15:12 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 23.07.2013 15:09, schrieb Richard Shann:
On Sun, 2013-07-21 at 14:03 +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's
Am 20.07.2013 17:57, schrieb Richard Shann:
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from
published work that I could find
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from
published work that I could find with a quick search - then please let
me know
I have been compiling some examples of LilyPond's typesetting compared
with those of well-known alternatives:
http://denemo.org/CompareScorewriters
If anyone can provide better examples - these are just taken from
published work that I could find with a quick search - then please let
me know -
We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
current job ...). OK, Janek?
Best
Urs
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
current job ...). OK, Janek?
ok
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Totally agree Wasil. A beautiful sheet, the syntax is only very small part.
Lilypond make other default setting great. We just focus on music and
syntax. These are the key of music.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.comwrote:
There is a chance, but only when
On 29 mai 2012, at 23:56, Lucas Gonze wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of
interest and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere
on the musescore twitter account
Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke at gnu.org writes:
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it happen.
The people who put the project together choose their tools,
Carl Sorensen carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke at gnu.org writes:
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it
happen.
It is not
, given the idea that the soul of Lilypond is engraving, I don't
know if having musescore import Lilypond syntax is absolutely
necessary or even absolutely possible. For them to do that would
require using Lilypond as a library and constantly updating the import
routines. The insane and incredible
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of notation
programs making use of an open standard.
Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:31:49 +0200
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: musescore lands sponsoring?
Message-ID: 87fwahu1lm@fencepost.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Carl Sorensen carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
Jan
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Jan
--
Jan
On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't
On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:15:08 +0200
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
A SponsorshipMeister is dangerously close to the premise that we can
turn money into LilyPond. The truth is that we can turn enthusiasm into
LilyPond.
Money does prevent enthusiasm from working at a gas station.
Nil
David Kastrup writes:
We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
recognition to the community and gets a lot of people on board.
A
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup writes:
We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
recognition to the community and gets a
of the MuseScore workflow)
Or it's about the input?
If it's technically superior because it's text-based, I would agree
with you for a number of reasons.
In this particular case, there's another benefit: no need to write
from scratch because Golden Variations are in Mutopia
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a
that writing a .ly file would have allowed better tweaking?
(I have no idea of the MuseScore workflow)
Or it's about the input?
If it's technically superior because it's text-based, I would agree
with you for a number of reasons.
In this particular case, there's another benefit: no need to write
from
LilyPond output. Can you confirm?
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/node/191
This isn't Lily output, it's directly from MuseScore.
You were fooled by the fact that MuseScore uses our Feta font.
Last year I was thinking about trying to introduce LilyPond in some
music schools in my area
2012/5/29 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
What do you mean with technically superior? It's about the output?
I think it's LilyPond output. Can you confirm?
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/node/191
This isn't Lily output, it's directly from MuseScore.
You were fooled by the fact
superior choice for this
sponsoring project?
Yes, certainly.
What are we missing?
Werner is a crack coder, just look at
https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore to see how he cranked this out
in just 3 days.
kidding aside, I think a GUI appeals to more people, both developers,
users and passers-by (I
cases when printing - but
exporting to lilypond seems to work in all (little) cases I tried.
Thus for simple cases I like that combination: musescore for typing and
lilypond for rendering.
Sponsorings are not always easy to understand :(
Marc Weber
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
