Re: organizing orchestral music

On Thu, 25 Jun 2015 at 11:37 Marc Hohl m...@hohlart.de wrote: Am 25.06.2015 um 12:00 schrieb Orm Finnendahl: [...] violin-music.ly (containing the music only) To make life easier, I'd use violin-music.ily to make clear that this is an _included_ file, not a standalone compilable one.

Re: volta repeat with and without alternative ending

On 25 June 2015 at 09:47, Flaming Hakama by Elaine ela...@flaminghakama.com wrote: Conductor will say bar number. Nope. From my experience I would say she says everytime something different: - from 3 measures before rehearsal mark B - from the lyric measure - second repeat, please -

Re: transposable figured bass?

On 29 June 2015 at 14:20, Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@gmail.com wrote: Dear community, I run in a problem, when I transpose the below quoted figured bass from g to f. In this special case the natural sign before the 5 in the 2nd chord should be a flat sign. Is it possible to get a

Re: [OT] Bizet op.2

It's in the BnF, according to their catalogue: http://catalogue.bnf.fr/servlet/biblio?idNoeud=1ID=39593555SN1=0SN2=0host=catalogue (The Edition Mario Bois from 1984) via

Re: [OT] Bizet op.2

+02:00 Chris Yate chrisy...@gmail.com: It's in the BnF, according to their catalogue: http://catalogue.bnf.fr/servlet/biblio?idNoeud=1ID=39593555SN1=0SN2=0host=catalogue (The Edition Mario Bois from 1984) via http://www.worldcat.org/title/oeuvres-pour-le-piano-les-inedits-et-3-pieces-du

Re: transposable figured bass?

On 29 June 2015 at 19:13, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-06-29 18:08 GMT+02:00 Ralf Mattes r.mat...@mh-freiburg.de: Just a question - is this an example drawn from a historic source? What you call a flat sign would back then be called a fa-sign and the corresponing

Re: Partial Bars

On 1 Jul 2015 04:56, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@gmx.net wrote: Hi Bill, Can you please include a minimal compilable example that shows your problem? I don't plan to do both - goto the next shop or library to get that menut - guess what 'part' expresses in the context of that piece - write an

Re: Partial Bars

On 1 July 2015 at 07:28, Chris Yate chrisy...@gmail.com wrote: On 1 Jul 2015 04:56, Helge Kruse helge.kr...@gmx.net wrote: Hi Bill, Can you please include a minimal compilable example that shows your problem? I don't plan to do both - goto the next shop or library to get that menut

Re: Testing requested: new manuscript viewer tool for Frescobaldi

Sounds a good idea, I will try to test it tonight. Thanks On 17 July 2015 at 16:13, flup2 phili...@philmassart.net wrote: For the few testing I made, it's what I was looking for :-) I would like a larger screen to put the preview and the manuscript side by side ;-) but in the meantime, I'll

Cannot resolve rest collision: rest direction not set

Hi, I'm not sure what I'm meant to do to fix this... Have already used explicit positioning for the rests but that doesn't stop the warnings. Granted they're *only* warnings but I always prefer clean compilation. Thanks in advance! Chris --- \language english \new Score { \relative c''

Easy way to switch off transpositions

Hi, I find it would be very convenient every now and again to be able to change a score to be non-transposing -- in order to easily check pitches etc. I've already organised my music via variables, e.g.: BflatBassMusic = { \transposition bf,, \transpose bf,, c { \relative c{

Re: My finances for working on LilyPond

Yes, naturally PayPal takes commission. So does your bank, any credit card provider, WorldPay or Moneygram or any other similar service. However, PayPal is secure and reliable enough for Amazon and a huge number of online stores to be happy using it, not to mention charitable organizations that

Re: My finances for working on LilyPond

> Well, this *something* seems easy to pin down: too few developers. So at > any given moment it is difficult to find someone who has the ability, > the interest, and spare time at the same moment. ... Could we expect to be paid for it? I don't expect to be paid for open-source work. In fact,

Re: Frescobaldi creates the pdf but doesn't export it?

Hi -- yes, I've seen this happen a few times recently (on Windows). Although as far as I know, the file you're looking at in Frescobaldi is a temporary PDF file. I may be corrected by someone. Having said that I'm not sure whether Frescobaldi always has the "working" folder you would expect...

Re: Switching on/off instrument staff

Hi Rob, Wow, thanks, that's a much neater way. I think I should probably look at refactoring my band template. I agree, my method is a bit complicated -- but it's bothering me a bit, because I think there was a reason I did it like this in the first place! Could well be an insufficient

Re: lilypond snippet web page

http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/lsr.di.unimi.it :-) Down here too On 8 July 2015 at 13:47, MING TSANG tsan...@rogers.com wrote: I am trying to access snippets since Sunday. Web apge down? All I get is : This webpage is not available ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT

Re: Switching on/off instrument staff

{ \keepWithTag #'score \removeWithTag #'repc \music \layout {} \midi { } } On 8 July 2015 at 00:27, Chris Yate chrisy...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. This is how I do parts and score. Use tags music = { \new StaffGroup \tag #'score \tag #'sop \new Staff \with { instrumentName

Re: Switching on/off instrument staff

Yes. This is how I do parts and score. Use tags music = { \new StaffGroup \tag #'score \tag #'sop \new Staff \with { instrumentName = #Soprano Cornet shortInstrumentName = #Eb Cn } \global \Marks \SopranoCornetVoice \tag #'score \tag #'solc \new

Re: Easy way to switch off transpositions

On 12 July 2015 at 23:02, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote: Chris Yate chrisy...@gmail.com writes: I find it would be very convenient every now and again to be able to change a score to be non-transposing -- in order to easily check pitches etc. Any better approaches? Well, the Midi

Re: Extract notes from chords, with silence when there are none

Just to clarify, in the case of 3-voice music, how would you expect it to deal with a 2 note chord? One note to Treble, one to Bass, or one in Treble, one in Alto, or... what? Chris On 16 September 2015 at 13:07, wrote: > I'd like to take a passage of music that

Re: Violin notation advice requested

No, It's quite common to indicate the string by Roman numerals. Printed music would hardly ever indicate position, but it is normal to see either "sul G" or "IV". On 19 Sep 2015 12:31, "Ralph Palmer" wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Michael Gerdau

Re: How Beautiful Upon the Mountains by Stainer

It's available at CPDL, did you look there? http://www1.cpdl.org/wiki/images/7/7e/How_beautiful_upon_the_Mountain.pdf On 3 December 2015 at 15:18, Gregory Citarella wrote: > Hello: is there anyway I can get a pdf of the choir anthem that I see on > you tube of

Re: How Beautiful Upon the Mountains by Stainer

Sorry, I see that's an arrangement for ATB On 3 December 2015 at 15:44, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's available at CPDL, did you look there? > > http://www1.cpdl.org/wiki/images/7/7e/How_beautiful_upon_the_Mountain.pdf > > > On 3 December 2015 at

Strange beaming error

Hi, I'm wondering whether anyone can shed some light on the attached image. LH of the piano here is: { bf,16 (ef g8) r8 c,16 g' c, g' bf, g' \clef bass } I have a suspicion this may have something to do with the Timing / beat moment and beat structure, but it's inconclusive. This section

Re: Strange beaming error

On 6 January 2016 at 23:53, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering whether anyone can shed some light on the attached image. > > LH of the piano here is: > > { > bf,16 (ef g8) r8 > c,16 g' c, g' bf, g' > \clef bass > } > &g

Re: Strange beaming error

Further problems. I commented out the Time settings and here's more, this time in the RH (note paired semiquavers in LH here, which would be in sixes). This is now built with revision 35 (the latest). [image: Inline images 1] On 6 January 2016 at 23:59, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com>

Re: Strange beaming error

On 7 January 2016 at 00:49, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2016-01-07 0:53 GMT+01:00 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com>: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm wondering whether anyone can shed some light on the attached image. >> >> LH of the pi

RE: Strange beaming error

ore this problem occurs (that may or may not be coincidental), and there's partial bars at the beginning and end of most of the movements Chris --- On 7 January 2016 at 09:05, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> writes: > > Are i

Re: How to reproduce this?

Hi there,There's a few things wrong here... I'd start by getting the voices separated. So something like: << \quaver_triplet_stuff % this will be voice 1 and stems-up \\ \chord_notes % this will be voice 2, but you'll have to hide the stems. exercise for the reader ;-) >> Chord notation

Re: Strange beaming error

On 7 January 2016 at 17:12, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Chris, > > > > As I mentioned in a previous reply, make sure that identical “\set > Timining” instructions are in both the upper and lower staff. > > Once this is done, recompile and check for accuracy. > > > > Mark >

Fwd: Manual page breaking causing assertion failure

In case anyone here is interested (perhaps Ralph), a Minimal not-Working Example I've sent to the bugs list. -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> Date: 9 January 2016 at 09:55 Subject: Re: Manual page breaking causing assertion failure To: t

Instrument name in magnified staff

Hi, As per the documentation*, I'm using \magnifyStaff to reduce the size of the solo line in a piano accompaniment. \version "2.19.35" \score { << \new Staff \with { instrumentName = "Example 1" \magnifyStaff #4/7 } << \relative c{ a b c d } >> \new

Re: Manual page breaking causing assertion failure

No, it's not self-built, it's the latest dev image from the website! Windows 10, 64bit. Any other info you need? Chris On 9 Jan 2016 10:17 pm, "Colin Campbell" <c...@shaw.ca> wrote: > On 16-01-08 07:09 PM, Chris Yate wrote: > > Hi, > I'm trying to paginate my sc

Re: Manual page breaking causing assertion failure

On 9 January 2016 at 14:28, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-01-09 14:18 GMT+01:00 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com>: > > In case anyone here is interested (perhaps Ralph), a Minimal not-Working > > Example I've sent to the bugs list. >

Manual page breaking causing assertion failure

Hi, I'm trying to paginate my score nicely and the automatic paging isn't good enough. So I'm doing all the page breaks manually -- and a certain situation is causing an assertion failure on compilation: << Snippet of output: MIDI output to `BeiMannernScore.mid'... Finding the ideal

Re: Unwanted barline. How to get rid of it?

Your 3rd full bar has only 5 quavers. It should be a partial, if that's what you want. On 23 December 2015 at 11:47, Robert Blackstone wrote: > Dear all, > > In one of the pieces that I'm presently typesetting there appears, near > the end, after a repeat, a

Re: Unwanted barline. How to get rid of it?

On 23 December 2015 at 12:03, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your 3rd full bar has only 5 quavers. It should be a partial, if that's > what you want. > Erm. I may be wrong... ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-use

Adjusting a slur after line break

Hi, I'm having trouble with a long slurred passage, where the final note appears on a new line. The slur shape is quite wrong after the line break in both upper and lower parts, but I've included only the upper part here. Snippet ly (actual excerpt) and a PNG attached -- I think there's a thing

Re: Adjusting a slur after line break

at present! Chris On 19 December 2015 at 22:46, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > I'm only on the phone right now. But wirh \shape you can pass overrides > for multiple parts of a broken curve. > > Am 19. Dezember 2015 23:39:15 MEZ, schrieb Chris Yate <chrisy...@gm

Re: Unwanted barline. How to get rid of it?

Just checked. As I said -- you may want another partial bar \relative c { \clef bass \key c \major \time 6/8 \repeat volta 2 {\partial 8 c'8 c4. c | c c | * \partial 8*5* c r4| } c4.~ c \bar "|."

Re: Unwanted barline. How to get rid of it?

On 23 December 2015 at 12:55, Robert Blackstone <blackstone.rob...@gmail.com > wrote: > > On 23 Dec 2015, at 13:44 , Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just checked. As I said -- you may want another partial bar > >\relative c { >

Re: Adjusting a slur after line break

On 20 December 2015 at 00:41, Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> wrote: > On 20.12.2015 00:45, Chris Yate wrote: > >> I can't get /alterBroken to work properly at all on control points. >> >> When I try the "tweak" version, that I assume would look lik

Re: Help with unexpexted double barline trouble and \markup

On 15 January 2016 at 07:07, Carl-Henrik Buschmann wrote: > I'm working on a lead sheet but being a novice i'm hitting my head against > the wall at some noob problems. > > Bar 1) > Stemlets. Do it have to be this hard creating them? Is there a way to make > it global? Also,

Re: Help with unexpexted double barline trouble and \markup

On 15 January 2016 at 14:37, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Carl-Henrik, > > > Bar 1) > > Stemlets. Do it have to be this hard creating them? Is there a way to > make it global? Also, i want the stemlet to reach down towards the rest. > How? > > This may be related

Programmatically building music-function names

Hi, I'm trying to typeset a number of short pieces into multiple scores in one file. I can do this manually, as: ``` musicOne = \relative c'' { g4 a b c } musicTwo = \relative c'' { g4 a b c } \score { \musicOne } \score { \musicTwo } ``` However, there's a lot more common stuff in my real

Re: Help with unexpexted double barline trouble and \markup

On 15 January 2016 at 15:58, Carl-Henrik Buschmann <chbuschm...@mac.com> wrote: > > 15. jan. 2016 kl. 15.32 skrev Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com>: > > > > On 15 January 2016 at 07:07, Carl-Henrik Buschmann <chbuschm...@mac.com> > wrote: > >> I'

Re: Programmatically building music-function names

On 15 Jan 2016 17:26, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to typeset a number of short pieces into multiple scores in one > > file. I can do this manually, as: >

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation

On 26 January 2016 at 05:35, Paul Morris wrote: > > One idea would be to use triangle shapes for the accidental notes to > better clarify their relation to the “natural” or rather in-the-key, > non-accidental, notes. Like a diatonic-staff version of Reed’s Twinline: >

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation

On 26 January 2016 at 12:06, Sharon Rosner wrote: > > But seriously, I see no reason to change a system which works so well for > so > many different kinds of music. All these alternative systems, I don't see > what advantage they offer. On the contrary, there are many

Re: Bar number moves down inexplicably

On 1 February 2016 at 02:17, David Wright wrote: > Coincidentally with Message-ID: <56ae6df7.8010...@gmx.de> > > It also seems to move the bar number down. Does anybody know why? > I also have a bar number which moves down for some reason. > > The attached snippet

Re: Determine the including file

On 22 January 2016 at 10:44, Urs Liska wrote: > If I have > > % file a.ly > \include "b.ily" > > % file b.ily > \include "c.ily" > > % file c.ily > > can I somehow refer to file b.ily from file c.ily? > In other words: If b.ily includes c.ily can I know from within c.ily >

Re: Determine the including file

On 22 January 2016 at 11:15, Urs Liska wrote: > > What I'm thinking about is the following: > > I have the file openlilylib.ily, which is the main entry point to > openLilyLib. > I'm currently changing the way how openLilyLib is organized. Previously > you loaded

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation

On 26 January 2016 at 16:02, Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> wrote: > On Jan 26, 2016, at 7:35 AM, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > As it is, when I mark up confusing music I sometimes use an upside-down > "V" to indicate semitones, "="

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation

Wow. Clairnote looks like an incredibly stupid idea, and a grand disservice to any poor child who you teach to read it. Simplified notation is not a lot better. Unless they spend their lives playing on their own at home, musicians have eventually to play with other people who will have learnt a

Re: simplifying chromatic scale notation

On 26 January 2016 at 12:25, musicus wrote: > *"1. I like to know where exactly I am at a given time."* > > Of course there are always some "key positions", which can help to > organize yourself while playing (or remembering/ learning etc.). > Nevertheless I do think that

Re: Replying to posts

On 28 Apr 2016 13:07, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > Would you suggest Frescobaldi is *not* a big improvement in the User > > Interface for Lilypond development? > > No, it isn't. It is a big improvement for *using* lilypond (well, for > all those guys and ladies who like IDEs),

Re: Replying to posts

On 27 April 2016 at 19:25, Anthonys Lists wrote: > > And the reality is, most people HERE, including the most important ones! use > simple, plain-text, email clients. > There's a reason why Outlook Lusers are not welcome on most mailing lists, > and that's because the

Re: Replying to posts

On 28 Apr 2016 13:07, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > Would you suggest Frescobaldi is *not* a big improvement in the User > > Interface for Lilypond development? > > No, it isn't. It is a big improvement for *using* lilypond (well, for > all those guys and ladies who like IDEs),

Re: Replying to posts

On 29 April 2016 at 11:20, Andrew Bernard wrote: > > Since this is the longest thread in recent memory - interesting > because it is a meta-thread really - I wonder if we should consider > using some forum type software for lilypond matters? There's some Lilypond

Re: Replying to posts

On 29 April 2016 at 11:59, Johan Vromans wrote: > > I have a very strong preference for one single place where all information > lives. And I'm very happy with this mailing list. Yes, although I personally find StackOverflow a far better way of asking, answering and

Re: Replying to posts

On 27 Apr 2016 12:40 pm, "N. Andrew Walsh" wrote: >> >> In german we have a saying: >> "Leute fresst Scheisse. Millionen Fliegen können nicht irren." > > Now I'm going to start an argument about your deplorable capitulation to the masses by abandoning the venerable "ß".

Re: Replying to posts

and arbitrary personal belief that top posting is ungodly and a scourge, that's completely different. Cheers. Chris On 27 Apr 2016 12:13 pm, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On 27 Apr 2016 12:04, "Andrew Bernard" <andre

Re: Replying to posts

> The list is plain text only. So if you use a mailer like Outlook and your default is to send HTML format mail, > you need to configure Outlook to reply to email in the format in which it was sent, that is, here, plain text. > Then list users will get properly formatted plain text replies with

Re: Replying to posts

On 27 Apr 2016 12:04, "Andrew Bernard" wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > Although I started this thread, it was purely because David Wright had mentioned the difficulty to another user, as he had to me. I am not the one complaining! Wanting to be considerate of all folks on the

Re: Replying to posts

> The reality is that the world, given the ubiquity of broadband and graphical interfaces, has moved on from plain text. > It is no longer the standard and has not been for a decade or more- most Internet users have, I suspect, no knowledge > of this old standard any longer. Expecting others to

Re: [OT] sorry for the spam

On Wed, 11 May 2016 at 08:39 Johan Vromans wrote: > > There are a few websites that > > provide strong password generators that make pretty much uncrackable > > passwords. > > Password Security: https://xkcd.com/936/ ;-) There's no point having passwords that you can't

Re: Replying to posts

On 29 April 2016 at 22:06, David Bellows wrote: >. I know a lot of people avoid Reddit, and for very good reasons, I think it's almost as bad a time-sink as TVTropes. Actually, Stack sites can be too. ___ lilypond-user mailing

Re: London-Heathrow

On 4 May 2016 at 15:25, Wols Lists wrote: > If you just want to do some sightseeing, I'd suggest getting the > Picadilly to Leicester Square (50 mins). That's in the middle of Soho, > or China Town. Head south to the river, and it takes you to Trafalgar > Square, Charing

Re: London-Heathrow

On Wed, 4 May 2016 at 19:35 Wols Lists wrote: > > And leaves you in Paddington? Okay, there's still a lot in the area, but > it's not exactly the most touristic bit there. I don't know that area > that well, you've got, what, Little Venice, Regent's Park, Madame

Re: I am not top posting

Hi Robert, Out of interest, what interface are you using? Chris On Sun, 24 Jul 2016 at 14:17 Robert Edge wrote: > Thank you, that is precisely what was happening. > > > > On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 2:49 AM, Nathan Ho wrote: > >> On 2016-07-23

Re: bis

Erik, Do you want it to reproduce that in Midi, or just create the appropriate markup? Could you create a mockup of what you want and post it (I'm sure it's possible if not quite easy to create the output). It's not a style of repeats I've ever seen. Chris On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 at 00:24

Re: Easy way to switch off transpositions

ch? ly:pitch? ly:music?) (if (eq? #t transposing-score) #{ \clef #transposing-clef \transpose #from #to #music #} #{ \clef #concert-clef #music #} ) ) - On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 at 00:14 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Chris Yate <chri

Re: Section repeat

On 2 Feb 2017 5:00 p.m., "Hans Åberg" <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:52, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving practice? > > The latter. > > I'd w

Re: Section repeat

Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving practice? On 2 Feb 2017 15:18, "Hans Åberg" wrote: > When the whole section is repeated when it has alternatives, how is that > normally engraved? Specifically, the section has two alternatives, but

Re: Section repeat

On 2 Feb 2017 16:49, "Hans Åberg" <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > On 2 Feb 2017, at 17:09, Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Did you mean, how to achieve it in Lilypond, or what is the best engraving practice? The latter. I'd write and expect to re

Re: Baritone and treble clef

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 at 12:18 David Sumbler wrote: > > > You are mistaken. > Well, there you are then - I said I might be mistaken, and I was right! > Always nice to be proven correct ___ lilypond-user mailing list

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 11:58 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > >> However, you have found a bug I think, since it doesn't seem to > >> work correctly for your case, eliminating dots on the wrong side of > >> the chord. > > > > Also, it’s clearly wrong to have dots in two ‘columns’. They

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 14:55 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > Here's some test cases. I doubt this is the best place to post them > > (bugs list?) but they're relevant to the conversation. > > Thanks! However, your PDF file was not in sync with the input file; > I've taken the

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 15:18 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 14:55 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> >> > Here's some test cases. I doubt this is the best place to post them >> > (bugs list?) but they're relevant t

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 15:20 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 15:18 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 at 14:55 Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> >>> > Here's som

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 at 18:53 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> However, you have found a bug I think, since it doesn't seem to work >> correctly for your case, eliminating dots on the wrong side of the >> chord >> > This may be related (or f

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 at 06:24 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > > > The issue occurs when writing closely spaced chords with an > > augmentation dot in the rhythm. Dots are placed only on spaces > > (which we should expect), but in certain very easy to reproduce > > conditions, the dot

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Tue, 13 Sep 2016 at 19:55 Werner LEMBERG wrote: > It's issue 3179 > > https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/3179/ > > and commit dfff5d3d1a1001f65d1f7183837f56ccd64fb15a > > >

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 14 Sep 2016 04:26, "Brian Barker" <b.m.bar...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > At 23:50 13/09/2016 +, Chris Yate wrote: >> >> Could someone that owns a copy of Gould chip in with a "best practice" recommendation? > > > I've not been following t

Augmentation dot positioning

Hi all, I have only rarely typeset piano music in the past, which is probably why I haven't come across this issue before. The issue occurs when writing closely spaced chords with an augmentation dot in the rhythm. Dots are placed only on spaces (which we should expect), but in certain very easy

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 15 Sep 2016 14:27, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > > > On 9/14/16 9:05 AM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >Attached with some extra cases I'd forgotten about (the inverted versions &g

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 14:36 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > According to Gould, I believe that dots limit 3 is the correct setting. > OK. On reflection, perhaps I can see your reasoning, although I disagree that the current situation reliably produces the notation o

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 16:37 Carl Sorensen wrote:That certainly is strange. I wonder why it drops to four dots instead of > 5, given that there are 5 notes in the cluster. And the G space dot would > only be two staff positions away from the E. > > I'm looking into the code

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

For the sake of argument, here's what Sibelius does in similar circumstances, and which I think is right, and actually within the spirit of Gould's coments. Chris ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 17:33 Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I note that sib1.png is exactly the same chord as in the Gould scan. And > it has two less dots than Gould shows. So it's not consistent with Gould. > I'm not quite sure what she's showing in that example you scanned,

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 at 15:22 Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > > On 9/15/16 7:36 AM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Carl, the key is the last bit of Gould's text as quoted by Brian above: > >"When a dot is forced

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > > On 9/15/16 4:15 PM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >Please note I'm working without her examples, but I disagree about > >[Lilypond's interpretation of] Gould's rules, because they appear to be > >in

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 15 Sep 2016 22:45, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > > On 9/15/16 10:41 AM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote:> > > > >I think the trouble with Gould's rules is that they're inconsistent, or > >could at

Question: Cross compilation

Hi all, Apologies for the potentially "blindingly obvious" question, bu't having read the devel webpages about compiling Lilypond for mingw/Windows, I'm none the wiser. I can compile for native linux using the gnu make (via the smart-autoconf.sh script). However, I'm trying to track down a crash

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> writes: > > > Hi Phil, > > > > Sigh... Yes, that's basically the conclusion I'd already come to, but > that > > it seemed such a ludicrous state of a

Re: Question: Cross compilation

> -- > Phil Holmes > > > > - Original Message - > *From:* Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> > *To:* Lilypond-User Mailing List <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > *Sent:* Monday, September 26, 2016 6:54 PM > *Subject:* Question: Cross compilation > > H

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On 26 Sep 2016 20:16, "Phil Holmes" wrote: > > TBH, you'd probably find it far easier to install a Linux VM on your Windows host, and compile the problematic score on that. I've done both, and what I suggest here is what I would do. That's exactly what I've done - I do a

Re: Question: Cross compilation

On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 23:05 Chris Yate <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2016 at 19:34 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> >> That's pretty good, actually. Not being able to do native/online >> compilations by anybody wanting to is bad.

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On 18 Sep 2016 17:37, "Werner LEMBERG" wrote: > > > > OK, I have rewritten the code for augmentation dot positioning. > > Great, and thanks a lot! > > > Personally, I like the results of this code better than the Gould > > recommendations. I would use this code, and make the

Re: Augmentation dot positioning

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 at 02:31 Carl Sorensen wrote: > On 9/18/16 4:00 PM, "Carl Sorensen" wrote: > >Chris, > > > >Here's a patch. But as Werner pointed out, it's not quite done yet. I > >think I need to improve the badness scoring in order to get better >

  1   2   >