Jim,
Please check /opt/IBM/IHS/bin/adminctl and /opt/IBM/IHS/conf/admin.conf
Ronald van der Laan
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO
I am getting the following errors when I start Apache2. They repeat over and
over and over. Any ideas?
[Fri Feb 03 08:09:01 2006] [error] (13)Permission denied:
apr_global_mutex_lock(jk_log_lock) failed
[Fri Feb 03 08:09:01 2006] [notice] Apache/2.0.49 (Linux/SuSE) configured --
resuming
I am wondering if anyone else has had the same problems with the service
pak 3
install. I set up the install tree as is recommended and incorporated the
sp3 CD's
so that when I install sles9 the sp3 patches should be installed at the
same time.
The install completes and there are no errors. When I
No occurance of /opt/IBMIHS in adminctl or admin.conf or envars or
envars-std
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 2/2/06, Phil Tully [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only one server would attempt (according to the application developer)
to write to any specific file so file level locking would not be required.
You're right that the NFS server would be a single point of failure.
Real
I am cross-posting this question to both the VMESA-L and LINUX-390 lists.
I am looking for anyone who might be willing to share experience using
SCSI/FCP DASD on zSeries with Linux. We are currently doing all of our
virtual Linux with CKD DASD. Many potential applications really need
amounts of
Hi Ranga,
YES!
See http://www.dignus.com.
We offer cross-compilers for z/OS; hosted on many different platforms,
including x86, 390 and z/Linux.
It's very reasonably priced on Linux platforms.
- Dave Rivers -
Is it possible to compile C programs on z/linux to run under z/OS?
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ranga Nathan
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:34 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Cross-compilation on z/Linux = target z/OS.
Is it possible to compile C programs on z/linux to run under
Hobbyist license? Is there info or some discussion about this somewhere?
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ranga Nathan
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 10:34 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Cross-compilation on
Hello everyone!
Yes, we do have a hobbyist license, for all of our products.
To avoid too much time here, I'll just direct everyone to
send inquiries to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
you'll the entire scoop.
- Thanks! -
- Dave Rivers -
Hobbyist license? Is there info or
delurk
There is also a very old port of GCC which runs on z/OS. I
never could get it to work properly. I don't know if there is
a current port of GCC for z/OS or not.
A few of the Hercules folks have been working on a GCC 3.2.3 port. Progress
is slow but steady - it's almost ready for prime
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 11:01 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Cross-compilation on z/Linux = target z/OS.
Hobbyist license? Is there info or some discussion about
There was a post this past Monday by David Wade on the VMESA-L list
asking for time on a modern VM system to work on the GCC 3.2.3 port.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ray Mullins
Sent: February 3, 2006 12:29
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hi Eric,
If you want to do another pedantic patchie, check out these printk()
s in fs/partitions/ibm.c:
printk(CMS1/%8s(MDSK):, name);
printk(CMS1/%8s:, name);
printk(VOL1/%8s:, name);
printk (LNX1/%8s:, name);
printk((nonl)/%8s:, name);
Mind you,
Hi,
I've run into an interesting issue with SLES 9 64-bit and zfcp and was
hoping someone here had an idea to fix it. I've checked the archives
but saw nothing matching this.
I've got a 50G FCP LUN on device F100 attached to a VM named LINUX2. If
I IPL SLES on LINUX2, zfcp discovers 0xF100
Silly question but your /etc/fstab has an entry for that device?
-Original Message-
I've got a 50G FCP LUN on device F100 attached to a VM named LINUX2. If
I IPL SLES on LINUX2, zfcp discovers 0xF100 after /etc/init.d runs
through all its startup scripts. I then need to log in as root
Matt Gourley wrote:
I've run into an interesting issue with SLES 9 64-bit and zfcp and was
hoping someone here had an idea to fix it. I've checked the archives
but saw nothing matching this.
I've got a 50G FCP LUN on device F100 attached to a VM named LINUX2. If
I IPL SLES on LINUX2, zfcp
Yeah. Probably should have mentioned that. :)
Thanks,
-Matt
Neale Ferguson wrote:
Silly question but your /etc/fstab has an entry for that device?
-Original Message-
I've got a 50G FCP LUN on device F100 attached to a VM named LINUX2. If
I IPL SLES on LINUX2, zfcp discovers
It seems that your boot disks are eckd and you have the fcp devices mounted
during the startup process rather than boot. You said the zfcp driver was being
loaded so I'm not sure yuo need the fcp stuff there right at boot time. Does
syslog show any problems/warnings?
If you had needed the fcp
This nailed it. I ran the mkinitrd command tailored to my environment,
ran zipl, and IPL'd. /dev/sda mounted on boot.
Big thanks.
-Matt
P David Schaub wrote:
Matt Gourley wrote:
I've run into an interesting issue with SLES 9 64-bit and zfcp and was
hoping someone here had an idea to
Ranga Nathan wrote:
In these situations I create a symlink and test my hypothesis.
ln -s /opt/IBM/HIS /opt/IBMHIS
When it complains elsewhere, then it is time to re-install :)
I often run stuff under strace to wee what's really happening. There's
also the possibility of
rpm -ql ... | xargs
Please join us for a half-day meeting of the Bay Bunch user group hosted by
Velocity Software, Jeskell and IBM. The Bay Bunch is a regional group
consisting of zSeries and Linux enthusiasts. This is a free meeting. If you
are interested in issues relating to zSeries and zLinux, you won't want to
Hello, somebody knows the equivalent to VIPA in Intel platformh and GPL ?
Thank you.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: INFO LINUX-390 or visit
-finline-limit might have been required for older compilers, but
nowadays it does no longer make sense.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This patch was already sent on:
- 10 Jan 2006
--- linux-2.6.15-mm2-full/arch/s390/Makefile.old2006-01-08
16:25:53.0 +0100
They are called Virtual Interfaces.
You configure it like any other interface except you reference it to the
base nic by placing a : x.
So to configure a Virtual interface on eth0 you could
ifconfig eth0:1 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/03/06
7:18 PM
Thank you for your answer.
The documentation said Vipa allows you to assign IP addresses to a
system, instead of individual adapters. This minimizes outage caused by
adapter failure.
Best regards
Gabriel Frank
--- Mensaje Original --
De: Doug Griswold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
26 matches
Mail list logo
