On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Post, Mark K wrote:
I don't know what traditional method you're talking about that did
dependency checking.
Ranga, are you referring simply to autoconf? Sure, the packager of
Product A should be making sure that the configure script ends up checking
for all of the
Mark,
Thanks for the report! We already fixed this in our internal CVS and will
soon ship a patch with the fix!
Michael
Linux for E-Server Development
Phone: +49-7031-16-2360, Bld 71032-03-U09
Email: [EMAIL
Domino's OK for mail on the 390 platform, but it's no gem for
applications. If you get a chance, try running the app from the
dedicated Windows client against the 390 server and compare results.
Some of the performance difference should go away for the things that
can be offloaded to the client
Why doesn't IBM sell you a device - call it a Linux co-processor, (really an Intel
chip in a box) to attach to the mainframe to offload your java and other high cpu work
onto;) Obviously I'm joking, but it just seems to me the phrase different horses for
different courses seems to apply in
Obviously I'm joking, but it just seems to me the phrase different horses
for different courses seems to apply in spades here.
And I agree. Perhaps you could make this point to IBM's marketing
department. (And should you have driven this point home with them during
the commercial onslaught
I don't know about that. We're running a mission critical database on
Linux. Not only did it save us cash, it's running better than before.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Matt Lashley/SCO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
We have a SLES8 system at kernel level 2.4.21-112. We are experiencing a problem with
an ext3 file system where the kjournald process is in an uninterruptable disk sleep
state. This file system is a LVM logical volume consisting of 11 3390-9 logical
devices on a 2105-800 (shark) disk unit with
And in a series of tests using websphere, after our tuning effort, a J2EE
application runnign under WAS 5.1 with NO RACF authentication on an 2.1 GHZ
intel box with gigabit ethernet is getting clobbered by the SAME
application on z/linux under WebSphere 5.1 with RACF authentication (which
is
So, if I understand what you're saying correctly, the mission critical
Linux horse really doesn't run well on the IBM mainframe
course... unless
you're talking email. (Which won't have a very long run
either as email
servers begin being replaced by more CPU intensive collaboration
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 12:06, James Melin wrote:
using z/linux and
WebSphere in a tuned environment using all of the available
performance
tweaks of that environment. This is repeatable.
Care to share those tweaks?
--
For
I have a LINUX instance that goes into a loop and i have to reipl.
Running Z/VM 4.1 Sles8 31 and 64 bit versions.
any insight would help
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 13:03, Moses Willoughby wrote:
I have a LINUX instance that goes into a loop and i have to reipl.
Running Z/VM 4.1 Sles8 31 and 64 bit versions.
any insight would help
Some more data is necessary.
What is the instance doing right before it goes into a loop? How big is
Hipersockets are an absolute godsend. This of course requires you to have
your DB2 data on the same physical z/box as the linux environment. If
you're using the 1.3 version of the IBM http server, dump it. Use the 2.0
version instead.
The other things that have helped were WebSphere related
The sad part is that only people/organizations doing their own development are likely
to take this much care when coding. You commercial vendors will just allow you to buy
more CPU and ram as they need to get their product out the door.
-Original Message-
From: James Melin
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ryan Ware
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on zLinux
The sad part is that only people/organizations doing their
Plus, there is Alex DeVries' presentation on Building Linux Packages with
RPM at
http://linuxvm.org/present/SHARE102/S9239ad.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic
Cross
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 4:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Compared to SMP/E, RPM is positively warm and fuzzy.
Post, Mark K
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
m To
Sent by: Linux on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
390 Port
You didn't mention how many MIPS you're throwing at the z/Linux.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 12:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Domino 6.5 performance a little disappointing on
Since Novell owns both SuSE and Ximian, I was wondering if anybody know
if Mono (the software, not the disease) is going to be ported to run on
zSeries? Would there be any interest?
In a totally unrelated thought. Linux is really catching on in the
embedded world. One of the main lacks in the
I am looking for a down load site for webmin to run on SuSE SLES8 Intel.
Can anyone point me in the correct direction ?
TIA ..
Regards,
Terry L. Spaulding
IBM Global Services
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
It is. The interpreter works fine and I just finised the JIT which
passes all but 2 of the regression tests. The mono guys are taking the
mods and making sure they'll fit with their 1.0 stuff. I'm not sure if
there'll be any RPMs in the immediate future but if I get any spare time
at home I'll
Since Novell owns both SuSE and Ximian, I was wondering if
anybody know
if Mono (the software, not the disease) is going to be ported
to run on
zSeries? Would there be any interest?
Neale Ferguson did a port a while back. Check http://linuxvm.org for a
pointer.
Do most
zSeries
To be a little more precise, http://linuxvm.org/Patches/
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Boyes
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mono on zSeries?
Since Novell owns both SuSE and
I am looking for a down load site for webmin to run on SuSE
SLES8 Intel.
Can anyone point me in the correct direction ?
www.webmin.com.
Google for webmin source. 2nd hit produced the reference.
You should also be prepared to explain why your system got hacked.
Webmin needs very careful setup
According to Freshmeat (http://freshmeat.net/), it's at
http://www.webmin.com/
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Spaulding
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 5:01 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: down load site for: webmin
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's wrong with YaST?
Other than being completely icky? Not much.
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I am looking for a down load site for webmin to run on SuSE
SLES8 Intel. Can anyone point me in the correct direction ?
Terry:
I am not sure why you are asking here, but did you check out
http://www.webmin.com/download.html ? Even if there is not an RPM
there that will work, the SRPM is there
I am looking for a down load site for webmin to run on SuSE
SLES8 Intel.
Can anyone point me in the correct direction ?
www.webmin.com.
Google for webmin source. 2nd hit produced the reference.
You should also be prepared to explain why your system got hacked.
Webmin needs very careful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Terry Spaulding wrote:
| I am looking for a down load site for webmin to run on SuSE SLES8 Intel.
| Can anyone point me in the correct direction ?
Just download the rpm from www.webmin.com.
Be aware the partitioning utilities in webmin are not
Webmin is all perl. So binary compatibility is not an issue.
You can download from any site and install.
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
Hello (again) from Gregg C Levine
I second that thought. And a little late perhaps.
William see if you can boot with your earlier kernel, and make a note
of the messaging output that the whole process generates. Then reset
things to talk to the newer one, and match the notes you've made with
the
Im sorry, but:
What is going on here?
I was sure, someone would give a statement about the real current state of PAV on
Escon DASDs.
Are there still problems replying to posts?
What I/O performance do you get, and how?
At moment we are creating a concept with a combination of raid-striping
32 matches
Mail list logo
