On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:20:08 +0100, Squabsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK with ulimit -a I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
max locked memory (kbytes, -l)
I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:52, Squabsy wrote:
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to comment on the realative
advantages/disadvantages of Suse Vs Knoppix
I've used Suse 8.2 and find it to be a good distro, especially if you
like a
On Monday 29 September 2003 6:41 am, someone claiming to be Squabsy wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:20:08 +0100, Squabsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK with ulimit -a I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file
quoth Squabsy:
| I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
| documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on
| reasonably ok with it.
| I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
| wondered if anyone would care to comment on the
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone would care to
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 00:20:08 +0100, Squabsy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
OK with ulimit -a I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ ulimit -a
core file size(blocks, -c) 0
data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 18:53, zohar wrote:
I want to know about various configuration files in Linux. I tried Linux network
administration guide of Orally but that book was made in 2000 and also does not
over many of the configuration files of system utilities. Can you please help me
to go to
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of
Somehow I've done some not-so-wonderous things to my RH9 installation:
I have a Monsterous (348Mb) /proc/kcore file which I cannot remove or edit
down. It is preventing me from using the system as it has filled the /
partition to full. I can't change permissions (even as root), rm it, or vi
On Monday 29 September 2003 9:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I've done some not-so-wonderous things to my RH9 installation:
I have a Monsterous (348Mb) /proc/kcore file which I cannot remove or
edit down. It is preventing me from using the system as it has filled
the / partition to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I've done some not-so-wonderous things to my RH9 installation:
I have a Monsterous (348Mb) /proc/kcore file which I cannot remove or edit
down. It is preventing me from using the system as it has filled the /
partition to full. I can't change permissions (even
Gulp, blushing, digging toe into dirt. Oops! Returning to very shaky system
to find something else monsterous. Sorry 'bout that, folks.
--
W3AHR
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Downingtown, PA
On Monday 29 September 2003 9:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Somehow I've done some not-so-wonderous things to
Squabsy wrote:
I still don't understand why any of the above limits would create a
problem when I'm trying to record a wav file that would be 500k at most.
I would propose a test:
- Create or find a test file of about 1M bytes
- Do this over and and over ...
'cat 1mfile bigfile.wav'
and see
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:18:00 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on
On Monday 29 September 2003 10:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gulp, blushing, digging toe into dirt. Oops! Returning to very shaky
system to find something else monsterous. Sorry 'bout that, folks.
No problem
KJ1B
--
SCO Says IBM's Amended Complaint, Based on GPL, is Built on a Shaky
Foundation
LINDON, Utah-September 29, 2003-The SCO Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOX)
today made the following announcement:
On Friday, September 26, IBM filed an amendment to its legal complaint
against The SCO Group. In this
Michael Hipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:49:16 -0500
Squabsy wrote:
I still don't understand why any of the above limits would create a
problem when I'm trying to record a wav file that would be 500k at most.
I would propose a test:
- Create or find a test file of about 1M bytes
- Do
Net Llama! wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Squabsy wrote:
I am currently using SuSE 8.2 personal and apart from the now well
documented problem I am havving recording Wavs I am getting on reasonably
ok with it.
I have read a lot of favourable press recently about knoppix and
wondered if anyone
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry combined with what i feel is completely
stupid packaging give me a bad taste in my
Hi Squabsy-
I also use SuSE 8.2pro and Knoppix 3.1/3.2
I would say that Knoppix is a great boot-distro and possibly something to
install as a secondary distro on your hard drive, but I'm not sure I would
replace SuSE with it. I like the way SuSE has packaged so much software and
basically made it
Net Llama! wrote:
Gotta ask. What is so stupid about what I consider the best
packaging/updating scheme out there. (sorry, haven't tried gentoo) You
can keep debian updated using only a couple of commands once in a while.
(apt-get update apt-get dist-upgrade)
Not if you want to compile from
Hi
In our /etc directory I am seeing there are two directories
1. cron.daily
2. cron.daily2
Under cron.daily2 the *webalizer.pl* is mentioned. But in
/etc/logrotate only cron.daily is mentioned to be executed. But somehow
i am seeing *webalizer.pl* is also running... So
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Gotta ask. What is so stupid about what I consider the best
packaging/updating scheme out there. (sorry, haven't tried gentoo) You
can keep debian updated using only a couple of commands once in a while.
(apt-get update apt-get
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
In our /etc directory I am seeing there are two directories
1. cron.daily
2. cron.daily2
Under cron.daily2 the *webalizer.pl* is mentioned. But in
/etc/logrotate only cron.daily is mentioned to be executed. But somehow
i am
--- Harry Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will this work?
LInux box, using a standard wired NIC plugs in to
the W.A.P. and the Windows
boxes on the network use the wireless cards.
The cable modem goes into the router, then plugged
into the W.A.P.
The W.A.P. shouldn't care about the
Hi
Pointer to what? You haven't said what the problem is. You did alude to
something about webalizer.pl, but there's no information on what is wrong.
Is webalizer.pl not running per a cronjob? If so, then say so. Of couse
the fact that its sitting in cron.daily2 sounds like the reason why.
I
Net Llama! wrote:
unpack it, then:
./configure
make
checkinstall -D
This makes a .deb file for easy uninstalling later.
Sure, but if you're going to go that route, then you're not really getting
the 'advantage' of debian any longer. its just as simple to do that on a
redhat box to give me
Net Llama! wrote:
All you need to edit is a single file for each interface:
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1
Remaining determined to depend on a gui will always leave you stuck when
the GUI isn't available.
Amen,
I have found that moving
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Swapana Ghosh wrote:
Hi
Pointer to what? You haven't said what the problem is. You did alude to
something about webalizer.pl, but there's no information on what is wrong.
Is webalizer.pl not running per a cronjob? If so, then say so. Of couse
the fact that its
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 11:11, dep wrote:
SCO Says IBM's Amended Complaint, Based on GPL, is Built on a Shaky
Foundation
LINDON, Utah-September 29, 2003-The SCO Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: SCOX)
today made the following announcement:
On Friday, September 26, IBM filed an amendment to its legal
quoth burns:
| Ballocks
i pretty much agree with you, but what i thought was significant was a
company, in court, saying that the gpl won't hold up. this is what
we've been waiting for and to some extent feared (court is always a
crap shoot, usually with a bunch of highly paid guys shooting
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, dep wrote:
quoth burns:
| Ballocks
i pretty much agree with you, but what i thought was significant was a
company, in court, saying that the gpl won't hold up. this is what
we've been waiting for and to some extent feared (court is always a
crap shoot, usually with a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 14:42:11 -0400 (EDT)
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ken Moffat wrote:
KNOPPIX Is debian based, SuSE is, well, SuSE. I love KNOPPIX for recovery
purposes, but i'd never use Debian on a regular basis. The entire
religious 'Gnu/Linux' zealotry
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:13:12 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that having been said, i have every confidence in the ability of david boies
to do for sco what he did for algore.
Excuse me? I thought the only thing he did for algore was to push him to
questionable election practices
Collins Richey wrote:
Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro when
Knoppix packages some closed software packages with its distro!
I don't usually reply to these things, but I felt much better after registering
for the service and letting the Debian guy know where he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat wrote:
| Collins Richey wrote:
|
| Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro
| when
| Knoppix packages some closed software packages with its distro!
|
| I don't usually reply to these things, but I felt much
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 20:13, dep wrote:
i pretty much agree with you, but what i thought was significant was a
company, in court, saying that the gpl won't hold up. this is what
we've been waiting for and to some extent feared (court is always a
crap shoot, usually with a bunch of highly
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:03:06 -0600
Andrew Mathews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ken Moffat wrote:
| Collins Richey wrote:
|
| Debian zealot griping - How dare Knoppix call itself a Debian distro
| when
| Knoppix packages some closed software
Quoth Collins Richey:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:13:12 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that having been said, i have every confidence in the ability of david boies
to do for sco what he did for algore.
Excuse me? I thought the only thing he did for algore was to push him to
Quoth Net Llama!:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, dep wrote:
quoth burns:
| Ballocks
i pretty much agree with you, but what i thought was significant was a
company, in court, saying that the gpl won't hold up. this is what
we've been waiting for and to some extent feared (court is always a
Quoth Collins Richey:
Hey, if you agree with me 50% of the time, you should definitely seek treatment
soonest grin. All kidding aside, I have difficulty playing with those who
have rigid opinions.
So, I'm guessing this means you don't play with yourself? ;-)
Kurt
--
An Englishman never
Actually, it was worse. It seems they asked for recounts without any
clear criteria for recounting ballots. That was the famous hanging chad
debate. That was what the Supremes declared unconstitutional. Which
is surprising, because I would have thought a compelling need to elect
a Democrat would
Joel Hammer wrote:
How soon
they forget.
Don't get me started!
but, dear me, this is getting OT.
--
Ken
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc - http://mail.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
Collins Richey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:27:30 -0600
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:13:12 -0400
dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that having been said, i have every confidence in the ability of david boies
to do for sco what he did for algore.
Excuse me? I thought the only thing he did for
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:15:33 -0400
Kurt Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoth Collins Richey:
Hey, if you agree with me 50% of the time, you should definitely seek
treatment soonest grin. All kidding aside, I have difficulty playing with
those who have rigid opinions.
So, I'm guessing
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:45:53 -0400
Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, it was worse.
Yep, time to retire this thread or move to general. The gentleman with the
mustache will appear any time now!
--
Collins Richey - Denver Area
if you fill your heart with regrets of yesterday and
47 matches
Mail list logo
