Re: One reason why I should have a Linux laptop

2003-11-19 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 19 November 2003 19:43 pm, Ken Moffat wrote: James McDonald wrote: I had to reboot g. Now if I had linux on the laptop Why do you not have linux on that laptop? Or why not use a Knoppix CD or even boot a floppy with Tom's RTBT? --

Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote: Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the once-and-future-browser, it would seem that improvements are to be expected. I've been using Firebird since it's early days, and it's quite good. Nevertheless, 0.7 has more of a

Re: way ot

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 14 November 2003 9:19 am, Collins Richey wrote: :-) and ;-) A smile (on its side) and a smile with a wink. -- ++ + Bruce S. Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bellaire, MI 11/14/03 09:42 +

Re: spamassassin's sa-learn

2003-11-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 14 November 2003 10:13 am, Myles Green wrote: On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 09:19:45AM -0500, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Friday 14 November 2003 9:09 am, Collins Richey wrote: Agrred. Since Mozilla have indicated that Firebird is the once-and-future-browser, it would seem

Re: StarOffice 7 user question

2003-11-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 4:27 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: StarOffice 7 user question: I am curious about the quicker startup time for StarOffice 7. I am not convinced mine is really faster than OpenOffice 1.1. Maybe this is how it should be. When your StarOffice 7 starts, you get the

Re: SUSE Linux 9.0 Professional Update - night 1

2003-11-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 15:34 pm, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: Has anyone done an update to an existing 8.2 system? Or will I be in a bad mood tomorrow evening? I don't do updates anymore... just new installs but no one over on the SUSE list has had any real problems with an update. Most

Re: Star Office 7

2003-11-05 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 21:28 pm, Bill Campbell wrote: My first computer had its only memory on a drum Sounds like either a Bendix G-15 or something from Univac. IBM 850 (IIRC) Drum was run by a drive belt and if there was a power hit, sometimes the belt would snap. One

Re: Star Office 7

2003-11-05 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 05 November 2003 10:19 am, Rick Sivernell wrote: My new linux user is fighting his new Suse system. Can not comprehind the use of multiple screens, thinks that is a waste of space, says Winders does this winders do that. I just grin and tell in a couple of weeks he will refuse to

Re: Star Office 7

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 0:53 am, Joel Hammer wrote: I just bought SO 7 from the lindows warehouse. At $30 bucks I figured why not, SO6 works well. An immediate, and welcome difference, is that it starts up much faster. This is actually important for reading documents on the internet. And,

Re: Star Office 7

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 20:00 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 08:01:31AM -0700, Collins Richey wrote: Only negative experience. Since I get really good results with OpenOffice, I would never pay even $.02 for Star Office. You, on the other hand, may find some particular

Re: Star Office 7

2003-11-04 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 04 November 2003 21:16 pm, Chong Yu Meng wrote: Bruce Marshall wrote: Well gee... I guess at 65 and having bought from Sun, I feel 2. times better than you do... :-) That's amazing ! I thought most of the people on this list were in their 30's, because you guys sound

Re: OT Well somewhat

2003-10-24 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 24 October 2003 17:55 pm, Rick Sivernell wrote: List We are having a new convert to Linux from M$sludge. He has a business, small, and is spendinging way to much time trying to keep his box working. I just spent 2 hours cleaning a virii and updateing his virii code, Norton. It

Re: SCO Woes III: 6 weeks later. I still can't buy a license from SCO.

2003-10-09 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 09 October 2003 10:57 am, M. Drew Streib wrote: SCO Woes III: 6 weeks later. I still can't buy a license from SCO. by Drew It has been six weeks since my initial contact with SCO regarding getting a license for my Linux appliance server business, and SCO's apathy towards the sale

Re: question

2003-10-07 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 08 October 2003 8:14 am, Rick Sivernell wrote: list I have converted my wife machine to linux, as I said about 10 days. Her only complaint is no printing. I can go to internet ok, but pinging machines on the intranet is a no go. Useing Suse 8.0 pro. can not find what is not

Re: sharing an inbox in kmail

2003-10-04 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 03 October 2003 23:36 pm, Andrew Mathews wrote: Tom Wilson wrote: | Hi all | | My wife and I have an e-mail address that we share for general | corresponce with friends and family. She is getting tired of | having to have me login under my username so she can see any e-mail |

Re: Laptop suggestions

2003-10-04 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 04 October 2003 9:18 am, Joel Hammer wrote: I need to buy a laptop in the next week for a trip. I don't think I can get a laptop loaded with linux during that time so I will likely just get an XP machine and either remove XP or dual boot it sometime down the road. So, my

Re: Big /proc problem

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 29 September 2003 9:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Somehow I've done some not-so-wonderous things to my RH9 installation: I have a Monsterous (348Mb) /proc/kcore file which I cannot remove or edit down. It is preventing me from using the system as it has filled the / partition to

Re: Big /proc problem

2003-09-29 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 29 September 2003 10:26 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gulp, blushing, digging toe into dirt. Oops! Returning to very shaky system to find something else monsterous. Sorry 'bout that, folks. No problem KJ1B --

Re: Su

2003-09-28 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 28 September 2003 16:31 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote: It seems that when I su I get the following error: -su: /etc/profile: line 87: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `' -su: /etc/profile: line 89: syntax error: unexpected end of file I've looked at /etc/profile using vi but I

Re: Su

2003-09-28 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 28 September 2003 17:55 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote: Bruce Marshall wrote: Check line 18 I must have gone over this puppy dozens of times to no avail. A classic case of forest and trees. Thank you, that was it. I use the brute-force method. (which works regardless of language) Make

Re: question

2003-09-22 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 23 September 2003 17:30 pm, Rick Sivernell wrote: list I have a little problem here, when I download some file, binary or one to build with compile, I have to umount partition and remount. When I try to untar or run a binary, I get permission denied. I do set the proper

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone claiming to be dep wrote: greets. i've been printing from acrobat via cups. the command is lp -d LJIIIDSS. problem is, i cannot get acrobat to remember this, and i cannot find where in

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 7:58 am, someone claiming to be dep wrote: greets. i've been printing from

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:52 am, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:34 am, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/17/2003 8:29 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Tuesday 16 September 2003 23:03 pm, Tim

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 18:33 pm, Tim Wunder wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2003 9:15 am, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Wednesday 17 September 2003 8:52 am, Tim Wunder wrote: On 9/17/2003 8:44 AM, someone claiming to be Bruce Marshall wrote: On Wednesday 17

Re: OT: Here we go again ...

2003-09-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 17 September 2003 18:38 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: Wouldn't it be great if people starting saying, enuf is enuf. Maybe if people whose computers were cracked and taken over by hackers faced legal sanctions (fines, suspension of service, etc.), they would take responsibility to fix up

Re: any acrobat experts here?

2003-09-16 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 10:06 am, Mike Reinehr wrote: I don't qualify as an expert, but I've identified two likely suspects on my system: /usr/local/Acrobat5/Reader/intellinux/app-defaults/AcroRead /home/cmr/.acrobat/prefs There's only one problem. AcroRead defaulted to lpr

Re: 2.6-test5 problem

2003-09-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 13 September 2003 4:02 am, Keith Antoine wrote: On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:44 am, Bruce Marshall wrote: Thanks for the tips...What I just tried (and it's working so far) is to go back to 'make mrproper' and after adding in XFS and EXT3 and making sure the cpu was set properly

Re: 2.6-test5 problem

2003-09-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 13 September 2003 12:39 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 09/13/03 07:53, Bruce Marshall wrote: I now have the kernel running with the only problem being that I can't get the aic7xxx code to compile. This was also a problem in the 2.4.22 code. huh? i've built a few 2.4.22 kernels

Re: ssh public key frustration

2003-09-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 13 September 2003 12:38 pm, Net Llama! wrote: I've setup used ssh public keys many times before. All of a sudden, i can't get it to work at all. It works on the boxes where i've set it up in the past, but new ones just fail to work. The servers are all RH-7.3. I thought that

Re: ssh public key frustration

2003-09-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 13 September 2003 15:27 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 09/13/03 10:09, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 13 September 2003 12:38 pm, Net Llama! wrote: I've setup used ssh public keys many times before. All of a sudden, i can't get it to work at all. It works on the boxes where

Re: ssh public key frustration

2003-09-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 13 September 2003 17:40 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 09/13/03 12:53, Bruce Marshall wrote: How about this in your /etc/sshd_conf ? # Change to no to disable s/key passwords ChallengeResponseAuthentication no Its commented out. I uncommented it, set it to yes, and restarted

2.6-test5 problem

2003-09-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
Trying to load up the test5 kernel and I have it compiled, etc. Also have been reading David's blurb on 2.6 and think I have all that covered. On boot, I get an error: Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! Due to the debugging info I can't see what it was working on just prior to the

Re: 2.6-test5 problem

2003-09-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 12 September 2003 18:14 pm, Collins Richey wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:07:22 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to load up the test5 kernel and I have it compiled, etc. Also have been reading David's blurb on 2.6 and think I have all that covered

Re: 2.6-test5 problem

2003-09-12 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 12 September 2003 20:33 pm, Jerry McBride wrote: On Friday 12 September 2003 08:12 pm, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Friday 12 September 2003 18:14 pm, Collins Richey wrote: On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 14:07:22 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to load up the test5

Re: net radio

2003-09-11 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 11 September 2003 16:30 pm, Ken Moffat wrote: Bill Davidson wrote: On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:42:13 -0700 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone found good sources of internet radio that work in mozilla? Many that I have tried use a url including playlist=... which opens to

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:07 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote: list I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote: It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks here Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends

Re: suse 8.0 pro

2003-09-06 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 06 September 2003 16:00 pm, Bill Campbell wrote: I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been many improvements in yast2, and SuSE has been very responsive to feedback from their users so 8.2 is a much better product than 8.0. I agree and disagree

Re: Kwrite is taking over my desktop

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:33 am, bof wrote: Myles Green wrote: I haven't used KDE in quite a while now but: You might try moving or renaming your ~/.kde directory and then, after re-login copying over your previous config files from your moved/renamed ~/.kde to the newly created

Re: Kwrite is taking over my desktop

2003-09-03 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 10:33 am, bof wrote: Myles Green wrote: I haven't used KDE in quite a while now but: You might try moving or renaming your ~/.kde directory and then, after re-login copying over your previous config files from your moved/renamed ~/.kde to the newly created

Re: Duplicate Posts

2003-09-02 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 02 September 2003 11:31 am, Mike Reinehr wrote: Has anyone else received a duplicate of my recent post to the Redhat 9.0 /usr/src/linux-2.4.x won't compile thread? I just received a second copy from the list server, myself. I've noticed this occasionally in the past, but, according

Re: OTTrip to Maine

2003-08-25 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 12 August 2003 21:08 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: C'est moi. Actually, the picture was badly composed. I should have piled up all three of the lobsters that I ate. Yes, this was excessive, but, c'est la vie. Joel Think I have you beat On a three week trip to Martha's Vineyard and

2.6.0 kernel compile doc

2003-07-26 Thread Bruce Marshall
Just a couple of comments for David: I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what you wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any boot lines... I was able to get the dmesg output after the fact and the boot went ok anyway. But I'll be damned if I

Re: 2.6.0 kernel compile doc

2003-07-26 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 26 July 2003 12:55 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/26/03 09:48, Bruce Marshall wrote: Just a couple of comments for David: I hope you again cover the virtual console issue. I followed what you wrote about enabling a virtual terminal and still didn't get any boot lines... I

Re: Mandrake or Slackware

2003-07-24 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 24 July 2003 16:04 pm, Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote: Folks, If you had to choose, with only a couple hours to decide, between Slackware and Mandrake for a laptop install, which would you choose? I don't know either of them well enough to make a logical decision, but I'm in the

Re: So do I need to start learning SuSE?

2003-07-22 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 23 July 2003 6:37 am, Keith Antoine wrote: On Tuesday 22 July 2003 11:41 am, Bill Campbell wrote: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:00:35AM -0400, Net Llama! wrote: On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Matthew Carpenter wrote: I'm not quite sure I follow the logic in the last sentence. But I

Re: compiler question

2003-07-21 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote: I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been running gcc 2.95.2. So can someone tell me what potential problems I might have if I install 3.3. Specifically a) will 3.3 prevent me from now making small changes in my

Re: compiler question

2003-07-21 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 21 July 2003 12:13 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote: On Monday 21 July 2003 08:32 am, Jerry McBride wrote: My reply is mixed within your original text... On Monday 21 July 2003 10:56 am, Tony Alfrey wrote: I see that more and more stuff will require gcc 3.3 and I've been running gcc

Re: DSL Gotcha

2003-07-20 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 20 July 2003 0:03 am, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Michael Hipp: Kurt Wall wrote: Hey, list, I learned something interesting about DSL today. I was having lots or intermittency problems with my DSL connection. A call to tech support later, and it was fixed. Immediately. The

Re: Redhat releases unofficial 2.60-test kernel RPMs

2003-07-19 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 19 July 2003 18:57 pm, Keith Antoine wrote: On Saturday 19 July 2003 01:03 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/19/03 11:22, Keith Antoine wrote: On Friday 18 July 2003 07:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: These are for RH9 Rawhide: http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/RPMS.kernel/ I've

Re: ALSA weirdness with 2.6.0

2003-07-15 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 13:25 pm, Douglas J Hunley wrote: I just compiled 2.6.0 and everything works but sound. I configured the included ALSA to use my SBLive! and when I rebooted, it errored saying 'snd-crd-0: no such module' . I thought no shit, this is a monolithic kernel' . Why is it

Re: Adding forgotten kernel module without complete recompile

2003-07-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 13 July 2003 12:04 pm, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: Bruce Marshall wrote: On Friday 11 July 2003 17:39 pm, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: Net Llama! wrote: On 07/11/03 14:11, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: ... the subject tells it all. Now the module in question wasn't really forgotten, I

Re: Adding forgotten kernel module without complete recompile

2003-07-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 13 July 2003 14:09 pm, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: Bruce Marshall wrote: Supposing there is a device I just invented called a Belchfire 90 mob-ulator... and I write a module for it. How could the kernel possibly use my module? It wouldn't know when to call it... Same thing goes

Re: Zaire still won't connect

2003-07-13 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 13 July 2003 21:31 pm, Joel Hammer wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 05:18:49PM -0700, Net Llama! wrote: On 07/13/03 17:00, Joel Hammer wrote: Koffice hasn't gone anywhere. Whether it sux is another story, but you seem to be confusing staying power with usefulness.

Re: Adding forgotten kernel module without complete recompile

2003-07-11 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 11 July 2003 17:39 pm, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: Net Llama! wrote: On 07/11/03 14:11, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote: ... the subject tells it all. Now the module in question wasn't really forgotten, I didn't need it on my last recompile, but now I do: I have a very nice new

Re: pppd with laptop and cellphone

2003-07-07 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 07 July 2003 15:23, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Bruce Marshall: I'm used to using pppd for connecting to the internet... and now I would like to use a Nextel phone connected to the serial port of the laptop. My problem is getting pppd started without the normal chat script

Re: Mozilla 1.4 Killed my Bookmarks File

2003-07-03 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 03 July 2003 21:55 pm, Kurt Wall wrote: This is fscking ridiculous - after I started Mozilla 1.4, it wiped out my existing bookmarks! If I hadn't had backup copy, I would be pissed off in the extreme. One more little surprise like this, and I'm wiping 1.4 off my machine and going

Re: Blame [OT]

2003-07-03 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 03 July 2003 22:42 pm, Collins Richey wrote: On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:32:14 -0700 Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who died and voted you list bully? On 07/01/03 16:21, ronnie gauthier wrote: Vern, I can call you Vern, Can't I? Good. Vern, listen. Grab a beer and I'll

Re: OT Re: Custom Printing

2003-07-01 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 0:13 am, Shawn Tayler wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700 Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] professed: - . - -. . . . . - . - .. . -. - . . - . ...- . - Yes are al deek? Yes a real deek --

Re: OT Re: Geeks, was Re: Custom Printing

2003-07-01 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 10:49 am, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 21:05:59 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 18:20 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:54 -0400 [snip] 2650? mhz? Don't even have that on my freq-cheat

Linux backup survey

2003-07-01 Thread Bruce Marshall
I wonder if I could talk any of you folks into going to: http://www.cds-inc.com/vote/linux.html and taking the 5-question survey on linux backup. BackAgain II is a very nice backup program (many types of devices and also network backups), and easy to use. It originally was written for

Re: Webnazis R Us

2003-07-01 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 01 July 2003 14:52 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: Spam is a byproduct of stupidity and laziness. Some stupid/lazy companies include Norton. I get spam from them regularly about how they can help keep my Windoze systems virus free (didn't know X windows had viruses). Hmmm... I

Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Sunday 29 June 2003 23:44 pm, Shawn Tayler wrote: Hi Guys, I have a need to be able to print some text onto the back of a 4x6in post card. Some of the text would be predefined, kind of a form with data being added from perhaps another application or a text file of sorts. Anyway I'd like

Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
card. On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 07:57:22 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] professed: On Sunday 29 June 2003 23:44 pm, Shawn Tayler wrote: Hi Guys, I have a need to be able to print some text onto the back of a 4x6in post card. Some of the text would be predefined, kind

Re: Geeks, was Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 30 June 2003 13:53 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:41:42 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 9:23 am, Shawn Tayler wrote: Just a few, they are QSL cards, I am a Ham Radio operator along with other questionable traits 8-). I

Re: OT Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:14 pm, Tony Alfrey wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 10:55 am, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 08:40:55 -0700 Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 30 June 2003 06:41 am, Bruce Marshall wrote: snip Yes, I have that affliction also

Re: Geeks, was Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:52 pm, Michael Hipp wrote: David A. Bandel wrote: Non-pilots just don't understand how relaxing flying is. I never found flying relaxing. Challenging, thrilling, exhilarating, rewarding but not relaxing. Flying: Hours of boredom separated by moments of terror.

Re: Geeks, was Re: Custom Printing

2003-06-30 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 30 June 2003 18:20 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 14:52:54 -0400 While I'm not a HAM, guess I should be (got the knowledge, but my code is _real_ rusty). I run two SailMail stations here (HF e-mail for boaters). I'm branching out to more than boaters --

Re: Odd FTP Problems

2003-06-18 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 18 June 2003 18:01, Jason Joines wrote: I inherited (old admin left, boss said this is yours) a RH 6.2 server that runs a web application via apache and mysql. It generates a link that points to an ftp URL to retrieve spreadsheets. The URL is something like ftp://user:[EMAIL

Re: SuSE upgrade

2003-06-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 8:07 am, Roger Oberholtzer wrote: On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 07:55:09 -0400 dep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: begin Roger Oberholtzer's quote: | I have an SuSE 7.1 distro, which I am not using. It was bought for | testing various distros but is not currently installed

Re: bootable Redhat based CD?

2003-06-17 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 12:17 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote: Just a thought but have you looked at Bernard's bootable linux on freshmeat? freshmeat.net/projects/bblcd/?topic_id=147%2C866 It has all you need to build a bootable CD from your currently

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:13 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:07, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 9:17 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/13/03 22:53, Kurt Wall wrote: Yup, as the Llama informed us, 2.4.21 has been released. Unfortunately, the XFS patch set for 2.4.21

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:43 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:36, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:13 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:07, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 9:17 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/13/03 22:53, Kurt Wall wrote: Yup

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:43 am, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Bruce Marshall: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:13 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:07, Bruce Marshall wrote: [slash] Wouldn't this be the right patch? Put up yesterday afternoon... ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:59 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:53, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:43 am, Kurt Wall wrote: Quoth Bruce Marshall: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:13 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:07, Bruce Marshall wrote: [slash

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: Maybe it's not cooked yet. The patch didn´t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn´t even bother trying to compile it. There were a dozen or so rejects and way to much fuzz... huh? the

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:24 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: Maybe it's not cooked yet. The patch didn´t apply cleanly to stock 2.4.21 sources, so I didn´t

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:14 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 09:05, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 11:24 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 08:08, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 10:55 am, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 07:43, Kurt Wall wrote: Maybe

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:53 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 09:27, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:14 pm, Net Llama! wrote: that throws my theory out. so, can anyone explain what the new option 'PGE extensions' is under 'processor type features'? it looks

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:53 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On 06/14/03 09:27, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:14 pm, Net Llama! wrote: that throws my theory out. so, can anyone explain what the new option 'PGE extensions' is under 'processor type features'? it looks

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:22 pm, David A. Bandel wrote: On Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:48:42 -0400 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: don´t know why you guys are having such problems. The linux-2.4.21-xfs.blah patch (not yet in 2.4.21 directory, but in the snapshot directory) worked fine

Re: Linux 2.4.21

2003-06-14 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 14 June 2003 16:58 pm, Net Llama! wrote: This is going to hell rather quickly. So i finally applied what looks to be the correct XFS patch, and I still can't get as far as 'make mrproper' without something blowing up. This is the same box that i've built every previous 2.4.x

Re: bootable Redhat based CD?

2003-06-11 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 11 June 2003 13:35 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Tuesday 10 June 2003 17:50, Net Llama! wrote: I've spend the better part of the past week exploring the varios options suggestions, but i'm not making much progress. The closest i've

Re: bootable Redhat based CD?

2003-06-10 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 10 June 2003 17:50, Net Llama! wrote: On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Andrew Mathews wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Mathews wrote: | Net Llama! wrote: | | Anyone know of a bootable Redhat based CD, similar to the Knoppix | | concept? I need to integrate

Re: SuSE Linux Enterprise Desktop

2003-06-03 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Monday 02 June 2003 11:18, Shawn L Johnston wrote: Does anyone know anything about this Enterprise Desktop product? I've only seen this article on it http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/04/02/HNsusedelay_1.html which says that its supposed to be available in June, but I haven't found

Re: the latest from sco

2003-05-31 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 30 May 2003 16:20, dep wrote: darl and chris held a teleconference today. the upshot apparently is that their basis for enforcement is the contracts which they have with unix licensees. which is to say that they intend to go after *their own customers.* if they have figured out a

Re: OT We won't back down...

2003-03-29 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 29 March 2003 10:21 am, Collins Richey wrote: On Sat, 29 Mar 2003 06:50:41 -0800 Ken Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you feel a bit mislead, judging by the amount of resistance, and the lack of open-armed welcome by the Iraqis? Our intentions may be good, but something

Re: lcd monitors and linux

2003-03-27 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 27 March 2003 17:49 pm, Collins Richey wrote: On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 17:29:15 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, el lodger wrote: I'm thinking about getting a lcd monitor. Are these supported by the 2.4.x kernel? If so, any recommendations or

Re: lcd monitors and linux

2003-03-27 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Thursday 27 March 2003 19:02 pm, el lodger wrote: On Thu, 27 Mar 2003 18:11:37 -0500 Bruce Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gee Collins, we agree on something!! I too recommend Viewsonic and I'm using a Viewsonic VE800 (18inch) LCD monitor as I type this. Connecting it to SuSE 8.0

Re: OpenOffice Outline View

2003-03-22 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 21 March 2003 22:56 pm, Brett I. Holcomb wrote: MS Word has the ability to view a document in outline format. That is if you have a document that has different heading levels in it you can select a view option that displays the document as an outline. This is very handy because you

Re: Network printing problem

2003-03-21 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 21 March 2003 13:03 pm, Susan Macchia wrote: Yes I am using LPRng. I looked at /etc/lpd.perms and DEFAULT ACCEPT is the last line. I looked on the RH website and read everything I could and have added /etc/hosts.lpd to list all of the hosts that will print. Restarted lpd on all

Re: What's after OpenLinux?

2003-03-08 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Saturday 08 March 2003 17:29 pm, Collins Richey wrote: Yes! I am so glad never to see RPM - I just emerge sync, emerge -up world and I see what I need to do. I've been using Gentoo for a couple of months God, I wish I'd said that! Wait a minute, I did say that. You better watch it,

Re: Caldera Sues IBM

2003-03-07 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Friday 07 March 2003 13:05 pm, Net Llama! wrote: On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Bruce Marshall wrote: On Friday 07 March 2003 12:46 pm, Ted Ozolins wrote: Kurt Wall wrote: Bastards. I'm going to throw away every piece of Caldera software I own. It's filthy and I refuse to soil my hands

Re: mouse accel rate issue -- resolved

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 7:52 am, dep wrote: begin Bruce Marshall's quote: | Oh well I think what's current in the Expert Mouse line is the | Pro now with four big buttons and 6 small ones on the top | edge... and a wheel above the ball. they still apparently have the plain

Re: mouse accel rate issue -- resolved

2003-02-26 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 13:06 pm, dep wrote: begin Bruce Marshall's quote: | Unless the connector itself is worn, I would think it | would be a mechanical problem (loose solder joint) more than | anything. just took it apart and wiggled the connector while looking at it under a 10x

Re: mouse accel rate issue

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 19:29 pm, dep wrote: greets. my beloved kensington trackball appears to have given up the ghost; it was a serial version whose cable i thought had gone screwy, but a new one (which kensington, btw, sent free of charge even though the trackball is about seven years

Re: mouse accel rate issue -- resolved

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 21:12 pm, dep wrote: bruce and kurt -- thanks. i took a short cut that roberto alsina suggested, which was to goose up the option resolution line (which involved creating the line first) in XF86Config. it doesn't fix the gdm problem, but if i turned gdm off i

Re: mouse accel rate issue -- resolved

2003-02-25 Thread Bruce Marshall
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 22:28 pm, dep wrote: begin Bruce Marshall's quote: | I assume you now have an Expert Mouse Pro nah, the old four-button one; my original was a v. 5; no idea what this one is -- it's whatever's current. Oh well I think what's current in the Expert Mouse

Fwd: [SLE] The Linux Uprising(OT)

2003-02-23 Thread Bruce Marshall
I haven't seen this article mentioned over on this list. Check it out, especially the part about SCO and how they are going to litigate on pieces of Linux. Our old friends, Caldera, can't make money in the Linux business so they're going to use lawyers to make money... Sounds rather

  1   2   >