Signed-off-by: Erez Geva
---
config.c| 9 +
ptp4l.8 | 8
raw.c | 6 --
sk.c| 38 --
sk.h| 14 +-
transport.c | 11 ++-
transport_private.h
>From 532e29347d80695db45e5b59e979a954d0e7238b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erez Geva
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:27:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] config: Add hardware time stamp filter setting mode
Add global option for the hardware time stamp setting.
The function could:
Normally set the filters
Signed-off-by: Erez Geva
---
sk.c | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sk.c b/sk.c
index f18b2bf..de8bf58 100644
--- a/sk.c
+++ b/sk.c
@@ -55,8 +55,17 @@ static int hwts_init(int fd, const char *device, int
rx_filter, int tx_type)
Hi,
My tabs are been replaced by spaces, do you understand why?
Can I send the patch as attachment file?
Erez
From: Erez [erezge...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 June 2018 15:27
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] config: Add
I'm sorry.
It is the Micro$oft Outlock which replace the tabs with spaces.
Micro$oft, where do you want to get lost today?
I will try later after setting my send mail and send it directly from git.
Yours
Erez
From: [ext] Geva, Erez [erez.geva
>From 532e29347d80695db45e5b59e979a954d0e7238b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erez Geva
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2018 11:27:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] config: Add hardware time stamp filter setting mode
Add global option for the hardware time stamp setting.
The function could:
Normally set the filters
Thanks for your input.
The code generate error rightfully, the message is misleading.
I will correct the code in sk.c to generate a more accurate error messaging.
I did saw that the daemon keeps running, is that the correct behaviour for
sk_timestamping_init() returning error (err = -1)?
I
Good explanation.
Sound good to me.
Erez
From: Anders Selhammer [anders.selham...@est.tech]
Sent: 13 November 2018 11:34
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Possibility to use ports in different
namespaces
What about "ip netns exec"?
From: Anders Selhammer [anders.selham...@est.tech]
Sent: 09 November 2018 10:25
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/6] config: Added network_namespace as config
parameter
Signed-off-by:
From: Anders Selhammer [anders.selham...@est.tech]
Sent: 09 November 2018 14:44
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (PD PA CI R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: SV: [PATCH 2/6] config: Added network_namespace as config parameter
Friday, 9 November, 2018 11:36 AM
> What about "
Hi,
It happens with one message "Delay Response" in the length 104 bytes.
Did you check your VLAN, may be the VLAN add the 4 bytes?
Did you see this behavior without using VLAN?
What is your ptp4l configuration?
Erez
From: Sun, Steven (NSB - CN/Qingdao)
As you feel, I don't care on the Ethernet frame.
Nor do I think we should try to fix it or criticize it.
If the packet pass the Linux kernel and received by the PTP daemon, we should
not care.
For me, the only question is, if the Ethernet frame does have padding and the
PTP frame is proper.
Is
.
But, I do respect other opinions. -:)
Erez
From: Vincent Li X [vincent.x...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 31 January 2019 18:14
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (PD PA CI R 3); Jiri Benc
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-devel] ptp4l wrongly takes
Great patch
Good work :-)
From: Petr Machata [pe...@mellanox.com]
Sent: 11 June 2019 18:35
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Petr Machata; Keller, Jacob E; Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA CI R 3)
Subject: [PATCH v4] sk: Recognize HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME
Hi,
The "cfg.rx_filter != HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL)) { "
line catch both filter mode is "HWTS_FILTER_FULL, and the fact that the
filter could is in a higher state for both HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL,
HWTS_FILTER_CHECK.
Could you be more specific what does the HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME means?
For me, the
Hi,
It make sense for HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL.
But for HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL, it does not make sense to get
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_SOME.
Some of what? You ask for all!
Neither can you use rx_filter in this case, since it was not used in the
SIOCSHWTSTAMP request.
Erez
ing packet */
HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL,
As of HWTS_FILTER_NORMAL case, your patch make sense.
Thanks
Erez
From: Petr Machata [pe...@mellanox.com]
Sent: 11 June 2019 16:22
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA CI R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
S
Hi,
I have update the Debian package build files.
If you wish to build it yourself, I can send you the files.
Erez
From: Richard Cochran [richardcoch...@gmail.com]
Sent: 23 April 2019 15:56
To: Prasanth KV
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > While the Kernel is under GPL 2.
> > The headers and system call are under exception, so user can use the
> > Kernel with non GPL code. But any changes or addition to the kernel
> > itself should be GPL 2.
>
> This is very different. The Linux kernel is supposed to run any kind of
> programs
that any code that is part of the LinuxPTP must be coverd
by GPL.
But user may embedded a library in their non GPL application and communicate
with the ptp4l.
Do you have another suggestion?
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Thursday, 16 April 2020 17:09
To: Geva, Erez
Hi,
I see that linux PTP is under GPL 2.
I would like to ask your permission to allow using a libpmc library and headers
needed by it under LGPL 2.
As you are the copywrite holders, we need your explicit consent.
Thanks
Erez Geva
From: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA CI R 3)
Sent: Thursday
Hi,
As I thought that libpmc could be nice for several application that need to
communicate with the ptp4l.
I decided to make a short test.
First I patch the makefile to create the libpmc.so
diff --git a/makefile b/makefile
index a23945a..f5e12da 100644
--- a/makefile
+++ b/makefile
>From a quick look.
It seems that it is 'pwmchip%d' for a long time.
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.0/source/drivers/pwm/sysfs.c#L314
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Saturday, 16 May 2020 21:15
To: Lokesh Vutla
Cc: Sekhar Nori ;
Hi,
Personally I prefer leader/followers over source/sink.
Source remind me of source code.
And sink remind me of where our water goes after we use them.
Client/server is good as well.
Erez
From: Jagmeet Singh Hanspal
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2020 06:00
To: Richard Cochran
Cc:
the leader.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2020 17:20
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA CI R 3)
Cc: jagmeet.hans...@gmail.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/1] Introduce inclusive terminology
On Wed
P.S.
The sink goes in one direction.
-Original Message-
From: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA CI R 3)
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August 2020 18:14
To: richardcoch...@gmail.com
Cc: jagmeet.hans...@gmail.com; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC 0/1] Introduce
Hi,
For TSN, we need jitter of ~ 100 nanoseconds,
And most interface can issue a jitter of ~10 nanoseconds.
So for now TSN does not need fractions of nanosecond.
Further more, I do not think there is any Ethernet based traffic that can
benefit from such accuracy.
As for 1 Gigabits, each bit is
On 12/08/2020 23:40, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Richard Cochran
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2020 8:40 AM
>> To: Keller, Jacob E
>> Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/15] posix_clock_open: derive PHC
>>
Hi,
I see an issue with the ptp4l using an Intel I210 connected back to back to an
Intel i255.
I am not sure if the issue is Intel related or is it ptp4l.
Probably something wrong that I did.
I use a very simple configuration:
On client side:
[global]
delay_mechanism P2P
network_transport L2
Yes.
-Original Message-
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2021 18:20
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ts2phc: Close socket on peer shutdown
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:24 PM Geva, Erez wrote
Make sense to handle 0, end of file.
But as it is NOT an error, perhaps it should use a proper pr_info().
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2021 13:34
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 2/4] ts2phc: Close socket on peer
A great idea to add baud-rate.
Just a suggestion,
As I remember from gtkterm application.
It provide setting: port name, Baud rate, parity, bits, stop bit, and flow
control.
What do you think of adding all of the setting?
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Friday, 14
Hi,
I think it is better to use a short explanation how does mktime() use the
tm_isdst flag, and why should it be set to 0.
For me the problem is that we did not comply with proper use of mktime().
Fixing glibc only revealed the bug in linuxptp.
So we fix linuxptp, not trying to comply with
One of my hardest bug was one a single bit.
Do not measure bugs by code. Measure by complexity.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2021 18:14
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 1
m: Lars Munch
Sent: Friday, 14 May 2021 19:30
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 1/4] ts2phc: Fix uninitialized variable in
nmea_scan_rmc
So how about the following simple explanation?
According to POSIX.1-2017 tm_is
In IEEE 1588-2019
I see PARENT_DATA_SET with
- observedParentOffsetScaledLogVariance
- observedParentClockPhaseChangeRate
You use a natural statistics syntax.
Perhaps you may use a more coherent phrasing that match the standard.
May be something that match the performanceMonitoringDS, like
-
The value comes from configuration on start up.
Our configuration file is read only.
The patch only implement a read operation (GET).
Erez
From: luigi.mantell...@sm-optics.com
Sent: Monday, 24 May 2021 08:53
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Subject
Hi,
I would like to use this opportunity to promote the libpmc library.
https://sf.net/p/linuxptp/
The library provide the functionality of the pmc tool.
It comes with wrapping for python, Perl, Lua, php, ruby.
And runs more then 20 times faster then the original linuxptp pmc tool
Query a
IEEE 1558 2019 does define Float64 that follow using the IEEE Std 754
As most hardware that runs Linux already use IEEE Std 754 (on hardware level or
library level for hardware lacking floating point).
The Float64 match C float on most 64 bits machine.
You may need more code to ensure your C
I do not see any connection of pmc poll time-out to ptp4l waiting for TX time
stamp.
On my libpmc https://sf.net/p/libpmc I do not use any time out.
The libpmc pmc tools works better this way.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Eric Decker
Sent: Friday, 9 July 2021 00:28
To: Richard
On 26/04/2021 00:47, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 03:04:17PM +0200, Erez Geva wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/pmc.c b/pmc.c
>> index a767c8a..00d6014 100644
>> --- a/pmc.c
>> +++ b/pmc.c
>> @@ -335,6 +335,11 @@ static void pmc_show(struct ptp_message *msg, FILE *fp)
>>
On 22/04/2021 09:18, Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote:
> With this patch we introduce the twoStepFlag evaluation at port level.
>
> ---
> config.c | 2 +-
> port.c | 35 ++-
> ptp4l.8 | 9 -
> 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
>
as the 'master only' is a port action and not clock action as 'slave
only', it might be easier to implement and verify.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2021 15:25
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
No,
You must use a proper domain number that match the PTP domain.
You can fetch it from
1. A configuration file with domainNumber
2. The – domainNumber option
3. The -d
The default is 0.
Erez
From: Ruby Bhati
Sent: Thursday, 22 April 2021 13:40
To:
On 04/05/2021 10:16, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0900, 박웅섭 wrote:
>> 1.In the text->length=c->desc.userDescription.length part of clock.c line
>> 368, the length declared in the static_ptp_text structure is of type signed
>> int and the length declared in the
On 30/03/2021 09:22, Michael Walle wrote:
> Hi Erez,
>
> Am 2021-03-30 01:26, schrieb Erez Geva:
>> Confirm to IEEE 1588 SLAVE_ONLY management TLB
>>
>> Erez Geva (1):
>> Fix SLAVE_ONLY TLV
>
> I guess this is the new patch version? This should be reflected in the
> Subject line, e.g. "[PATCH
How do you want to call the 64 bits?
I think that naming should be consistence.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Thursday, 11 March 2021 04:12
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 1/2
Hi,
There is a new uds_ro_address with the default file /var/run/ptp4lro.
Which allow to read without setting or modifying.
Great, Good work -:)
What is your view on the files permission?
$ ls -l /var/run/ptp4l*
srw-rw 1 root root 0 Mar 16 13:21 /var/run/ptp4l
srw-rw 1 root root 0 Mar
On 18/03/2021 11:57, Frantisek Rysanek wrote:
> On 17 Mar 2021 at 18:01, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>
> [on PCI-e PTM]
>>
>> The switches are supposed to work like NTP server and client at the
>> same time (boundary clock in the PTP terminology), so all PCIe links
>> have hardware timestamping on
___
Linuxptp-devel mailing list
Linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxptp-devel
On 10/03/2021 00:38, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Geva, Erez
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2021 2:29 PM
>> To: Richard Cochran
>> Cc:linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] PORT_STATS_NP manageme
Hi,
I am about to release a first version of a new libpmc library under LGPL for
all the guys who "parse" pmc output.
As I add the PORT_STATS_NP message,
I notice that the statistics is stored in unsigned integer 64 bits values, but
using host order instead of network order.
As I know you
On 22/03/2021 16:31, Erez Geva wrote:
> According to IEEE 1588 The slave only flag in the SLAVE_ONLY TLV
> is bit 0 and not bit 1 as in the DEFAULT_DATA_SET TLV.
>
> To retain backward compatibility and as bit 1 in SLAVE_ONLY
> is not used anyway. Read and set both bits with same value.
> ---
On 16/03/2021 16:59, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:52:36PM +0100, Frantisek Rysanek wrote:
>> On 16 Mar 2021 at 11:25, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>>>
>>> In the Intel's igc driver I saw few SYNCE registers defined,
>>> but no code using them.
>>>
>> Whoa. igc ? oh there's an
On 16/03/2021 15:52, Frantisek Rysanek wrote:
> On 16 Mar 2021 at 11:25, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
>>
>> In the Intel's igc driver I saw few SYNCE registers defined,
>> but no code using them.
>>
> Whoa. igc ? oh there's an i225... didn't know about this one, thanks
> for the pointer, this
limit this TLV message to UDS only?
Since UDS always run on the same machine.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2021 17:57
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: PORT_STATS_NP management TLV message
Hi,
Can you be more explicit?
What do you mean by “servo state”?
What state you want to query?
Erez
From: Ruby Bhati
Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2021 12:49
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Get servo state from PMC
Hi,
Updating the Qus.
Is there any way to
.
Is there any way from pmc also I can read this servo state
Thanks,
Ruby Bhati
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 4:31 PM Geva, Erez
mailto:erez.geva@siemens.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Can you be more explicit?
What do you mean by “servo state”?
What state you want to query?
Erez
From: Ruby Bhati mailto:ruby
Looks like you daylight time is broken on Arch Linux and Ubuntu 20.04.
-1 is error by mktime.
Why do you think it is related here?
Fix you daylight time setting in your system and open a bug report in the
relevant packages/systems.
Erez
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2021 22:24
Looks like the man page is not accurate.
Looking in https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/mktime.html
A positive or 0 value for tm_isdst shall cause mktime() to presume initially
that Daylight Savings Time, respectively, is or is not in effect for the
specified time.
A
Thanks,
Forgot about it.
Erez
From: Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2021 18:10
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] Propagate management messages from UNIX layer to
PTP network
You should specify 0
Hi,
We notice that when sending Management messages using UNIX socket ('pmc -u').
ptp4l propagate the message to the PTP domain network.
We try to set the target using local clock ID.
# pmc -u -f /etc/linuxptp/ptp4l.conf 'target xx.fffe.xx-1' 'get
CLOCK_DESCRIPTION'
Now, we get reply
That make sense.
nmea uses UTC.
UTC does not use daylight saving.
So we should set tm_isdst to zero or negative.
I think zero is better as UTC should not use daylight saving.
Sound like a good ground for a patch
Erez
From: Lars Munch
Sent: Wednesday, 21 April 2021 15:01
To: Geva, Erez (ext
Hi,
Regarding: "pmc executes as a new process each time it is called".
1. No you can run the pmc tool in interactive mode. Then send new requests,
line by line and with increasing the sequence ID.
2. You can use the libpmc library https://sf.net/projects/libpmc/, The library
allow you to
Hi,
In pmc_create(...)
if (transport_type == TRANS_UDS) {
pmc->port_identity.portNumber = getpid();
When portNumber is UInteger16
However in new Linux systems, I notice that the process ID can be larger than
16 bits.
Do you think we need to
that supports IEEE 1558 management
messages.
:-)
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Eric Decker
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2021 04:56
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; Richard Cochran
Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Only forward responses to UDS port
er 0m0.013s
sys 0m0.011s
= Run tcl =
real 0m0.012s
user 0m0.007s
sys 0m0.007s
debian@tsnlaptop:~/TSN/build/libpmc (master)$
From: Erez
Sent: Monday, 18 October 2021 10:32
To: Richard Cochran
Cc: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3) ;
linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Li
Regarding the "ugly scripting" of pmc.
I create the http://libpmc.sf.net/ just to work around this issue.
The libpmc provides a library with pmc tool capabilities, and wrapper for
scripting as Python, Lua and Perl.
I think pmc is as a testing tool for the linuxptp project, but not a real tool
Hi,
The linuxptp needs the driver to register to the PTP layer.
You may write a complete kernel driver, or a driver in kernel that register the
PTP layer and communicate with the user space driver.
Good luck
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Friday, 1 October
You may do this too.
A legal point, As linuxptp is GPL, any changed code or code you link with it
have to be GPL too!
And be published according to GPL.
Erez
From: Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini
Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 16:02
To: Richard Cochran
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
I like your patch.
You follow PRINT_RL, good thinking.
I want to recommend:
1. You need to commit the changes locally. You need to sign the patches.
And create patches for send with “git format-patch
--cover-letter”.
You need to fill the cover letter “patch” manually.
The cover letter
Do you mean?
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009696799/functions/realpath.html
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/realpath.3p.html
https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/realpath.3.html
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Wednesday, 17 November 2021 05:23
To: Keller,
Is the new IEEE Std 1588-2019 have any updates on that?
-Original Message-
From: Methlal Pallewatta
Sent: Friday, 19 November 2021 12:17
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linuxptp-devel] Inconsistent remote timestamps in the P2P mode
Hi all,
In the section 6.6.4
, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH RFC v3 06/10] Add the
ALTERNATE_TIME_OFFSET_PROPERTIES management message.
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 08:57:35AM +, Geva, Erez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> According to IEEE 1588 timeOfNextJ
Hi,
According to IEEE 1588 timeOfNextJump is 48 bits.
The alternate_time_offset_properties structure reserve the full 48 bits.
The pre and the post function do full handle.
But the rest handle only the low 32 bits.
I can understand the PMC set use 32 bits only, but the rest?
Erez
-Original
port is synchronise or not based on these values.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Monday, 15 November 2021 14:43
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: Vladimir Oltean ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/10] checksync:
Hi,
>From IEEE 1588-2019:
"This range is to be assigned by an alternate PTP Profile" E000 - FFFE
Can you provide the standard reference for this TLV?
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Vladimir Nosikov via Linuxptp-devel
Sent: Monday, 1 November 2021 13:45
To:
Nice,
Your code is GPL,
So using your code does not helps, we can simply use linuxptp directly.
We can not integrate your code in to our application without GPL our code,
or we need to use it through bash script/system and parse the result.
Why bother?
Enjoy coding
Erez
P.S.
We have
Hi,
I though gmPresent means an external clock, not own clock.
If the ptp4l looses sync, how can you have a grand master present?
Please explain.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Joanna Yurdal
Sent: Friday, 5 November 2021 12:04
To: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
value from this range? Except ofc C000, C001, C003 and C006.
____
From: Geva, Erez
Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 9:48:30 PM
To: Носиков Владимир Алексеевич
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Signed-off-by: Vladimir
, 8 November 2021 10:44
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Set grandmasterIdentity to
localClockIdentity
Without the proposed patch the result of pmc "get time_status" when lost
synchronization with e
This looks like a call to send the a patch with these options.
Richard, How do you think these options should be implemented?
A single enumerator, separate integer for each?
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Hal Murray
Sent: Monday, 19 July 2021 12:39
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3
Hi,
Do you mean this one, page 20?
http://www.leapsecond.com/museum/z3801a/097-z3801-01-iss-1.pdf
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Richard Cochran
Sent: Monday, 19 July 2021 04:13
To: Hal Murray
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ts2phc:
I think Richard is correct.
The sync state depends on your system.
On my setting a 'sync' is when the correction is bellow 100 nanoseconds, when
it is usually bellow 10 nanoseconds and I except to have it stable for 5
seconds long.
There is no generic sync.
So each user need to define a
Hi,
The standard define:
UNICAST_MASTER_TABLE
ACCEPTABLE_MASTER_TABLE
And some more tables.
Why do we need a new private management TLV and not use the standard TLVs?
Not against adding new management TLV, if we have good reason for.
Nor do I think the standard is better.
But it seems we skip
2022 19:54
To: Erez
Cc: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3) ;
linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH 1/1] Fix management TLV print.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:54:55PM +0100, Erez wrote:
> As actualTableSize name comes from the IEEE standard.
UNICAST_MA
Sent: Thursday, 17 March 2022 21:48
To: Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R 3)
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar ; Martin Pecka
; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Add non-portable management option to
query the servo state (via SERVO_STATE_NP).
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:16
t!
Thanks for sharing
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Martin Pecka
Sent: Monday, 28 March 2022 23:11
To: Richard Cochran ; Geva, Erez (ext) (DI PA DCP R
3)
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar ; linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Add non-portable managem
Hi,
When we would use multiple PHC per interface (or per bridge/switch).
How can we defer a real PHC from virtual PHC?
Would not it be easier to simply call then multiple PHC and use the index
regardless if it is virtual or not.
As for the PORT_PROPERTIES_NP. It is a port TLV not a clock TLV.
You can add a management set/command operation of the PORT_SERVICE_STATS_NP
management TLV.
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Dale Smith
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January 2022 23:05
To: Alexander Bulimov
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] Add
You can find it in the archive
https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/linuxptp-devel/
See:
[PATCH RFC v3 00/10] Profile support for IEEE C37.238-2011 and IEEE C37.238-2017
10 patches
https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/mailman/linuxptp-devel/?viewmonth=202111=9
Erez
From: Vijay Khurdiya
Hi,
I think the "if (type != TS_SOFTWARE" is wrong.
The "type" only refer to TX.
But hwts_init() also set the RX.
So no reason to skip it.
Setting to TS_SOFTWARE means no TX hardware time stamp.
I wonder how we miss it?
Probably in refactoring of the code.
Or is it is a quick work-around?
Erez
Looking in the kernel code.
The link mode mask are mandatory for the get_link_ksettings() call-back, the
driver is require to fill them.
The size is fixed to __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NU32.
>From kernel net/ethtool/ioctl.c:
Already have it in
https://github.com/erezgeva/libptpmgmt/blob/master/src/ptp.h
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Miroslav Lichvar
Sent: Thursday, 27 October 2022 17:00
To: Jacob Keller
Cc: linuxptp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linuxptp-devel] [PATCH] phc_ctl: add pin_cfg
Hi,
I think we should put a comment there.
It does looks buzzard to see ' ts->tv_nsec = ntx.time.tv_usec'.
Though this is how 'ADJ_NANO' works
Erez
-Original Message-
From: Miroslav Lichvar
Sent: Monday, 26 September 2022 10:57
To: j.raczynski
Cc:
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 15:33 -0500, vincent.cheng...@renesas.com wrote:
> From: Vincent Cheng
>
> In handle_state_decision_event(), the update of the clock's parent
> pid after
> best master change is non-deterministic. It depends on the port
> processing
> order and bmc_state_decision() results.
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 17:34 +0530, SyncMonk Technologies wrote:
> When master and slave instance interacting with each other operating
> at different interface speed, delay assymetry needs to be compensated
> as described in G.8271 appendix V.
>
> In this patch we are adding changes to get the
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 17:34 +0530, SyncMonk Technologies wrote:
> Delay asymmetry calculation based on the PTP port interface speed of
> master obtained from TLV and the slave interface rate obtained by
> ethtool.
>
> v3: updating network/host byte order handling.
> v1: initial commit
>
>
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 17:34 +0530, SyncMonk Technologies wrote:
> adding interface rate TLV as defined by ITU-T G.8275.2 Annex D to
> enable master to communicate PTP port interface rate to slave.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Armstrong
> Signed-off-by: Leon Goldin
> Signed-off-by: Devasish Dey
>
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 17:39 +0100, Erez Geva wrote:
On Tue, 2022-12-13 at 10:39 +0530, Devasish Dey wrote:
> + goto failed;
> + }
I think it is better to merge this ioctl and the socket creation with
sk_get_ts_info().
No reason for duplication.
You can use a static function or
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
