Hi,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:37:36PM -0400, Jim Pingle wrote:
On 4/25/2013 11:20 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Whenever I am logged into my pfSense box via SSH, I always get logged
out within some time, even when I am running something. Where can I
change that timeout value?
As others
Hi,
Christophe Ségui christophe.se...@math.univ-toulouse.fr wrote:I'tried
pfsense 2.1-BE5A1 as router/firewall (ospf is used for wan) and /22 network as
internal network. With PF activated, the node crash after 2 hours up … since
pf is deactivated, node stays up (routing functionnalities are
Hi,
We've just upgraded our two-nodes failover cluster to 2.1BETA1 built on
Thu Feb 28 04:29:38 EST 2013, because we encountered problems with DHCP
failover not being in state normal / normal for some interfaces.
Searching the web, I've found this link which might be related :
Hi,
We're running 2.1BETA1 on a two-nodes failover pfSense cluster. Each
node is in a separate physical location, and connected to a different
switch.
We've got around 15 interfaces, 8 of which have an active DHCP server
served by pfSense
We encounter synchronization problems between the two
Hi there,
Here we've got a long standing problem with the Captive Portal, and I've
just checked with 2.1-BETA1 (amd64) built on Sat Feb 2 21:38:38 EST
2013 the problem remains, and we believe it was already present in 2.0,
at least for us.
It always takes ages to stop and start the CP correctly,
as well. Could there be
an option to save Full backup without Squid's cache ?
As for our other problems I can only confirm that restoring BETA0 from Nov 10th
fixed the CP problems.
TIA
--
Jerome Alet
attachment: pfsense-screenshot.png___
List mailing
Hi,
We've got pfSense 2.1 snapshots running with Squid package 2.7.9 pkg
v.4.3.1 (not sure if it's meaningful or not)
If a client behind the captive portal is not authenticated yet, and its
browser's homepage is an https:// URL (typically our University's
webmail), then there's no redirection to
Hi,
Just to let you know that this 2.1 snapshot :
FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE-p4 #1: Thu Nov 8 11:35:37 EST 2012
Fixes my problem.
Now the slave can ping and do DNS queries at will, as expected (at least
as I expected).
bye, and thanks for your work guys !
--
Jérôme Alet -
):
I'm restoring again right now.
Any other idea ?
bye, and thanks so much again for your time
--
Jerome Alet
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
interface and the ssh server work,
even when connecting from LAN.
Could this be a misconfiguration on our part, being exposed only because of the
update ?
Thanks in advance for any hint
--
Jerome Alet
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
Me, again :-)
I've noticed something that might be helpful...
When I have upgraded the slave member of my pfSense cluster, the version
number of the configuration file changes from 9.0 to 9.1
So I've got two members of the cluster with different versions, since
I've not upgraded the master yet,
, and thanks a lot for your help
--
Jerome Alet
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Hi,
We've got two pfsense 2.1-BETA0 snapshots running on AMD64 as a failover
cluster. Each of these two Dell R610 has two Intel quad ports Gigabit
Ethernet (igb) and one (integrated) Broadcom (bce) quad ports Gigabit
Ethernet cards.
Both were running 8.3-RELEASE-p4 #1: Thu Sep 27 14:06:33 EDT
Good evening,
From: Stefan Baur newsgroups.ma...@stefanbaur.de
Sent: Wed Jul 25 17:51:19 NCT 2012
To: list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] Squid transparent ssl proxy
Am 25.07.2012 05:17, schrieb Jerome Alet:
Any idea what I'm doing
Hi,
We'd like to setup 2.1 with two different WAN interfaces, each being
exclusively used by two sets of several LAN's.
So what we've done is create first WAN (WAN1) and set its gateway (GW1)
as the default one.
And now we've added second WAN (WAN2) and its gateway (GW2)
So we've got NETS1 as
tests and we complexify our setup each
day : 15 vlans and 2 unrelated wan links (two sets of clients) all with carp
failover, squid and so on, we're confident it now works as expected with this
hardware.
hth
--
Jerome Alet
___
List mailing list
List
Hi there,
I've just searched the bug tracker with no luck.
I'm using 2.1-BETA0 (amd64) built on Thu Jun 28 09:42:08 EDT 2012
I've got a problem with DNS resolution for the firewall itself.
I've added my two DNS servers (in LAN) to General Setup and checked
the Do not use DNS Forwarder as a
Good evening,
Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 22 jun 2012, om 04:30 heeft Moshe Katz het volgende geschreven:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Jerome Alet jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc wrote:
When you add an alternative IP address to monitor, a static route is
added between the gateway address
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:30:15PM -0400, Moshe Katz wrote:
If you know PHP, and have time, maybe you can write a patch to connect the
gateway monitor and the static route, and submit it.
I'm more a Python and C guy, and I don't know PHP enough to not do
something bad.
I opened an issue
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:36:49PM -0400, Chris Buechler wrote:
The static routes aren't even necessary anymore, so they can go in the future.
http://redmine.pfsense.org/issues/2514
What a GREAT software and development team !!!
Thanks to all
--
Jérôme Alet - jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc -
Hi there,
While playing with gateways and monitoring alternative IP addresses,
I've noticed a problem.
When you add an alternative IP address to monitor, a static route is
added between the gateway address and the address to monitor.
But when you delete this alternative IP address, click on
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 08:35:38AM +0200, Seth Mos wrote:
Op 18-6-2012 23:26, Jerome Alet schreef:
So now that I'm trying to replicate the OpenBSD configuration on my
pfSense 2.1 boxes, I'm wondering if I really need 3 distinct IP
addresses on each vlan and what are the consequences
Hi there,
We currently have two OpenBSD 4.1 boxes acting in failover mode to
serve some of our firewalling needs.
We are also using pfSense 2.0.1 and 1.2.2 for other firewalling needs.
I'm planning to consolidate all these firewalls onto two pfSense 2.1
acting in failover mode, and finally shut
Hi there,
I'd like to know if support for Dell Perc H200i raid controllers is
planned in the next release of pfSense, could anyone enlighten me ?
Thanks in advance
--
Jérôme Alet - jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc - Direction du Système d'Information
Université de la Nouvelle-Calédonie - BPR4 -
Hi,
From: Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net
Sent: Sat May 12 07:36:48 NCT 2012
To: 'jerome alet' jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc
Subject: RE: [pfSense] 2 LANs and time based limits
I understand (thanks to your explanations) but what I was thinking
with pfSense and if yes please could someone tell me how to
proceed ?
Thanks in advance
--
Jerome Alet
___
List mailing list
List@lists.pfsense.org
http://lists.pfsense.org/mailman/listinfo/list
Hi again,
From: Ermal Luçi e...@pfsense.org
Sent: Fri May 11 21:29:17 NCT 2012
To: jerome alet jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc, pfSense support and discussion
list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense] 2 LANs and time based limits
On Fri, May 11
Hi,
From: Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net
Sent: Fri May 11 22:51:08 NCT 2012
To: 'jerome alet' jerome.a...@univ-nc.nc, 'pfSense support and discussion'
list@lists.pfsense.org
Subject: RE: [pfSense] 2 LANs and time based limits
QoS on ADSL
28 matches
Mail list logo