Dear online friends,
I need to make an effect that use to be very simple in HTML to my new
XHTML strict pages
of new development websites. I have before used a iframe where i
rollvoer icons inside the iframe
pages, i feel that this was the worst solution but i used it.
I will now start to
On 23/5/2006, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear online friends,
I need to make an effect that use to be very simple in HTML to my new
XHTML strict pages
of new development websites.
I will now start to develop some new websites and i need the effect of
the similarity to gallery
Thanks Peter, but the only 12 errors on the page are repeated p tags or
the placement of them in the wrong place (i.e in the middle of a paragraph).
I cant see how that could be causing the problem of a difference between IE6
and Firefox on this home page of the site.
IF anyone still feels like
Hi Angus,
Visually Insane Genetically Modified Organism wrote:
This might be off topic so please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am
working on converting a calendar that fits my needs a little closer
and What I understand to be a simpler code that probably will work in
browsers from IE 5.x and
In a different context, Mathew Patterson wrote:
I would suggest you look at Eric Myer's website, here:
http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/css/edge/popups/demo2.html
I've noticed before that Mr Meyer quite often uses stuff like:
[1] div#links a:hover img {position: absolute; etc.
Designer wrote:
I've noticed before that Mr Meyer quite often uses stuff like:
[1] div#links a:hover img {position: absolute; etc.
whereas I would just say :
[2] #links a:hover img {position: absolute; etc.
I find myself being intrigued as to why he does this. Is
Hey all again
I finally get the whole faux columns idea, seems a stupid
way and in this day and age youd expect we could do something as simple,
but alas were still learning!
Ive had many off-list and on-list e-mails with
ideas, encouragement and tips. Many thanks to everyone on the
Michael Kear wrote:
My new site is not displaying correctly in IE6,
but working fine in Firefox
http://incheckdb.com http://incheckdb.com/
The Around the site box at the bottom should be almost touching
the left side underneath the main nav menu (and it does in Firefox)
but doesn't.
page:
Michael Kear wrote:
The content of the page is flowing around the menu (which is inside
the content div and floated left) in Firefox, but isn't flowing in
IE.
So see what I mean, go to http://incheckdb.com
http://incheckdb.com/ The Around the site box at the bottom
should be almost touching
sarcastic pony
Looks like most efforts towards separation of content and presentation
may cause severe accessibility-failures[1] in the future.
Looks like there will be no need/use for valid markup either - according
to the latest WGAC 2.0 draft.
Ref: article on ALA[2].
Time to go back to
From: Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sarcastic pony
Looks like most efforts towards separation of content and
presentation
may cause severe accessibility-failures[1] in the future.
Looks like there will be no need/use for valid markup either -
according
to the latest WGAC 2.0 draft.
Ref:
That didn't take long, at least its compliant HTML :P
I'll sit it out and see what the professionals say.
Thanks, David Moyle
e: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: listdad@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Al
Which parts/paths do you think we should choose to follow?
As enlightend/informed developers we continue doing what we've been doing.
WCAG 2.0 won't make accessible design suddenly inaccessible.
A different but related question is which path should we be advising the
less enlightened/informed
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
Michael Kear wrote:
The Around the site box at the bottom
should be almost touching the left side underneath the main nav menu
(and it does in Firefox) but doesn't.
http://incheckdb.com http://incheckdb.com/
Adding...
#content {height: auto!important;}
...solves it,
HI guys,
There is a very nice thing in this flash movie link where a woman zooms
in and have
a transparency where her hair is transparent and shows the background...
anyone knows how it is done in flash?? or is it maybe director shockwave??
Which parts/paths do you think we should choose to follow?
As enlightend/informed developers we continue doing what we've been
doing.
WCAG 2.0 won't make accessible design suddenly inaccessible.
No, but it might make it fail WCAG 2.0, as using any form of layout
where the onscreen flow
Al Sparber wrote:
It's hard to tell who the good guys are :-)
http://wcagsamurai.org/
In principle, it's a very good idea for the community to begin
addressing accessibility issues and the serious problems with WCAG 2.0
themselves, but my main concern with the the WCAG Samurai is this:
|
On 5/23/06 11:09 AM, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a transparency where her hair is transparent and shows the background...
Off the top of my head, blue screen/alpha trans. But this is Web standards
related how?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
Quoting Gunlaug Sørtun [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sarcastic pony
Looks like most efforts towards separation of content and presentation
may cause severe accessibility-failures[1] in the future.
Rubbish. This is no different to the current 1.0 Organize documents so
they may
be read without style
it must be a png -- because it doesnt work in IE -- so I guess that makes it web standards related ;)
On 5/23/06, Tom Livingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/06 11:09 AM, Michael Persson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: a transparency where her hair is transparent and shows the background...Off the
Quoting Jake Badger [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, but it might make it fail WCAG 2.0, as using any form of layout
where the onscreen flow doesn't mirror the html flow is a big no no.
*Only* if the different layout *fundamentally changes the meaning of the
content*. Don't be hasty to jump to
It does kick in if I'm using tables for layout:
The semantics of some elements define whether or not their content
is a meaningful sequence. For instance, in HTML, text is always a
meaningful sequence. Tables and ordered lists are meaningful
sequences, but unordered lists are not.
At 06:43 AM 5/23/2006, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
sarcastic pony
Looks like most efforts towards separation of content and presentation
may cause severe accessibility-failures[1] in the future.
...
[1]http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/#F1
My take on this passage is different. The
specific
I have been looking around for a while trying to solve a
little problem I have. I have a background titled in the middle and a container
holding 2 divs as columns. Everything works as expected but just with one
glitch. When I resize the browser in IE there is a pixel that throws things
Hi Michael, I am not an expert on this, but I will try to help you showing the way I do it:For example, your icon would be 80px by 80px, you would want to make an image that is 80px by 160px where thetop 80x80 would be your original image and the bottom 80x80 would be your "hover" image,
Title: Re: [WSG] cool flash with transparency???
On 5/23/06 11:42 AM, Warren Cardinal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it must be a png -- because it doesnt work in IE -- so I guess that makes it web standards related ;)
A PNG inside of a Flash file (.swf) isnt a PNG when it hits the browser. Odd
Dear Minh,
I didnt make myself clear sorry. i need a rollver as a gallery, not a
little icon, yes i know
loading time will scare the users away but its what i need. The problem
is that before
i made it in a iframe where i change the full background on a rollover,
that means i need
to have
After looking at the responses, I guess 'use common sense, and wait till
the dust settles before changing anything of what works now', is the
most appropriate action for the time being.
That's the path I was going to follow anyway, so it is good to see that
I'm not too far off from the
Hi Michael
This site has a lot of great tested, proven standards compliant
galleries, menus and so on. It's terrific, and it might help solve
your problem
http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/index.html
Regards,
Peter
On 24/05/2006, at 03:12 , Michael Persson wrote:
Dear Minh,
I didnt make
From: Lachlan Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| WCAG Samurai will toil in obscurity for the foreseeable future.
| Membership rolls will not be published, and membership is by
| invitation only.
-- http://wcagsamurai.org/
While I do have the utmost respect for Joe Clark and the other invited
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
After looking at the responses, I guess 'use common sense, and wait till
the dust settles ...
Georg
Maybe you should tend the Rhododendrons and quit stirring up trouble...I
can tell, this is going to go on for weeks, if not months-- perhaps
years, if not decades. Time
David Laakso wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
After looking at the responses, I guess 'use common sense, and wait till
the dust settles ...
Georg
Maybe you should tend the Rhododendrons and quit stirring up
trouble...I can tell, this is going to go on for weeks, if not
months-- perhaps years,
From: David Laakso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Laakso wrote:
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
After looking at the responses, I guess 'use common sense, and
wait till
the dust settles ...
Georg
Maybe you should tend the Rhododendrons and quit stirring up
trouble...I can tell, this is going to go on
From: Jorge Laranjo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: marvin hunkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JAWS and Frontpage with frames?
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 04:24:02 +0100
Ok. Here I am again. Here are the replys to your questions.
If you need more help, please, feel free to ask me.
1. when i have a
Thanks for sending me an email.
I'm out of the office until Thursday 25th May 2006 and I will not be accessing
emails during this time.
If you need to contact the Hiser office, please phone 03 9648 4333.
Regards,
Naomi Heagney
***Disclaimer***
This email and any attachments may contain
On 06/05/19 15:18 (GMT-0400) Warren Cardinal apparently typed:
I am getting ready to launch a new site that I would like to get some
final constructive feedback on.
It's an xhtml strict ecommerce site and uses alot of ajax features
formt eh time-being, the site can be viewed at
36 matches
Mail list logo
