Re: [WSG] Shadows on a div?

On 1/13/07, Tom Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, Just to say I'm a new member, and this is my first post, but I know people who have been using this for a while, and I know what a great bunch you all are! The problem I've got a the minute is I've built a page for a client, but now

Re: [WSG] Shadows on a div?

On 1/13/07, Christian Montoya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/13/07, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/13/07, Tom Roper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, ... The problem I've got a the minute is I've built a page for a client, but now she would like shadow on either side

Re: [WSG] Tabbed Navigation newspaper websites review

: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec s.p. --- tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec

[WSG] Re: usage of fieldset

Hi! What would be your reaction, if you'd see someone using fieldset for something else than containing forms? eg. something like... fieldset legendSome tite here/legend div class=notification pThis is some content./p /div /fieldset cya! Mihael

Re: [WSG] Logo and H1's

h1img src=logo alt=site title/h1 And have never seen any issues with regards to SEO. As for semantics, if you think about it, the title of the site is in the title tag (you know, in the head), so having a duplicate of that in the h1 tag really isn't that useful. If you can go with just using a

Re: [WSG] Logo and H1's

On 1/12/07, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/12/07, Rob O'Rourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Montoya wrote: On 1/12/07, Marcio Werneck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello ! I have a doubt regarding putting the logo in an H tag. Wrapping the website logo in an H1

Re: [WSG] Logo and H1's

On 1/12/07, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mihael Zadravec wrote: you also need to point out with alt text that the image graphic is Somecompanyname logo... Not necessarily. The alt can just be Company name. And if the logo has a strapline Company name - strapline. The fact

Re: [WSG] Logo and H1's

No worries Mihael, i think you wanted to say if you have ever listened to a screen reader. When I say I put the logo in a header it's because It's my opinion that it is an important part of the document and should be in the html as with other images that are relevant to the document. A website

Re: [WSG] Free Screen Readers (was: Logo and H1's)

On 1/12/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Rob O'Rourke at 01/13/07 08:25... I've not managed to get a screen-reader working very well for testing so far, does anyone know of one (preferably free) that provides a fairly typical screen reader experience? JAWS is a bit out of

Re: [WSG] Logo and H1's

On 1/12/07, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Something like ... screan reader reads it dotdotdot... that is anoying. This is the start of shorten news text and it ends with dotdotdot It is something that is also a part usability issue, while it anoyes while listening... But the

Re: [WSG] Free Screen Readers

On 1/13/07, Mark Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mihael Zadravec wrote: The problem in my country is that we speak slovenian :) and I don't know of any SR software that suportes that language, so it is pretty much useless as we pronounce word different from english or other supported

Re: [WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec s.p. --- tel: 00386 51

Re: [WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

On 1/11/07, Barney Carroll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think I'm flippant in thinking that this is standardisation gone mad - it is at the point where designing no longer requires insight or creativity, and simply demands mechanical processing according to ancient presets without analysis.

Re: [WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

On 1/11/07, Nick Fitzsimons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please don't take this personally (it so happens it's one of my bugbears, and I tend to start ranting when it comes up) but one of the worst problems on the web is graphic designers who think that their vision or creativity or whatever

[WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

is the logical procedur that picks them out ) 12px margin top and bottom... :( Any expierience with that anyone? Maybe the solution? Btw. I'am useing notepad++ for coding... thank you! -- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec s.p. --- tel: 00386 51

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

OH BOY This is realy making me crazy! All they by now! It happens in IE 6, IE 7 and Opera 9.01... In firefox it looks like it renders it properly.. On 1/11/07, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know any more... Is it me, or it is some kind of stupid software's sh

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

] *** -- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec s.p. --- tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec --- Toasted

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

*** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Računalniške storitve Toasted Web Mihael Zadravec

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

On 1/11/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/12/07 07:21... OH BOY This is realy making me crazy! All they by now! It happens in IE 6, IE 7 and Opera 9.01... In firefox it looks like it renders it properly.. Still OK in all browsers when done by hand

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

On 1/11/07, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/11/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/12/07 07:21... OH BOY This is realy making me crazy! All they by now! It happens in IE 6, IE 7 and Opera 9.01... In firefox it looks like it renders

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

There are no white spaces... :D On 1/11/07, Patrick H. Lauke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mihael Zadravec wrote: well... if I echo with php the code, than it's ok, but if I include a file (header.php) it adds a top and bottom margins,... however, there are no whitespaces :D Are you checking

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

In order for people to help you, it would be great if you could answer the following questions: 1. Is the gap present when viewed in browsers other than Firefox when the code is all in one file? There is no gap... and no whitespaces 2. Is there a place where the files are hosted so we

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

OH BOY This is realy making me crazy! All they by now! It happens in IE 6, IE 7 and Opera 9.01... In firefox it looks like it renders it properly.. Still OK in all browsers when done by hand? when done without including content without php, all in one :D it 's ok... THAT

Re: [WSG] including files with php produces 12px margin height ???

On 1/11/07, Abdulrahman Al-Otaiba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It happened to me one and it was some encoding problems, UTF-8 encoding on windows introduced some extra characters that was hidden from almost all editors except from few of them, i believe that Zend IDE got the extra character, that

[WSG] seo url

Hello! What would you consider to be better: [1] www.domain.com/index.php/something or [2] www.domain.com/something.com or [2] www.domain.com/index.php?page=something I know that the best would be www.domain.com/something, but there is no mod_rewrite option enabled.. Thank you! Mihael

[WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

Hello list! I have a question for you... :) If one uses cursor:default; as a default property for body {}, on the whole page (links are cursor:pointer;)... Do you find that souch method is not good or it actualy does have any relevancy? I use it on a daily basis...Should I change that? thank

Re: [WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

If it is not set as default than over the text cursor looks like this: I but if set as defautlt when you go with it over the text, it stay like: arrow On 1/10/07, Matthew Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/10/07, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If one uses cursor:default

Re: [WSG] Using cursor:default; on the whole page but links

On 1/10/07, Anders Nawroth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mihael Zadravec skrev: that is rigt. I will stop doing that... But than again... Opera displays arrow even when cursor is positiond over the text... There are people who have problems to spot the cursor when it's the vertical bar

Re: [WSG] display:none; property and screenreaders

] wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:13:20PM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote: alt atribute is usefull... but for eg. navigational purposes, text based link sould be provided to the user... It feels like discriminating when providing alternatives to one of user groups... The alt text should

Re: [WSG] display:none; property and screenreaders

On 1/9/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 01:25:55PM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote: What I wanted to say, is that for the navigational purposes, it should be used text rather than images with alt atribute that sould than be like alt=Image as a link

Re: [WSG] display:none; property and screenreaders

On 1/9/07, Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 1/9/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm very much in favour of text based navigation - but if an author is going to go with an image based design, then the use of img elements with alt text is the sane approach. But the current

[WSG] my world, my country.. :(

This is realy sad... but this is the website of a Blind peopele comunnity Škofja Loka from Slovenija (where I live, but in Ljubljana...) Center slepih in slabovidnih Škofja Loka http://www.css-sl.si/ any comments on the code, usabillity and accessability issues? thank you! Mihael (Slovenija)

Re: [WSG] my world, my country.. :(

@webstandardsgroup.org Subject: Re: [WSG] my world, my country.. :( At 1/9/2007 10:15 AM, Mihael Zadravec wrote: This is realy sad... but this is the website of a Blind peopele comunnity Škofja Loka from Slovenija (where I live, but in Ljubljana...) Center slepih in slabovidnih Škofja Loka http://www.css

[WSG] display:none; property and screenreaders

Hello list! Is it true that if we use like div style=display:none;, that div could be invisible for screenreader software? thank you! Mihael (Slovenija) *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm

Re: [WSG] XML driven websites

so, what you are saying, is that if I would code website with xml, search engines ( like google ), will not index the site as good as it would if it would be coded with xhtml? On 1/5/07, David Dorward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 08:58:55AM +0100, Mihael Zadravec wrote

Re: [WSG] XML driven websites

, as the source of the data matters not, and the result is standard xhtml. Bruce Prochnau BKDesign Solutions - Original Message - *From:* Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] *To:* wsg@webstandardsgroup.org *Sent:* Friday, January 05, 2007 2:58 AM *Subject:* [WSG] XML driven websites Hello list! I

Re: [WSG] XML driven websites

Mihael Zadravec s.p. --- tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec --- Toasted Web http://www.toastedweb.com

Re: [WSG] XML driven websites

that is it. thank you! On 1/5/07, Matthew Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoth Mihael Zadravec at 01/05/07 19:12... What would than be the right xslt transformation? Is than the source code of a web document xml or xhtml? Sorry for strange questions, but I am a bit confused

Re: [WSG] Skip Navigation question

Hello! I belive that it depends on what CSS techniques are you using... (?) As much as I know (read: think) ... display:none; will not do the work so well because it will make the content (your links) invisible to screenreaders... Moving it from the visible field with negative margin is better

Re: [WSG] Compliant pop ups

Mybe it would be good to provide an alternative link (it does not have to be displayed to the screen)... On 12/13/06, Emma Sax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Chris Price wrote: David answered my question but the issue it leaves me with is: many people find pop-ups very useful and often request

Re: [WSG] A little Friday fun

] *** -- Mihael Zadravec tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: mihael.zadravec na gmail.com Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec --- Toasted Web http://www.toastedweb.com --- Miss

Re: [WSG] BG images in links

Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** -- Mihael Zadravec tel: 00386 51 808136 email in msn: mihael.zadravec na gmail.com Skype kontakt: mihael_zadravec

Re: [WSG] Your email requires verification verify#ClzcCtK3WXzb3aIZxmdB6mR5lyC4TsGV

Me is real :)On 11/13/06, Marcos Vidal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The message you sent requires that you verify that you are a real live human being and not a spam source. To complete this verification, simply reply to this message and leave the subject line intact. The

Re: [WSG] Dropdown menu issue - part II

great :)On 11/6/06, Al Sparber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED]II It looks the same in FF and IE7 take a look at screenshot... Nick has apparently deployed the fix I suggested. I see this in hissource:!--[if IE 7]style#dropnav a {zoom:100%;}#dropnav li{float:left

[WSG] Access key does not work in Firefox browser?

Is it possible that in Firefox 2.0 Accesskey does not work???In IE 7 works fine but with Firefox 2.0 it just does nothing...Any ideas why?-- Mihael Zadravectel: 00386 51 808136email in msn: mihael.zadravec na gmail.comSkype kontakt:

Re: [WSG] Access key does not work in Firefox browser?

http://www.nsk-slo.si/---On 10/24/06, Frances Berriman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL of site?On 10/24/06, Mihael Zadravec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible that in Firefox 2.0 Accesskey does not work???In IE 7 works fine but with Firefox 2.0

Re: [WSG] Access key does not work in Firefox browser?

://www.nsk-slo.si/ --- On 10/24/06, * Frances Berriman* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: URL of site? On 10/24/06, *Mihael Zadravec* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible that in Firefox 2.0 Accesskey does

Re: [WSG] styling the optgroup

Try this link:http://www.cssplay.co.uk/menu/form.htmlOn 10/20/06, Designer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Am I correct in thinking that styling the optgroup (and label) with CSS simply doesn't work?I am trying to get some vertical space around the label element, but sofar my expts have produced no

Re: [WSG] Entity Name vs Entity Number

Using Notepad++ - View / encode UTF-8 than save.Using Dreamweaver - Edit / Preferences :: Default encodingby!On 10/19/06, TuteC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I tried doing so just yesterday with one of my sites, but it didn´t work. I had the meta http-equiv and the http header, with characterencoding