Hi guys,
There is a problem I've had to deal with for a long time, and I hoped in
1.0 for it to be fixed.
And that is using VSTs on windows.
I have a win7 64bit, 4GB ram, 3.00Ghz, lmms 1.0.2 and this occurs with
most VSTs, like SuperWave P8, Synth1 and also softer ones.
If I use LMMS for some
On 05/15/2014 01:26 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> Hi guys,
> There is a problem I've had to deal with for a long time, and I hoped
> in 1.0 for it to be fixed.
> And that is using VSTs on windows.
> I have a win7 64bit, 4GB ram, 3.00Ghz, lmms 1.0.2 and this occurs with
> most VSTs, like SuperWav
I'll try my best. I can even give you a dxdiag if you want it.
My computer setup
- AMD Athlon II X2 250 Processor, 3.00Ghz
- Ram: 4,00 GB
- Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1 64bit (6.1, build 7601)
- ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series, about 2296 MB
- Realtek High Definition Audio
my LMMS setup
- Buff
Citerar Stian Jørgensrud :
> If you want to write articles, click edit on the link above and copy the
> exact name of the article you want to write. Search for it and then click
> create. If you aren't registered reply to this message. A lot, if not most
> of the text, can be copied over from the
Should I go ahead and subscribe to them?
--
Jonathan Aquilina
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled sca
On 05/15/2014 02:01 PM, giakk...@hotmail.it wrote:
> I'll try my best. I can even give you a dxdiag if you want it.
> My computer setup
> - AMD Athlon II X2 250 Processor, 3.00Ghz
> - Ram: 4,00 GB
> - Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1 64bit (6.1, build 7601)
> - ATI Radeon HD 4800 Series, about
I don't know what it does, that's why xD
Anyway, 256 sounds fine, and after having changed all those settings you
said it seems that it's all working fine.
I opened 5 VSTs and 1 Zyn, keeping their UIs opened, and nothing was wrong.
Then I opened Synth1, which didn't load. LMMS didn't crash, but
I use VSTs all the time with default settings and they rarely crash.
There are affinity issues using VSTs on Windows, which I workaround with
some hackish scripts, but in my experience those issues affect performance,
not stability.
I use the free (as in beer) plugins DPC/ GTG, DSK which tend to
Citerar "giakk...@hotmail.it" :
> For the autosave function, is there any way to have it back?
Try turning it on and see what happens. If LMMS starts crashing again,
it might be the VST+autosave combination that's causing it.
And then some technical speculation:
As of now LMMS won't autosave wh
I vote yes.
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform ava
So, each automatable model has a "step size" property, which is used for
determining the accuracy of the knobs. A step size of 0.1 causes the
knob values to move in 0.1 increments, a step size of 1 causes the knob
to only move between integer values, and so on.
This is of course good for user conv
Autosave just doesn't work to me, no matter what i do!
Il 15/05/2014 16:04, Raine M. Ekman ha scritto:
> Citerar "giakk...@hotmail.it" :
>> For the autosave function, is there any way to have it back?
> Try turning it on and see what happens. If LMMS starts crashing again,
> it might be the VST+au
I think you are right in that I should use LMMS users for wiki mails. Going
to do that from now on, so people who wan to know what is happening on the
wiki must subscribe to the user list.
Here are the Opulenz page:
http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Opulenz
I must reconsider the 1.0 instr
A 3. string release of a 'portable 1.0.2'
https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/lmms/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1339
But nothing wrong there -right
--
View this message in context:
http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/fyi-others-releases-1-0-2-tp8817.html
Sent from the lmms-devel mai
... and it's been downloaded 1600 time already... :)
http://i.imgur.com/gnLfhSt.png
- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 11:48 AM, musikbear wrote:
> A 3. string release of a 'portable 1.0.2'
> https://sourceforge.net/apps/phpbb/lmms/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1339
> But nothing wron
I think we should see if the portable apps community would be interested in
adding lmms to their list. We would be the only foss daw on there
On 15 May 2014 18:01, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote:
> ... and it's been downloaded 1600 time already... :)
>
> http://i.imgur.com/gnLfhSt.png
>
> - tres.finocc
They have.
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform avai
I have decided not to make special pages for 1.0 instruments. So 0.4
instruments on the wiki will change, however most (all?) of the instruments
have just added functionality, so the guide still applies for 0.4. This also
means links will be broken and wrong in the 0.4 manual, but as the pages
foll
On 05/15/2014 05:31 PM, Vesa wrote:
> So I've come up with some ideas on solving this dilemma.
>
> 1. Interpolate all volume controls (and others where similar issues
> exist) - so that volume transitions would always be smooth and not
> sudden: when the volume is changed, it slides from oldvalue
I vote yes for this too. This is exactly what we need.
On 15 May 2014 16:16, "Tres Finocchiaro" wrote:
> I vote yes.
>
--
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium
I'm very glad this is being brought up.
Option 2 reads the most beneficial whereas Option 1 reads the most
unobtrusive from a coding perspective.
>From you experience, do plugins/instruments/controls/etc which require
strict step values generally rely on the GUI for proper strict values, or
do th
On 05/16/2014 12:34 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote:
>
> I'm very glad this is being brought up.
>
> Option 2 reads the most beneficial whereas Option 1 reads the most
> unobtrusive from a coding perspective.
>
> From you experience, do plugins/instruments/controls/etc which require
> strict step values
22 matches
Mail list logo
