Hey guys,
I see we did not win?
https://jaxenter.com/winners-jax-innovation-awards-2016-jax-london-129588.html
I wonder why. Because the log4j community is just great, and all the
people I worked here are just great as well. I would have given us a
"great community" award or something.
Next time
Hello all,
I was the chair of the Apache Logging Services project for 3 1/2 years.
Thank you, it was a great time. But it is time to move on. I think it is
critical for ASF projects to let the Chair role rotate.
At Logging Services, we agreed to discuss the role each year at the time
of the ASF
Hi,
this vote passed with 5x +1 from:
- Ralph Goers
- Scott Deboy
- Gary Gregory
- Remko Popma
- Christian Grobmeier
I will prepare everything over the next days and will let you know. I
also reach out to Sally for an official press statement.
Thanks!
Christian
- Original message
Hello all,
as previously discussed, this is a vote to label Log4j 1.x as EOL.
This means:
1. label Log4j 1.x as "EOL" on the main page
2. Add a note to the Log4j 1.x download section that we are not
maintaining this version anymore
3. place a prominent EOL announcement on the Welcome page
4. wor
on the logging project was to focus on
> version 2.
>
> Ralph
>
>> On Jul 6, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Christian Grobmeier
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I thought we would make a formal "vote" on this, just like we would
>> do a release. Not
t I got stalled when it came
>> > time to porting our custom appenders and custom initialization
>> > code. It's just too much work. If I had to redo it I would start
>> > with using the 1.2 compatibility jar to get to dealing with our
>> > custom bits soo
/07/04, at 19:42, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > What is the difference between EOL and the way things are now. Are you
> > proposing that bugzilla would be closed?
> >
> > Ralph
> >
> >> On Jul 4, 2015, at 2:30 AM, Christian Grobmeier
> >
Hi all,
we are actively working on Log4j 2.x, but Log4j 1.x hasn't been touched
since the last release. I was doing the last one, and I can't see I will
find the time or motivation in any time to roll out another one. Nobody
else stood up since then. That's OK, because I can observe the community
I checked formalities, like keys, can open, things like that. Looks all
good to me. I haven't checked internal details like "looking into the
actual code"
+1 on the release
On Mon, May 11, 2015, at 00:28, Ralph Goers wrote:
> This is a vote to release Log4j 2.3, the next version of the Log4j 2
+1.
I haven't seen much more than already said. I used the -tar distribution
to build things and run mvn tests.
java version "1.8.0_31"
I did not build the site, as it failed with mvn 3.2.5. But this was
already covered by Gary, so I am ignoring. Hope thats ok.
In addition I did check sigs and
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015, at 20:34, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> This brings up the point that we do not consistently document (or not
> document) this information for each module.The link to
> http://www.eaipatterns.com/WireTap.html on the IO Streams module index
> page was broken when I tried it; YMMV.
Congratulations! It reads very good, and I am very happy that I am not
the only person writing about Log4j2 now :)
--
Christian Grobmeier
http://www.grobmeier.de
http://www.timeandbill.de
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 06:07, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> last week's Java
Hi all,
specifically this is a question to Scott:
wouldn't this:
https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/code_signing_service_now_available
solve the problems we had with releasing Chainsaw?
Regards
Christian
--
Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmai
Hi folks,
the current JavaMagazin issue features Logging, and of course I had
to add an article on the log4j 2 highlights. Also I wrote a small one
on using Apache Flume.
https://jaxenter.de/Java-Magazin/Java-Magazin-1114-176447
Cheers,
Christian
--
Christian Grobmeier
grobme
We need to update this page:
[1]http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/source-repository.html
--
Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014, at 03:59 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
The Git repo is live.
The Svn repo is read-only.
I am not getting commit emails from Git. How do
In my opinion its surely obsolete, but where is the point saying it?
Do you want to add a statement on the website?
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 1:08 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I do not think it matters from the Commons POV. I am the Commons PMC Chair
> FYI. Commons as a community can think and do wha
I am +1 for the GA release.
First off, I am sorry for being silent that long time and then coming
back with an opinion in this topic as I am just a prime time
contributor. I have to deal with some personal issues which made my days
long and nights short, so I haven't got the time I want to fol
Haven't reviewed yet - would be great if there this one would make it
without my vote (trouble to solve).
However if there is nobody available for review, i am going to do that
On 24 Jun 2014, at 2:59, Ralph Goers wrote:
+1 from me too.
We still need another +1 from a PMC member.
Ralph
On J
Hi,
I just committed the logo files to:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/graphics/log4j/
I was thinking the working files should not necessary become
part of the build, only the reduced versions we need.
However if we want to offer a "powered by" it might make sense to move
them around.
E = 0
F = 0
G = 0
H = 3
I = 0
Most votes currently held by a candidate = 4.
Number of candidates with the greatest number of votes = 1.
D has exceeded the quota and is elected. If there are seats
remaining
to be filled, the surplus will now be reallocated.
*The election is complete and the elected
is elected. If there are seats remaining
to
be filled, the surplus will now be reallocated.
*The election is complete and the elected candidates are (D).*
On Jun 6, 2014, at 12:25 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
My vote: ABDHCEFGI
Thanks!
On 3 Jun 2014, at 22:08, Ralph Goers wrote:
My vote: ABDHCEFGI
Thanks!
On 3 Jun 2014, at 22:08, Ralph Goers wrote:
It is time to select a logo. The list of candidates can be found at
https://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations as those having
at least two supporters and are arbitrarily identified as A through I.
This vote wi
Not related to this problem, but don't we have a CI in place?
If not, we should consider to get some help rom Jenkins.
On 18 May 2014, at 7:36, Ralph Goers wrote:
in some circumstances ThrowableProxy was setting the suppressed proxy
to an empty list. In another case it was setting it to null.
I recall that usually Jim or Sam is very helpful with setting up the
voting tool for such things.
Maybe somebody else involved in Infra is willing to help as well.
Somebody got time to ask there?
On 13 May 2014, at 22:00, Ralph Goers wrote:
Then we could do it manually. You can find some docu
It should be doable to transform this image to vector with inkscape.
Borders will be sharper and smoother then. It might be a problem
with the gradient colors though, we would have to try out (i am just a
prime-time vectorist)
On 13 May 2014, at 16:42, Matt Sicker wrote:
Can you make it a nea
On 14 May 2014, at 8:52, Ralph Goers wrote:
Yes the Jira outlines a process that was proposed by Christian in the
Jira issue. However, that would be equivalent to someone creating an
issue and saying that a new feature must be implemented a certain way.
I don’t recall ever really discussing th
Glad if you would help. With l0g4j2 its not longer that urgent
but we have actually a few things to address.
However as Gary mentioned, its PITA. On the other hand, I have released
the last 1.2.17 and I already knew about a couple of problems...
On 21 Mar 2014, at 14:02, Matt Sicker wrote:
Ah
I actually asked the guy behind a log4r, but most of the projects are
pretty
small. It would be a problem to have them here but nobody would be able
to release after Apache standards.
Then there are log4js and log4javascript. However it seems they are fine
to reside where they currently reside.
+1 to that.
Otherwise it certainly can be done by pom.xml properties
On 21 Feb 2014, at 17:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Nick Williams <
nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
I don't think it should even say WHO signed it. It already instructs
users
to download th
Glad to hear that, please recover soon!
On 21 Feb 2014, at 6:19, Ralph Goers wrote:
I just wanted to let you all know that I am out of the hospital and am
now continuing to get better at home. I still require oxygen so I have
a bit of a ways to go, but at least I now have access to my computer
thanks Nick for your work!
Could you send the announcement also to:
log4j-u...@logging.apache.org
annou...@apache.org
I think the later one requires an apache.org mail adress.
Thanks again!
On 16 Feb 2014, at 21:19, Nick Williams wrote:
The Apache Log4j 2 team is proud to announce the Log4j
Dear all,
please welcome Nick Williams as the lastest member of the
Apache Logging PMC.
Nick made very valuable contributions esp to Log4j in the past
and the current PMC is very happy that he accepted our invitation.
Thanks Nick for your work so far and we are all looking forward
for more grea
like.
Cheers
Christian
Gary
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I think it was me who was thinking wrong, sorry.
Then let's start the round-1-vote coming thursday.
Cheers
Christian
On 16 Feb 2014, at 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
The wiki lists more than 10. W
I think it was me who was thinking wrong, sorry.
Then let's start the round-1-vote coming thursday.
Cheers
Christian
On 16 Feb 2014, at 15:53, Gary Gregory wrote:
> The wiki lists more than 10. What am I missing?
>
> G
>
> Original message ----
> From: Chri
s not change the rules in the middle of the game here...
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:02/15/2014 13:21 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List ,Log4J Users
List
Subject: Re: Logo contest: nominate your favorite logo
I would like to encourage everybody who d
n the logos which are currently
supported by minimum 2 persons.
On 2 Feb 2014, at 11:21, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> please show your support for your favorite logo on this wiki page:
> http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations
>
> I added a few nominations a
er we
updated the website.
Cheers
Christian
On 15 Feb 2014, at 16:53, Nick Williams wrote:
Done. Let me know if you didn't receive the email.
Nick
On Feb 15, 2014, at 9:38 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Sorry, I thought I already wrote I could do it, but forgot!
Sure, let me do that for you
atures against the KEYS file by at
least one person in our PMC. It'll be smoother next time :)
Gary
Nick
Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive brief replies and frequent
typos
On Feb 13, 2014, at 3:39, "Christian Grobmeier"
wrote:
On 12 Feb 2014, at 20:01, Nick Williams wr
On 12 Feb 2014, at 20:01, Nick Williams wrote:
What matters is what is in https://www.apache.org/dist/logging/KEYS
If someone will provide me instructions, I can put my keys there.
Instructions are at the top of the file:
https://www.apache.org/dist/logging/KEYS
also, following through the lin
On 12 Feb 2014, at 19:31, Nick Williams wrote:
On Feb 12, 2014, at 12:14 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Scott Deboy
wrote:
Actually when I run gpg on the .asc files I get:
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 9 11:08:17 2014 PST using DSA key ID
ED446286
gpg: Good signa
I think Rat is wrong on the jquery license.
They have included a header, but its not identified by rat.
MIT is a clear "yes" for me. We have several other portions of MIT code
inside AL code (i.e. commons compress if i recall correctly).
If we want to put it into the NOTICE file we need to mak
Not sure if the site dependency needs to be considered part of our
software.
I recall having that discussion once i am going to dig archives
On 11 Feb 2014, at 6:13, Nicholas Williams wrote:
I think it's very clearly a yes. The legal page says code with the MIT
license can be included in ASF p
+1
On 9 Feb 2014, at 20:56, Nick Williams wrote:
This is a vote to release Log4j 2.0-rc1, the twelfth release of Log4j
2.0.
This release contains several changes that break binary and backwards
compatibility with previous versions. Please read the release notes
correctly so that you can adj
ing to 3.1 just to disable the
site plugin for all of the sample modules. That still doesn't explain
why you're getting that error and I'm not, but I've changed this to
3.0 just to be on the safe side.
Nick
On Feb 9, 2014, at 12:15 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I a
AD shows that my local copy is identical to that on
svn.apache.org.
Nick
On Feb 9, 2014, at 2:46 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
hm, its there:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/src/site/site.vm
Does it exist on your system? If not maybe you should work on on a
fresh chec
hm, its there:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/src/site/site.vm
Does it exist on your system? If not maybe you should work on on a fresh
checkout.
On 9 Feb 2014, at 7:56, Nick Williams wrote:
By the way, this is the error I'm getting when building site now:
[ERROR
Can someone forward that email to me
privately?
I haven't seen an email to the PMC. If it would be sent to private it
would need to go to public anyway as this is not confidential.
Great you have made it, thanks! I am going to vote tomorrow.
Nick
On Feb 8, 2014, at 1:17 PM, Christia
On 8 Feb 2014, at 20:11, Nick Williams wrote:
On Feb 8, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
OK, so just confirming you want me to do:
svn delete
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/tags/log4j-2.0-rc1/
Correct. Please delete that.
OK, its done.
I would prefer to
so I think its somehow related
to my setup. Recently I found out another apache guy has the same
problem, solving it the same way.
maybe worth a shot.
On 8 Feb 2014, at 20:06, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Nick,
i totally feel your pain. Releasing is always evil, i never
experienced it othe
Nick,
i totally feel your pain. Releasing is always evil, i never experienced
it otherwise in what ever project.
On 8 Feb 2014, at 19:56, Nick Williams wrote:
Well, after wasting a couple hours, it turns out I do NOT have the
power to roll a release. I got a "401 Unauthorized" error when it
It looks weird that it says:
log4j-core-osgi-nosql-couch
shouldn't it be couchdb instead meanwhile?
Same for mongodb.
At least in the artifact ids its:
log4j-core-osgi-nosql-mongodb
So maybe its some dependency which is still using the old artifact
Just a guess
On 8 Feb 2014, at 18:02, Nick W
Hello,
we have a lot of
...
tags in our docs. Thinking about the board recommendation to remove
author tags from the source code, I would like to bring up the
discussion of removing author tags from the docs too.
I am not very oppinionated on this change, just want to bring it
up as I have lo
ems to changes.xml for both renames. I think this closes this
discussion.
Thanks mate!
Agreed, ! :)
Gary
Nick
On Feb 7, 2014, at 3:51 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
I am sorry that I didn't express myself better. For some reason I
thought everybody would know about the couchd
t;couchdb."
Nick
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
folks thats what i meant.
Couchbase is a different database than CouchDB. They share the same
roots,
but meanwhile have some differences.
My guess is one needs a second appender.
The one we have seems to work
On 7 Feb 2014, at 22:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
It's ok for me to make an RC.
I would like to avoid the "beta" from a community perspective.
I also don't don't think that we are beta anymore and it would
be mis
o GA.
Gary
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Let me do the package rename from couch to couchdb.
I am just after it
On 7 Feb 2014, at 19:29, Remko Popma wrote:
Any showstoppers left for anyone?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-529 is not great, but
time to work on
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-520 this weekend, but
this is
not a showstopper IMHO. So I'd be fine with doing a release with what
we
have now.
Cheers, -Remko
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 28 Jan 2014, at 1:45, Ralph Goers
. Be
sure to
change the test package name, too.
Nick
On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
+1 to couchbase
On Feb 7, 2014 7:54 AM, "Christian Grobmeier"
wrote:
On 7 Feb 2014, at 16:19, Nick Williams wrote:
It doesn't so much matter because the XML element names are ca
me another
NoSQL database with the word "couch" in it and I'll reconsider. :-)
couchbase maybe?
N
On Feb 7, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
also the packagename is just "couch", but it should better be
"couchdb".
The name couch is misleadin
also the packagename is just "couch", but it should better be "couchdb".
The name couch is misleading imho
On 7 Feb 2014, at 16:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Hi
one minor thing in ClouchDBProvider:
* The Apache CouchDB implementation of {@link NoSQLProvider}.
*/
@Pl
Hi
one minor thing in ClouchDBProvider:
* The Apache CouchDB implementation of {@link NoSQLProvider}.
*/
@Plugin(name = "CouchDb", category = "Core", printObject = true)
public final class CouchDBProvider
The name of this plugin is "CouchDb" while the correct name of the
product
is CouchDB:
ing list is preferable. Voting
on the
wiki will be hard and discourage participation.
Nick
On Feb 3, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
Christian, it worked!
What was "Immutable Page" in gray before is now an "Edit (text)"
link.
Thanks!
-Remko
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6
stick with that lanugage as well.
>
>
> On 3 February 2014 07:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Keep it simple: 2.0.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> Original message
>> From: Christian Grobmeier
>> Date:02/03/2014 05:12 (GMT-05:00)
>
On 3 Feb 2014, at 22:28, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 3 Feb 2014, at 14:40, Gary Gregory wrote:
Wow, our wiki is lame.
Does each wiki need new user account, or is my account an all-apache
wiki
account that needs to be added to each
, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:21 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hi all,
please show your support for your favorite logo on this wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations
I added a few nominations already, just stick with the format.
Everybody reading this message is invited to
> Best regards,
> -Remko
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:14 PM, Remko Popma wrote:
>
>> Aha!
>> rpopma
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On 2014/02/03, at 19:10, "Christian Grobmeier"
>> wrote:
>>>
>>&
Also 2.0 or 2.0.0 for me
On 3 Feb 2014, at 7:41, Ralph Goers wrote:
I had thought it would be 2.0.
Sent from my iPad
On Feb 2, 2014, at 8:59 PM, Nick Williams
wrote:
I'm finalizing the logging chapter of my book to send to the printers
Wednesday (I'm so glad I got to correct it to say Le
link)...
Can you check?
Remko
On Sunday, February 2, 2014, Christian Grobmeier
>
wrote:
Hi all,
please show your support for your favorite logo on this wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations
I added a few nominations already, just stick with the format.
Everybo
Hi all,
please show your support for your favorite logo on this wiki page:
http://wiki.apache.org/logging/Log4jLogoNominations
I added a few nominations already, just stick with the format.
Everybody reading this message is invited to nominate their favorite logo.
Cheers,
Christian
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Grobmeier updated LOG4J2-316:
---
Description:
h4. Log4J logo contest
THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING - we are going to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1386#comment-1386
]
Christian Grobmeier commented on LOG4J2-316:
THANK YOU FOR PARTICIPATING
ased on the # of CFPs
submitted), which means 5-9 simultaneous talks can occur.
Rich: That is correct.
It sounds like there is potentially time to have multiple talks
on Apache Logging. Though I am new-ish, I'd love to present on
behalf of Apache Logging. Do we want to have multiple talks
ased on the # of CFPs
submitted), which means 5-9 simultaneous talks can occur.
Rich: That is correct.
It sounds like there is potentially time to have multiple talks
on Apache Logging. Though I am new-ish, I'd love to present on
behalf of Apache Logging. Do we want to have multiple talks?
me to have multiple talks on
Apache Logging. Though I am new-ish, I'd love to present on behalf
of Apache Logging. Do we want to have multiple talks?
Nick
On Jan 26, 2014, at 9:29 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I would like to attend but I’m not sure I can.
Ralph
On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:11 AM, C
On 29 Jan 2014, at 0:22, Remko Popma wrote:
... I'm still learning proper ML etiquette...
Just for the record: i didn't mean you or anyone hear at Logging ;-)
Very nice slides, btw.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
I would love to go, but i have to
Apache Logging. Though I am new-ish, I'd love to present on behalf of
Apache Logging. Do we want to have multiple talks?
Nick
On Jan 26, 2014, at 9:29 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I would like to attend but I'm not sure I can.
Ralph
On Jan 25, 2014, at 11:11 AM, Christian Grobmeier
On 28 Jan 2014, at 1:45, Ralph Goers wrote:
I agree with that, but that doesn’t mean we can’t add new stuff to
the API.
I would like to highlight that!
Anyway happy with the proposed time plan :-)
Cheers
Ralph
On Jan 27, 2014, at 2:08 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
IMO: We cannot/should no
If people really thing that another non-GA release is necessary, please
label it RC.
Beta sounds as log4j2 is absolutely not ready but this isn't the case.
At least with a RC we show some confidence in what we do.
As additions are easier to make then removals, I would even sacrifice
something
Hi folks,
I would like to remind you ApacheCon is happening in April 2014.
If you would like to submit your talk, now is the chance.
I think it would be great to have somebody presenting our Logging frameworks.
I will not be there unfortunately.
Regards,
Christian
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
Th
User debug info and internal product
debug info are MIXED. Our users are confused, our consultants don't
like the giant logs.
Gary
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 24 Jan 2014, at 21:47, Paul Benedict wrote:
We should ensure that both the Javadocs and the u
t the info is there. If you want more info,
feel free to ask ;)
Gary
Original message
From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:01/24/2014 14:20 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Levels added in revision 1560602
What I miss in this discussion are actually good examples of
more info,
feel
free to ask ;)
Gary
Original message ----
From: Christian Grobmeier
Date:01/24/2014 14:20 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Subject: Re: Levels added in revision 1560602
What I miss in this discussion are actually good examples of what the
(new) log levels ar
What I miss in this discussion are actually good examples of what the
(new) log levels are intended for.
In example, Gary mentioned he is on a wireshark level with "trace".
That's fine, because it would give some idea when to use verbose (maybe
entering method).
Maybe I missed it when what I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Grobmeier updated LOG4J2-316:
---
Description:
h4. Log4J logo contest
Log4j 2.0 is looking for a new logo!
After 12
Dear all,
as previously discussed, the Log4j logo contest will be closed
on 31.01.2014. No more submissions will be accepted until then.
If you have another suggestion to make, please make sure
you enter it before that date.
Thanks!
Christian
---
http://www.grobmeier.de
The Zen Programmer: htt
I pretty much like this Nick
I read the question from time to time how one can add custom log levels
in log4j,
so this is surely a useful feature for some.
On 23 Jan 2014, at 10:02, Remko Popma wrote:
I would be happy with any solution that is generic enough to fulfill
all
users requirement
Maybe:
ZOMBIE_APOCALYPSE > APOCALYPSE > CATASTROPHE > EMERGENCY > FATAL > ...
On 23 Jan 2014, at 3:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
But that is not as high as APOCALYPSE right?
Gary
Original message
From: Matt Sicker
Date:01/22/2014 21:43 (GMT-05:00)
To: Log4J Developers List
Su
Jumping in late, sorry. I have read all messages around this now
(hopefully) and I am still unsure why we actually need new log levels.
Personally I don't see much difference between trace and verbose.
Honestly the people I spoke to are usually using debug. I don't know
many people who actually
Hello all,
I would like to close submission on 31.01. (Friday).
Please let me know if there are any objections to this, otherwise I am
going to send such an email on friday.
After that I believe we should create a wiki page where everybody can
nominate his preferred logos.
If we have more th
On 11 Jan 2014, at 23:34, Matt Sicker wrote:
Oh neat. I've gotten too used to working for an enterprise that now I
assume all OSS projects have PMs. I know it's not usually the case
with
small projects (especially ones with only one main developer), but I
must
have gotten the wrong impression
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Christian Grobmeier updated LOG4J2-316:
---
Attachment: logo-log4j-eruption.png
logo-log4j-circle.png
Log4j
ks do you have in mind? API changes?
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:45 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Why the caution?
We can have a 3.0, a 2.1 and son on.
Nobody expects we should stick forever with a version.
On the other hand, we were rele
Why the caution?
We can have a 3.0, a 2.1 and son on.
Nobody expects we should stick forever with a version.
On the other hand, we were releasing in beta for ages now.
What are the reasons you don't want a 2.0 stable?
On 2 Jan 2014, at 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
Make it RC or another beta IMO
Make it 2.0, if you ask me.
On 2 Jan 2014, at 8:46, Ralph Goers wrote:
I am trying to find a bit more time to work on Log4j again. I see
quite a few issues that I would like to address and think I will need
about 2 weeks to complete them so I am tentatively targeting the
middle of the mont
Yap saw that as well yesterday.
However I looked a bit around, this doesn't seem to go in-depth
and it doesn't feel well researched.
On 18 Dec 2013, at 20:22, Gary Gregory wrote:
FYI:
http://www.takipiblog.com/2013/12/18/the-logging-olympics-a-race-between-todays-top-5-logging-frameworks/
G
Can somebody else help testing this on Windows?
I was not able to reproduce this, but on the other hand i lack the OS.
On 6 Nov 2013, at 16:43, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
On 6 Nov 2013, at 14:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at
Hello all,
as we discussed earlier, I asked to open access of:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/sandbox/
to all Apache committers, which is now done.
I am planning to write a short blog post about it the other day but
wanted to let you know right now.
Cheers
Christian
---
http://www.
On 6 Nov 2013, at 14:39, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:33 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
The class files must have been left over from an old build. With "mvn
clean
package" I still get one error:
Results :
Failed tests: test1(org.apache.log4j.rolling.TimeBasedR
1.2.17.1?
I'll use this release in any case, but it would be nice if this was
the
latest public release in general.
On 10/21/2013 9:26 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 21 Oct 2013, at 15:28, Jess Holle wrote:
Packaging now looks good at a glance as I now see no duplication.
I don'
6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
Thoughts?
Gary
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 4:20 AM, Christian Grobmeier
wrote:
Hello
please vote to release Apache Log4j Extras 1.2.17.1.
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~grobmeier/extras-12171
(download path will be corr
1 - 100 of 472 matches
Mail list logo
