2016-11-05 19:38 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2016-11-05, Joe wrote:
>
> >> If you are willing to help, please join log4net's dev mailing list and
> raise your hand. Look through log4net's issue tracker and pick things you'd
> like to work on. If you don't know where to start, please ask, Domin
On 2016-11-05, Joe wrote:
>> If you are willing to help, please join log4net's dev mailing list and raise
>> your hand. Look through log4net's issue tracker and pick things you'd like
>> to work on. If you don't know where to start, please ask, Dominik and Stefan
>> will be there to help.
>> I
> If you are willing to help, please join log4net's dev mailing list and raise
> your hand. Look through log4net's issue tracker and pick things you'd like to
> work on. If you don't know where to start, please ask, Dominik and Stefan
> will be there to help.
> If there is anything holding you
Hi Nicholas
On 2016-11-01, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Got some questions around this. I was hoping that if I put the call
> to LogManager.Shutdown() in my application it might call Close() on
> all the appenders. However, that doesn't seem to be the case.
That's what I would have expected as well
y way of syncing the .NET app domain shutdown event. At
that point you're not given any time to cleanup.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Stefan Bodewig
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 7:32 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: AsyncAppender (was Re: Apache log4net Needs Help)
On 2016-10-16, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> By the way, what's the state of async appenders in log4net?
This is one of the things I'd love people to get involved in. We've got
* a simple implementation inside the sample
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-190
* https://issues.apache.org/j
as Duane [mailto:nic...@msn.com]
Sent: 16 October 2016 04:23
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
By the way, what's the state of async appenders in log4net? I ask because the
guys pushing nlog over here say that one reason they like nlog is that is
allows for async oper
utdown the appenders in the shutdown routine as opposed to
relying on .NET's appdomain shutdown logic.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Nicholas Duane
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 4:28 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
>Whether a log4j2 port hap
On 2016-10-04, Nicholas Duane wrote:
>> Whether a log4j2 port happens or not really is decided by the people who
>> are willing and able to invest the time needed. The same is true for any
>> other decision we take. There is no "business plan" for log4net, those
>> who do the work decide about wha
rted to both linux/java and windows/.net.
Anything else doesn't make sense, at least to me.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Stefan Bodewig
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 10:06 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
On 2016-10-04, Nicholas Duane wro
On 2016-10-04, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> While I realize resources are needed to make any changes to the code base,
> even if resources are/become available it's yet another (big?) decision on
> whether the changes that are made to log4net are ones which will take it off
> into its own direction
g4net is created which is a port of
lo4j2.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Stefan Bodewig
Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 12:18 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
On 2016-10-03, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Just curious if anyone
On 2016-10-03, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> Just curious if anyone has any feedback?
I think I've written this before, but in case I haven't:
Whether a port of log4j 2.x will happen depends on whether people show
up who want to do the porting work. This hasn't happened, yet.
Cheers
Stefan
ser@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
One thing to note is that the development of a stable logging framework is
rather slow. I would not want the most stable (in regards of features and API)
part of a software to need regular updates. This is one of the main reasons why
r the enterprise for logging on Windows/.NET.
Thanks,
Nick
*From:* Nicholas Duane
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:03 AM
*To:* log4net-user@logging.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
Maybe a bit of hi
Nick
From: Nicholas Duane
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 10:03 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
Maybe a bit of history would help.
We had written our own logging framework a while back, prior to the launch of
.NET. It was a Windows
ent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 2:26 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
That's an interesting point. Would you mind to share your thoughts and reasons
why you picked log4net over other logging frameworks beyond being a log4j port?
On 2016-09-20 0
Monday, September 19, 2016 3:49 PM
*To:* Log4NET User
*Subject:* RE: Apache log4net Needs Help
>Any chance that we'll get a log4net version which is a "port" of the
latest log4j2?
Maybe this is a discussion for the dev list, and granted I haven’t
looked at what the changes are
__
From: Walden H. Leverich
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:49 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: RE: Apache log4net Needs Help
> Any chance that we'll get a log4net version which is a "port" of the latest
> log4j2?
Maybe this is a discussion for the dev list, and g
infrastructure.
-Walden
--
Walden H Leverich III
(516) 627-3800 x3051
wald...@techsoftinc.com<mailto:wald...@techsoftinc.com>
From: Nicholas Duane [mailto:nic...@msn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 9:19 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
I had asked a
On 2016-09-14, Nicholas Duane wrote:
> I had asked about this in the past and I figured I would ask again
> after seeing this mail. Any chance that we'll get a log4net version
> which is a "port" of the latest log4j2?
If and only if we get enough people to do it, sure.
Anything is possible if p
016 12:32 AM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: Apache log4net Needs Help
Welcome!
even though the official build system currently is NAnt, development
with your setup is supposed to work (if it doesn't, it is a bug).
The first thing you should do is to join the log4net-dev mailing list.
I t
Welcome!
even though the official build system currently is NAnt, development
with your setup is supposed to work (if it doesn't, it is a bug).
The first thing you should do is to join the log4net-dev mailing list.
I think we need help in virtually any area - fixing bug, discussing
changes, docu
Hello,
I use log4net too, but in Windows/IIS/Visual Studio environment. If there is
anything I can do let me know.
Thanks,
Shivinder Singh
+1-409-330-3608
shivindersi...@hotmail.com
> From: bode...@apache.org
> To: log4net-...@logging.apache.org
> Subject: Apache log4net Needs Help
> CC: log4ne
On 2016-09-08 10:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On 2016-09-08, Dominik Psenner wrote:
That process is a little bit clumsy and therefore we should all agree
on one build solution.
+1
We've already reached the point in trunk where a single build system
doesn't work anymore. Right now it is NAnt + .
On 2016-09-08, Dominik Psenner wrote:
> That process is a little bit clumsy and therefore we should all agree
> on one build solution.
+1
We've already reached the point in trunk where a single build system
doesn't work anymore. Right now it is NAnt + .NET Core's CLI.
We should collect our requ
On 2016-09-08 06:05, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Justin
On 2016-09-08, Justin Taylor wrote:
I pulled down the source. It builds fine but the unit tests fail
(log4net.vs2012.sln). Is there some setup/prerequisites I've
overlooked?
Currently the official build system is the Nant build. I perso
Hi Justin
On 2016-09-08, Justin Taylor wrote:
> I pulled down the source. It builds fine but the unit tests fail
> (log4net.vs2012.sln). Is there some setup/prerequisites I've
> overlooked?
Currently the official build system is the Nant build. I personally
don't use VS so am perfectly able to
I pulled down the source. It builds fine but the unit tests fail
(log4net.vs2012.sln). Is there some setup/prerequisites I've overlooked?
It's showing:
Passed 121 Failed 4Errors 31
Running
log4net.vs2012.log4net.Tests.vs2012.log4net.Tests.Appender.AdoNetAppenderTest.Buf
Hey Stefan,
I've got my hands full at the moment, but I'll try to step up and contribute
to log4net on a best effort basis.
Surely don't want to let log4net fade out.
Regards,
Gert
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: dinsdag 6 september 2016 06:12
T
30 matches
Mail list logo
