re either on May 3rd or May 2nd.
Now, as the poster had a nice big picture of London Pride on it (IIRC) it
is unlikely that I would have walked past it for even 1 day without noticing
it. So I wonder if the cheeky buggers only put the posters up after the event.
Nicholas Clark
t;
> Curses! That was my cunning plan to acquire more victims for the Sun god,
> why'd you have to go and spoil it? I need a sacrifice to get this VT320
> working.
I think I can see where you're going wrong. It's the DEC god you should be
making your sacrifices to. The Sun god will only help for Sparc 1s, 4/110s
etc
Nicholas Clark
#x27;s the not the end of the world. Just the beginning of the end.
Nicholas Clark
rse they
> deny all responsiblity for it as well...
Are these e-mail addresses? If so, does it make it possible to forward all
4 denials in 1 message To: all four and ask for one "joined up government"
answer?
Nicholas Clark
saying that my lightning talk
had been accepted. I don't know anything further
Nicholas Clark
ntion.
Is this the "new" bit? Not sure if it will catch on.
Nicholas Clark
e should be shipping the DeCCS perl code around
in .sigs rather than the perl RSA code, as the former seems to be much more
successful at getting up people's noses these days.
Nicholas Clark
do we drink extra
for each that doesn't? [This is perhaps the hardest question]
Nicholas Clark
- Forwarded message from Ilya Zakharevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
list-unsub
reak, because emacs interprets every character)
Nicholas Clark
y Overflow ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
And there was me thinking that Chris was going to say that he doesn't have
a TV either. But he didn't. I don't have a TV. But I'm currently camped out
in my parents house, and they have 2. But I learn that they will both be
obsolete in 5 years when we all the analogue TV transmitters are turned off.
Is that relevant? :-)
Nicholas Clark
rom an
ubsw.com address has that sort of disclaimer on it, wouldn't it be easier
to obtain an address outside ubsw.com so that you can avoid having the
disclaimer in the first place?
Otherwise at least 17 lines of on-topic discussion per message is going to
unacceptably increase the signa
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:58:32PM +0100, Robin Houston wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:09:02PM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > [...] the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
> > my disk space at 4 times the rate.
>
> You mean you *archive* this bollocks?
rnative, which is fine IMO.
> People with broken mail clients may disagree :-)
I have a non-broken client which copes with multipart/alternative and
I still disagree. For a text message the text part carries all the
information, and the HTML hanger on serves no purpose except to consume
my dis
ens.
Sarathy has said on p5p that there's going to be very little changed
between TRIAL3 and the real thing
Nicholas Clark
--
ENOJOB: http://plum.flirble.org/~nick/CV.html
s absolute or relative)
And then you can test that (and work your way along the symlink chain,
but make sure you put a trap in after a some large number of steps else
you will be gotcha'd by symlinks looping back to themselves)
Nicholas Clark
15 matches
Mail list logo