No pre/post processing involved. They are just to see how the output of
these tools looks like.
DIGY
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Also, was there any pre/post processing involved in these files? Was it
> manual / scripts etc? Just trying to get a feel for
using JIRA ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa ) , you
can create an issue and add your code to that.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Jörg Lang wrote:
> Hi
>
> I started looking into Lucence, as I might need it on a project. As there
> was no GermanAna
people can find more examples. Of course, none of them is a blocking
issue but too far from giving a .NET taste.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2011-01-27, Granroth, Neal V. wrote:
>
> > Use of IKVM was discussed before.
>
> I'm really sorry. No
ns made by Lucene.Net users, not as
a Lucene.Net project.
DIGY
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi DIGY
>
> On 2011-01-28, digy digy wrote:
>
> > * Java's bytecode doesn't contain metadata about generics and when Java
> is
> > com
I think I don't have write access to "../incubator/lucene.net".
Since when I try to commit README.TXT as a test, I get the following error.
"access to '/repos/asf/!svn/ver/897426/incubator/lucene.net/README.txt'
forbidden".
DIGY
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:40 A
I am the current moderator of the mailing lists. It is not much work than
"reply" or "delete"
but having more than one moderator would be good.
DIGY
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the proposal says to keep the current lists and
Lucene.Net users sometimes discuss the same issue in both JIRA and dev
mailing list. And people mostly don't subscribe to commit list(I wouldn't
also subscribe to commit-list, if I weren't a committer since it is full of
spam :) ).
So I would prefer leaving it as is.
DIGY
On Tue,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:04 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> DIGY - Extracting the public key out is generally only used for delay
> signing.
In my senario, public key will not be used in delay signing. Just for
validating the assembly by comparing the public key in assembly with the
public ke
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Glyn Darkin wrote:
> +1
> On 28 Feb 2011, at 08:39, Troy Howard wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > A quick voting reminder... This [VOTE] thread will only be active for
> > another 4 hours (72 hours total).
> >
> > S
+1
DIGY
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
> +1 to all suggestions. Hudkins is my new favourite word. ;)
>
> One quick concern I have, is how much of the things listed are already
> available on the Apache hudson server? A lot of this is .NET specific, so
> u
0
".Net"s seem to be redundant under /src/contrib/ . It could be something
like
Analyzers
Highlighter
Similarity
...
(Maybe, we should find a different name for contrib.net. It contains
"contributions specific to Lucene.Net which are not available in
Lucene.java)
DIGY
On W
Well, not really "core".
Codes under Analyzer(by DIGY) can be moved to /src/contrib/analyzers (but
they are not ports from java).
The others(by M.GARSKI) are extensions to the core(something like
Lucene.Net.Core.Extensions)
DIGY
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
&
It would be better to attach the patches to the issue before committing.
So others can track what is going on.
DIGY
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:20 AM, wrote:
> Author: slombard
> Date: Sat Mar 12 07:20:44 2011
> New Revision: 1080881
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1
Sorry, no binaries. You can download the source from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/trunk/C#/src/Lucene.Net
DIGY
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Wyatt Barnett wrote:
> Actually about to dive into a big search tweaking spike in a certain
> project here, happy to do
Thanks, updated.
DIGY
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Granroth, Neal V. <
neal.granr...@thermofisher.com> wrote:
>
> I had no difficulty building it in Visual Studio 2005.
> The assembly copyright information appears to be out of date; shouldn't it
> read 2011
http://www.devatwork.nl/articles/lucenenet/faceted-search-and-drill-down-lucenenet/
DIGY
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:40 AM, K a r n a v wrote:
> How can we implement faceted search with lucene
>
docID) {
return !r.isDeleted(docID);
}
};
}
};
DIGY
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Rory Plaire wrote:
> This is a great improvement, but why not also remove the braces and
> returns?
>
>
> var cache = new FilterCache(deletesMode,
>
ty on the types that can be used.
>
>
I changed List to ICollection
> Also there is a little confusion around the treatment of the various
> collection types. i.e. string[] gets converted to a CharArraySet. Why not
> just a List ?
>
So is it in lucene.java
>
> Thoughts?
I've never committed any code to 2.9.4g branch before testing. So, It should
pass all the tests.
DIGY
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> Does anyone have the latest 2.9.4g branch they can run the tests on - I've
> done some WP7 stuff, and I'm
System.Collections.ICollection interface does result in Hashtable's
GetEnumerator() being invoked. So an explicit typecast is needed for
invoking CharArraySet.GetEnumerator()
(As a result, a bad (but *almost* working) implementation. It is rewritten
in 2.9.4g)
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Pre
Since it includes some level of divergence from java I committed it to only
2.9.4g branch.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1930
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-431
DIGY
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Itamar Syn-Hershko wrote:
> Ok, core compiles, and all te
Congrats Mike, Welcome aboard.
DIGY
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:07 AM, George Aroush wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> The Lucene PMC has voted to accept Mike Garski as a new Lucene.Net
> committer.
>
> Please join me to congratulate and welcome Mike to Lucene.Net. He has been
> an
I'd prefer "single issue with three patches".
DIGY
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Andy Pook wrote:
> Subscribed
>
> 1- Ah, hadn't spotted ISerializable. However, the recommendation for
> combining ISerializable and sealed classes is to use private
. it is covered in the FAQ...
> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ#head-133cf44dd3dff3680c96c1316a663e881eeac35a
> "Are Wildcard, Prefix, and Fuzzy queries case sensitive?"
DIGY
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Arne Claassen wrote:
> I created a tokenizer that
just string comparison:
'2' < 'N'
'*' < '2'
DIGY
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ayende Rahien wrote:
> I am seeing something strange with range queries:
>
> This works:
> Created:[20100730100201790 TO NULL]
> This returns no r
iters was after Grant's mail.)
So, If there are people willing to keep Lucene.Net alive, I am in, but I
don't want to be the only one.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsing...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 11:48 PM
To: lucene-net-u...@lucen
1. You don't have a field named "contents" in the index. (It is "text") use
"text" field to search.
2. Use "file_text" string while indexing ( not encoding.GetBytes(file_text) )
3. You should index the "text" field as ANALYZED.
4. You h
Try to see what you are indexing
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-lucene-net-user/201011.mbox/%3caanlktim6kyuzhwb8p7g=hvqx6dy1fkarchro0hyw+...@mail.gmail.com%3e
And you can also think of use of ASCIIFoldingFilter if it fits to your needs.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From
See the parameters of IndexWriter ("create").
If you already have an index containing docs it must be set to "false".
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wade Girard [mailto:wade.gir...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 10:30 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache
I got bored with being the only committer who tries to answers the user's
questions and making commits to keep the project alive.
So, I continue (for now) to answer some question on mailing lists but
stopped committing months ago.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Prescott N
> The 3.0.X ports should be 100% Sharpen
Why?
What about other alternatives?
Lucene.java 3.0.3 ==> .Net Conversion Samples (
http://people.apache.org/~digy/Lucene.Net.3.0.3.zip )
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 01
Hi Peter,
Most of them existed also in previous ports. This is why we have a huge
SupportClass.cs
If you compare the source with Lucene.Net 2.9.2, you can see how it was
solved previously.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Peter Mateja [mailto:peter.mat...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January
Thanks Troy,
It is very good.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
All,
Thanks for all the recent
I think there are some misunderstandings about how to contribute to
Lucene.Net.
Everyone is free to grab to source code, work on it and post the
bugs/improvements/new features. They are always welcomed.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: srikalyan swayampakula [mailto:srikalyansswa
coding.UTF8" instead of "System.Text.Encoding.ASCII"
* ">>>" is already implemented in SupportClass.
* Threshold differences between .NET & Java while comparing floats/doubles.
Use also these classes:
* There is a good implementation of WeakHashTable in SupportClass.
I think we should discuss it later not to hijack this thread..
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Hans Merkl [mailto:h...@hmerkl.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:29 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Stefan's Newbie Questions (was Re: Proposal Status, In
I copied Lucene.Net to the new location
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/) and changed some
links in the index.html page.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 06, 2011 9:55 AM
To: lucene-net-dev
By Hand. Find-Replace is your best friend :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 12:02 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Arabic Analyzer
Hey Digy,
Do you use sharpen (or some other
Although it is a minimal code it took about 2 hours to port these (6+3)
classes and then test.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2011 12:02 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Arabic Analyzer
Hey
us up to date or not.
3- ASCIIFoldingFilter.cs is another example for dealing with non-ascii
chars.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 3:55 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Umlauts as Char
He
One more thing, don't open
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/lucene_2_9_2/contrib/analy
zers/common/src/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/de/GermanStemmer.java using
browser. just checkout from svn and then open it.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott N
1.
Using a svn client to download the code is a solution.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 7:10 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Umlauts as Char
On 2011-02-08, Prescott Nasser
On moderation: I don't think we had a specific policy. I have usually
allowed mails as long as it is related with Lucene.Net(and in English of
course)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:49 AM
To: lucene-ne
Hi Stefan,
I don't see it as a "request for permission". It is rather to inform people
about the change who may have different ideas and give a chance to comment
on it if this change breaks something in their own local copy.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodew
They all contain Apache License 1.1 and compatible with v1.4.3( for ex, they
don't implement ReusableTokenStream of Analyzer class)
There may be also other fixes in v2.9. I think they can wait till a complete
review.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:g
I changed the content of index.html at /www/lucene.apache.org/lucene.net as
below. It will be active in a few hours.
http://incubator.apache.org/lucene.net/";>
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, Feb
Read-only access is enough.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, February 13, 2011 9:04 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Can I remove access of Lucene.NET committers to Lucene
infrastructure now?
Hi,
as far as I can tell
It is configured as "Embedded Resource" in project file. No need to load
explicitly.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Ben Foster [mailto:b...@planetcloud.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 5:51 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (LUC
lly be used.
DIGY
Either
-Original Message-
From: Ben Foster [mailto:b...@planetcloud.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 12:25 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENENET-392) Arabic Analyzer
What needs to be done to support localized query parse
You are adding the same doc twice.
(See how you add "acttime" )
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samuel.gao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 11:35 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: duplicate records in index
Hi,
I am creating an
Whether *fuzzy* or not, all queries are simple term queries at the end and
Lucene does not have an info like *similarity*, just scores.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samuel.gao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Download the source from
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_2
using a svn client(like TortoiseSVN), and open the project file with VS20XX.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samuel.gao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 9
Sorry, I am not admin.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:bode...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:46 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incubator Infra: JIRA
On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote:
> I'm not terribly familiar with
.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:48 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Prescott Nasser
Subject: Re: Proposed Roadmap
Yes. If you look at the milestone dates on those two tracks of development:
Lucene.Net
Hi Sergey,
I added you too.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:ser...@mirvoda.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 6:55 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Incubator Infra: JIRA
Hi, DIGY
My jira user name is sergey_mirvoda.
https://issues.apache.org
But I would prefer do the same thing on my own local copy and create a patch
for trunk.
Thanks,
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:39 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Sergey Mirvoda
Subject: Re: svn
> Although why wait until after the official release?
Just for Lucene.Net users who doesn't use VS2010 and want to use the latest
version.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:27 PM
To: lucene
Why not having a release targeting 2.0, 3.5 and 4.0, then updating the
project to 4.0
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:ser...@mirvoda.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 11:56 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator
What I meant was a binary release.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:ser...@mirvoda.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2011 12:02 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1072121 - /incubator/lucene.net/branches/vs2010/
4.0 rules them all. You
Hi Prescott,
I think there is a misunderstanding about the release. In Apache way, a
release is a *signed* binary release(compiled version).
Lucene.Net.dll has no dependency to other binaries(unless you want to test
or use compression) and they will not be included in the release.
DIGY
s the signed-release in GAC
and then wants to compile and sign with his own key and forgets to remove the
old one from GAC) should be handled by Lucene.Net.
At the end, all Lucene.Net users are developers.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: M
http://www.google.com.tr/search?q=%22Near+Realtime+Search%22+lucene
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Wen Gao [mailto:samuel.gao...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 11:07 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] how to update the index
Hi,
I am using lucene
2.3.1->2.3.2 or 2.9.1 -> 2.9.2 transitions were done with just a single
patch, for ex.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issu
In the time needed to create 10s of issues, half of the fixes could be done
:)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 11:36 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] JIRA issues for Java
We can take,for ex, a namespace like Lucene.Net.Util(+test cases) and create
a single patch for all of the related issues.
(This approach needs to work on svn history, not on issues)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Lombard, Scott [mailto:slomb...@kingindustries.com]
Sent: Thursday
Instead of looking at issues, use TortoiseSVN's compare revision utility.
Some issues seem to be complex but patches are really simple. See the fix
for 2 of 103 files below
DIGY
Index: Constants.cs
===
--- Constan
What about this source tree?
RC2
build
contrib
core
Lucene.Net
Test
demo
"src" doesn't mean anything since other dirs contain sources as well.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, Februar
If this directory structure is to be used also in trunk, I must say that that I
am not comfortable with this rapid changes without any previous
warnings(although I understand Troy's arguments). Now, I have to reorganize all
my local works.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy H
First of all, I don't want to start a flame war. What I want to say is: "This
is just what made sense while building this release" might not make sense for
all.
(I must admit, it is better than the previous one)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thow
+1 for Layout1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 26, 2011 4:04 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] New website / layout looks
Hey all,
I've uploaded two potential new layouts /
different time zones, non-searchable content.
Definitely -1
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: mhern...@amptools.net [mailto:mhern...@amptools.net] On Behalf Of
Michael Herndon
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 9:00 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] irc chanel
If there
No, I don't think it is a bad design. It could be limited to some number,
but what would it be? 10,100,1000,100 or 1?
Besides that you have other alternatives to use while searching.
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: steven.h...@pattersoncompanies.com
[mailto:ste
LZOCompressor? Do we need it?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 3:07 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure
I guess by 'today' I meant 'In about 6 days'.
Everything seems to be OK.
+1 for removing old directory structure.
Thanks Troy
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 3:07 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure
I guess by '
Yes, we can use these classes after the work is finished. It will be easy
since I use a wrapper in SupportClass for Set and Dictionary.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Robert Jordan [mailto:robe...@gmx.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 7:46 PM
To: lucene-net-...@incubator.apache.org
Would you add the same stuff to 2.9.4g branch too?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:28 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure
I'm going to move ahead with
A good blog about this.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ericlippert/archive/2011/04/20/uses-and-misuses-of-i
mplicit-typing.aspx
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 8:20 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject
ting 2.0 framework.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 12:06 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
Using var is wonderful and great. We'll hopefully do doing a lot of
refactoring in
Hi Prescott,
Can you apply these fixes also to trunk? They don't diverge from java 2.9.4 and
can be compiled targetting .NET 2.0.
LUCENENET-361 Workaround for a Mono C# compiler issue
LUCENENET-330 Search.Regex Minimal Port
LUCENENET-371 Unit test for Search.Regex port
DIGY
-Ori
on't see a case to vote.
If you think the code will be easier to read, use it. If not, don't.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 10:54 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] var
I'll sta
Yes, I missed something :)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support After Apache Lucene.Net
performance are more important
than backwards compatibility.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:05 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework
Before 2.9.4g, I would surely say "drop support for 2.0 completely". But now we
have two versions(2.9.4 & 2.9.4g) and one can continue to support 2.0 till its
death (2.9.4g may be used as base for future versions, but this is not true for
2.9.4)
DIGY
-Original Message--
I chose the name "2.9.4g", since 2.9.5 may give a feeling of lucene.java 2.9.5
exists.
2.9.4g is somewhere between 2.9.4 & 3.0.3(more close to 3.0.3)
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 11:54 PM
To:
By the way, the "g" in 2.9.4g stands for "Generics"
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Digy [mailto:digyd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:03 AM
To: 'lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org'
Subject: RE: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework Support Aft
It is used already.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE/fixforversion/12315914
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 12:21 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] VOTE: .NET 2.0 Framework
Thanks Michael, I fixed it.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:48 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] build scripts & v2.9.4g contrib projects build state
I get a number of b
Hi Christopher,
According to my experience, this kind of eMails eighter gets no response or
too many fluctuations with no result.
What about preparing a *small* "Proof of Concept" code that passes all unit
tests.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Currens [mailto:
ot; approach is good when result set is small but number of
facets is relatively large as in your case.
What to use really depends on your needs(or a hybrid approach that uses both
like in Solr)
DIGY
PS: every contribution is always welcome.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Stewart
Hard to guess.
Have you seen Contrib.IsolatedStorage.Test.csproj?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Prescott Nasser [mailto:geobmx...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2011 12:33 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [Lucene.Net] Could not load assembly
While trying to set
Hi Rory,
I agree with you in theory. But collecting people to work on a project is
not easy as giving advise.
Till now, line-by-line port have seemed to be the best with a limited human
source.
Would you be willing to work on your approach and maintain newer Lucene.Net
releases?
DIGY
.9.4g? It is a *branch* and has
nothing to do with the trunk. It need not be an offical release and can live in
branch as a PoC.
As a result, I got bored to listen to "this should be done that way". What I
want to see is "I did it that way, should we continue with this&q
ne answers in a reasonable time(mostly), then commit.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 11:58 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
@Troy
not exist in the
collection whereas .NET throws exception". A better way may be used.
* missing IEquatable's
* making Iterators as real .NET Enumerators
etc. etc. etc.
It seems to be a never ending story.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lombard [mailto:lombardena...@gmail.
I can not say I like this approach, but till we find an automated way(with good
results), it seems to be the only way we can use.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:43 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
> I've add a Paths Class under the Lucene.Net.Tests Util folder
Since it is a Lucene.Net specific code, may "Support" be a better place?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 11:53 PM
a 2.9.4 tag and replacing trunk with 2.9.4g?
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 12:36 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
DIGY - Re: Why do I wait
OK. Maybe I asked wrong question, Suppose I committed IsolatedStorageDirectory
only to trunk. How would you merge this branch & trunk?
DIGY.
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 12:28 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache
No no. It was just an example. As you already know, there are a lot of changes
in contrib codes related with those API changes in Lucene.Net.2.9.4g core.
Therefore, I see no option like merging other that copying.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com
And just for this hard work I removed the obsolete Similarity.Net.
DIGY
-Original Message-
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:53 AM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] Is a Lucene.Net Line-by-Line Jave port needed?
I&#
1 - 100 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
