tion for the recording.
Hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Denys
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
On Behalf Of Frank A. Gerbode, M.D.
Sent: 20 June 2020 20:29
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Maestro
@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Maestro
Thanks, Denys. Very helpful and thoughtful comments. There are a
handful of instances I have encountered in v.1 of Spinacino where
corrections were written in, possibly by Petrucci himself. In any
case,
th
m the print in preparation for the recording.
Hope this helps.
Best wishes,
Denys
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
On Behalf Of Frank A. Gerbode, M.D.
Sent: 20 June 2020 20:29
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Ma
elps.
Best wishes,
Denys
-Original Message-
From: lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
On Behalf Of Frank A. Gerbode, M.D.
Sent: 20 June 2020 20:29
To: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Maestro
I am working on an edition of Spinacino v.1 (
I hear ya, Sarge.
Most pieces connected to Ghiselin in Spinacino aren't for the
faint-heared. (ditto Kyrie de les armes) I don't know why. Isn't there
a concordance in the Buxheim Organ book? Maybe make two edits: the
first faithful and the second with ficta suggestions from the
I am working on an edition of Spinacino v.1 (1507) and have run across
these 2 extremely dissonant duets.
I am not personally a big fan of gratuitous dissonance (diabolus in
musica). Dissonance that serves a purpose, as in Dowland, yes.
Dissonance as a passing note, yes. Dissonance
d?
RA
__
From: [2]lute-...@new-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
[3] on behalf of Frank A. Gerbode,
M.D. [4]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 9:17 PM
Cc: [5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu [6]
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A stra
Am Dienstag, 15. Oktober 2019 08:48 CEST, Alain Veylit
schrieb:
>I cannot read this thread without thinking about Spinacino's duets,
>particularly the setting of Ghiselin's Jolis amours: are the notes
>wrong or is it our ears? Yet, I had found a very convincing rendition
>of
14, 2019 9:17 PM
Cc: [5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu [6]
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Maestro
I always feel compelled to "correct" these instances, because to me it
just does not sound right as is, and it's no big deal to play the 4 on
the next course. To me,
-old-mail.cs.dartmouth.edu
on behalf of Frank A. Gerbode,
M.D.
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 9:17 PM
Cc: lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Subject: [LUTE] Re: A strange "error" in Maestro
I always feel compelled to "correct" these instances, because to me it
just
Maybe it's really just an error...
Real playability-friendly "errors" can be found in Newsidler's pieces,
where he uses a chromatic coloring of the cadence to avoid a fast
stretch to the 4th fret.
On 14.10.19 22:34, r.ba...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Rainer and all,
For those who didn't
I always feel compelled to "correct" these instances, because to me it
just does not sound right as is, and it's no big deal to play the 4 on
the next course. To me, the bottom line is what sounds good.
--Sarge
On 10/14/2019 13:34, r.ba...@gmx.de wrote:
Something a bit similar is where one
Hi Rainer and all,
For those who didn't check out these examples, they all involve a
simple melody where Milan drops down to an open string resulting in a
minor third jump rather than using a half or whole step which would
better match as an imitation.
For example, instead
13 matches
Mail list logo
