Swaying is good, bobbing can be ditracting, but many of the best
players (on many instruments) do it. Sway.
dt
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
'Sway to go, though some will say it sway too difficult. Leap
swayward thoughts.
Swaying is good, bobbing can be ditracting, but many of the best
players (on many instruments) do it. Sway.
dt
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
2008/11/18 Anthony Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I have been told that most lutenists find their playing
drops by around 20% when playing in public or before the mike.
Anthony, it is actualy 17.8 per cent. Please get your facts right. This
is a scientific list. We care
On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Stephen Arndt rattled on the keyboard:
On music not only evoking feelings but also forming the character of the
listener, see also (prior to Quintilian) Plato, Republic, 376d-403c,
particularly 398c-403c. Music, however, at least in the Latin tradition,
was part
Rob
Le 19 nov. 08 à 09:26, Rob MacKillop a écrit :
2008/11/18 Anthony Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I have been told that most lutenists find their playing
drops by around 20% when playing in public or before the mike.
Anthony, it is actualy 17.8 per cent. Please get your facts right.
Dear Gary,
this is true if people manage to contribute something. If their only aim is
writing arrogant and
even insulting mails, no one gains.
Regards,
Stephan
Am 18 Nov 2008 um 2:56 hat gary digman geschrieben:
I have to say, I'm not sure I agree with this policy of banning people
What gets me about the new technology is that we can record in such
high fidelity yet so many people prefer downloads of MP3s which are
quite lo-fi. It's rather curious to see these paths going in different
directions.
On Nov 19, 2008, at 2:25 PM, Anthony Hind wrote:
Rob
I heartily
I agree that MP3s are not the same quality as CDs, and add that CDs are
not the same quality as vinyl. I wish I had made an old-fashioned LP. I
suppose I still can, but it would be very expensive.
I bought a 1930s gramophone a couple of years ago to play 78s. I was
able to
]; lutelist
lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: The Online Lute Player
On Wednesday 19 November 2008, Stephen Arndt rattled on the keyboard:
On music not only evoking feelings but also forming the character of the
listener, see also (prior
I feel compelled to contribute my viewpoint, not because it is
necessarily so profound but because I do enjoy making and sharing
videos. First off, I am an amateur and I very rarely get the
opportunity to play for others (my supportive wife and indifferent
children and pets aside).
Bravo, Danny, Bravo!
Rob
--
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mercredi 19 novembre 2008 19:38
À : Rob MacKillop
Cc : lute List
Objet : [LUTE] Re: The Online Lute Player
I feel compelled to contribute my viewpoint, not because it is
necessarily so profound but because I do enjoy making and sharing
videos. First off, I am an amateur
: The Online Lute Player
I feel compelled to contribute my viewpoint, not because it is
necessarily so profound but because I do enjoy making and sharing
videos. First off, I am an amateur and I very rarely get the
opportunity to play for others (my supportive wife and indifferent
children
Holy cow, talk about timing!
[1]http://www.earlymusic.org/files/Early%20Music%20on%20YouTube.pdf
--
References
1. http://www.earlymusic.org/files/Early%20Music%20on%20YouTube.pdf
To get on or off this list see list information at
Holy cow is right. I saw you listed, Danny!
ed
At 08:44 PM 11/19/2008 -0500, Daniel Shoskes wrote:
Holy cow, talk about timing!
[1]http://www.earlymusic.org/files/Early%20Music%20on%20YouTube.pdf
--
References
1.
I have to say, I'm not sure I agree with this policy of banning people
from posting on the lutelist. I know that some people engage in ad hominem
arguing, name calling, insults etc., but it seems to me one can always use
the delete button to eliminate postings one finds objectionable. I
I concur with Gary on this.
I have to say, I'm not sure I agree with this policy of banning people
from posting on the lutelist. I know that some people engage in ad hominem
arguing, name calling, insults etc., but it seems to me one can always use
the delete button to eliminate postings
Well, stated, Gary. I agree. Igor, in particular, seemed a very
minor irritation and a rather superficial provocateur. Even though I
rarely agreed with his posts, they did sometimes make me
chuckle. I'd rather delete the occasional irritant with a simple
keystroke then banish it along with
Dear Rob
I had begun to write this before you sent your message, and then
wondered whether it wasn't better to let sleeping lurkers lie.
I will cut my message into two, trying not to saturate your post,
beginning with (1):
1) Easy pieces,
2) CD or MP3
I had just discovered your
of folks,
most of whom were contributing nothing substantive to the group at all.
Guy
-Original Message-
From: Eugene C. Braig IV [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:09 AM
To: gary digman; lutelist
Subject: [LUTE] Re: The Online Lute Player
Well, stated, Gary
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:09 AM
To: gary digman; lutelist
Subject: [LUTE] Re: The Online Lute Player
Well, stated, Gary. I agree. Igor, in particular, seemed a very
minor irritation and a rather superficial provocateur. Even though I
rarely agreed with his
There is an interesting phenomenon (which seems to be occurring
here), described once to me by a friend and character, who sold bric-
a-brac on Bermondsey market:
Rumour: There's a dirty old man coming through the stalls, acting
suspicious, more than likely filched something already
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:09 AM
To: gary digman; lutelist
Subject: [LUTE] Re: The Online Lute Player
Well, stated, Gary. I agree. Igor, in particular, seemed a very
minor irritation and a rather superficial provocateur. Even though I
rarely agreed with his posts
The point is rather that the regrets come after the event. They could
have been expressed, before the exclusion. They are provoked by BY
the exclusion. I am not criticising anyone, but I think the scenario
does describe a tendancy. Igor overstepped the mark, and probably was
purely
I must first insist that in my brief remark in the form of a moral
tale, I was not criticising those who defend the right for everyone
to have their say, warning of the dangers of banning anyone.
I quite understand that point of view. I also undertand the point of
view of those who fear the
On music not only evoking feelings but also forming the character of the
listener, see also (prior to Quintilian) Plato, Republic, 376d-403c,
particularly 398c-403c. Music, however, at least in the Latin tradition, was
part of the quadrivium and thus one of the seven liberal arts, understood
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008, Rob MacKillop [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It would be wonderful if we could hear how the average lute player
played in the 16th/17th centuries.
hear, hear!
yet, we have some clues, if from other instruments.
Lots of pubs and coffee houses on this side of the pond
27 matches
Mail list logo
