Re: Possible new LyX Bug - Umlaut_Path_Bug

[Ron is not subscriber, please keep him in copy if possible] Le 21/05/2022 à 08:43, Ron Pietzel a écrit : Hi LyX team. I have been a user of LyX since about 1996. Fantastic program, and given the choice, I would use nothing else. But I think I have (finally) found a small bug. It is all

Re: Fwd: [Bug 1815278] [NEW] LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s)

--- Message transféré > Sujet : [Bug 1815278] [NEW] LyX restores the same cursor position > wherever it was placed next time(s) > Date : Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:48:49 - > De : Konstantin Boyandin <1815...@bugs.launchpad.net> > Répondre à : Bug 1815278 <1815...@bugs.launchpad.ne

Fwd: [Bug 1815278] [NEW] LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s)

An interesting bug report from ubuntu bugs. I did not try confirm the bug. JMarc Message transféré Sujet : [Bug 1815278] [NEW] LyX restores the same cursor position wherever it was placed next time(s) Date : Sat, 09 Feb 2019 10:48:49 - De : Konstantin Boyandin <1

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

Richard Heck wrote: > I'll ask again: What is the status of the mingw build? Last I heard, it > built our executables fine and the only issue was with building the > installer. The mingw build works fine in several flavours: -natively on windows as described in INSTALL.Win32 (uses autotools) -

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

On 06/25/2016 12:00 PM, Georg Baum wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > >> Richard, could you please put it on ftp.lyx.org? Could you please also >> write a news message that we now have a Vista installer but that this >> installer should not be used for other Windows versions than Vista. > This is not

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Richard, could you please put it on ftp.lyx.org? Could you please also > write a news message that we now have a Vista installer but that this > installer should not be used for other Windows versions than Vista. This is not possible for legal reasons. Our own license forbids

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I am not completely sure why we are having this surreal discussion. Uwe, > what is wrong with the following? > 1/ Dima provides a patch that makes a Vista compatible build > 2/ Kornel checks that the cmake part good enough for inclusion > 3/ Uwe does his usual builds

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

Le 25/06/2016 16:45, Richard Heck a écrit : There is a discussion about this topic in the bug tracker that I cannot understand. Scott and Richard are concerned that Dima'S build contains malware. This is not fair. Dima invested some spare time to fiddle around with Qt to prepare a Vista build

Re: new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

On 06/25/2016 05:13 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Dear LyXers, > > there is a new Windows installer available that provides support for > Windows Vista: > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/LyX-220-Installer-Vista-3.exe > > Dima kindly prepared the binary from the 2.2.0 tarball, I checked it > against viruses

new LyX 2.2.0 installer for Windows Vista is available

Dear LyXers, there is a new Windows installer available that provides support for Windows Vista: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/LyX-220-Installer-Vista-3.exe Dima kindly prepared the binary from the 2.2.0 tarball, I checked it against viruses and malware using commercial antivirus software, I

Re: please put new LyX 2.2.0 Win installer on ftp.lyx org

on Windows confirmed that they went away after a reinstallation using the new installer.) Can you please put the new installer on ftp.lyx.org from here?: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ Done. p.s. Maybe it makes sense to provide also for the other OSes new LyX binaries using Qt 5.6.1? I do not know

Re: please put new LyX 2.2.0 Win installer on ftp.lyx org

Am 10.06.2016 um 04:57 schrieb Richard Heck: Done. Thanks. p.s. Maybe it makes sense to provide also for the other OSes new LyX binaries using Qt 5.6.1? I do not know if OSX needs such an update, but Linux does not. This is one of the many ways in which Linux is not a piece of s**t. Ehm

Re: please put new LyX 2.2.0 Win installer on ftp.lyx org

ey went away after a reinstallation using the new installer.) > > Can you please put the new installer on ftp.lyx.org from here?: > http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ Done. > p.s. Maybe it makes sense to provide also for the other OSes new LyX > binaries using Qt 5.6.1? I do not

please put new LyX 2.2.0 Win installer on ftp.lyx org

you please put the new installer on ftp.lyx.org from here?: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0/ thanks and regards Uwe p.s. Maybe it makes sense to provide also for the other OSes new LyX binaries using Qt 5.6.1?

Re: new LyX 2.1.4 Win installer for FTP

On 10/13/2015 07:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hi Richard, due to bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9733 I released a new installer: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.1.4/ Could you please put it on ftp.lyx.org? The bug is not our fault but the users of course expect that a basic thing like the spell

new LyX 2.1.4 Win installer for FTP

Hi Richard, due to bug http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9733 I released a new installer: http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.1.4/ Could you please put it on ftp.lyx.org? The bug is not our fault but the users of course expect that a basic thing like the spell checker works. thanks and regards Uwe

some feedback for the new LyX toolbar buttons

Hello Enrico, many thanks for your work with the buttons. I don't have a strong opinion for the colors and style, I only want to give feedback for the readability. So far all buttons are OK except of: - the insert index entry button. It is very hard to understand what this is about because

some feedback for the new LyX toolbar buttons

Hello Enrico, many thanks for your work with the buttons. I don't have a strong opinion for the colors and style, I only want to give feedback for the readability. So far all buttons are OK except of: - the insert index entry button. It is very hard to understand what this is about because

Re: [LyX GSoC/odt2lyx] Basic Python Script to parse the complete odt file and write appropriate text into a new lyx file.

Pilligundla prannoy.b...@gmail.com Date: Wed Jul 9 22:56:32 2014 +0530 Basic Python Script to parse the complete odt file and write appropriate text into a new lyx file. Warning:Open the generated lyx file with a text editor as of now. LyX syntax is not yet incorporated It seems

Re: [LyX GSoC/odt2lyx] Basic Python Script to parse the complete odt file and write appropriate text into a new lyx file.

Pilligundla <prannoy.b...@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jul 9 22:56:32 2014 +0530 Basic Python Script to parse the complete odt file and write appropriate text into a new lyx file. Warning:Open the generated lyx file with a text editor as of now. LyX syntax is not yet incorporated It

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/21/2014 06:36 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 21.03.2014 04:13, schrieb Richard Heck: 3. A new preference variable to adjust the minimum length of words to be collected in the candidate list for text input completion was provided by Richard Heck and Stephan Witt. This feature misses a

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 22.03.2014 22:33, schrieb Richard Heck: If so the tooltip should be Words with less than the specified number of characters will not be completed. and the label in the dialog should be Minimum characters for words that should be completed If this formulation seems better to you, that's

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/22/2014 08:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 22.03.2014 22:33, schrieb Richard Heck: If so the tooltip should be Words with less than the specified number of characters will not be completed. and the label in the dialog should be Minimum characters for words that should be completed If

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 23.03.2014 02:23, schrieb Richard Heck: You can commit it now to the 2.1.1-staging branch, if you wish. Done now. regards Uwe

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/21/2014 06:36 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 21.03.2014 04:13, schrieb Richard Heck: 3. "A new preference variable to adjust the minimum length of words to be collected in the candidate list for text input completion was provided by Richard Heck and Stephan Witt." This feature misses a

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 22.03.2014 22:33, schrieb Richard Heck: If so the tooltip should be "Words with less than the specified number of characters will not be completed." and the label in the dialog should be "Minimum characters for words that should be completed" If this formulation seems better to you,

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/22/2014 08:50 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: Am 22.03.2014 22:33, schrieb Richard Heck: If so the tooltip should be "Words with less than the specified number of characters will not be completed." and the label in the dialog should be "Minimum characters for words that should be completed"

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 23.03.2014 02:23, schrieb Richard Heck: You can commit it now to the 2.1.1-staging branch, if you wish. Done now. regards Uwe

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard contents.

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote: 3. A new preference variable to adjust the minimum length of words to be collected in the candidate list for text input completion was provided by Richard Heck and Stephan Witt. This feature misses a tooltipin the prefeences

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de wrote: While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. Ability to paste as simple unformatted

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 21.03.2014 04:13, schrieb Richard Heck: I played a lot bat cannot see this new menu entry. What do I have to do to see it? We've always had this menu, even in 2.0.x. There are just new options, I think. Hi Richard, thanks for your help. As Vincent said this feature was indeed later on

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't > fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): > > 1. "Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Richard Heck wrote: > >> 3. "A new preference variable to adjust the minimum length of words to be >> collected in the candidate list for text input completion was provided by >> Richard Heck and Stephan Witt." >> >> This feature misses a tooltipin

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: >> While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I >> don't fully understand (all texts taken from >> http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): >> >> 1. "Ability to paste as

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

Am 21.03.2014 04:13, schrieb Richard Heck: I played a lot bat cannot see this new menu entry. What do I have to do to see it? We've always had this menu, even in 2.0.x. There are just new options, I think. Hi Richard, thanks for your help. As Vincent said this feature was indeed later on

Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard contents. This is available from a new Paste Special... menu item, as well as

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/20/2014 11:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard contents. This is available from a

Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. "Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard contents. This is available from a new "Paste Special..." menu item, as well as

Re: Questions and annotations about some new LyX 2.1 features

On 03/20/2014 11:05 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote: While updating the docs I stumbled over the following features which I don't fully understand (all texts taken from http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/NewInLyX21): 1. "Ability to paste as simple unformatted text the clipboard contents. This is available from a

Re: [LyX/master] installer: support new LyX helper programs

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 4-12-2013 0:46: commit fc400ae8ebd6e6ad815ea19c385abf31bcbd6028 Author: Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@lyx.org Date: Wed Dec 4 00:45:46 2013 +0100 installer: support new LyX helper programs diff --git a/development/Win32/packaging/installer/include/filelist.nsh b/development

Re: [LyX/master] installer: support new LyX helper programs

Uwe Stöhr schreef op 4-12-2013 0:46: commit fc400ae8ebd6e6ad815ea19c385abf31bcbd6028 Author: Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@lyx.org> Date: Wed Dec 4 00:45:46 2013 +0100 installer: support new LyX helper programs diff --git a/development/Win32/packaging/installer/include/filelist.

problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. In the old TRAC we defined keywords and linked an explanation page to them. This assured that users could only

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de writes: | Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, | since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: | - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. | In the old TRAC we defined keywords and linked an explanation page to

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Uwe Stöhr uwesto...@web.de writes: | | - people send us updates to po-files and the documentation via the | | mail address po-upda...@lyx.org Unfortunately there is a size limit in | | attachments of emails sent to this address. Therefore almost

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

On 03/03/2012 09:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Uwe Stöhruwesto...@web.de writes: | Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, | since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: | - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. | In the old TRAC

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net writes: | On 03/03/2012 09:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Uwe Stöhruwesto...@web.de writes: | - people send us updates to po-files and the documentation via the | mail address po-upda...@lyx.org Unfortunately there is a size limit in | attachments of

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Am 03.03.2012 16:28, schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: This is a google mail group, run within mail.lyx.org. I am not aware of any such limits there. | I.e., the change to the server shouldn't have affected mail, since | mail is not handled there. I also think so because the problem arose before

problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. In the old TRAC we defined keywords and linked an explanation page to them. This assured that users could only

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Uwe Stöhr writes: | Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, > | since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: > | - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. | In the old TRAC we defined keywords and linked an explanation

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | Uwe Stöhr writes: | | - people send us updates to po-files and the documentation via the | | mail address po-upda...@lyx.org Unfortunately there is a size limit in | | attachments of emails sent to this address. Therefore almost

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

On 03/03/2012 09:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Uwe Stöhr writes: | Hello JMarc, Lars, Christian, | since we moved to a new server for lyx.org I encountered the following problems: | - since the TRAC update the keyword settings for bug reports are lost. | In the old

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Richard Heck writes: | On 03/03/2012 09:44 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Uwe Stöhr writes: >> >> | - people send us updates to po-files and the documentation via the >> | mail address po-upda...@lyx.org Unfortunately there is a size limit in >> |

Re: problems with new LyX TRAC, the Wiki and with our mailing lists

Am 03.03.2012 16:28, schrieb Lars Gullik Bjønnes: This is a google mail group, run within mail.lyx.org. I am not aware of any such limits there. | I.e., the change to the server shouldn't have affected mail, since | mail is not handled there. I also think so because the problem arose before

[s...@timegate.de: Goodbye message and the search for a new LyX Debian package maintainer]

- Forwarded message from Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de - From: Sven Hoexter s...@timegate.de To: lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org Cc: pkg-lyx-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Goodbye message and the search for a new LyX Debian package maintainer Hi all, I already switched my work

[s...@timegate.de: Goodbye message and the search for a new LyX Debian package maintainer]

- Forwarded message from Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de> - From: Sven Hoexter <s...@timegate.de> To: lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org Cc: pkg-lyx-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Subject: Goodbye message and the search for a new LyX Debian package maintainer Hi all, I already

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: on a different note: what about this header? http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif If it's for wiki.lyx.org, I'd like to wait with messing around with it until we've sorted out a released www.lyx.org. After that, the room for improving

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

on a different note: what about this header? http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif If it's for wiki.lyx.org, no i meant it for www.lyx.org pavel

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: on a different note: what about this header? http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif If it's for wiki.lyx.org, no i meant it for www.lyx.org Ok, I'll bounce that ball to Joost... Joost? /C -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: on a different note: what about this header? http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif If it's for wiki.lyx.org, I'd like to wait with messing around with it until we've sorted out a released www.lyx.org. After that, the room for improving

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

>> on a different note: what about this header? >> http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif > > If it's for wiki.lyx.org, no i meant it for www.lyx.org pavel

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: on a different note: what about this header? http://195.113.31.123/~sanda/junk/header.gif If it's for wiki.lyx.org, no i meant it for www.lyx.org Ok, I'll bounce that ball to Joost... Joost? /C -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44

[devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Rex C. Eastbourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Glad you like it Rich! Christian, Joost, Jean-Marc, Pavel, and others were all instrumental in putting this all together. I do not think I deserve any credit here... BTW, is it possible to hide

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You, Jean-Marc, can make the web server rewrite URIs as follows: www.lyx.org/XXX -- www.lyx.org/index.php/Main/XXX Users would then never need to see 'index.php/Main' - I've emailed you about this, it's related to changing some config in

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK sorry I thought this was not needed anymore. I'll dig out your mail and see what I can do. It's the post I sent yesterday, or maybe on Saturday, not the earlier one. It's some rewriting of the URI that needs to be done. Please note that we

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info for development newcomers, you get

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

* www.lyx.org/Page- ../Main/Page * wiki.lyx.org/LyX/Page - The group LyX/ * wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Page - .../Devel/Page This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). on

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What do you mean with two servers? (I want to make sure we understand each other here... www.lyx.org/ would be used to retrieve the official web pages even if a single wiki is used). Yes. It's trivial[*] to use different skins for different groups. In fact, a wiki

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some official' devel pages?). Ok, it sounds like most agree that it's ok to use a single wiki, assuming we have the

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info for development newcomers, you get

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Pavel Sanda wrote: Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info for development

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your request :) i really can't help it :D pavel

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Joost Verburg wrote: In my opinion that logo looks just too unprofessional, especially when combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your request :) Joost What if we had some shadow or other contrast behind the letters of that LyX logo that's currently on

[devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Rex C. Eastbourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Glad you like it Rich! Christian, Joost, Jean-Marc, Pavel, and others were all instrumental in putting this all together. I do not think I deserve any credit here... BTW, is it possible to hide

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > You, Jean-Marc, can make the web server rewrite URIs as follows: > > www.lyx.org/XXX --> www.lyx.org/index.php/Main/XXX > > Users would then never need to see 'index.php/Main' - I've emailed you > about this, it's related to changing some config in >

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: OK sorry I thought this was not needed anymore. I'll dig out your mail and see what I can do. It's the post I sent yesterday, or maybe on Saturday, not the earlier one. It's some rewriting of the URI that needs to be done. Please note that we

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

>> Are we sure that all >> development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' >> devel pages?). > > Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info for development newcomers, you

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

> > * www.lyx.org/-> ../Main/ > > * wiki.lyx.org/LyX/ -> The group LyX/ > > * wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ -> .../Devel/ > > This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all > development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some > 'official' devel pages?). on

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > What do you mean with two servers? (I want to make sure we understand > each other here... www.lyx.org/ would be used to retrieve the official > web pages even if a single wiki is used). Yes. > It's trivial[*] to use different skins for different groups. In fact, > a

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: This is definitely the outcome I would prefer. Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some official' devel pages?). Ok, it sounds like most agree that it's ok to use a single wiki, assuming we have the

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Pavel Sanda wrote: Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). >>> >>> Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... >> >> - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not >> - its good to have some basic info for

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Pavel Sanda wrote: Are we sure that all development pages should be in the wiki part (do we need some 'official' devel pages?). Hmm... not sure why we'd need that to be honest... - clear distinction of devel pages we care and we do not - its good to have some basic info for development

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

> combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your > request :) i really can't help it :D pavel

Re: [devel-list] Re: New LyX website

Joost Verburg wrote: In my opinion that logo looks just too unprofessional, especially when combined with the mascot. The colors are already back because of your request :) Joost What if we had some shadow or other contrast behind the letters of that "LyX" logo that's currently on

Re: [announce] new LyX manual about math - question for branch

Jürgen, the new manual covers the content of the file examples/mathed.lyx. I therefore deleted it in trunk. Can I do the same in branch? regards Uwe

[announce] new LyX manual about math

Hello LyXers, I just finished the English translation and revision of my German math manual (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXMathebefehle) It describes all math stuff you can do with LyX in detail. So it can be taken as the math counterpart of the EmbeddedObjects manual. I hope it provides answers

Re: [announce] new LyX manual about math - question for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: the new manual covers the content of the file examples/mathed.lyx. I therefore deleted it in trunk. Can I do the same in branch? OK. Jürgen

Re: [announce] new LyX manual about math - question for branch

Jürgen, the new manual covers the content of the file examples/mathed.lyx. I therefore deleted it in trunk. Can I do the same in branch? regards Uwe

[announce] new LyX manual about math

Hello LyXers, I just finished the English translation and revision of my German math manual (http://wiki.lyx.org/LyX/LyXMathebefehle) It describes all math stuff you can do with LyX in detail. So it can be taken as the math counterpart of the EmbeddedObjects manual. I hope it provides answers

Re: [announce] new LyX manual about math - question for branch

Uwe Stöhr wrote: > the new manual covers the content of the file examples/mathed.lyx. I > therefore deleted it in trunk. Can I do the same in branch? OK. Jürgen

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

:14:56 +0200 From: Lorenzo Paulatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.general Subject: New lyx icon Dear lyx users, during the last years I grew increasingly annoyed by the (in my opinion) horrible lyx default icon. Finally, during last rainy sunday afternoon

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: It would be a pity to slip on that... Could somebody (Bennett?) generate a patch so that we can test the proposed new banner and icons easily? I'm not sure how to produce a patch for an image file like banner.png; isn't testing it as

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

Bennett Helm wrote: On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: It would be a pity to slip on that... Could somebody (Bennett?) generate a patch so that we can test the proposed new banner and icons easily? I'm not sure how to produce a patch for an image file like banner.png;

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

:14:56 +0200 From: Lorenzo Paulatto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.general Subject: New lyx icon Dear lyx users, during the last years I grew increasingly annoyed by the (in my opinion) horrible lyx default icon. Finally, during last rainy

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: It would be a pity to slip on that... Could somebody (Bennett?) generate a patch so that we can test the proposed new banner and icons easily? I'm not sure how to produce a patch for an image file like banner.png; isn't testing it as

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

Bennett Helm wrote: > On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:06 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >> It would be a pity to slip on that... Could somebody (Bennett?) >> generate a patch so that we can test the proposed new banner and >> icons easily? > > I'm not sure how to produce a patch for an image file like >

New lyx icon (fwd)

-- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:14:56 +0200 From: Lorenzo Paulatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.general Subject: New lyx icon Dear lyx

Re: New lyx icon (fwd)

On Apr 2, 2007, at 7:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Forwarded message -- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:14:56 +0200 From: Lorenzo Paulatto [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Newsgroups: gmane.editors.lyx.general Subject: New lyx icon Dear lyx users, during the last years I

  1   2   3   4   >