I've tried it. If it works for you, I think that's great. It generated
really bad formatting for me in my use cases, which is why I forgot about
it.
Thanks,
Ben
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023, 8:51 AM Rich Shepard wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Jun 2023, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
>
> > Have you tried Libre Office
>From experience, no. It is really not hard to format a docx to latex though.
Really, you are only thinking about lines and some special formatting.
Tables, images, headers, footers, and more make it very complicated. The
formats are diametrically opposite. Docx keeps information on every glif on
It's working to demonstrate the problem. I don't see a significant problem
with it.
Thanks,
Ben
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021, 3:32 PM Jean-Marc Lasgouttes via lyx-users <
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> wrote:
> Le 14/12/2021 à 21:05, Steve Litt via lyx-users a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Here on the LyX list
through code, I dont know what the point of using a code debugger would
be.
Thanks,
~Ben
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019, 8:45 AM Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 13. August 2019, 13:20:52 CEST schrieb Pavel Sanda:
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 06:10:19PM -0400, Benedict Holland wrote:
> >
You probably need to compile lyx though. I assume that Lyx uses the O2 flag
for production builds so while error messages and logs are a huge help
(minimum working example is the best), unless you can compile with the O0
flag for gcc, gdb will just return a mess.
The good news is that you mostly
I want to reiterate the ERT of \nocite{*} and you can probably put it in
your preamble if you want it for all parts in your document. This is your
answer:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/17653/how-to-list-all-bibliography-entries-without-citing
Then you just have to create a
If you don't include biblatex in the UI (remove any bibliography settings
in Lyx), it shouldn't load anything. Of course, then it is on you to
include biblatex with all options and customizations you would like.
Does that work?
Thanks,
~Ben
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:13 AM Bert Lloyd wrote:
>
For automation, I include a tex file within Lyx. I then create all of my
latex tables using python or whatever. It produces valid latex. This is
very hard to do without a heavy level of conformity. For example, I can
write a quick script that will take 95 rows of 4 column data quite quickly.
I
Oh. My apologies. LibreOffice or Excel can split text based on a character.
In this case, I would bring your text into excel, split to columns on | and
copy it into a defined table within Lyx. Lyx accepts Excel "copy and paste"
as long as you have the table already defined. You would want Excel to
Create a table that is 5 columns and 84 rows (assuming you want a header).
Copy from excel into the table. You can specify rows and columns of your
table.
Next comes orientation. From the table, select properties and I would chose
fancy table options, long table, and then orient the page as
I have lyx working with texlive and it is awesome. No issues. TexLive is
really hard to install though.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:16 PM Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 10/15/18 12:13 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I was trying to compile texinfo on Windows, if you succeed, let me
I don't want to be one of "those people" but does the problem still persist
in 2.3.1? Typically the first response for issues is to ask that the user
upgrades to the latest stable version. I have breaks in my PDF and it seems
fine.
Thanks,
~Ben
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 7:48 AM Daniel Goya wrote:
I would be in disagreement with Charles. Lyx has a massive range of users
from latex experts to novices. Power users will be incredibly upset if Lyx
does something that changes a working configuration without notifying them
first. It is even more important to get it right before release since it
I would say that the only people who would update MiKTeX outside of a Lyx
install are power users.
I would simply state something like:
Lyx requires MikTeX 2.9 or later. Your version is X.X. Chose "Continue" to
automatically update MiKTeX to version X.X or cancel the LyX installation
and update
Hi Katrin,
My guess is you want something like this.
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/150314/change-table-caption-numbering
You will probably need to create the tables using latex. I am unsure if Lyx
has a specific way of doing what you want. My guess is that you want to
renew the thetable
Is this a problem with Lyx or the parser? What reference engine are you
using? Can you replicate it with biber and biblatex? I only harp on this a
bit because I ended up with huge problems with my .bib file and the
solution was to switch to biber (which AFAIK) is unsupported by lyx, though
that
In a perfect world, yes. From my understanding, the lyx integration of
beamer is quite complicated. Also, this makes a great deal of sense. The
itemized lists are under a frame object, so they are essentially treated as
a sub-object when the user hits tab, as they should be. It also clearly
My guess is that would be the cause. Since you do not have a common (in a
typical citation style of last_name, first and first_name last_name and
first_name last_name), I believe it would treat "Rana A. Find AND Frank J."
as the first name and Millero as the last name. Also, this isn't a lyx
Hi everyone,
I have a strange bug and don't know if it is already known. When I install
lyx from the Ubuntu release repo, I start up lyx and continuous spell check
is not enabled. I enable it, close down lyx, start up lyx, and continuous
spell check is not enabled. This is despite the checked box
<skost...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Benedict Holland
> <benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have a strange bug and don't know if it is already known. When I
> install
> > lyx from the Ubuntu release repo
You get the privilege of giving money to Microsoft. Also, I think it
prevents that really annoying pop-up saying THIS MIGHT BE UNSAFE RUN RUN
RUN~ OR YOUR COMPUTER WILL CRASH AND DIE HORRIBLY. NEVER TRUST
ANYTHING NOT VERIFIED BY US. Do you wish to install the application anyway?
AFAIK,
You get the privilege of giving money to Microsoft. Also, I think it
prevents that really annoying pop-up saying THIS MIGHT BE UNSAFE RUN RUN
RUN~ OR YOUR COMPUTER WILL CRASH AND DIE HORRIBLY. NEVER TRUST
ANYTHING NOT VERIFIED BY US. Do you wish to install the application anyway?
AFAIK,
.
thank you,
~Ben
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 08/04/2015 09:41 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am on Ubuntu 15.04. I did not experience this on 14.04. I am doing the
workaround. It works. I am willing and happy to test this. This is really
.
thank you,
~Ben
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 08/04/2015 09:41 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am on Ubuntu 15.04. I did not experience this on 14.04. I am doing the
> workaround. It works. I am w
Hi Everyone,
I am on Ubuntu 15.04. I did not experience this on 14.04. I am doing the
workaround. It works. I am willing and happy to test this. This is really
bad, as if that needed to be said. Let me know when or if I can help.
Thanks,
~Ben
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak
Hi Everyone,
I am on Ubuntu 15.04. I did not experience this on 14.04. I am doing the
workaround. It works. I am willing and happy to test this. This is really
bad, as if that needed to be said. Let me know when or if I can help.
Thanks,
~Ben
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Scott Kostyshak
I find, from experience, that the best thing you can do is learn biblatex.
Is this something you are willing to do? It has a very steep learning curve
but is very well documented and supported. Your problem is trivially solved
as well. Lyx can also use biblatex with a small amount of work that
I find, from experience, that the best thing you can do is learn biblatex.
Is this something you are willing to do? It has a very steep learning curve
but is very well documented and supported. Your problem is trivially solved
as well. Lyx can also use biblatex with a small amount of work that
I find, from experience, that the best thing you can do is learn biblatex.
Is this something you are willing to do? It has a very steep learning curve
but is very well documented and supported. Your problem is trivially solved
as well. Lyx can also use biblatex with a small amount of work that
If you have generated the tex file in Stata, use ERT. It is much easier.
The command you want to look up is \input as in \input{table.tex}. This is
the only way I generate, edit, and include tables now. This should also be
the command that lyx uses... either that or include but I assume input
If you have generated the tex file in Stata, use ERT. It is much easier.
The command you want to look up is \input as in \input{table.tex}. This is
the only way I generate, edit, and include tables now. This should also be
the command that lyx uses... either that or include but I assume input
If you have generated the tex file in Stata, use ERT. It is much easier.
The command you want to look up is \input as in \input{table.tex}. This is
the only way I generate, edit, and include tables now. This should also be
the command that lyx uses... either that or include but I assume input
that should be performed or is it just ad-hoc
testing and report bugs to the channel?
~Ben
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with
known catastrophic
that should be performed or is it just ad-hoc
testing and report bugs to the channel?
~Ben
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@lyx.org wrote:
On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with
known catastrophic
that should be performed or is it just ad-hoc
testing and report bugs to the channel?
~Ben
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Richard Heck <rgh...@lyx.org> wrote:
> On 07/02/2015 03:24 PM, Benedict Holland wrote:
>
>> Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an applica
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known
catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the
2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time
and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when
I have been working with biblatex now for over a year. It is exceptionally
complex. It might actually be too complex to automate. I can't even think
up a decent UI to present the hundreds of different configuration options,
and there are probably even more than I use. The documentation alone is
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known
catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the
2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time
and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when
I have been working with biblatex now for over a year. It is exceptionally
complex. It might actually be too complex to automate. I can't even think
up a decent UI to present the hundreds of different configuration options,
and there are probably even more than I use. The documentation alone is
Just curious, why are we testing old versions of an application with known
catastrophic bugs? Wasn't the uncorrupted save feature implemented in the
2.1 branch? Also, I have been using the 2.1.3 exclusively for a long time
and I admit that I am a power user. It is stable as anything I use and when
I have been working with biblatex now for over a year. It is exceptionally
complex. It might actually be too complex to automate. I can't even think
up a decent UI to present the hundreds of different configuration options,
and there are probably even more than I use. The documentation alone is
I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at
parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone
would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex
documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex
I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at
parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone
would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex
documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex
I have to plug emacs for native lyx support. That application is awesome at
parsing raw Latex. As Richard said, this is the antithesis of why anyone
would use Lyx. I have become a huge fan of seamlessly integrating my latex
documents, mostly tables, using the input command and editing the .tex
I do not know about multiple versions but I can say that typing in 3 dashes
will produce an em-dash and 2 dashes will produce an en-dash. I would be so
bold as to say that if this works other than expected it would be a bug. It
is also possible that multiple versions of the same character will be
I do not know about multiple versions but I can say that typing in 3 dashes
will produce an em-dash and 2 dashes will produce an en-dash. I would be so
bold as to say that if this works other than expected it would be a bug. It
is also possible that multiple versions of the same character will be
I do not know about multiple versions but I can say that typing in 3 dashes
will produce an em-dash and 2 dashes will produce an en-dash. I would be so
bold as to say that if this works other than expected it would be a bug. It
is also possible that multiple versions of the same character will be
It is my understanding that if a selected font has math characters with it,
that will automatically be used. Most fonts do not so it falls back to the
default. There are a series of default options which are quite good and if
it makes you feel better, having greek letters in one font and normal
It is my understanding that if a selected font has math characters with it,
that will automatically be used. Most fonts do not so it falls back to the
default. There are a series of default options which are quite good and if
it makes you feel better, having greek letters in one font and normal
It is my understanding that if a selected font has math characters with it,
that will automatically be used. Most fonts do not so it falls back to the
default. There are a series of default options which are quite good and if
it makes you feel better, having greek letters in one font and normal
Hi everyone,
I am going to take a strong line on this one and say it works as designed
and the design is very well done. The reason for is it that you do have
references and labels, under the table, that lyx is managing for you. You
have an equation, you number the question, you label the
Hello,
So you want to label each of the lines in order? If you are in the math
environment, right click and select Displayed Formula. That will center
the entire math block. Then you can right click and number the whole
formula or each line. It is true that it will not number each line 1-4 and
Hi everyone,
I am going to take a strong line on this one and say it works as designed
and the design is very well done. The reason for is it that you do have
references and labels, under the table, that lyx is managing for you. You
have an equation, you number the question, you label the
Hello,
So you want to label each of the lines in order? If you are in the math
environment, right click and select Displayed Formula. That will center
the entire math block. Then you can right click and number the whole
formula or each line. It is true that it will not number each line 1-4 and
Hi everyone,
I am going to take a strong line on this one and say it works as designed
and the design is very well done. The reason for is it that you do have
references and labels, under the table, that lyx is managing for you. You
have an equation, you number the question, you label the
Hello,
So you want to label each of the lines in order? If you are in the math
environment, right click and select "Displayed Formula". That will center
the entire math block. Then you can right click and number the whole
formula or each line. It is true that it will not number each line 1-4 and
,backend=biber]{biblatex}
Should I modify something?
Thank you
Jess
Benedict Holland benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com
5. Februar 2015 17:55
In that case, can you post your call to biblatex located in the preamble?
~Ben
jezZiFeR jezzi...@gmail.com
5. Februar 2015 12:49
Hello Ben,
yes, I
,backend=biber]{biblatex}
Should I modify something?
Thank you
Jess
Benedict Holland benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com
5. Februar 2015 17:55
In that case, can you post your call to biblatex located in the preamble?
~Ben
jezZiFeR jezzi...@gmail.com
5. Februar 2015 12:49
Hello Ben,
yes, I
pageref=true,idemtracker=false,backend=biber]{biblatex}
>
> Should I modify something?
>
> Thank you
> Jess
>
> Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com>
> 5. Februar 2015 17:55
> In that case, can you post your call to biblatex located in the preamble?
>
>
Benedict Holland benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com
4. Februar 2015 17:56
Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
which you need, perhaps biber is an option you want?
~Ben
jezZiFeR jezzi
Benedict Holland benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com
4. Februar 2015 17:56
Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
which you need, perhaps biber is an option you want?
~Ben
jezZiFeR jezzi
ng biber.
>
> Best
> Jess
>
>
>
>
> Benedict Holland <benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com>
> 4. Februar 2015 17:56
> Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
> bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
> w
Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
which you need, perhaps biber is an option you want?
~Ben
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, jezZiFeR jezzi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a
Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
which you need, perhaps biber is an option you want?
~Ben
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, jezZiFeR jezzi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a
Are you using biblatex and biber as a backend? I don't think bibtex and
bibtex8 displays URLs by default. Biber does however. If this is something
which you need, perhaps biber is an option you want?
~Ben
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 12:18 PM, jezZiFeR wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have
, Benedict Holland
benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Francesco Menoncin
francesco.menon...@unibs.it wrote:
Hello Benedict,
thank you for your answer.
I give you an example about how R is difficult for dealing with
matrices: if in Matlab (or Scilab or Octave
, Benedict Holland
benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Francesco Menoncin
francesco.menon...@unibs.it wrote:
Hello Benedict,
thank you for your answer.
I give you an example about how R is difficult for dealing with
matrices: if in Matlab (or Scilab or Octave
, at 2:56 PM, Benedict Holland <
> benedict.m.holl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Francesco Menoncin <
> francesco.menon...@unibs.it> wrote:
> > Hello Benedict,
> > thank you for your answer.
> > I give you an example about how
R is not so easy to use for big matrix computations? This is a first for
me. R is extremely efficient at dealing with matrices. If you have huge
matrices, I don't think it would perform much better than anything else. If
you need sparse matrix functionality, R comes with it built in. Python is
matrix.
I find all this very inefficient for dealig with matrices.
This is my point :-)
Francesco
Il 25/01/2015 22:25, Benedict Holland ha scritto:
R is not so easy to use for big matrix computations? This is a first for
me. R is extremely efficient at dealing with matrices. If you have huge
R is not so easy to use for big matrix computations? This is a first for
me. R is extremely efficient at dealing with matrices. If you have huge
matrices, I don't think it would perform much better than anything else. If
you need sparse matrix functionality, R comes with it built in. Python is
matrix.
I find all this very inefficient for dealig with matrices.
This is my point :-)
Francesco
Il 25/01/2015 22:25, Benedict Holland ha scritto:
R is not so easy to use for big matrix computations? This is a first for
me. R is extremely efficient at dealing with matrices. If you have huge
R is not so easy to use for big matrix computations? This is a first for
me. R is extremely efficient at dealing with matrices. If you have huge
matrices, I don't think it would perform much better than anything else. If
you need sparse matrix functionality, R comes with it built in. Python is
rite:
>
> x(3,1)=5
>
> and I obtain the matrix:
>
> [0 0
> 0 10
> 5 0]
>
> while in R I cannot do that, because x has already been defined as a 2 by
> 2 matrix.
> I find all this very inefficient for dealig with matrices.
> This is my point :-)
>
> Francesco
Be very careful when viewing Beamer presentations with anything other than
Adobe. I have found that the presentations never display correctly and when
giving a presentation, it is almost a guarantee that you will be presenting
on Adobe. If you are not using Beamer, anything else should work. I
possible that there is a bug with lyx if this occurs. BTW, I have no
affiliation with Adobe at all but everyone uses it and if I don't use it, I
can easily run into problems where it will view in one browser but not in
others. I can't afford that issue.
~Ben
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Benedict
Be very careful when viewing Beamer presentations with anything other than
Adobe. I have found that the presentations never display correctly and when
giving a presentation, it is almost a guarantee that you will be presenting
on Adobe. If you are not using Beamer, anything else should work. I
possible that there is a bug with lyx if this occurs. BTW, I have no
affiliation with Adobe at all but everyone uses it and if I don't use it, I
can easily run into problems where it will view in one browser but not in
others. I can't afford that issue.
~Ben
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Benedict
Be very careful when viewing Beamer presentations with anything other than
Adobe. I have found that the presentations never display correctly and when
giving a presentation, it is almost a guarantee that you will be presenting
on Adobe. If you are not using Beamer, anything else should work. I
possible that there is a bug with lyx if this occurs. BTW, I have no
affiliation with Adobe at all but everyone uses it and if I don't use it, I
can easily run into problems where it will view in one browser but not in
others. I can't afford that issue.
~Ben
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Benedict
I use dropbox for something similar. That also means that your .lyx folder
should also be on there and any changes you make to the default
configuration are synced.
~Ben
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote:
Den 25. sep. 2014 12:06, skrev Renato Pontefice:
I use dropbox for something similar. That also means that your .lyx folder
should also be on there and any changes you make to the default
configuration are synced.
~Ben
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Helge Hafting helge.haft...@hist.no wrote:
Den 25. sep. 2014 12:06, skrev Renato Pontefice:
I use dropbox for something similar. That also means that your .lyx folder
should also be on there and any changes you make to the default
configuration are synced.
~Ben
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> Den 25. sep. 2014 12:06, skrev Renato
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For my example,
\usepackage[
uniquename=false,
uniquelist=false,
maxcitenames=2,
mincitenames=1,
maxbibnames=200,
minbibnames=1,
natbib=true,
url=false,
doi=false,
isbn=false,
eprint=false,
backref=false,
backend=biber,
I would say that what could go wrong is your references might need to be
cleaned up. I know that was the huge shift for me. The major difference
(and in my opinion a terrible decision) is that biblatex assumed that your
bib file is valid latex code. That means that all reserved characters are
You might have to get your configuration with ERT. I find a lot of
formatting is complicated with koma. You could also play around with your
din.lco file. That is where all of the spacing is defined unless
overridden. I might suggest an ERT of \raggedright with the includeimage
command. It is hard
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that particular
style though? If this is only for one journal, modification of style files
would not only be overkill, but would impact future work in unexpected
ways. To get the desired results, it would be best to limit it to document
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For my example,
\usepackage[
uniquename=false,
uniquelist=false,
maxcitenames=2,
mincitenames=1,
maxbibnames=200,
minbibnames=1,
natbib=true,
url=false,
doi=false,
isbn=false,
eprint=false,
backref=false,
backend=biber,
I would say that what could go wrong is your references might need to be
cleaned up. I know that was the huge shift for me. The major difference
(and in my opinion a terrible decision) is that biblatex assumed that your
bib file is valid latex code. That means that all reserved characters are
You might have to get your configuration with ERT. I find a lot of
formatting is complicated with koma. You could also play around with your
din.lco file. That is where all of the spacing is defined unless
overridden. I might suggest an ERT of \raggedright with the includeimage
command. It is hard
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that particular
style though? If this is only for one journal, modification of style files
would not only be overkill, but would impact future work in unexpected
ways. To get the desired results, it would be best to limit it to document
You should use biblatex. It has the ability to do this. For my example,
\usepackage[
uniquename=false,
uniquelist=false,
maxcitenames=2,
mincitenames=1,
maxbibnames=200,
minbibnames=1,
natbib=true,
url=false,
doi=false,
isbn=false,
eprint=false,
backref=false,
backend=biber,
I would say that what could go wrong is your references might need to be
cleaned up. I know that was the huge shift for me. The major difference
(and in my opinion a terrible decision) is that biblatex assumed that your
bib file is valid latex code. That means that all reserved characters are
You might have to get your configuration with ERT. I find a lot of
formatting is complicated with koma. You could also play around with your
din.lco file. That is where all of the spacing is defined unless
overridden. I might suggest an ERT of \raggedright with the includeimage
command. It is hard
Wouldn't that change the default for every document using that particular
style though? If this is only for one journal, modification of style files
would not only be overkill, but would impact future work in unexpected
ways. To get the desired results, it would be best to limit it to document
You want to use a package called fancyhdr.
This code will put the page number at the bottom left on odd numbered pages
and right on even numbered pages.
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\fancyhf{} %clears everything
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} %make header line 0 width
You want to use a package called fancyhdr.
This code will put the page number at the bottom left on odd numbered pages
and right on even numbered pages.
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\fancyhf{} %clears everything
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} %make header line 0 width
You want to use a package called fancyhdr.
This code will put the page number at the bottom left on odd numbered pages
and right on even numbered pages.
\usepackage{fancyhdr}
\fancyhf{} %clears everything
\renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt} %make header line 0 width
Hi,
You want to use komascript2. http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/KomaLetter2
You also want to look up how to modify the .lco files from koma. This is
the local file which will determine different margins. This is not
trivial to do and I found that is requires a great amount of tinkering to
get
Hi,
You want to use komascript2. http://wiki.lyx.org/Examples/KomaLetter2
You also want to look up how to modify the .lco files from koma. This is
the local file which will determine different margins. This is not
trivial to do and I found that is requires a great amount of tinkering to
get
1 - 100 of 185 matches
Mail list logo