edu Gpl wrote:
> Dear Paul, lyx users
>
> please how i can add differents bullts in the same document ?
> Example: in attachment files i used main documnts with bullts (shape =
> dots), and child documents "exam" with bullts (shape = square), but when i
> generated pdf file, i got all the bullts
Riccardo wrote:
> Hello,
> I have the following configuration:
>
>
>- texlive-full (including texlive-bibtex-extra) from unofficial
>ppa:jonathonf/texlive-2016
>- biber 2.5
>- Lyx 2.2.1 from ppa:lyx-devel/release
>
>
> After the last update, LyX show me a compatibility error
John Kane wrote:
> Is there any relatively simple way to implement the Chicago Manual of
> Style's full reference in a footnote style?
You should use BibLaTeX with the Chicago style
https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago
>
> I saw a reference to \footcite in LaTex but a) it's not clear to
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Knowing what went wrong, why are you doing it again?
> Simply remove your local copy of cua.bind. Lyx will use the system
> version.
>
Of course.
Charles
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> 2.2.0 packages are now available on the PPA, including for 16.04:
> https://launchpad.net/~lyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release
>
> Please report on the list if you encounter any issues with the packaging.
>
Thank you Liviu for the packages !
I have updated LyX on Ubuntu
Laura Schröder wrote:
> Hello! Im a very beginner in lyx. I started to write a
> document, and after some time, I wanted to get the PDF preview, but I got
> the error message: LaTex error: eqdistribution undefined
>
>
> LaTex error: pagedeclaration undefined
>
>
> LaTex error: nomname
> Hello Lyx,
>
>
> Im having a problem when using threeparttablex with longtables. In order
> to see the table I am working with, I have chosen to use ERT code to
> \begin{ThreePartTable} and then \begin{TableNotes} \end{TableNotes}
> etc then ive inserted a table and made it a long table.
Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I have probably chosen
> InBook
> wrongly or added the editor at the wrong place.
>
Inbook is to cite a chapter in a book written by an author : W. Engelmann,
"My first and best chapter", My Big Book, Hamburg 2015, S. 10-50
Incollection for an article in a
Maria Gouskova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Elsevier wants me to create a .tex file for them that uses
Arial--a
> non-TeX font. When I go to make the PDF using XeTeX, I get
the LaTeX
> error "Command \sups already defined".
>
> A bit of digging suggests this is because of an
incompatibility
>
Michael Berger wrote:
Needles to say that I have studied all issue related comments I could
find. Is somebody out there with a resolution?
Biblatex uses the package url to format and print urls. In the file
biblatex.def, you will find options made by biblatex to break long urls. The
code
Michael Berger wrote:
> Needles to say that I have studied all issue related comments I could
> find. Is somebody out there with a resolution?
>
Biblatex uses the package url to format and print urls. In the file
biblatex.def, you will find options made by biblatex to break long urls. The
Rich Shepard wrote:
elsarticle-harv and clicked the OK button. The status line reported the
document was being reformatted. After saving, I compiled it using
pdflatex. But, the bibliography is still in author-title format with the
year at the end.
It seems that elsarticle bst file works
Rich Shepard wrote:
elsarticle-harv and clicked the OK button. The status line reported the
document was being reformatted. After saving, I compiled it using
pdflatex. But, the bibliography is still in author-title format with the
year at the end.
It seems that elsarticle bst file works
Rich Shepard wrote:
> elsarticle-harv and clicked the "OK" button. The status line reported the
> document was being reformatted. After saving, I compiled it using
> pdflatex. But, the bibliography is still in author-title format with the
> year at the end.
>
It seems that elsarticle bst file
It looks like a mismatch between the paper size of your pdf and the one in
your printer.
C.
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your
bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with
natbib, it is much more difficult.
Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to
check that you have all what is needed
It looks like a mismatch between the paper size of your pdf and the one in
your printer.
C.
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your
bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with
natbib, it is much more difficult.
Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to
check that you have all what is needed
It looks like a mismatch between the paper size of your pdf and the one in
your printer.
C.
You should really switch to biblatex. It is the way to fine tune your
bibliography and make certain fields appear or not. If you stick with
natbib, it is much more difficult.
Try to compile the examples in the biblatex package from the command line to
check that you have all what is needed
Hello,
I'm trying to get opening and closing single quotes correct.
I'm typing in my Lyx file : 'This must be printed between single quotes' and
I get
\textquoteright This must be printed between single quotes \textquoteright
when I want
\textquoteleft This must be printed between single
Thank you Jürgen.
Following your recommendation, I have added in the preamble :
\usepackage[style=french]{csquotes}
\MakeInnerQuote{¬}
\DeclareQuoteStyle[quotes]{french}
{\mkfrenchopenquote{\guillemotleft}}
{\mkfrenchclosequote{\guillemotright}}
{\textquoteleft}
{\textquoteright}
and
Hello,
I'm trying to get opening and closing single quotes correct.
I'm typing in my Lyx file : 'This must be printed between single quotes' and
I get
\textquoteright This must be printed between single quotes \textquoteright
when I want
\textquoteleft This must be printed between single
Thank you Jürgen.
Following your recommendation, I have added in the preamble :
\usepackage[style=french]{csquotes}
\MakeInnerQuote{¬}
\DeclareQuoteStyle[quotes]{french}
{\mkfrenchopenquote{\guillemotleft}}
{\mkfrenchclosequote{\guillemotright}}
{\textquoteleft}
{\textquoteright}
and
Hello,
I'm trying to get opening and closing single quotes correct.
I'm typing in my Lyx file : 'This must be printed between single quotes' and
I get
\textquoteright This must be printed between single quotes \textquoteright
when I want
\textquoteleft This must be printed between single
Thank you Jürgen.
Following your recommendation, I have added in the preamble :
\usepackage[style=french]{csquotes}
\MakeInnerQuote{¬}
\DeclareQuoteStyle[quotes]{french}
{\mkfrenchopenquote{\guillemotleft}}
{\mkfrenchclosequote{\guillemotright}}
{\textquoteleft}
{\textquoteright}
and
Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
Hi Prannoy,
I use, praise (and sometimes curse) Tex4ht to convert lyx/latex
files
to odt and msword.
Tex4ht is a powerful software but complex and fragile. In the many
years, I have been using Tex4ht, I have found that :
- The overloading of the latex macros that
Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
Hi Prannoy,
I use, praise (and sometimes curse) Tex4ht to convert lyx/latex
files
to odt and msword.
Tex4ht is a powerful software but complex and fragile. In the many
years, I have been using Tex4ht, I have found that :
- The overloading of the latex macros that
Prannoy Pilligundla wrote:
Hi Prannoy,
I use, praise (and sometimes curse) Tex4ht to convert lyx/latex
files
to odt and msword.
Tex4ht is a powerful software but complex and fragile. In the many
years, I have been using Tex4ht, I have found that :
- The overloading of the latex macros that
rgheck wrote:
It'd be nice to hear precisely what people would want that version
control does not provide. I have a hard time myself seeing why it is any
more than an isn't that cool feature for two people simultaneously to
edit a single document. I.e., fun, but hardly revolutionary as far as
rgheck wrote:
It'd be nice to hear precisely what people would want that version
control does not provide. I have a hard time myself seeing why it is any
more than an isn't that cool feature for two people simultaneously to
edit a single document. I.e., fun, but hardly revolutionary as far as
rgheck wrote:
> It'd be nice to hear precisely what people would want that version
> control does not provide. I have a hard time myself seeing why it is any
> more than an "isn't that cool" feature for two people simultaneously to
> edit a single document. I.e., fun, but hardly revolutionary as
Piero wrote:
I *think* that the issue is originated by some wrong use of auxiliary
files in LyX, but please help me solve this.
When the biblatex styles creates some op. cit, ibid., etc. it needs a new
latex run ro get the cross-references right. LyX does not understand that.
Maybe in the
Piero wrote:
I *think* that the issue is originated by some wrong use of auxiliary
files in LyX, but please help me solve this.
When the biblatex styles creates some op. cit, ibid., etc. it needs a new
latex run ro get the cross-references right. LyX does not understand that.
Maybe in the
Piero wrote:
>
> I *think* that the issue is originated by some wrong use of auxiliary
> files in LyX, but please help me solve this.
When the biblatex styles creates some op. cit, ibid., etc. it needs a new
latex run ro get the cross-references right. LyX does not understand that.
Maybe in
Νίκος Αλεξανδρής wrote:
Please, let me know if I am doing something wrong, or forgot an
important package to install.
apt-get install tex4ht latex2rtf
At some point the tex4ht package in Debian was not working but now it is in
good shape, I think.
Nevertheless tex4ht is a complex and
Νίκος Αλεξανδρής wrote:
Please, let me know if I am doing something wrong, or forgot an
important package to install.
apt-get install tex4ht latex2rtf
At some point the tex4ht package in Debian was not working but now it is in
good shape, I think.
Nevertheless tex4ht is a complex and
Νίκος Αλεξανδρής wrote:
> Please, let me know if I am doing something wrong, or forgot an
> important package to install.
>
apt-get install tex4ht latex2rtf
At some point the tex4ht package in Debian was not working but now it is in
good shape, I think.
Nevertheless tex4ht is a complex and
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Just an untested idea: Have you tried (mis-)using the note field for
this purpose?
@book {...
note={\includegraphics{...}}
}
Yes but the lists of references is basically a list and if you include a
graphics at the end of an item of the list, LaTeX is going to do
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
Just an untested idea: Have you tried (mis-)using the note field for
this purpose?
@book {...
note={\includegraphics{...}}
}
Yes but the lists of references is basically a list and if you include a
graphics at the end of an item of the list, LaTeX is going to do
Daniel Lohmann wrote:
> Just an untested idea: Have you tried (mis-)using the "note" field for
> this purpose?
>
> @book {...
>
> note={\includegraphics{...}}
> }
>
Yes but the lists of references is basically a list and if you include a
graphics at the end of an item of the list, LaTeX is
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of applying color to a footnote mark while keeping the
footnote itself black? That is, the superscript number in white with
colored background (inside a longtable) and the footnote (outside the
table) in black.
I've tried with footmisc, but I
M. C. Sunny Wong wrote:
Dear LyX Users:
Would you please let me know if there is anyway to make the footnotes to
be 12-font-size and double-spaced?
If you use KomaScript, look the documentation. Basically, you must add
something like \setkomafont{footnotes}{@)for changing the font of the
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
Something like this:
\deffootnotemark{\textsuperscript{\colorbox{red}%
{\textcolor{white}{\thefootnotemark
in the preamble. Use koma-script class.
Yago and Charles,
Thanks for your help. I think I'll need something more refined, though.
The
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way of applying color to a footnote mark while keeping the
footnote itself black? That is, the superscript number in white with
colored background (inside a longtable) and the footnote (outside the
table) in black.
I've tried with footmisc, but I
M. C. Sunny Wong wrote:
Dear LyX Users:
Would you please let me know if there is anyway to make the footnotes to
be 12-font-size and double-spaced?
If you use KomaScript, look the documentation. Basically, you must add
something like \setkomafont{footnotes}{@)for changing the font of the
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
Something like this:
\deffootnotemark{\textsuperscript{\colorbox{red}%
{\textcolor{white}{\thefootnotemark
in the preamble. Use koma-script class.
Yago and Charles,
Thanks for your help. I think I'll need something more refined, though.
The
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a way of applying color to a footnote mark while keeping the
> footnote itself black? That is, the superscript number in white with
> colored background (inside a longtable) and the footnote (outside the
> table) in black.
>
> I've tried with footmisc,
M. C. Sunny Wong wrote:
> Dear LyX Users:
>
> Would you please let me know if there is anyway to make the footnotes to
> be 12-font-size and double-spaced?
>
If you use KomaScript, look the documentation. Basically, you must add
something like \setkomafont{footnotes}{@)for changing the font
Miguel Rubio-Roy wrote:
>> Something like this:
>>
>> \deffootnotemark{\textsuperscript{\colorbox{red}%
>> {\textcolor{white}{\thefootnotemark
>>
>> in the preamble. Use koma-script class.
>
>
> Yago and Charles,
> Thanks for your help. I think I'll need something more refined, though.
>
Marshall Feldman wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting a project for which LyX appears to be the best choice, but
I have a few questions related to getting started. I'd prefer to ask
them now and start doing things the right way rather than find out six
months from now that I have to go back and change
Marshall Feldman wrote:
Hi,
I'm starting a project for which LyX appears to be the best choice, but
I have a few questions related to getting started. I'd prefer to ask
them now and start doing things the right way rather than find out six
months from now that I have to go back and change
Marshall Feldman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting a project for which LyX appears to be the best choice, but
> I have a few questions related to getting started. I'd prefer to ask
> them now and start doing things the right way rather than find out six
> months from now that I have to go back and
sara teinturier wrote:
Thanks Charles, I've taken away the first two lines, now Bibliographie
title appears as the good French word... I use the TeXlive packages for
Ubuntu 9.04: csquotes package is an outdated version.
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/433493)
sara teinturier wrote:
Thanks Charles, I've taken away the first two lines, now Bibliographie
title appears as the good French word... I use the TeXlive packages for
Ubuntu 9.04: csquotes package is an outdated version.
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-extra/+bug/433493)
sara teinturier wrote:
>
> Thanks Charles, I've taken away the first two lines, now "Bibliographie"
> title appears as the good French word... I use the TeXlive packages for
> Ubuntu 9.04: csquotes package is an outdated version.
>
Piero wrote:
But you're true, I would love to know how
to create a style of mine with less effort and low programming skills.
1) In your local tex directory (here /usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex/)
create a new directory for example Faustini
2) In Faustini create 2 sub-directories a) cbx b)
Piero wrote:
But you're true, I would love to know how
to create a style of mine with less effort and low programming skills.
1) In your local tex directory (here /usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex/)
create a new directory for example Faustini
2) In Faustini create 2 sub-directories a) cbx b)
Piero wrote:
But you're true, I would love to know how
> to create a style of mine with less effort and low programming skills.
1) In your local tex directory (here /usr/local/share/texmf/tex/latex/)
create a new directory for example Faustini
2) In Faustini create 2 sub-directories a) cbx b)
Antonio Díaz wrote:
Someone knows how can i do the multiple bibliographies with the biblatex
package?
Yes, it is possible. Read the biblatex manual. There are several options
depending on your needs.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Luca De Marini wrote:
And as I said, of course I know Scribus is a better toy for this kind of
work. The interesting thing for me is pushing Lyx to the limit, see if it
can do this work, see if it will make the whole process of writing a
manual such a pain that using Scribus would be better
Antonio Díaz wrote:
Someone knows how can i do the multiple bibliographies with the biblatex
package?
Yes, it is possible. Read the biblatex manual. There are several options
depending on your needs.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Luca De Marini wrote:
And as I said, of course I know Scribus is a better toy for this kind of
work. The interesting thing for me is pushing Lyx to the limit, see if it
can do this work, see if it will make the whole process of writing a
manual such a pain that using Scribus would be better
Antonio Díaz wrote:
> Someone knows how can i do the multiple bibliographies with the biblatex
> package?
>
Yes, it is possible. Read the biblatex manual. There are several options
depending on your needs.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Luca De Marini wrote:
> And as I said, of course I know Scribus is a better toy for this kind of
> work. The interesting thing for me is pushing Lyx to the limit, see if it
> can do this work, see if it will make the whole process of writing a
> manual such a pain that using Scribus would be
Olivier Vilaça wrote:
Any idea about what is going wrong? Thanks!
It looks like aspell cannot find the French dictionary. Try 'aspell' from a
terminal, it should list the dictionary installed.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Olivier Vilaça wrote:
Any idea about what is going wrong? Thanks!
It looks like aspell cannot find the French dictionary. Try 'aspell' from a
terminal, it should list the dictionary installed.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Olivier Vilaça wrote:
> Any idea about what is going wrong? Thanks!
It looks like aspell cannot find the French dictionary. Try 'aspell' from a
terminal, it should list the dictionary installed.
Cheers,
Charles
--
http://www.kde-france.org
Marcelo Reis wrote:
/Yes, Maybe I should try another way but since I spend a lot of time
using JabRef, creating the Bib Files and other things I was trying first
to solve this frustrating issue :-(
Hope some one give me an idea.
Thanks
/
natbib will work with your bib file done in
Marcelo Reis wrote:
I've sent the files directly to Kosta Welke and Charles de Miramon,
I'm not sure how to send the files directly to the mail-list (I tried
renaming the zip file to zip_, Txt - but the List was blocking) so If
any other wants the examples files illustrating the problem
Marcelo Reis wrote:
Charles de Miramon wrote:
Marcelo Reis wrote:
A quick lokk at your problem seems to reveal that natbib is not
compatible with apalike or apalike2. Either you suppress the natbib
option and get back to plain bibtex but the formatting of the citation in
the bibliography
Marcelo Reis wrote:
/Yes, Maybe I should try another way but since I spend a lot of time
using JabRef, creating the Bib Files and other things I was trying first
to solve this frustrating issue :-(
Hope some one give me an idea.
Thanks
/
natbib will work with your bib file done in
Marcelo Reis wrote:
I've sent the files directly to Kosta Welke and Charles de Miramon,
I'm not sure how to send the files directly to the mail-list (I tried
renaming the zip file to zip_, Txt - but the List was blocking) so If
any other wants the examples files illustrating the problem
Marcelo Reis wrote:
Charles de Miramon wrote:
Marcelo Reis wrote:
A quick lokk at your problem seems to reveal that natbib is not
compatible with apalike or apalike2. Either you suppress the natbib
option and get back to plain bibtex but the formatting of the citation in
the bibliography
Marcelo Reis wrote:
> /Yes, Maybe I should try another way but since I spend a lot of time
> using JabRef, creating the Bib Files and other things I was trying first
> to solve this frustrating issue :-(
> Hope some one give me an idea.
> Thanks
> /
>>
natbib will work with your bib file done
Marcelo Reis wrote:
>>
> I've sent the files directly to Kosta Welke and Charles de Miramon,
> I'm not sure how to send the files directly to the mail-list (I tried
> renaming the zip file to zip_, Txt - but the List was blocking) so If
> any other wants the examples
Marcelo Reis wrote:
> Charles de Miramon wrote:
>> Marcelo Reis wrote:
>>
>> A quick lokk at your problem seems to reveal that natbib is not
>> compatible with apalike or apalike2. Either you suppress the natbib
>> option and get back to plain bibtex b
Mario Paul wrote:
Hi,
on an Ubuntu Linux 9.04 with Lyx 1.62 using document class koma-script
article and biblatex I have the following problem:
- everything works fine as long as I _dont_ insert the
\printbibliography command.
- when I insert \printbibliography in lyx via ERT I get an
Mario Paul wrote:
Hi,
on an Ubuntu Linux 9.04 with Lyx 1.62 using document class koma-script
article and biblatex I have the following problem:
- everything works fine as long as I _dont_ insert the
\printbibliography command.
- when I insert \printbibliography in lyx via ERT I get an
Mario Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on an Ubuntu Linux 9.04 with Lyx 1.62 using document class "koma-script
> article" and biblatex I have the following problem:
>
> - everything works fine as long as I _dont_ insert the
> "\printbibliography" command.
>
> - when I insert "\printbibliography" in lyx
Piero Faustini wrote:
Thanks.
There's already a issue open in BibLaTeX:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detailaid=2460100group_id=244752atid=1126005
The issue is about the DVI and PDF output differ. In fact, I also get the
wrong upper caps after a dot in a PDF, while it is OK in
Piero Faustini wrote:
Thanks.
There's already a issue open in BibLaTeX:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
func=detailaid=2460100group_id=244752atid=1126005
The issue is about the DVI and PDF output differ. In fact, I also get the
wrong upper caps after a dot in a PDF, while it is OK in
Piero Faustini wrote:
>
> Thanks.
> There's already a issue open in BibLaTeX:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?
> func=detail=2460100_id=244752=1126005
>
> The issue is about the DVI and PDF output differ. In fact, I also get the
> wrong upper caps after a dot in a PDF, while it is OK in DVI.
Piero Faustini wrote:
I find very annoying the fact that when citing with the verbose-trad
styles of BibLaTeX and it switches to latinitates like Id. and Ibid.,
LaTeX can't get it to have the correct upper/lower case (I bet this is NOT
a BibLaTeX issue, but a LaTeX problem):
- When citing at
Piero Faustini wrote:
I find very annoying the fact that when citing with the verbose-trad
styles of BibLaTeX and it switches to latinitates like Id. and Ibid.,
LaTeX can't get it to have the correct upper/lower case (I bet this is NOT
a BibLaTeX issue, but a LaTeX problem):
- When citing at
Piero Faustini wrote:
> I find very annoying the fact that when citing with the verbose-trad
> styles of BibLaTeX and it switches to latinitates like "Id." and "Ibid.",
> LaTeX can't get it to have the correct upper/lower case (I bet this is NOT
> a BibLaTeX issue, but a LaTeX problem):
> - When
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not
Richard Heck wrote:
Dan Fitch wrote:
1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
make a cross reference to a section or subsection, without adding a
label? So the user might say As defined in s. 10.91 without having
to go to section 10.91 and adding a label?
Not
Richard Heck wrote:
> Dan Fitch wrote:
>> 1. The new hyperref stuff in 1.6 is very slick. Is there any way to
>> make a "cross reference" to a section or subsection, without adding a
>> label? So the user might say "As defined in s. 10.91" without having
>> to go to section 10.91 and adding a
stefano franchi wrote:
On the other hand:
* LyX produces glorious output--through LaTex---but that's not that
important to me, because no one in my field would accept a LaTex file. In
fact I doubt they would even know what it is. And they would not accept a
camera-ready file either. Almost
stefano franchi wrote:
On the other hand:
* LyX produces glorious output--through LaTex---but that's not that
important to me, because no one in my field would accept a LaTex file. In
fact I doubt they would even know what it is. And they would not accept a
camera-ready file either. Almost
stefano franchi wrote:
> On the other hand:
>
> * LyX produces glorious output--through LaTex---but that's not that
> important to me, because no one in my field would accept a LaTex file. In
> fact I doubt they would even know what it is. And they would not accept a
> camera-ready file either.
j.asal wrote:
Hi,
I want to write a music theory book with LyX. For musical examples I would
like to use Lilypond, but there seems to be no support for including and
displaying Lilypond snippets (apart from importing whole Lilypond files).
I know that one could use lilypond-book to
j.asal wrote:
Hi,
I want to write a music theory book with LyX. For musical examples I would
like to use Lilypond, but there seems to be no support for including and
displaying Lilypond snippets (apart from importing whole Lilypond files).
I know that one could use lilypond-book to
j.asal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to write a music theory book with LyX. For musical examples I would
> like to use Lilypond, but there seems to be no support for including and
> displaying Lilypond snippets (apart from importing whole Lilypond files).
> I know that one could use lilypond-book
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
I hope LyX will soon have some new features that will ease this
collaboration. As we won't be able to implement everything, it would be
nice to know which feature would satisfy most users.
Having just finished editing a book, I think there is two phases
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
I hope LyX will soon have some new features that will ease this
collaboration. As we won't be able to implement everything, it would be
nice to know which feature would satisfy most users.
Having just finished editing a book, I think there is two phases
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> I hope LyX will soon have some new features that will ease this
> collaboration. As we won't be able to implement everything, it would be
> nice to know which feature would satisfy most users.
>
Having just finished editing a book, I think there is two
jezZiFeR wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to enter the \printbibliography-ERT. I also removed
the problem with the false references. Now I at least get an index,
but a totally empty one. It seems, that I have to install the styles
also. I have downloaded this, which should work for me:
jezZiFeR wrote:
If you want to use Dominik Wassenhoven's styles you must also
download and
install them on your computer because, the styles are not included
in the
standard biblatex. But you can do that later...
So it doesn?t matter which style I choose?
In the wiki is mentioned, that I
1 - 100 of 731 matches
Mail list logo
