sable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
I find that in my document (with documentclass report), unless I
disable numbering on all equations, I get the error "\mathrm allowed
only in math mode".
Does anyone know how to fix this issue or work around it to get
equation numbering working in the appendices?
Kuang Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The ONLY difference is that those real display equations created by
> CTRL+SHIFT+M has a larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs,
> which I don't quite look like.
Make sure that the display equation is in the _same_ paragra
Kuang Chen wrote:
Hi, Konrad:
Problem solved. I found the reason seems to be that spacing is big whenever
I want to insert a real display equation in a separate line. However if I
insert it right after a paragraph by ctrl+alt+n, a new box will also show up on
a new line below the
larger spacings away from its adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this,
This is not a good way of doing it (also paragraph indentation beco
spacings away from its
adjacent paragraphs, which I don't quite look like.
Then I found I couldn't number my pseudo-displaystyle equation. So I was
wondering if anyone have any clue about how to do this, or EQUIVALENTLY, how
can I modify the style of real displaystyle equation wh
ht now I have all my equations
numbered but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
Hi,
I use Lyx 1.5.1 on Mac OS. Right now I have all my equations numbered
but the label appears to the far right
of the equation, I'm wondering if its possible to make the label
appear at the far left of the equation.
Thank you very much for your help,
Paulina
th. As I
said, I need the right column to overfill the left one in order to
make the equation fit inside one column of the document.
Anyways, thank you very much.
-
Julio Rojas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Vittorio Zuccala&#
ull for you.
> Bye,
>Vittorio
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I
>> have a problem with some equation arrays that are t
Bye,
Vittorio
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:01 PM, Julio Rojas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I
> have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this
> format. They span over the other column or
Dear all, I'm finishing a paper with the two columned article class. I
have a problem with some equation arrays that are two big for this
format. They span over the other column or over the margins, even with
an smaller font (\scriptstyle). What can I do to solve this problem?
Should I use an
FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
If you're getting equation numbers on the left side, try adding 'reqno'
as a class option in Document -> Settings... -> Document Class.
/Paul
> How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
> LyX 1.6?
Normally (Insert > Math > numberedformula) gives the equation number,
right justified, applicable in many journals and books.
Maybe this is not what you want ?
WAS
Right click and choose "Toggle Labeling/Numbering"
On Nov 24, 2008, at 7:35 AM, FERNANDO DIAZ wrote:
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the
equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad d
Hi:
How can make the equation numbers to appear to the right of the equations in
LyX 1.6?
Thanks!
* Fernando Díaz H, Ph.D. *
Profesor de Economía y Finanzas
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales
Universidad de los Andes
(56 2) 412-9650
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Avda. San
just move the cursor to the end of the first 2 lines, and enter delete.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Erez Yerushalmi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Simple question here.
>
> I want to start with an equation, do the calculation on the right side, and
> end
Dear All,
Simple question here.
I want to start with an equation, do the calculation on the right side, and
end up with the solution and an equation number at the end.
For example,
I begin with insert equation with a number by using cnrl-alt-M
Then I use cnrl-enter to create the next equations
wangyq wrote:
> In AMS book docuement class equation numbers are put on the left of the
> equations by default, such as
>
> (1.2.9) a+b=c
>
>
> I think the style is ugly. How the put it on the right, such as ?
>
>
> a+b=c (1.2.9)
>
In AMS book docuement class equation numbers are put on the left of the
equations by default, such as
(1.2.9) a+b=c
I think the style is ugly. How the put it on the right, such as ?
a+b=c (1.2.9)
Many thanks!!
2008-09-13
wangyq
Renaud Lacour wrote:
Le mardi 02 septembre 2008, Paul A. Rubin a écrit :
Renaud Lacour wrote:
Hello,
I would like to achieve the following example.
Assume I number a given equation in a LyX document with the tag
"eq:property" and the resulting number is "n". Then
Le mardi 02 septembre 2008, Paul A. Rubin a écrit :
> Renaud Lacour wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to achieve the following example.
> >
> > Assume I number a given equation in a LyX document with the tag
> > "eq:property" and the resu
Renaud Lacour wrote:
Hello,
I would like to achieve the following example.
Assume I number a given equation in a LyX document with the tag
"eq:property" and the resulting number is "n". Then after some text and
equations, I put a slightly modified version of "eq:proper
Hello,
I would like to achieve the following example.
Assume I number a given equation in a LyX document with the tag
"eq:property" and the resulting number is "n". Then after some text and
equations, I put a slightly modified version of "eq:property".
How can
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> This is a known problem and fixed for the next major release LyX 1.6.
As well as the next minor release, 1.5.5.
Jürgen
Neal Becker wrote:
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Neal Becker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to delete a label from an ams align. It was somehow applied
to
the first equation of the set instead of the entire set.
I can't seem to figure out a
Bob Lounsbury wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Neal Becker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to delete a label from an ams align. It was somehow applied
>> to
>> the first equation of the set instead of the entire set.
>>
>> I
Neal Becker schrieb:
I can't seem to figure out any way to select the label to delete it.
This is a known problem and fixed for the next major release LyX 1.6.
For now, use the method the other user wrote you.
regards Uwe
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to delete a label from an ams align. It was somehow applied to
> the first equation of the set instead of the entire set.
>
> I can't seem to figure out any way to select the label
I'm trying to delete a label from an ams align. It was somehow applied to
the first equation of the set instead of the entire set.
I can't seem to figure out any way to select the label to delete it.
If I ever do, how can I make sure the label is attached to the whole set of
(align
blem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
> preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
>
-
David Hewitt
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16078261.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rrectly in the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
>>
>
>
Ok I have now read that post and it seems that there is currently no
solution to this problem and that its caused somewhere in the instant
preview implementation, or have I misread the post?
--
View this
in LyX?
>
-
David Hewitt
Virginia Institute of Marine Science
http://www.vims.edu/fish/students/dhewitt/
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16073725.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
All my equations in LyX have the number (0.1) but they are shown correctly in
the pdf. But why the same number for all equations in LyX?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Equation--numbering-tp16071319p16071319.html
Sent from the LyX - Users mailing list archive at
CSL schrieb:
I want to have my equations numbered like (section.formula) so I put the
comand
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
in the preambule. I did in a document and it worked.
My problem is that now, I created a new document and it doesn't work.
You have to turn on "amsm
Hi,
I want to have my equations numbered like (section.formula) so I put the
comand
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
in the preambule. I did in a document and it worked.
My problem is that now, I created a new document and it doesn't work. It's
the same type (article) and I write e
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Paul A. Rubin schrieb:
Right. And it should go without saying that anyone who is using math
in LyX should at least have a look at Herbert Voss's comprehensive
guide to math mode:
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf
Just for information for
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Here's an odd thought: perhaps we could include among the help docs
that ship with LyX something that points to "additional LaTeX help"
on the wiki, and then on that page link things like Herbert's math
opus, Scott Pakin's list of
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
Here's an odd thought: perhaps we could include among the help docs
that ship with LyX something that points to "additional LaTeX help" on the
wiki, and then on that page link things like Herbert's math opus, Scott
Pakin's list of LaTeX symbols, etc.
Paul A. Rubin schrieb:
Right. And it should go without saying that anyone who is using math
in LyX should at least have a look at Herbert Voss's comprehensive
guide to math mode:
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf
Just for information for me, what is in ma
Richard Heck wrote:
Right. And it should go without saying that anyone who is using math in
LyX should at least have a look at Herbert Voss's comprehensive guide to
math mode:
ftp://cam.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/math/voss/mathmode/Mathmode.pdf
Agreed. Here's an odd thought: perhaps we c
Siegfried MEUNIER-GUTTIN-CLUZEL wrote:
For long equations, you can use specific environments for multiline
formula.
You can find a lot of informations on the new Math.lyx manual :
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X/lib/doc/Math.lyx
or in PDF
http://wiki.lyx.org/up
For long equations, you can use specific environments for multiline formula.
You can find a lot of informations on the new Math.lyx manual :
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/branches/BRANCH_1_5_X/lib/doc/Math.lyx
or in PDF
http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/LyX/LyXDevelDocumentation/1.5/Math.pdf
Once you are in the math mode, press Ctrl-Enter without inputting anything. By
doing so, you will get two rows of empty boxes. Then, you can choose any box to
input LHS, RHS, and =.
Winson
HI lyx users,
I am writing a rather long equation and I'd like to get the = sign
and the RHS on the next line. When I press Ctrl-Enter a line break is
generated alright but the upper line is left aligned while the lower
line is right aligned. this way the equation is still longer tha
the cells that lyx
creates for the LHS, the "=", and the RHS for that line.
Is there a better way than to create a new multiline equation and copy
over all lines except the invalid ones?
Thanks,
Manoj
Hi all,
If I make a mistake in one line then I don't seem to be able to
remove that line even if I remove all the contents in the cells that lyx
creates for the LHS, the "=", and the RHS for that line.
Is there a better way than to create a new multiline equation and
copy
A. Wehage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 2:24:26 PM
Subject: Increasing the equation and font size for ease of creation
The displayed fonts and symbols are too small, especially when working
with super and subscripts, etc. I have been worki
Roger A. Wehage schrieb:
A related question. I now insert a properly formatted LaTeX display
equation into a Raw TeX Code field, along with an associated Label when
needed. The equation number will display correctly, but when I go to
insert a Cross Reference to that label, it doesn't a
Roger A. Wehage schrieb:
These expressions always display correctly when
pasted into LyX's Raw TeX Code field, but they don't always display
correctly when pasted into a Raw TeX Code field that has been inserted
inside LyX's equation structure.
Yes because LyX's formul
s display
correctly when pasted into a Raw TeX Code field that has been inserted
inside LyX's equation structure.
Here is an example where the LaTeX code always display correctly. The
following code was copied from MathType:
\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c}
{a_b^c } & {a_b^c } &
Tomek wrote:
reqno
thanks a lot.
is there any manual available for this
specific document class ?
tomek
There's documentation for amsmath -- I'm not sure if any of it is
specific to the book class. The reqno option is covered in section 2 of
/doc/latex/amsmath/amsldoc.dvi. If you googl
> reqno
thanks a lot.
is there any manual available for this
specific document class ?
tomek
Tomek wrote:
hallo,
in the ams book class equation numbering is on
the left by default. how to move it to the right
side ?
regards,
tomek
Put 'reqno' (without the quotes) in Document -> Settings -> Document
Class -> Options.
/Paul
hallo,
in the ams book class equation numbering is on
the left by default. how to move it to the right
side ?
regards,
tomek
James schrieb:
I should have mentioned that this is on a Mac. I haven't tried the windows
version...
Then plese file a bug report at
bugzilla.lyx.org
thanks and regards
Uwe
I should have mentioned that this is on a Mac. I haven't tried the windows
version...
On 5/21/07 5:10 PM, "Uwe Stöhr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James schrieb:
>
>> In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
>> preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 1
James schrieb:
In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 150% (the default) to
anything else, the text is resized properly but the equations are not. This
was not a problem in the beta 2 version.
Works for mere o
In 1.50 beta 3, there may be a bug in resizing equations. If I go to
preferences -> screen fonts and change the zoom from 150% (the default) to
anything else, the text is resized properly but the equations are not. This
was not a problem in the beta 2 version.
James
Dan Kaplan wrote:
Dear Lyx Users,
I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite
right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted
paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so
I am
using the stfloats package to
Dan Kaplan wrote:
However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!
Seems
Dear Lyx Users,
I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so I am
using the stfloats package to allow that. Then I
Dan Kaplan wrote:
Dear Lyx Users,
I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines.
So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is
too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE
has the
equation move to the b
Dear Lyx Users,
I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines. So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE has the
equation move to the bottom of the page whe
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Karol Dudzinski wrote:
The minibuffer is a text input field that lets you enter a LyX
command. Alt-X will display the minibuffer at the bottom of the
screen. (Getting rid of it is not so easy. In 1.4.4, you can right
click an empty space in the menu bar and desele
Karol Dudzinski wrote:
The minibuffer is a text input field that lets you enter a LyX command.
Alt-X will display the minibuffer at the bottom of the screen.
(Getting rid of it is not so easy. In 1.4.4, you can right click an
empty space in the menu bar and deselect it. In 1.5.0, you can'
sert new line in numbered equation
Karol Dudzinski wrote:
>
>
> I have a multiline equation that I would like numbered, but I only
> want one number/label for the entire equation. By default, Lyx
> numbers each line separately.
Not so for me, but it probably depends on which
Karol Dudzinski wrote:
I have a multiline equation that I would like numbered, but I only
want one number/label for the entire equation. By default, Lyx
numbers each line separately.
Not so for me, but it probably depends on which class you are using and
which environment for the equation
Hi,
I have a multiline equation that I would like numbered, but I only want one
number/label for the entire equation. By default, Lyx numbers each line
separately. How do I remove the unnecessary numbering? I have looked
around on Google and the best advice I found is “You can turn off
Gerard Ateshian schrieb:
I am trying to put a box around an entire equation written in the AMS
multline environment. Any hints on how I can do that within LyX?
Attached is an example LyX-file. There the calc-package is loaded in the preamble as it's needed to
calculate the frame wid
Hi,
I am trying to put a box around an entire equation written in the AMS
multline environment. Any hints on how I can do that within LyX? By
using the \boxed command, I am only able to put a box around each
line of a multi-line equation, but not around the entire equation.
Any help
Gary wrote:
> Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Richard, maybe I didn't understand what you were saying.
> \renewcommand{\chaptername}{}
> Where am I supposed to add this line? In an ERT box?
>
You can put it in the preamble.
> \renewcommand{\theequati
ion.\arabic{equation}}
This is even less comprehensible. It looks like this code suggests I need to
enter this command somewhere for every equation which is not going to happen.
And arabic?
Sorry guys I am Latex handicapped and I ain't terribly inclined to learn it.
Don't have the time.
thanks,
Gary
more comfortable with the article class where the top level is Section.
> But
> then the equations don't inherit the section number. They are simply numbered
> 1,2,3...
>
Something like:
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\thesection.\arabic{equation}} should do the
trick. Yo
t
then the equations don't inherit the section number. They are simply numbered
1,2,3...
Add to the preamble:
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
This ought to work; it's what works for the amsart class.
--
David L. Johnson
Some people used to claim that, if enough monkeys sat in fron
Hi,
I'm writing my thesis using lyx.
I'm not exactly sure what class to use. The problem is this:
If I use the book class, the top level sectioning environment is chapter and
the numbering of the equations inherit the chapter number. Equation's on
chapter 1 will be numbered: 1.1, 1.2 ... and on
Nick Kuzmik wrote:
Does anyone know a way to increase the font size of equations?
You can put \DeclareMathSizes in the preamble. See
http://www.andy-roberts.net/misc/latex/latextutorial10.html (search for
DeclareMathSizes on the page).
/Paul
Does anyone know a way to increase the font size of equations?
--
Nick Kuzmik
AIM nkuzmik
845-406-5115
Nick Kuzmik schrieb:
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than
Is there any way to get section/subsection reflected in equation numbering?
For example, I have a study guide that chapter 13.1 to 17.5, thats 36 pages
long with some 228 lines of equations. It would be more concise to be able
to reference equation 14.3.3, rather than Equation 94
--
Nick Kuzmik
On 1/23/07, Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
two-column style:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
like:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t
>>From: Wolfgang Engelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
>>Subject: math equation in two lines
>>Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:06:51 +0100
>>
>>How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
>>two-col
How do I get the following math equation in two lines in order to fit it to a
two-column style:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
like:
(Produktion_Substanz_zur_Zeit_(t)
=(-K*(Konzentration_zur_Zeit_(t-t_{0}))
(the _ are in Lyx the rectangular laying
On 11/8/06, Neal Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When working with math formula in equation array mode, I found out that
>> my equation is too long on the page. I want to break it to two lines. Is
>> there a way do that ? All my equations are numbered (with label
Micha Feigin wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:42:55 -0500
> "Reuben D. Budiardja"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> When working with math formula in equation array mode, I found out that
>> my equation is too long on the page. I want to br
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:42:55 -0500
"Reuben D. Budiardja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> When working with math formula in equation array mode, I found out that my
> equation is too long on the page. I want to break it to two lines. Is there a
> way do that ? A
Hello,
When working with math formula in equation array mode, I found out that my
equation is too long on the page. I want to break it to two lines. Is there a
way do that ? All my equations are numbered (with label), when breaking long
equation into two lines, the first line should not be
ults
In order to enter multiple lines in a formula:
1)Place cursor in the equation
2)Press Enter while keeping ctrl button pressed
> The word "Figure" is part of the "caption" paragraph type. That
> is why they tell you to change it to "standard" instead of "caption"
I had no idea that "Figure" appeared because it is a paragraph type. I
thought it was a part of the float and could not be removed or changed.
Thank you, your s
LB wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a double
column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old threads
about this (see below).
A solution to the newer message was to: "After you have inserted the figure
float, set th
Hi
What worked even better than "cuted" is \begin{figure*} because "cuted"
follows strange rules when it places the text around two-column equations
and "midfloat" which should do better did not work. I suspect it did not
work because my equation is in the right co
Hi
"cuted" worked pretty good.
Thank you
Leo
> LB wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a
double
> > column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old
threads
> > about this
LB wrote:
Hi
I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a double
column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old threads
about this (see below).
A solution to the newer message was to: "After you have inserted the figure
float, set th
Hi
I'm looking for a way to make a long equation span both columns in a double
column article. I've searched the mailing list and found two old threads
about this (see below).
A solution to the newer message was to: "After you have inserted the figure
float, set the cursor
Dear All,
So I've now used th follwing in my preamble
\usepackage{remreset}
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
no errors but no success. Numbers are consecutive in each section starting with
1, so the renewcommand has got rid of the section number e.g Eq
Noeckel; Uwe Stöhr; Lyx-users
Subject: Re: Equation numbering
You'll need to \usepackage{remreset}.
Mike Reeks wrote:
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am ass
mmand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
in my preamble will automatically be recognized. Anyway no point in installing
remreset twice. Any thoughts on why it's not working. Do I need to declare the
use of remreset.sty anywhere?
Best
Mike
From: Richard Heck [mai
Dear Richard, Jens and Uwe
In the process of installing remreset.sty I noticed that it is already
installed in Miktex in texmf/tex/latex/carlisle so I am assuming therefore
that the commands
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
in my preamble will
Mike Reeks wrote:
In my preamble after the line
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\arabic{equation}}
I added the line
@addtoreset{equation}{section}
which had nor effect. Have I followed your suggestion correcty, have I mispelt
it. What next?
You missed the preceding "\": [EMAIL PROT
t: Re: Equation numbering
Mike,
I'm assuming your document class is derived from "article". I don't
know what else you have in the preamble, but in order for this to
work one needs to make sure that no other package re-defines the
counters after your modifications. So
201 - 300 of 725 matches
Mail list logo
