On 2014-07-12, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Hello,
a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
true?
This depends on the installed converters. With e.g. inkscape installed, it
is converted to
I strongly encourage you to turn the SVG into a PS, EPS, or PDF file. I
think somewhere is the documentation is states that for SVG to correctly
work within the document is requires inkscape. Not at all a problem,
inkscape is one of the best vector editors out there but it is required as
Guenter
On 2014-07-12, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
Hello,
a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
true?
This depends on the installed converters. With e.g. inkscape installed, it
is converted to
I strongly encourage you to turn the SVG into a PS, EPS, or PDF file. I
think somewhere is the documentation is states that for SVG to correctly
work within the document is requires inkscape. Not at all a problem,
inkscape is one of the best vector editors out there but it is required as
Guenter
On 2014-07-12, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> Hello,
> a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
> it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
> true?
This depends on the installed converters. With e.g. inkscape installed, it
is converted
I strongly encourage you to turn the SVG into a PS, EPS, or PDF file. I
think somewhere is the documentation is states that for SVG to correctly
work within the document is requires inkscape. Not at all a problem,
inkscape is one of the best vector editors out there but it is required as
Guenter
Hello,
a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
true?
In case, somebody is familiar with xcos/scilab, can the text of a model
figure be set (externally?) in latex?
Are there plans to call up
Hello,
a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
true?
In case, somebody is familiar with xcos/scilab, can the text of a model
figure be set (externally?) in latex?
Are there plans to call up
Hello,
a svg graphic can apparently be imported into a Lyx document. However,
it seems it is converted into bitmap if exported eg by pdflatex. Is that
true?
In case, somebody is familiar with xcos/scilab, can the text of a model
figure be set (externally?) in latex?
Are there plans to call up
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:15:58 + (UTC)
Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
I don't know AsciiDoc, but know that Sphinx is not only for Python
projects but also supports C and more.
Yeah, I know about that, but mentioned it's not Python 'cause many
projects nowadays choose reST/Sphinx
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:15:58 + (UTC)
Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
I don't know AsciiDoc, but know that Sphinx is not only for Python
projects but also supports C and more.
Yeah, I know about that, but mentioned it's not Python 'cause many
projects nowadays choose reST/Sphinx
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 16:15:58 + (UTC)
Guenter Milde wrote:
> I don't know AsciiDoc, but know that Sphinx is not only for Python
> projects but also supports C and more.
Yeah, I know about that, but mentioned it's not Python 'cause many
projects nowadays choose reST/Sphinx
On 2012-03-19, Gour wrote:
We're considering which markup to use for writing user's manual for a
multi-platform desktop application.
It should produce nice HTML output which can be invoked from within
application as 'help' file and it should be possible to generate
hight-quality PDF output
On 2012-03-19, Gour wrote:
We're considering which markup to use for writing user's manual for a
multi-platform desktop application.
It should produce nice HTML output which can be invoked from within
application as 'help' file and it should be possible to generate
hight-quality PDF output
On 2012-03-19, Gour wrote:
> We're considering which markup to use for writing user's manual for a
> multi-platform desktop application.
> It should produce nice HTML output which can be invoked from within
> application as 'help' file and it should be possible to generate
> hight-quality PDF
Hi Rob,
Very nice initiative, thank you very much! Even importing/exporting only docx
would be wonderful for collaboration with Oird people.
Do you also plan a clean import option with which even these local styles would
be dropped in order to have a clean Lyx document with just the structure
Hi Rob,
Very nice initiative, thank you very much! Even importing/exporting only docx
would be wonderful for collaboration with Oird people.
Do you also plan a clean import option with which even these local styles would
be dropped in order to have a clean Lyx document with just the structure
Hi Rob,
Very nice initiative, thank you very much! Even importing/exporting only docx
would be wonderful for collaboration with Oird people.
Do you also plan a clean import option with which even these local styles would
be dropped in order to have a clean Lyx document with just the structure
On 2012-02-02, stefano franchi wrote:
Is this a tool that would prove useful to yourselves, your collaborators,
and others?
What features would you consider essential?
...
Math, on the other hand, would not be very important. That is: I
assume math would be finally produced by Latex, if
the Word--OOffice-- Latex-- Lyx
Route, with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an
additional cleanup of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is
not fun. A project like yours would make LyX much, much easier to
use in an academic environment.
Absolutely - I am working in biological
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey Rob, that sounds like quite a nice project you have in mind!
My two cents: it's not worth carrying it out if you can't get the math
to import somewhat well. That seems to be the biggest problem with
most ways of converting doc to lyx. I understand
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
EK
On 02/02/2012 10:55 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey
On 02/02/2012 11:04 AM, UD wrote:
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
Unfortunately, there are math-heavy documents that are
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:59:33 -0700
Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
One thing you do not mention is handling figures. The documents I work
with tend to be very heavily illustrated, and I like LyX because it
handles figures so much better than
, then I'm
sceptical that round-trips to Word can be more reliable. It would be
great, however, to be able to reasonably import .doc in LyX, and
reasonably export from LyX to .doc. Reliable round-tripping should be
more of a secondary goal.
Regards
Liviu
Thank you everyone for the comments so far. I really appreciate hearing from
others as it helps me to build out a more detailed use-case. In addition to the
earlier questions, I have one more:
How important is support of .doc?
I know that it is the standard upon which the publishing industry
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:50:05 -0700
Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
In the meantime, hearing about what features should be supported
would be very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus
only docx support) would also be very helpful.
I would be quite happy with only .docx
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support simplifies your task and helps ensure that your
tool would support a good deal of functionality,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support simplifies your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/12 19:27, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us
wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only
docx support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Les Denham wrote:
Supporting Styles and Figures is a major achievement as far as I am
concerned. I assume you don't do much in deciphering the fingerpainting
favored by most Word users. Such crass formatting is probably best left
as Standard in LyX anyway.
On 2012-02-02, Rob Oakes wrote:
How important is support of .doc?
IMO, you should concentrate on docx - lyx. One tool for one task.
If it turns out that parts can be reused for doc-lyx later, fine.
How good/bad is the doc - docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
If I go ahead with
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
How good/bad is the doc - docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
My experience with OpenOffice and .docx isn't very good: I always had
the feeling that .doc support was better than .docx. The issues
concerned mainly
On 2012-02-02, stefano franchi wrote:
Is this a tool that would prove useful to yourselves, your collaborators,
and others?
What features would you consider essential?
...
Math, on the other hand, would not be very important. That is: I
assume math would be finally produced by Latex, if
the Word--OOffice-- Latex-- Lyx
Route, with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an
additional cleanup of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is
not fun. A project like yours would make LyX much, much easier to
use in an academic environment.
Absolutely - I am working in biological
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey Rob, that sounds like quite a nice project you have in mind!
My two cents: it's not worth carrying it out if you can't get the math
to import somewhat well. That seems to be the biggest problem with
most ways of converting doc to lyx. I understand
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
EK
On 02/02/2012 10:55 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey
On 02/02/2012 11:04 AM, UD wrote:
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
Unfortunately, there are math-heavy documents that are
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:59:33 -0700
Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
One thing you do not mention is handling figures. The documents I work
with tend to be very heavily illustrated, and I like LyX because it
handles figures so much better than
, then I'm
sceptical that round-trips to Word can be more reliable. It would be
great, however, to be able to reasonably import .doc in LyX, and
reasonably export from LyX to .doc. Reliable round-tripping should be
more of a secondary goal.
Regards
Liviu
Thank you everyone for the comments so far. I really appreciate hearing from
others as it helps me to build out a more detailed use-case. In addition to the
earlier questions, I have one more:
How important is support of .doc?
I know that it is the standard upon which the publishing industry
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:50:05 -0700
Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
In the meantime, hearing about what features should be supported
would be very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus
only docx support) would also be very helpful.
I would be quite happy with only .docx
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support simplifies your task and helps ensure that your
tool would support a good deal of functionality,
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Liviu Andronic landronim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support simplifies your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/12 19:27, Liviu Andronic wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes rob.oa...@oak-tree.us
wrote:
very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only
docx support) would also be very helpful.
If .docx-only support
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Les Denham wrote:
Supporting Styles and Figures is a major achievement as far as I am
concerned. I assume you don't do much in deciphering the fingerpainting
favored by most Word users. Such crass formatting is probably best left
as Standard in LyX anyway.
On 2012-02-02, Rob Oakes wrote:
How important is support of .doc?
IMO, you should concentrate on docx - lyx. One tool for one task.
If it turns out that parts can be reused for doc-lyx later, fine.
How good/bad is the doc - docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
If I go ahead with
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Guenter Milde mi...@users.sf.net wrote:
How good/bad is the doc - docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
My experience with OpenOffice and .docx isn't very good: I always had
the feeling that .doc support was better than .docx. The issues
concerned mainly
On 2012-02-02, stefano franchi wrote:
>> Is this a tool that would prove useful to yourselves, your collaborators,
>> and others?
>> What features would you consider essential?
...
> Math, on the other hand, would not be very important. That is: I
> assume math would be finally produced by
d. I now use the Word-->OOffice--> Latex--> Lyx
> Route, with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an
> additional cleanup of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is
> not fun. A project like yours would make LyX much, much easier to
> use in an academic enviro
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey Rob, that sounds like quite a nice project you have in mind!
My two cents: it's not worth carrying it out if you can't get the math
to import somewhat well. That seems to be the biggest problem with
most ways of converting doc to lyx. I understand
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
EK
On 02/02/2012 10:55 AM, Richard Heck wrote:
On 02/01/2012 03:11 PM, Xu Wang wrote:
Hey
On 02/02/2012 11:04 AM, UD wrote:
IMHO it is unlikely that math-heavy documents are produced by anything
but Latex/Lyx.
I applaud the initiative to make MS-WORD/Lyx conversion easier. I am
sure it will have
many appreciative users.
Unfortunately, there are math-heavy documents that are
On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:59:33 -0700
Rob Oakes wrote:
> Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
One thing you do not mention is handling figures. The documents I work
with tend to be very heavily illustrated, and I like LyX because it
handles figures so much better than
e. If LyX has a hard
time to round-trip to LaTeX, as it currently is more or less, then I'm
sceptical that round-trips to Word can be more reliable. It would be
great, however, to be able to reasonably import .doc in LyX, and
reasonably export from LyX to .doc. Reliable round-tripping should be
more of a secondary goal.
Regards
Liviu
Thank you everyone for the comments so far. I really appreciate hearing from
others as it helps me to build out a more detailed use-case. In addition to the
earlier questions, I have one more:
How important is support of .doc?
I know that it is the standard upon which the publishing industry
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:50:05 -0700
Rob Oakes wrote:
> In the meantime, hearing about what features should be supported
> would be very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus
> only docx support) would also be very helpful.
I would be quite happy with only
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
> very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
> support) would also be very helpful.
>
If .docx-only support simplifies your task and helps ensure that your
tool would support a good deal of
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes wrote:
>> very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only docx
>> support) would also be very helpful.
>>
> If .docx-only support
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/02/12 19:27, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Rob Oakes
> wrote:
>> very nice. Hearing your opinions about doc support (versus only
>> docx support) would also be very helpful.
>>
> If .docx-only
On Feb 2, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Les Denham wrote:
> Supporting Styles and Figures is a major achievement as far as I am
> concerned. I assume you don't do much in deciphering the fingerpainting
> favored by most Word users. Such crass formatting is probably best left
> as Standard in LyX anyway.
On 2012-02-02, Rob Oakes wrote:
> How important is support of .doc?
IMO, you should concentrate on docx <-> lyx. One tool for one task.
If it turns out that parts can be reused for doc<->lyx later, fine.
How good/bad is the doc <-> docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
> If I go ahead
On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> How good/bad is the doc <-> docx conversion in OpenOffice/LibreOffice?
>
My experience with OpenOffice and .docx isn't very good: I always had
the feeling that .doc support was better than .docx. The issues
concerned
and then importing that way.
(The original blog article about this can be found at
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx-import.)
Since I'm (re)writing a book chapter about this topic, I thought that I
would look at alternative strategies for importing Word (and other file
formats) into LyX
to crack the import MS Word to LyX nut). In the
process, I got really excited about using OpenOffice to convert the word
document to HTML, running tidy on the HTML and then importing that way.
(The original blog article about this can be found at
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx
Hi Rob,
first: great project! I constantly struggle with converting file to
and from MS Word. I now use the Word--OOffice-- Latex-- Lyx Route,
with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an additional cleanup
of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is not fun. A project like
yours would
and then importing that way.
(The original blog article about this can be found at
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx-import.)
Since I'm (re)writing a book chapter about this topic, I thought that I
would look at alternative strategies for importing Word (and other file
formats) into LyX
to crack the import MS Word to LyX nut). In the
process, I got really excited about using OpenOffice to convert the word
document to HTML, running tidy on the HTML and then importing that way.
(The original blog article about this can be found at
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx
Hi Rob,
first: great project! I constantly struggle with converting file to
and from MS Word. I now use the Word--OOffice-- Latex-- Lyx Route,
with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an additional cleanup
of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is not fun. A project like
yours would
and then importing that way.
(The original blog article about this can be found at
http://blog.oak-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx-import.)
Since I'm (re)writing a book chapter about this topic, I thought that I
would look at alternative strategies for importing Word (and other file
formats) into LyX
k-tree.us/index.php/2010/05/14/msword-lyx-import.)
>
> Since I'm (re)writing a book chapter about this topic, I thought that I
> would look at alternative strategies for importing Word (and other file
> formats) into LyX. While doing research, I came across a (potentially) much
> be
Hi Rob,
first: great project! I constantly struggle with converting file to
and from MS Word. I now use the Word-->OOffice--> Latex--> Lyx Route,
with the needed manual cleanup of Latex code and an additional cleanup
of ERT code from LyX after LaTeX import. It is not fun. A project l
Hello:
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is generated
programatically. I see that latex has the /input{file}
construct, but I do not find an equivalent in lyx.
I do see the one-time insert/file capability, but that is
not what I want. I
Hello:
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is
generated programatically. I see that latex has
the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert-File-Child document... And select Input as the Include
Type.
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is
generated programatically. I see that latex has
the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert-File-Child document... And select Input as the Include
Type.
Hello:
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is generated
programatically. I see that latex has the /input{file}
construct, but I do not find an equivalent in lyx.
I do see the one-time insert/file capability, but that is
not what I want. I
Hello:
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is
generated programatically. I see that latex has
the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert-File-Child document... And select Input as the Include
Type.
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is
generated programatically. I see that latex has
the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert-File-Child document... And select Input as the Include
Type.
Hello:
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is generated
programatically. I see that latex has the /input{file}
construct, but I do not find an equivalent in lyx.
I do see the one-time insert/file capability, but that is
not what I want. I
>Hello:
>
>I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
>Now, I would like to include a section which is
>generated programatically. I see that latex has
>the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
>equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert->File->Child document... And select "Input" as the
I have been using lyx to creation documentation.
Now, I would like to include a section which is
generated programatically. I see that latex has
the /input{file} construct, but I do not find an
equivalent in lyx.
Try Insert->File->Child document... And select "Input" as the "Include
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Konrad Hofbauer:
If there is no native os x version, then install macports (http://
www.macports.org/), and from there install the needed packages.
I made the same experience as Joachim K. Rennstich, so I followed the
advice of Konrad Hofbauer, downloaded the
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Konrad Hofbauer:
If there is no native os x version, then install macports (http://
www.macports.org/), and from there install the needed packages.
I made the same experience as Joachim K. Rennstich, so I followed the
advice of Konrad Hofbauer, downloaded the
Am 04.12.2008 um 15:49 schrieb Konrad Hofbauer:
If there is no native os x version, then install macports (www.macports.org/>), and from there install the needed packages.
I made the same experience as Joachim K. Rennstich, so I followed the
advice of Konrad Hofbauer, downloaded the Mac-OSX
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the File Import Rich Text Format... command but
get the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2latex2e and discovered that apparently
Dr. Joachim K. Rennstich wrote:
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the File Import Rich Text Format... command but get
the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2latex2e
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the File Import Rich Text Format... command but
get the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2latex2e and discovered that apparently
Dr. Joachim K. Rennstich wrote:
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the File Import Rich Text Format... command but get
the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2latex2e
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the "File > Import > Rich Text Format..." command but
get the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up rtf2latex2e and discovered that
Dr. Joachim K. Rennstich wrote:
I am trying to import a RTF document into Lyx 1.6 (Mac OS X 10.5.5,
Intel) through the "File > Import > Rich Text Format..." command but get
the following error:
An error occurred whilst running rtf2latex2e 'whateverfile.rtf'
I have been looking up
that output a latex file of the code, but when I import them into lyx, I
get 27 errors when I try to view the PDF.
Thanks!
--
Andrew Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know if there is a way to publish Matlab code in a lyx
document with the colors of the keywords, variables, comments and etc.
preserved?
There is a package called listings that might be useful, but colors on the
keywords, I'm not sure if that is supported.
A perl/sed script might
that output a latex file of the code, but when I import them into lyx, I
get 27 errors when I try to view the PDF.
Thanks!
--
Andrew Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone know if there is a way to publish Matlab code in a lyx
document with the colors of the keywords, variables, comments and etc.
preserved?
There is a package called listings that might be useful, but colors on the
keywords, I'm not sure if that is supported.
A perl/sed script might
that output a latex file of the code, but when I import them into lyx, I
get 27 errors when I try to view the PDF.
Thanks!
--
Andrew Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Does anyone know if there is a way to publish Matlab code in a lyx
> document with the colors of the keywords, variables, comments and etc.
> preserved?
>
There is a package called "listings" that might be useful, but colors on the
keywords, I'm not sure if that is supported.
A perl/sed script
96 matches
Mail list logo