On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 03:53:21PM -0400, Maria Gouskova wrote:
> What is up? Upgrading used to be fairly straightforward, and now I feel
> like I'm spending half an afternoon package-wrangling instead of writing my
> papers...
Ubuntu maintainer of PPA upgrades is gone and no one else stood up to
Interesting, I'll try the Optional Sources thing. It was turned off on my
Mint 22 system, and that didn't prevent me from compiling LyX from source
on that.
I've also tried to install the .deb packages, but hit a Qt plugin bug when
trying to run LyX, even though I installed
On 9/19/24 15:53, Maria Gouskova wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 2.4.1 on Linux Mint 21.3. I have previously
successfully compiled it from source on 22, and now I cannot work on
the files produced on my other computer using the 21.3 computer
because of lyx2lyx failures. So I fi
On 9/19/24 3:53 PM, Maria Gouskova wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 2.4.1 on Linux Mint 21.3. I have previously
successfully compiled it from source on 22, and now I cannot work on
the files produced on my other computer using the 21.3 computer
because of lyx2lyx failures. So I fi
ebian repositories.
I also work writing papers. Compiling software is not option for me.
Best regards.
Manuel.
On Thu, 2024-09-19 at 15:53 -0400, Maria Gouskova wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to install 2.4.1 on Linux Mint 21.3. I have previously
> successfully compiled it from source o
Hi all,
I'm trying to install 2.4.1 on Linux Mint 21.3. I have previously
successfully compiled it from source on 22, and now I cannot work on the
files produced on my other computer using the 21.3 computer because of
lyx2lyx failures. So I figured I'd just compile from source on
I upgraded to Lyx 2.3.6 version from 2.1.x on two Intel Macs over the
weekend—one running Mojave and the other OS Vsn 12.6.1. Lyx ran without a
hitch on the Mojave machine. The Vsn 12 machine would not convert template
files so I could not access my old documents. The error message said tha
Am 13.02.22 um 18:04 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann via lyx-users:
lyx 2.4.0 -alpha3 error in
sudo make install
using Debian
...
+checking for package biblatex [biblatex]... yes
+Inspection done.
+Read the file doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx for more information.
LyX: Fertig!
LyXRC.cpp (260): Conversion
lyx 2.4.0 -alpha3 error in
sudo make install
using Debian
...
+checking for package biblatex [biblatex]... yes
+Inspection done.
+Read the file doc/LaTeXConfig.lyx for more information.
LyX: Fertig!
LyXRC.cpp (260): Conversion failed for /home/wolfgang/.lyx/preferences
Warning: Die
My colleague in Norway has now Lyx successfully installed under windows
and managed to get scrbook.cls
Thanks for all help.
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
Sorry, this letter went wrong
Wolfgang
Am 28.12.19 um 15:20 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Dear Anders and Tobe,
I have forwarded your question to the lyx user group. You should not
install texlive if you used already miktex. What is missing is the cls
file for the Koma-script book. I think
Am 28.12.19 um 06:58 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck:
On 12/27/19 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I have asked this before, but there were different opinions on how to
proceed (texlive vs miktex).
A colleague of mine in Trondheim (Norway) has his son at home in
these days and he would like t
On 12/27/19 9:47 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I have asked this before, but there were different opinions on how to
> proceed (texlive vs miktex).
>
> A colleague of mine in Trondheim (Norway) has his son at home in
> these days and he would like to help his father in installing. What
> should
I have asked this before, but there were different opinions on how to
proceed (texlive vs miktex).
A colleague of mine in Trondheim (Norway) has his son at home in these
days and he would like to help his father in installing. What should he
use? I am on Linux and can't help therefore.
Wolf
I had to install TexLive in Linux, it was always a
nightmare (paths, privileges, dependencies..), especially to get an
installation in which tlmgr was working. It is frustrating that such
an important piece of software doesn't have a smooth installation
method. I realize that they wa
Den 12.10.2019 17:46, skrev UD Kap:
In the few times I had to install TexLive in Linux, it was always a
nightmare (paths, privileges, dependencies..), especially to get an
installation in which tlmgr was working. It is frustrating that such
an important piece of software doesn't h
I would like to come back to an earlier mail.
I traced the error I got back to Setting > Fonts: use non-tex fonts. The
output does not show the figure. It does, if I cancel it, the figure is
shown.
I used 'use non-tex fonts' in order to get the Umlaute right, as shown
also in my attachement
On 29.04.19 23:06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'pdflatex
"CANCER-CIRCADIAN-KOMA-20190429-N.tex"' finished with exit code 1
17:59:12.031: Error while exporting format: PDF
(pdflatex)support/Syste
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 06:07:59PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'pdflatex
> "CANCER-CIRCADIAN-KOMA-20190429-N.tex"' finished with exit code 1
>
> 17:59:12.031: Error while exporting format: PDF
> (pdflatex)support/Systemcall.cpp (276): Systemcall: 'p
On 29.04.19 16:31, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
A lyx file containing a png graphic in a float is now shown,
however a pdf graphic in the same file is not shown. I tried to find
out the tools> converter stuff by comparing it with one of t
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 03:35:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> A lyx file containing a png graphic in a float is now shown,
> however a pdf graphic in the same file is not shown. I tried to find
> out the tools> converter stuff by comparing it with one of the help
> file of lyx, but can't fi
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> But why am I told by trying to install iM, that it is already the
> newest version
>
> imagemagick ist already the Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13) ? W
It is *newest* for Mint repository you are using, that's r
stscript,
while waiting for the proper fix inside imagemagick.
Now, you have either unupdated packages or Mint maintainers decided
to ban imagemagick forever (or they just forgot all about this,
maybe it's worth filling the bug report or query).
But why am I told by trying to install iM, th
ide imagemagick.
Now, you have either unupdated packages or Mint maintainers decided
to ban imagemagick forever (or they just forgot all about this,
maybe it's worth filling the bug report or query).
But why am I told by trying to install iM, that it is already the newest
version
imagema
On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:22:14AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> >Ok, most likely your distro still has version 6, not 7,
>
> but why is it telling me:
>
> imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13)
Because you have it already installed on your computer.
> >can you t
ound
However installing tells me it is the newest version:
imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13).
0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
I also tried|||sudo apt-get install libmagick++-dev|
Same answer. Strange.
Ok, most likely y
; However installing tells me it is the newest version:
>
> imagemagick ist schon die neueste Version (8:6.8.9.9-7ubuntu5.13).
> 0 aktualisiert, 0 neu installiert, 0 zu entfernen und 0 nicht aktualisiert.
>
> I also tried|||sudo apt-get install libmagick++-dev|
>
> Same answer.
On 28.04.19 00:25, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
in trying out this https://tecadmin.net/install-imagemagick-on-linux/
I have difficulties with step
Step 3 ??? Install imagick PHP Extension
At this point, you have successfully
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 01:48:57PM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> in trying out this https://tecadmin.net/install-imagemagick-on-linux/
>
> I have difficulties with step
>
>
>Step 3 ??? Install imagick PHP Extension
>
> At this point, you have successfully insta
On 27.04.19 11:06, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
I would like to go back to Debian and install it but am afraid that
I might make things even worse, as it usually does if I change
things.
I wouldn't switch to debian just because of
On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I would like to go back to Debian and install it but am afraid that
> I might make things even worse, as it usually does if I change
> things.
I wouldn't switch to debian just because of this.
I am also scept
would like to go back to Debian and install it but am afraid that I
might make things even worse, as it usually does if I change things.
Wolfgang
I used
official-source-repositories.list
and did
sudo apt-get -t stretch-backports install lyx
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhängigkei
b http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main
in lyx-devel-release-xenial.list
which contains so far these two lines:
deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/lyx-devel/release/ubuntu xenial main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/lyx-devel/release/ubuntu xenial main
I would like to go back to Debian and install
On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 09:35:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am not sure about the procedure to download lyx 2.3.2 from
>
> https://packages.debian.org/stable-backports/source/lyx
>
> Should I first download qtbase5-dev (>=5.6.0) from Other Packages
> related to lyx and what does
>
>
I just noted that I have installed already the new qt5 version, but it
is not shown in Lyx. How do I make Lyx to recognize it?
Wolfgang
The short answer: you can't. Either you download a qt5-lyx-version or build
own from source. Switching between qt4 and qt5 is not possible.
Kornel
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2019 20:09:10 CET schrieb Adolf Mathias
:
> $mkdir mynewbuilddir
> $cd mynewbuilddir
> $cmake /home/dolfi/Downloads/lyx-2.3.2 -DLYX_CPACK=ON
> -DCPACK_BINARY_DEB:BOOL=ON -DLYX_NLS=ON > OUT 2>&1
> $ls -a
>./ ../ OUT
>
> I have attached OUT.
The problem is that the sou
Am Donnerstag, 7. März 2019 16:14:51 CET schrieb Adolf Mathias
:
> Same story - when I do this in the build directory you suggested, no
> files are generated there, and make rightfully complains.
>
> Sorry, I am not familiar with cmake and cannot be of any help yet.
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10
Op 13-10-18 om 19:58 schreef Paul Johnson:
The only critical flaw in TeXLive we have encountered is that it does
not include texi2pdf. Because of that absence, the R team is still
devoted to MikTeX as a part of the tool chain to build/use R for
windows. I spent a while trying to figure out how to
On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 3:32:43 PM PDT Benedict Holland wrote:
> I have lyx working with texlive and it is awesome. No issues. TexLive is
> really hard to install though.
Is not. Its in the Debian Stretch repositories.
John
I have lyx working with texlive and it is awesome. No issues. TexLive is
really hard to install though.
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 3:16 PM Richard Kimberly Heck
wrote:
> On 10/15/18 12:13 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > Hi:
> >
> > I was trying to compile texinfo on Windows, i
On 10/15/18 12:13 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I was trying to compile texinfo on Windows, if you succeed, let me know how.
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo
I was able to cross-compile on Linux, but I'm a bit clueless about what
to do with the result.
The files texi2* that it install
Hi:
I was trying to compile texinfo on Windows, if you succeed, let me know how.
https://www.gnu.org/software/texinfo
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 1:12 PM Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
> On 10/13/18 1:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > The only critical flaw in TeXLive we have encountered is that it
On 10/13/18 1:58 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> The only critical flaw in TeXLive we have encountered is that it does
> not include texi2pdf. Because of that absence, the R team is still
> devoted to MikTeX as a part of the tool chain to build/use R for
> windows. I spent a while trying to figure out
en by
> > Scientific Workplace and Bakoma, I guess.
> >
> > If the intention is develop only a powerful frontend that allows users
> > to juggle around the TeX system, to do their own customization, allow
> > different TeX systems to be used (and let the TeX developers
need
should be listed there.
Paul
this is apparently the one I need: qtbase5-dev
Good. Synaptic can install that for you (and will, with your
approval, install any required dependencies).
Paul
Thanks, Paul, will wait for Liv's package. Will this be announced in
this list?
Wolfgang
I&#x
parently the one I need: qtbase5-dev
Good. Synaptic can install that for you (and will, with your
approval, install any required dependencies).
Paul
Thanks, Paul, will wait for Liv's package. Will this be announced in
this list?
Wolfgang
I'm not sure. My suggestion is to add the PPA. In
ve/ubuntu/release
<https://launchpad.net/%7Elyx-devel/+archive/ubuntu/release>). Mint
uses the Ubuntu releases. So I do not have it yet.
, so I don't know which ones you need, but the ones you need should
be listed there.
Paul
this is apparently the one I need: qtbase5-dev
Good. Sy
evel/+archive/ubuntu/release>). Mint
uses the Ubuntu releases. So I do not have it yet.
, so I don't know which ones you need, but the ones you need should
be listed there.
Paul
this is apparently the one I need: qtbase5-dev
Good. Synaptic can install that for you (and will, with
s
the Ubuntu releases. So I do not have it yet.
, so I don't know which ones you need, but the ones you need should
be listed there.
Paul
this is apparently the one I need: qtbase5-dev
Good. Synaptic can install that for you (and will, with your approval,
install any required dependencies).
Paul
On 28.09.2018 16:23, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 09/28/2018 10:02 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. September 2018 15:35:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang
Engelmann :
I wanted to install the recent Lyx-2.3.1 under Linux-Mint. In the Quick
compilation guide it says
---
These
On 28.09.2018 16:23, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
On 09/28/2018 10:02 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. September 2018 15:35:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang
Engelmann :
I wanted to install the recent Lyx-2.3.1 under Linux-Mint. In the Quick
compilation guide it says
---
These
On 09/28/2018 10:02 AM, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. September 2018 15:35:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
:
I wanted to install the recent Lyx-2.3.1 under Linux-Mint. In the Quick
compilation guide it says
---
These four steps will compile, test and install LyX
Am Freitag, 28. September 2018 15:35:54 CEST schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann
:
> I wanted to install the recent Lyx-2.3.1 under Linux-Mint. In the Quick
> compilation guide it says
> ---
>
> These four steps will compile, test and install LyX:
>
> 0) Li
I wanted to install the recent Lyx-2.3.1 under Linux-Mint. In the Quick
compilation guide it says
---
These four steps will compile, test and install LyX:
0) Linux users beware: You need qt4/5 and qt4/5-devel packages
of the same version to compile LyX
On 09/16/2018 03:06 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:34:31PM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
>
>> I have been looking into the LyX Bug reporter and changes made to the
>> code by the developers, and I have realized that I am not actually too
>> far away from code being developed.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 06:34:31PM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
> I have been looking into the LyX Bug reporter and changes made to the
> code by the developers, and I have realized that I am not actually too
> far away from code being developed. I studied C and C++ long time ago,
> but I have nev
Workplace and Bakoma, I guess.
>>
>> If the intention is develop only a powerful frontend that allows users
>> to juggle around the TeX system, to do their own customization, allow
>> different TeX systems to be used (and let the TeX developers to do
>> job of develo
allows users
> to juggle around the TeX system, to do their own customization, allow
> different TeX systems to be used (and let the TeX developers to do
> job of developing TeX systems) and even maybe allow users install
> their own addons and functions to LyX, then LyX should have
On Fri, 14 Sep 2018 12:56:25 -0700
Hal Kierstead wrote:
> >
> > True. I don't think that we have as a goal for LyX users never to
> > learn LaTeX. In fact, I usually advocate learning LaTeX well before
> > using LyX, because I agree with you that eventually the user will
> > need to learn it any
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:56:25PM -0700, Hal Kierstead wrote:
> I think people should be encouraged to use LyX to learn LaTeX. The code
> window is very useful! In a collaborative world, it is impossible to only use
> LyX, but you can get started only using LyX. For instance students should be
>
> True. I don't think that we have as a goal for LyX users never to learn
> LaTeX. In fact, I usually advocate learning LaTeX well before using LyX,
> because I agree with you that eventually the user will need to learn it
> anyway.
>
>
> Scott
I think people should be encouraged to use Ly
On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 06:38:30AM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
> Hello Again;
>
> This is a tough one.
+1
> I think the target audience and intended scope is also important.
>
> If the intention is more like a complete WYSIWYG software package (or bundle)
> allowing users to produce documents r
:
(start quote)
Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause the
MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems, the
solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX
Oh, cool.
But to nit a pick, it is installable on LinuX :-)-O
el
On 11/09/2018 14:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/09/2018 à 12:26, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit :
>> Because MikTeX does not work on Linux? :-)-O
>
> It does, actually.
> https://miktex.org/download
>
> JMarc
>
> webpage which says:
>>
>>
>>
>> (start quote)
>>
>> Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
>> the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
>> https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
>&g
Le 11/09/2018 à 12:26, Dr Eberhard Lisse a écrit :
Because MikTeX does not work on Linux? :-)-O
It does, actually.
https://miktex.org/download
JMarc
Because MikTeX does not work on Linux? :-)-O
el
On 09/09/2018 23:26, Steve Litt wrote:
[...]
> As far as I know, my LyX has been working perfectly, with TeXLive, for
> many years. Why would someone choose MiKTeX?
>
> [slitt@mydesk linux]$ uname -a
> Linux mydesk 4.17.14_1 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug
MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems, the
solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version before
installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any questions
Thanks for your responses – I remember having some problem with a MiKTeX
upgrade recently so I can understand that you might have had a problem.
I will wait before trying to install LyX – I will keep an eye on the
installation page to see if anything changes.
Regards,
Peter
From: Richard
installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then
re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
*before* installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any questions about
again if I don’t have to upgrade – so please could you update your
>>>>>> webpage which says:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (start quote)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes
>>
run into
problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then
re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
*before* installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any questions about how
to update MiKTeX, you can email lyx-users@lists.lyx.org for help.
(You do not need to
gt;>>> Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes
>>>> cause the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
>>>> https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
>>>> problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and t
webpage which says:
(start quote)
Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes
cause the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then
re-install.
We
/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
> > problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then
> > re-install.
> >
> > We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
> > *before* installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any questions about how
> > to
)
> >>
> >> Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
> >> the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
> >> https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems,
> >> the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and th
>> (start quote)
>>
>> Due to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
>> the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
>> https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into
>> problems, the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and
MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems,
the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems,
the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
ue to a bug in MiKTeX, installation of LyX 2.3.0 can sometimes cause
> the MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
> https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems,
> the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
>
> We highly recommend that MiKTeX
MiKTeX installation to be corrupted. (See
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems,
the solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version
*before* installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any
https://github.com/MiKTeX/miktex/issues/82.) If you run into problems, the
solution will be to uninstall MiKTeX and then re-install.
We highly recommend that MiKTeX users update to the latest version before
installing LyX 2.3.0. If you have any questions about how to update MiKTeX, you
can email
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 09:18:49AM +, mike wrote:
> On 08/05/2018 10:15, mike wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > So I have Cygwin installed with a working pdflatex. How do I install
> > LyX 2.3 /within /Cygwin so that I can use it within Cygwin? I run 32
> > b
On 08/05/2018 10:15, mike wrote:
Hi
So I have Cygwin installed with a working pdflatex. How do I install
LyX 2.3 /within /Cygwin so that I can use it within Cygwin? I run 32
bit Cygwin on a 64-bit Win 7 Pro machine.
Thanks very much in advance for any help.
I ask because AFAIK there
Hi
So I have Cygwin installed with a working pdflatex. How do I install
LyX 2.3 /within /Cygwin so that I can use it within Cygwin? I run 32
bit Cygwin on a 64-bit Win 7 Pro machine.
Thanks very much in advance for any help.
Best
Mike
--
An immigrant is a person without a country that
(??).
Therefore I would like to install 2.2.3 with the instructions given
below the ###).
I added
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian stretch-backports main
to my sources.list
(did I choose something wrong here??)
and ran
sudo apt-get -t stretch-backports install lyx 2.2.3
but get this (see the *bold
On 2018-02-15, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I use to start my lyx with
> /src/lyx -dbg info
> but I get apparently interferences, if I do this with 2.2.3 (in the
> 2.2.3 lyx folder) and 2.3.0beta1(in another folder), perhaps via the
> .lyx stuff (??).
> Therefore I would lik
I use to start my lyx with
/src/lyx -dbg info
but I get apparently interferences, if I do this with 2.2.3 (in the
2.2.3 lyx folder) and 2.3.0beta1(in another folder), perhaps via the
.lyx stuff (??).
Therefore I would like to install 2.2.3 with the instructions given
below the
On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:13:29PM +0200, Gérard Degrève wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since I installed the last release of lyx (2.2.3), all the shortcuts
> disappeared (even ctrl + c, ...). When I try to access the shortcut
> management, lyx tells me that the bind file is missing.
>
> However, there is a
Hello,
Since I installed the last release of lyx (2.2.3), all the shortcuts
disappeared (even ctrl + c, ...). When I try to access the shortcut
management, lyx tells me that the bind file is missing.
However, there is a "Lyx2.2\resource\bind" directory that contains
several .bind files (eg cua.b
install it? (I don't see
Lyx2.2.0, installed via Debians synaptic
Debians synaptic can install any Debian version.
Which version(s) is configured in /etc/apt/sources.list
Here:
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
...
deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ j
>>>> sid) in the repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already
>>>> the bibtex related error reporting? These are the reason I would
>>>> like to change my version.
>>>> Version 2.2.2 is what I see in sid:
>>>> http
repos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already
the bibtex related error reporting? These are the reason I would
like to change my version.
Version 2.2.2 is what I see in sid:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
What version do you have now? And how did you install it? (I don
epos? And does this lyx2.2.2 version contain already
>> the bibtex related error reporting? These are the reason I would
>> like to change my version.
>> Version 2.2.2 is what I see in sid:
>> https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
>> What version do you have now?
ontain already
the bibtex related error reporting? These are the reason I would
like to change my version.
Version 2.2.2 is what I see in sid:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
What version do you have now? And how did you install it? (I don't see
any other versions in Debian i
orting? These are the reason I would like to change my version.
>
Version 2.2.2 is what I see in sid:
https://packages.debian.org/sid/lyx
What version do you have now? And how did you install it? (I don't see any
other versions in Debian in the other Debian repos.)
Liviu
>
>
>) (gcc version 4.8.4
(Debian 4.8.4-1) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22)
You probably should enable the Debian unstable repo then, and
install it from Synaptic / aptitude / apt-get. Else you risk
getting dependency problems as you've already noticed.
3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22)
>>
>>
> You probably should enable the Debian unstable repo then, and install it
> from Synaptic / aptitude / apt-get. Else you risk getting dependency
> problems as you've already noticed.
>
> Liviu
>
>
>
>> Wolfgang
>>
bian version:
we$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 3.16.0-4-amd64 (debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
<mailto:debian-ker...@lists.debian.org>) (gcc version 4.8.4
(Debian 4.8.4-1) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22)
You probably should enable the Debian unstable repo the
@lists.debian.org) (gcc
> version 4.8.4 (Debian 4.8.4-1) ) #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1+deb8u1 (2017-02-22)
>
>
You probably should enable the Debian unstable repo then, and install it
from Synaptic / aptitude / apt-get. Else you risk getting dependency
problems as you've already noticed.
Liviu
> Wolfgang
>
>
>
>
1 - 100 of 954 matches
Mail list logo
