It was such a simple design that I didn't bother with a BOM.
I started with the Probotix config files, but can't guarantee
that my board is still completely compatible with the PBX-BB.
The "engr480a" hal and ini files work with my board.
-- Ralph
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 11:20:27 AM
Thank you for the advice. I will look into probekins and see if it can be
adapted for auto leveling.
May take a while.
However is there anyone who ever got dual extrusion working?
--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github:
https://github.com/machinekit
---
You can try to integrate probekins in Machinekit.
This is a modified kinematics with geometry compensation.
It is using a matrix of points previously built by probing the surface.
Will acts as the bed compensation code we can find in Marlin firmware.
Hi,
I just see 4.4.y kernel for Beaglebone patched by RobertCNelson with
Xenomai 3.0.3.
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-xenomai-4.4.y
that's ready to try using update_kernel script:
$ sudo ./update_kernel.sh --ti-xenomai-channel --lts-4_4
Could be time for
I guess it would make sense from a kernel version standing point, not from
the rt hypervisor though.
As I remember, the idea of not moving to Xenomai 3.x was because it would
support preempt_rt under the hood and hence machinekit would be better off
migrating straight to preempt_rt and avoid the
I'm not using a 3d printer but on my cnc router we use gcode ripper and it
works great.
You could extract what you wanted from its guts and make it work for you I
think.
Fernando
On Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 3:13 AM 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit <
machinekit@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> I have a 3d
On 1/12/2017 2:47 AM, Matteo Facchinetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just see 4.4.y kernel for Beaglebone patched by RobertCNelson with
> Xenomai 3.0.3.
> https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-xenomai-4.4.y
>
>
> that's ready to try using update_kernel script:
> $ sudo
That is very interesting for wrapping CNC gcode on an unleveled surface
however I am unsure if it would work with an stl file. However the
principle is indeed the same.
BCNC also has this feature built in for milling circuit boards and such. Am
just unsure if machinekit currently has it also
So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I would then need a program
to make a matrix. Then another program to compensate for all incoming gcode.
Sounds like I would be reverse engineering what is in other 3d printing
firmware and porting to machinekit.
The language for machinekit is
So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I would then need a program
to make a matrix. Then another program to compensate for all incoming gcode.
Sounds like I would be reverse engineering what is in other 3d printing
firmware and porting to machinekit.
The language for machinekit is
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 12:11, 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit
> wrote:
>
> That is very interesting for wrapping CNC gcode on an unleveled surface
> however I am unsure if it would work with an stl file. However the principle
> is indeed the same.
> BCNC also has
Yes, using the Python FDM HAL it's a single flag. Afaik the "UNI-PRINT-3D"
config supports it:
https://github.com/thecooltool/UNI-PRINT-3D
Also see
http://machinekoder.com/mini-3d-printer-from-hobbyking-running-with-cramps-board-and-machinekit/
for details on how to get the HAL FDM working.
On 12/01/17 15:17, 'IonicBasher' via
Machinekit wrote:
So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I
would then need a program to make a matrix. Then another program
to compensate for all incoming gcode.
Sounds like
Have the boards you had made worked well for a probotix type setup? I have
a V90 and an asteroid and am now working on a diy engraver that I want to
use the BBB on. Finding capes for CNC only instead of 3D printer setups has
been a challenge. I would be especially interested in your board since
I made one mistake on the (hasty) board layout I did, which requires pullup
resistors
to be added to the digital input pins at the BBB headers, but otherwise
they did the
job for me. They are nothing fancy. You can look at my documentation at:
Do you have a BOM for the board and will the configuration files for
Comet_NP for the PBC BB work and how much for the PCB? Looks like a good,
simple setup.
Harley
On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 10:43:44 AM UTC-8, Ralph Stirling wrote:
>
> I made one mistake on the (hasty) board layout I
16 matches
Mail list logo