Re: [Machinekit] Simple capes for BBB/Machinekit

2017-01-12 Thread Ralph Stirling
It was such a simple design that I didn't bother with a BOM. I started with the Probotix config files, but can't guarantee that my board is still completely compatible with the PBX-BB. The "engr480a" hal and ini files work with my board. -- Ralph On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 11:20:27 AM

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit
Thank you for the advice. I will look into probekins and see if it can be adapted for auto leveling. May take a while. However is there anyone who ever got dual extrusion working? -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit ---

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread Frederic RIBLE
You can try to integrate probekins in Machinekit. This is a modified kinematics with geometry compensation. It is using a matrix of points previously built by probing the surface. Will acts as the bed compensation code we can find in Marlin firmware.

[Machinekit] Machinekit over Xenoami 3.x

2017-01-12 Thread Matteo Facchinetti
Hi, I just see 4.4.y kernel for Beaglebone patched by RobertCNelson with Xenomai 3.0.3. https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-xenomai-4.4.y that's ready to try using update_kernel script: $ sudo ./update_kernel.sh --ti-xenomai-channel --lts-4_4 Could be time for

Re: [Machinekit] Machinekit over Xenoami 3.x

2017-01-12 Thread Fernando Correa Neto
I guess it would make sense from a kernel version standing point, not from the rt hypervisor though. As I remember, the idea of not moving to Xenomai 3.x was because it would support preempt_rt under the hood and hence machinekit would be better off migrating straight to preempt_rt and avoid the

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread Fernando Correa Neto
I'm not using a 3d printer but on my cnc router we use gcode ripper and it works great. You could extract what you wanted from its guts and make it work for you I think. Fernando On Thu, Jan 12, 2017, 3:13 AM 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit < machinekit@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I have a 3d

Re: [Machinekit] Machinekit over Xenoami 3.x

2017-01-12 Thread Charles Steinkuehler
On 1/12/2017 2:47 AM, Matteo Facchinetti wrote: > Hi, > > I just see 4.4.y kernel for Beaglebone patched by RobertCNelson with > Xenomai 3.0.3. > https://github.com/RobertCNelson/ti-linux-kernel-dev/tree/ti-linux-xenomai-4.4.y > > > that's ready to try using update_kernel script: > $ sudo

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit
That is very interesting for wrapping CNC gcode on an unleveled surface however I am unsure if it would work with an stl file. However the principle is indeed the same. BCNC also has this feature built in for milling circuit boards and such. Am just unsure if machinekit currently has it also

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit
So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I would then need a program to make a matrix. Then another program to compensate for all incoming gcode. Sounds like I would be reverse engineering what is in other 3d printing firmware and porting to machinekit. The language for machinekit is

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit
So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I would then need a program to make a matrix. Then another program to compensate for all incoming gcode. Sounds like I would be reverse engineering what is in other 3d printing firmware and porting to machinekit. The language for machinekit is

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread Bas de Bruijn
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 12:11, 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit > wrote: > > That is very interesting for wrapping CNC gcode on an unleveled surface > however I am unsure if it would work with an stl file. However the principle > is indeed the same. > BCNC also has

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread Alexander Rössler
Yes, using the Python FDM HAL it's a single flag. Afaik the "UNI-PRINT-3D" config supports it: https://github.com/thecooltool/UNI-PRINT-3D Also see http://machinekoder.com/mini-3d-printer-from-hobbyking-running-with-cramps-board-and-machinekit/ for details on how to get the HAL FDM working.

Re: [Machinekit] Autoleveling Induction Probe and Dual extrusion

2017-01-12 Thread schoone...@btinternet.com
On 12/01/17 15:17, 'IonicBasher' via Machinekit wrote: So if I use the probe to obtain those points. I would then need a program to make a matrix. Then another program to compensate for all incoming gcode. Sounds like

Re: [Machinekit] Simple capes for BBB/Machinekit

2017-01-12 Thread 'Harley Engholm' via Machinekit
Have the boards you had made worked well for a probotix type setup? I have a V90 and an asteroid and am now working on a diy engraver that I want to use the BBB on. Finding capes for CNC only instead of 3D printer setups has been a challenge. I would be especially interested in your board since

Re: [Machinekit] Simple capes for BBB/Machinekit

2017-01-12 Thread Ralph Stirling
I made one mistake on the (hasty) board layout I did, which requires pullup resistors to be added to the digital input pins at the BBB headers, but otherwise they did the job for me. They are nothing fancy. You can look at my documentation at:

Re: [Machinekit] Simple capes for BBB/Machinekit

2017-01-12 Thread 'Harley Engholm' via Machinekit
Do you have a BOM for the board and will the configuration files for Comet_NP for the PBC BB work and how much for the PCB? Looks like a good, simple setup. Harley On Thursday, January 12, 2017 at 10:43:44 AM UTC-8, Ralph Stirling wrote: > > I made one mistake on the (hasty) board layout I