Hi,
I came across something odd editing a script with BBEdit. The BBEdit #!
menu has a 'Run' command and a 'Run in Terminal' command. The script
below works fine when I use the Run command, but returns HTTP response
code 500 when I use Run in Terminal. I tried running it directly from
Terminal
On 7/9/06 at 6:03 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sherm Pendley) wrote:
On Jul 9, 2006, at 5:03 PM, Andrew Brosnan wrote:
my $file = 'Users/andrewbr/Desktop/google.html';
Easy fix - add a / to the beginning of $file to make it a fully-
qualified path.
Ahh, that was a typo...thanks for
The script below prints a list of 34 Burmese characters. I happen to
have a font for these but I'm not sure that matters.
If I run the script in BBEdit or TextWrangler just after launching
the apps, there is a huge delay before the output is printed (up to
15 seconds) but subsequent runs
On 2005.12.7, at 04:10 AM, John Delacour wrote:
The script below prints a list of 34 Burmese characters. I happen to
have a font for these but I'm not sure that matters.
If I run the script in BBEdit or TextWrangler just after launching the
apps, there is a huge delay before the output
At 6:41 am +0900 7/12/05, Joel Rees wrote:
First guess is font caching, which is mostly the time to find and
load glyphs. It looks like you might be also implicitly invoking the
relevant parsing attribute tables, which will also take some time to
find and load.
It's interesting (to me) that
On Jun 3, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
On Jun 2, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Bill Stephenson wrote:
So I guess what I'm asking is if there a way to get either of these
apps to upload a file with a new name and rename it after the upload
is complete with one click. Obviously, this doesn't
with to make this easier for me..
Open the file from the remote server with BBEdit.
Use the Save a Copy to FTP Server menu command and save the file with
a new name
Then I wrote this cgi script on the remote server to chmod and rename
the file
At 7:39 +0900 4/6/05, Joel Rees wrote:
On 2005.6.4, at 04:31 AM, Ken Williams wrote:
Actually, it *would* entirely solve the problem. Renaming a file
is an atomic operation, there's no point at which anybody could
get a partial file. People still reading the old file would be
fine too, even
for the reply Jay,
I've done that too, but it's a rather laborious solution to what must
be a rather common task and I'm thinking there could be a more
automated way to deal with it. Since both BBEdit and Interarchy are
already built to work together I was hoping that someone more familiar
daggerquill [at] gmail [dot] com
http://www.engatiki.org
Thanks for the reply Jay,
I've done that too, but it's a rather laborious solution to what must
be a rather common task and I'm thinking there could be a more
automated way to deal with it. Since both BBEdit and Interarchy
I think HTML::Tidy doesn't offer what you're seeking: looks like it's a
validation tool, not a pretty-print tool. So your output is empty
if things are well in the world of your html, and warnings/errors if
there are problems validating the string HTML::Tidy is fed.
Well, yes and no. Perhaps it
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul McCann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the items in the Markup-Tidy submenu do what you're seeking? I'm
pretty sure they hook into a copy of HTML Tidy that's embedded in BBEdit.
There is an HTML Tidy in BBEdit, but it only works on the whole
document. The filter
.
The following works as a filter in BBEdit, but (as above) I don't think
it'll do what you're seeking!
Do the items in the Markup-Tidy submenu do what you're seeking? I'm
pretty sure they hook into a copy of HTML Tidy that's embedded in BBEdit.
Cheers,
Paul
http://validator.w3.org/source/
Instructions for that one are only a couple clicks away:
http://www.mediaville.net/articles/validator/
Thank you. I had no idea. Checking it out now.
It's possible to install these tools on LINUX using PPM
I think you're confused - Linux is not an ancronym, and
I'm working through the instructions on the mediaville.net site, but
it's going to take a while from the looks of things.
How about my original question, just for the sake of it?
I can, for instance, easily create an AppleScript which tells BBEdit to
validate a certain file and write
10.3.5) just yesterday. I
had to install Fink to get OpenSP working; my attempts to build it from
source failed, but other than that, it wasn't too tricky.
I, too, considered how to work BBEdit into the mix, but gave up on it
without doing too much digging into its AppleScript dictionary. I find
On Nov 12, 2004, at 5:24 AM, John Horner wrote:
I can, for instance, easily create an AppleScript which tells BBEdit
to validate a certain file and write the results to another file --
how hard would it be to hook in to that with a CGI script?
If BBEdit can be driven via AppleScript, you should
On 13/11/2004, at 5:48 AM, Sherm Pendley wrote:
If BBEdit can be driven via AppleScript, you should also be able to
use Mac::Glue to drive it. Or, you could run your AppleScript with the
osascript tool.
That got me on the right track -- to the extent that this is already
working:
#!/usr/bin
them and the associated C libraries to work on OSX is
way beyond my capabilities.
But then it occurred to me I already have an application which does
HTML validation which works on OSX - BBEdit. Is it a crazy idea that
it might be possible to pipe a file or string to BBEdit's Check
Syntax
On Nov 11, 2004, at 7:06 PM, John Horner wrote:
I would like to be able to install a browser-based HTML validator on
my OSX web server, like the W3C:
http://validator.w3.org/source/
Instructions for that one are only a couple clicks away:
http://www.mediaville.net/articles/validator/
It's
/ - There are at
least a few jEdit users who are old-BBEdit users, and there's even a
page on switching from BBEdit to jEdit (that could use some updating!)
http://community.jedit.org/cgi-bin/TWiki/view/Main/SwitchingFromBBEdit
Pete
I cannot get autocompletion to work with jEdit 4.2 on Panther. Do you
have
that issue as well?
Works here... (10.3.5 and 4.2 final)
Bild 1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
I guess you have checked edit mode = perl in Buffer Options/Global
Options?
___ Peter Hartmann
mailto:[EMAIL
The Ghost wrote:
I'd really like to reiterate the suggestion to try JEdit. It used to
have some problems on OS X, but in 4.2 Final they are cleared up. It
has everything with the SFTP, multi-file search/replace with regex
(better than BBEdit's in IMO), and all that fancy stuff, the only thing
On Sep 12, 2004, at 1:32 PM, The Ghost wrote:
Other than JEdit, my other choice would be KDE's KATE (K Advance Text
Editor). (This may now be Quantra, I don't know). Excellent syntax
highlighting control, integrated command line, a nice file browser
(good for looking at logs quickly), The
I'd really like to reiterate the suggestion to try JEdit. It used to
have some problems on OS X, but in 4.2 Final they are cleared up. It
has everything with the SFTP, multi-file search/replace with regex
(better than BBEdit's in IMO), and all that fancy stuff, the only thing
it doesn't
At 14:50 +1000 10/9/04, John Horner wrote:
Multi-file regular expression find replace functionality, with
nameable saveable expressions
That's the killer-app feature for me. I could actually say that I
think it's BBEdit that gave me my first glimpse of the power of Perl.
Also, if you're a Perl
On 10 Sep 2004, at 09:59, Andy Holyer wrote:
On 10 Sep 2004, at 02:54, Doug McNutt wrote:
At 19:41 -0500 9/9/04, Ian Ragsdale wrote:
Shell worksheets (allows easy editing running of shell commands)
And there is by far the most important item. When the MacPerl port
ran as an MPW tool it looked a
can cause.
Developing in a mixed platform environment can be a real nightmare.
I do all my Perl scripting in BBEdit on OS X, almost exclusively,
primarily to avoid issues with line endings. My boss works on a Windows
machine and occasionally has to alter my scripts there (or data files
be interested in Tailer+. It simply tails a log file (can do
so with ssh too) but it also highlights and strips lines based on criteria
such as a regex. I find it great for getting to just the data I want to see in
apache error logs.
After Affrus and BBEdit, it's one of the most useful tools in my
, and happens to be open-source,
you might want to check out jEdit - http://jedit.org/ - There are at
least a few jEdit users who are old-BBEdit users, and there's even a
page on switching from BBEdit to jEdit (that could use some updating!)
http://community.jedit.org/cgi-bin/TWiki/view/Main
, but none of them seemed to use it until recently -- they were
all just using BBEdit. But then someone noticed the networking abilities
in SEE, and they've quickly started using it for collaborating on
documents, interacting with people elsewhere in the office or over the
internet, or even
Is there a text editor (preferably something
simple) on Windows that allows you to deal with line breaks the way
BBEdit does?
UltraEdit does a fine job:
http://www.ultraedit.com/
-Steve
--
#! /usr/bin/perl -w
my @wish = qw/60 47 98 117 115 104 62/;
foreach (@wish) {
print chr($_);
};
Hi Ken,
I have been using emacs in one window and a terminal in another window
to run the command line. I tried what you say and the control-z works
to suspend emacs, but I can't seem to get the .login to work to pop me
back into emacs. Does .login work when you start a new terminal
window,
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:13:43 -0700, Steve Axthelm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a text editor (preferably something
simple) on Windows that allows you to deal with line breaks the way
BBEdit does?
UltraEdit does a fine job:
http://www.ultraedit.com/
...where fine is defined as allows
It Should Be Done By Everybody. :-)
I believe it's also slightly cheaper than UltraEdit (both TextPad and
UltraEdit are $15-$20 cheaper than the BBEdit 8.0 *upgrade* price, and
are every bit as good - market forces maybe, but if you have a Windows
license knocking around it's *cheaper* to buy VPC
At 11:37 PM -0500 9/2/04, Bill Stephenson wrote:
Those BBEdit guys went and implemented another of my wish list
feature requests! Remember the one about a button that allowed you
to view output from a perl script in a browser? It's apparently in
8.0, as well as some other pretty cool new
On Sep 3, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Bill Stephenson wrote:
Those BBEdit guys went and implemented another of my wish list
feature requests! Remember the one about a button that allowed you to
view output from a perl script in a browser? It's apparently in 8.0,
as well as some other pretty cool new
On Sep 3, 2004, at 12:37 AM, Bill Stephenson wrote:
Those BBEdit guys went and implemented another of my wish list
feature requests! Remember the one about a button that allowed you to
view output from a perl script in a browser? It's apparently in 8.0,
as well as some other pretty cool new
clicks (I think, I haven't used it yet) than what you describe above.
I'm curious as to the attraction of BBEdit. Coming from a Unix/Windows
background, I find that whilst it seems pretty solid and has some nice
features, it costs at least five times more than any sane person
should be prepared to pay
On Sep 9, 2004, at 5:00 PM, Chris Carline wrote:
I'm curious as to the attraction of BBEdit. Coming from a Unix/Windows
background, I find that whilst it seems pretty solid and has some nice
features, it costs at least five times more than any sane person
should be prepared to pay. But even taking
On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:41 PM, Ian Ragsdale wrote:
Well, I imagine a lot of it's following started during the OS = 9
days, when things like vi or emacs weren't really available. It also
served as a replacement for things like grep and sed which weren't
available at the time. I'd imagine that for
and, though I have read the
book, I just ain't there. X11 isn't that easy to use either with my four monitors.
BBEdit worksheets are still fairly new and I really hope they will migrate more and
more closely to either MPW or emacs. As of now even emacs is not a real shell having
to pass commands
with text that's heavily structured, like code or
delimited data files, I usually plunge into the shell emacs. For
other stuff I usually fire up BBEdit. Getting comfortable with both is
really handy. =)
-Ken
Multi-file regular expression find replace functionality, with
nameable saveable expressions
That's the killer-app feature for me. I could actually say that I
think it's BBEdit that gave me my first glimpse of the power of Perl.
I use BBEdit literally every day for both HTML and Perl. It's got
Those BBEdit guys went and implemented another of my wish list
feature requests! Remember the one about a button that allowed you to
view output from a perl script in a browser? It's apparently in 8.0, as
well as some other pretty cool new features.
They also mention integration with Affrus. I
into that :)
The cool thing about SubEthaEdit (nee Hydra) is the Rendezvous-enabled
collaborative editing features. The editor isn't [yet?] as full-featured
as say BBEdit, Vim, or Emacs, but that feature alone is interesting enough
to make SubEthaEdit interesting.
This feature seems very good for any kind of XP
his favorite editor and that the
matter is an
almost religious one, but if you are looking for a
free and powerful
text editor to replace your proven, old BBEdit
4.5.3, you should have a
look at JEdit (http://jedit.org). It rocks.
I've looked at jedit before and recall not being
Okay, so I've been messing around with my website
lately and in the transition to it being database
driven, part of it is going over to CSS. I have an old
version of BBEdit (4.5.3 on macclassic) and I was
wondering if someone has made a CSS language to get
the colors to highlight correctly. I'd
of $PATH. Everything works well except that BBEdit seems
rather
confused. Any suggestions as to how to rectify this confusion would be
appreciated.
p0: have you set up a
$HOME/.MaxOSX/environment.plist
that would contain say:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!DOCTYPE plist SYSTEM
file://localhost
On Friday, October 17, 2003, at 02:20 am, Doug McNutt wrote:
At 16:12 -0700 10/16/03, Ingles, Juan W. wrote:
I wonder: Is this because
/opt/local/bin/perl points to the perl 5.6 binary
or
5.6 binary path is hard coded in BBEdit
I don't have any /opt/local/bin/. None was created by the CPAN
I have recently installed Perl 5.8.0 on my iMac via PortsManager from
DarwinPorts http://www.opendarwin.org/projects/darwinports/. Perl 5.8.0
resides in the /opt/local/bin directory, and this directory is at the
beginning of $PATH. Everything works well except that BBEdit seems rather
confused
except that BBEdit seems rather
confused.
BBEdit is almost surely executing perl 5.6 and it's probably because of a hard coded
path.
I had 5.8 running, with some difficulty, over a year ago from the CPAN distribution
and it is in /opt/. But I had to remove 5.6 from the other directories
I guess there is no fix right now.
But actually the bug is somewhat convenient. Now a BBEdit script starting with
#!/opt/local/bin/perl -w
# Perl 5.8
uses Perl 5.8.0 with its @INC list if Run from BBEdit and
uses Perl 5.6.0 with a different @INC list if Run in Terminal.
It's not all bad
I wonder: Is this because
/opt/local/bin/perl points to the perl 5.6 binary
or
5.6 binary path is hard coded in BBEdit
which perl
on the terminal will tell you what binary you are launching
( not currently at my machine to check )
juan
-Original Message-
From: Vic Norton
On 10/16/03 5:12 PM, Ingles, Juan W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder: Is this because
/opt/local/bin/perl points to the perl 5.6 binary
or
5.6 binary path is hard coded in BBEdit
Would this be in a plist file for BBedit?
C.
which perl
on the terminal will tell you what binary
On 10/16/03 5:12 PM, Ingles, Juan W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder: Is this because
/opt/local/bin/perl points to the perl 5.6 binary
or
5.6 binary path is hard coded in BBEdit
which perl
on the terminal will tell you what binary you are launching
( not currently at my
At 16:12 -0700 10/16/03, Ingles, Juan W. wrote:
I wonder: Is this because
/opt/local/bin/perl points to the perl 5.6 binary
or
5.6 binary path is hard coded in BBEdit
I don't have any /opt/local/bin/. None was created by the CPAN perl 5.8 install in
July 2002
which perl
on the terminal
At 5:57 PM +1100 12/3/02, Ken Williams wrote:
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:07 PM, Rob Barris wrote:
Could someone use Inline.pm to talk to the Carbon API and the
desktop database? Then you could look up any app by its creator
code (I would wager).
Have a look at Mac::MoreFiles (part
Bruce A. Burdick, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/1/02 at 11:28p:
I had to change 'BBEdit' to 'BBEdit 6.5' to allow this to work in my
environment.
[...]
Naturally, this patch'll probably break other systems. A general solution
might try one and then the other.
You could also just change
On Monday, December 2, 2002, at 10:01 PM, John Gruber wrote:
Bruce A. Burdick, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/1/02 at
11:28p:
I had to change 'BBEdit' to 'BBEdit 6.5' to allow this to work in my
environment.
[...]
Naturally, this patch'll probably break other systems. A general
solution
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 05:07 PM, Rob Barris wrote:
Could someone use Inline.pm to talk to the Carbon API and the desktop
database? Then you could look up any app by its creator code (I would
wager).
Have a look at Mac::MoreFiles (part of Mac::Carbon), which does exactly
this.
On Thursday, November 28, 2002, at 01:23 AM, Pete Prodoehl wrote:
This may (or may not) work for you, I wrote a script to do a diff with
two files via the command line, and if they really are different, it
opens them both in BBEdit.
It's here:
http://zymm.com/raster/code/src
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 03:39 pm, Peder Axensten wrote:
I want to get started with CVS and BBEdit, how to I run a server?
There's nothing in the BBEdit manual...
Any good sources of info would be appreciated!
If you're doing local development you might find
http
for Perl development on OS X, of course :-)
CVS client:
I really like Mac CVS Pro, and have been using it under OS 9 and OS X
as my CVS client. Now, as I'm moving more exclusively to OS X with
it's command-line cvs, and with the release of BBEdit 7 with it's cvs
integration, I'd really
This may (or may not) work for you, I wrote a script to do a diff with
two files via the command line, and if they really are different, it
opens them both in BBEdit.
It's here:
http://zymm.com/raster/code/src/diffem_pl.txt
Pete
Ray Zimmerman wrote:
for Perl development on OS X
I want to get started with CVS and BBEdit, how to I run a server?
There's nothing in the BBEdit manual...
Any good sources of info would be appreciated!
/Peder
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 10:39 AM, Peder Axensten wrote:
I want to get started with CVS and BBEdit, how to I run a server?
There's nothing in the BBEdit manual...
Any good sources of info would be appreciated!
Setting up a server is beyond the scope of the BBEdit manual I'm
At 9:08 AM -0500 11/27/02, Jim Correia wrote (regarding my comments
on MacCVS Pro):
I think the problem is more than line feeds. The repository file
gets written out as (this may be wrong since it is from memory)
server:blahblahblah for an ssh type repository when the command line
cvs expects
At 9:08 AM -0500 11/27/02, Jim Correia wrote:
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 08:42 AM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
BBEdit diff:
I want a bbdiff command-line program. Something that will let me type:
bbdiff file1 file2
or
bbdiff dir1 dir2
to initiate a file comparison or multi-file
BBEdit diff:
I want a bbdiff command-line program. Something that will let me type:
bbdiff file1 file2
or
bbdiff dir1 dir2
to initiate a file comparison or multi-file comparison in BBEdit.
Ideally, Bare Bones would include something like this along side the
bbedit command-line tool, but I
jEdit anyone? http://jedit.org/
Open-source, customizable, hackable, extendable, good community,
responsive developers, lots of plugins, multi-platform, etc...
True, it's slower than BBEdit (since it's written in Java) but it's also
more open, if that's important to you.
Pete
_brian_d_foy
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:09:43 -0600 Pete Prodoehl wrote:
jEdit anyone? http://jedit.org/
Open-source, customizable, hackable, extendable, good community,
responsive developers, lots of plugins, multi-platform, etc...
True, it's slower than BBEdit (since it's written in Java) but it's
On 11/14/02 12:26 AM, Peter N Lewis wrote:
Yeah, I considered that, but I figured it'd be mentioned somewhere in the
BBEdit docs if I had to go to that length. Anyway, BBEdit appears to try to
contact the correct server, which leads me to believe it is reading my
config (or at least some
text editor: commit and diff.
Local CVS-only, or remote via ssh (with passcode prompting)?
I keep upgrading to new BBEdit versions, and it is useful enough on
occasion to make it worth while, but it's not my primary editor. It
requires far too much use of the mouse (emacs sequences probably
help
In article p0530090cb9f97023425e@[192.168.1.104],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kee Hinckley) wrote:
At 11:29 PM -0500 11/13/02, Chris Nandor wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (_brian_d_foy) wrote:
i'll have to see about this CVS tool thing. i'm dubious.
It really rocks.
Did you see that rectangular text selections made it into BBEdit 7.0 :) Not
only was Jim listening to us, he (they?) must have worked pretty hard to get
this feature ready in time for the 7.0 release. Looks like some other cool
features are in there too. I'm getting mine now!
--
Bill Stephenson
And CVS support too! Excellent!
Where's my credit card...
Adrian
On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 04:29 pm, Bill Stephenson wrote:
Did you see that rectangular text selections made it into BBEdit 7.0 :)
Not
only was Jim listening to us, he (they?) must have worked pretty hard to
get
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Howard) wrote:
And CVS support too! Excellent!
The CVS support is very cool, too.
--
Chris Nandor [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://osdn.com/
. Maybe
BBEdit isn't picking up my CVS environment variables? I thought there'd be
someplace to set them in the BBEdit prefs, but I haven't found it yet...
The only problem I had like that was when I tried to use CVS with a
checkout that had Mac newlines. Oopsie. :)
--
Chris Nandor
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark S Lowe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is BARELY an update. BBEdit is going the way of Interarchy.=20
They've run out of features, or in most causes reached a point where=20
they refuse to program anything difficult, so we're left with features=20=
they have
At 14:18 -0500 13/11/02, John Siracusa wrote:
On 11/13/02 11:46 AM, Adrian Howard wrote:
And CVS support too! Excellent!
Hrm, not so excellent for me so far...it just hangs with the connecting
dialog box and then fails. CVS works fine from the command line. Maybe
BBEdit isn't picking up my
the command line. Maybe
BBEdit isn't picking up my CVS environment variables? I thought there'd be
someplace to set them in the BBEdit prefs, but I haven't found it yet...
Where are your environment variables configured?
For BBEdit to have them, they probably need to be in:
~/.MacOSX
a simple key-command away; commit brings up a message
window to type in, and diff brings up a list of revisions to diff
against (and, of course, takes you to the great BBEdit differences
windows to view the diff).
I use it for a few other little things, like revision history and
checking the status
box and then fails. CVS works fine from the command line. Maybe
BBEdit isn't picking up my CVS environment variables? I thought there'd be
someplace to set them in the BBEdit prefs, but I haven't found it yet...
Where are your environment variables configured?
For BBEdit to have them
Yeah, I considered that, but I figured it'd be mentioned somewhere in the
BBEdit docs if I had to go to that length. Anyway, BBEdit appears to try to
contact the correct server, which leads me to believe it is reading my
config (or at least some of it). Or is the hostname in the CVS/ directories
He's got some J to E dictionary stuff
Yes! that's the odd, incredibly obscure reference I was going for, he also
wrote the regex book for Oreilly, which is choke full of perl examples,
although I don't think he uses a mac :(
Good book though, I really want a motorcycle now.
--
justin.
s
Has anyone experienced this,
Perl files saved in BBEdit in Unix and then closed and reopened, will be
opened as a Macintosh format? The problem seems to be that BBEdit isn't
changing \n to \r in the editing window, or aren't understanding that the
file is using Unix newlines and thinks it's
Well it seems a little obscure.
He's got some J to E dictionary stuff
I am still not pattingback(me)
But it reminded me to try grep replace in 10.1 and it now works
correctly for me though I am not sure if this was a universal problem.
find was working but replace was returning a pointer
hey everyone,
has anyone seen a Palette for BBEdit that shows all functions in an open
Perl Script? I think that would be killer for some of my monster
scripts. I know you can do it with dropdown button on the toolbar, but I
like the idea of always haveing the list accessable and move back
You know, that would be a great addition! Where do I petition for
(someone else!) to develop it? =)
--Ian
hey everyone,
has anyone seen a Palette for BBEdit that shows all functions in an
open Perl Script? I think that would be killer for some of my
monster scripts. I know you can do
BBEdit has it's own SDK for floating palletes and such. You can grab it
from the Bare Bones site I'm sure anyone who knows C could bust it out.
I was wondering if anyone has created one yet.
justin.
s k a z a t - http://skazat.com
On Thursday, September 20, 2001, at 04:31 PM, Ian Cabell
You know, that would be a great addition! Where do I petition for
(someone else!) to develop it? =)
bbedit-talk would be a better place to ask. It's a good list: see
http://www.barebones.com/bbswlists.html
apparently:
This discussion list is intended for any current or prospective users
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, william ross wrote:
ps. don't ask for the best bbedit substitute under windows.
drives them crazy.
Gvim. Good substitute on Macs, too... ;)
runs away/
--
Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is still there (only from bbedit)
thanks
allan
the commandline
Perl as shipped with X doesn't have this problem. I don't know how
Apple built it or configured it to not have this problem (it did in
development versions of the OS but that was fixed before it shipped).
Anything you set in .cshrc or the like won't affect BBEdit since it
inherits
.
I have saved two terminals to the MacPerl Support folder in BBEdit
Support
the 6.1.2 docs says this name is supposed to change but it did not to
Perl Support
The updater doesn't change the name of an existing folder. MacPerl
Support is supported for the time being so we don't break
At 12:31 -0400 4/23/01, Chris Nandor wrote:
Maybe one with not just an awesome GUI, but one that actually works well?
And a Unix that Works As I Expect? (Yes, I can change my expectations, but
I cannot fix the GUI.)
I haven't found the switch to the modified BSD Unix under Mac OS X any more
At 15:27 -0700 2001.04.23, John W Baxter wrote:
When a rational person can make that recommendation, then one is just
accommodating people who elect not to move up or can't afford to by
continuing MacPerl. That's a decision for later this year, I think...post
5.6.1-based MacPerl (if Chris and
to pass BBEdit flags when running a perl script?
I don't think so if I understand the question correctly.
I've been playing around with a perl script called swigs.pl and it
requires additional input to run correctly.
./swigs.pl -t Templates Pictures Gallery
If you are running the script
On Sunday, April 22, 2001, at 01:49 PM, Jim Correia wrote:
On 1:44 PM 4/22/01 Forest Dean Feighner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies, I don't want to turn this into a feature feud like I've
seen on other lists.
Naah. I just wanted to be clear that if you want to make sure we (Bare
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
