Jerry,
To list the installed versions of octave-devel:
post select octave
to select a particular version, e.g. octave-devel-rc:
sudo port select octave octave-devel-rc
On Oct 27, 2016, at 5:59 PM, list_em...@icloud.com wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Marius Schamschul
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>
> Jerry,
>
> If you want to use octave packages with octave-devel*, you need to use octave
> select. Otherwise mkoctfile (which is needed to build octave packages) cannot
> be found, and MacPorts will proceed
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:11 PM, wrote:
> I recently did a fresh installation of MacPorts. I then installed
> octave-devel because the version given for it is 4.1.0+, more recent than
> that for octave the version of which is given as 4.0.3_1.
>
-devel ports are for testing;
I recently did a fresh installation of MacPorts. I then installed octave-devel
because the version given for it is 4.1.0+, more recent than that for octave
the version of which is given as 4.0.3_1.
I then did
sudo port install octave-signal
which immediately began trying to install octave
>
> One last question … can you give me a quick idea of how much work would be
> involved in me attempting to locally implement the first approach you
> mentioned (different ports for different versions of octave). That is,
> starting with the files for the 3.8.2 revision of
One last question … can you give me a quick idea of how much work would be
involved in me attempting to locally implement the first approach you mentioned
(different ports for different versions of octave). That is, starting with the
files for the 3.8.2 revision of the octave port, what
re to it?
>
> An installed port is a compressed tarball of files. Activating a port
> extracts that tarball into /opt/local.
>
>> I guess my real question is, can I create a few symlinks to be able to
>> execute a deactivated octave port without activating it? If so, th
ocal.
> I guess my real question is, can I create a few symlinks to be able to
> execute a deactivated octave port without activating it? If so, that may be
> good enough for my purposes.
No, when a port is not active, the files you propose to symlink against do not
exist.
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2016, at 08:01, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
>>
>> I am the developer of a Matlab/Octave package that I need to test against
>> multiple versions of Matlab and Octave. I’ve been using MacPorts to build
On Sep 23, 2016, at 08:01, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
>
> I am the developer of a Matlab/Octave package that I need to test against
> multiple versions of Matlab and Octave. I’ve been using MacPorts to build and
> install Octave on my system and was wondering what is the best way to …
&
I am the developer of a Matlab/Octave package that I need to test against
multiple versions of Matlab and Octave. I’ve been using MacPorts to build and
install Octave on my system and was wondering what is the best way to …
(1) keep older versions of a port when the port is updated to use a
Today I installed octave (over some old versions) and octave-signal (signal
processing toolbox).
Octave installed without whining about conflicting Fortran compilers. Thanks to
somebody for fixing that.
However, when installing both octave and octave-signal, an attempt was made to
install
: org.macports.fetch for port qrupdate returned: must set at least
>> one Fortran variant
>>
>>
>>
>>> On May 23, 2016, at 8:19 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>>>
>>> Try +gcc5. (There is no +gfortran variant since this port uses only
>>> Fortra
s-jre-8-on-mac-os-x-el-capitan/>
[for just JRE]
Not sure whether octave with its default variant +java will be so fooled..
> On May 24, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On May 24, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>
>> Java SE 6 is apparently
On May 24, 2016, at 10:48 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
> Java SE 6 is apparently no longer on Apple’s servers (I looked for it a week
> or two ago).
Java SE 6 for OS X 10.7 Lion through OS X 10.11 El Capitan:
https://support.apple.com/kb/DL1572
For Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard:
https://suppor
I did the same, installing octave with -java variant. Finally, it’s working.
Thanks to all who gave help in this thread.
> On May 24, 2016, at 11:48 AM, Marius Schamschula
> wrote:
>
> Murray,
>
> On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
>
Murray,
On May 24, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Murray Eisenberg
wrote:
> Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the
> Java 6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.)
>
>
>
>> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wro
it, unless you
> specifically disabled it.
I think making the +java default might may have been a mistake, as this also
prevents the build bots from successfully building any octave packages. The
build bots apparently don’t have access to JRE. I ran into two of those
failures yesterday, when
Uh oh! Then how do I get octave to run at all, given that it requires the Java
6 runtime? (And I have Java 8 from Oracle as the active runtime.)
> On May 24, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>
> On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> (I’m u
On May 24, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> (I’m unsure why I installed with the +java variant in the first place!)
Looks like +java is in octave's default variants, so you'd get it, unless you
specifically disabled it.
___
macports-users
I have octave installed with variants:
octave
@4.0.2_0+app+atlas+docs+fltk+gfortran+graphicsmagick+java+qt4gui+sound
When I try to run octave from command line, I get pop-up window:
‘To open “this Java application” you need to
install the legacy Java SE 6 runtime.”
Under OS X
; Try +gcc5. (There is no +gfortran variant since this port uses only Fortran.)
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Murray Eisenberg > <mailto:murrayeisenb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Tried
>>
>> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +
nt
>
>
>
> On May 23, 2016, at 8:19 PM, David Strubbe wrote:
>
> Try +gcc5. (There is no +gfortran variant since this port uses only
> Fortran.)
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Murray Eisenberg <
> murrayeisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tried
>>
>
t; Tried
>
> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
>
> but following the automatic installation of fftw-3-single @3.3.4_1+gfortran
> the fetch of qrupdate-1.1.2_4+atlas generated new error:
>
> Error: org.macports.fetch for port qrupdate re
Try +gcc5. (There is no +gfortran variant since this port uses only
Fortran.)
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> Tried
>
> sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
>
> but following the automatic installation of fftw-3-single
>
Tried
sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
but following the automatic installation of fftw-3-single @3.3.4_1+gfortran
the fetch of qrupdate-1.1.2_4+atlas generated new error:
Error: org.macports.fetch for port qrupdate returned: must set at least one
Fortran
Perhaps you need to run
sudo port upgrade --enforce-variants octave -gcc48 +gfortran
which seems to rebuild fftw-3 and hdf5 to match.
> On May 20, 2016, at 17:59, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>
> OK, tried
>
> sudo port upgrade octave -gcc48 +gfortran
>
> but n
OK, tried
sudo port upgrade octave -gcc48 +gfortran
but now I see warnings for dependencies fftw, hdf5, fftw-3-single, qrupdate. ,
and the additional warning at the end.
How should I proceed now (so that I do NOT have to run octave with
—no-gui-libs)?
[user:~]$ sudo port upgrade
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Murray Eisenberg wrote:
> sudo port upgrade octave +gfortran
sudo port upgrade octave -gcc48 +gfortran
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
allber...@gmail.com ballb...@sinenomine.
Just tried that…
sudo port upgrade octave +gfortran
but I get error about of variant gcc48 with gfortran. Here’s record of
Terminal session:
[user:~]$ sudo port upgrade octave +gfortran
---> Fetching archive for expat
---> Attempting to fetch expat-2.1.1_0+universal.darwin_1
On May 16, 2016, at 6:27 AM, Joshua Root wrote:
> Murray Eisenberg wrote:
>> Currently installed and active is:
>>
>> octave @3.8.2_18+atlas+gcc48+glgui
>>
>> This is flagged as having available upgrade to 4.0.2_0, so I executed...
>>
>>
Murray Eisenberg wrote:
Currently installed and active is:
octave @3.8.2_18+atlas+gcc48+glgui
This is flagged as having available upgrade to 4.0.2_0, so I executed...
sudo port upgrade octave
…which generated the error:
Error: org.macports.fetch for port octave returned
Currently installed and active is:
octave @3.8.2_18+atlas+gcc48+glgui
This is flagged as having available upgrade to 4.0.2_0, so I executed...
sudo port upgrade octave
…which generated the error:
Error: org.macports.fetch for port octave returned: must set at least one
I am not able to build either octave-devel-rc or octave-devel-release on my
machine with OS X 10.11.2 and Xcode 7.2. It fails with the following error …
:info:build MAKEINFO octave.info
:info:build TEXI2DVI octave.dvi
:info:build MAKEINFO octave.html
:info:build You don't have a wo
Jerry,
You can find the variants as usual. For example
port info octave-devel-release
I have installed both octave-devel-rc and octave-devel-release (on different
machines) with -java +atlas
On Jan 16, 2016, at 6:25 PM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Brandon Allbery
On Jan 16, 2016, at 4:45 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Any idea when we can expect a port of Octave 4.x? I think its been available
> from source since May 2015.
>
> left-ear Z$ port list octave-devel\*
> octave-devel
On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Any idea when we can expect a port of Octave 4.x? I think its been
> available from source since May 2015.
left-ear Z$ port list octave-devel\*
octave-devel @4.1.0+ math/octave-devel
octave-devel-rc
Any idea when we can expect a port of Octave 4.x? I think its been available
from source since May 2015.
Jerry
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
Yes, there would be no difference so long as gcc5+ uses libgcc or
libgcc-devel (which they seem to do). The change actually works pretty
well in my testing; in the pre-configure stage from octave-1.0.tcl,
change the current "configure.env-append" to instead do:
{{{
set GFORTRAN [glo
linking. My way around this is to override the settings in mkoctfile by
> those determined from the active libgcc port. Since all of the gcc4*
> ports link with the libraries provided by libgcc, we should not have to
> rev-bump octave* ports for updates to gcc4*.
And there would presumab
e by
those determined from the active libgcc port. Since all of the gcc4*
ports link with the libraries provided by libgcc, we should not have to
rev-bump octave* ports for updates to gcc4*.
All of the above said, I need to get the qt4-mac relocation work done
first. I don't know when I'll get t
On 05.07.2015 05:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> If octave truly requires a revbump following every gcc upgrade, that's
> horrible.
>
> But if that's going to remain the case, then I guess a comment should be
> added to the top of every affected gcc port reminding
On Jul 4, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
> On 04.07.2015 04:34 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>> That means octave was not revision bumped with the gcc48 update. You’ll need
>> to
>> rebuild octave.
>>
>> As gcc49 was also updated recently, octav
> On Jul 4, 2015, at 11:28 AM, Mihai Moldovan wrote:
>
> On 04.07.2015 04:34 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>> That means octave was not revision bumped with the gcc48 update. You’ll need
>> to
>> rebuild octave.
>>
>> As gcc49 was also updated recently,
On 04.07.2015 04:34 PM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
> That means octave was not revision bumped with the gcc48 update. You’ll need
> to
> rebuild octave.
>
> As gcc49 was also updated recently, octave will need to be rev-bumped. You
> should add a ticket on MacPorts trac.
Alan,
That means octave was not revision bumped with the gcc48 update. You’ll need to
rebuild octave.
As gcc49 was also updated recently, octave will need to be rev-bumped. You
should add a ticket on MacPorts trac.
On Jul 4, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Alan Rakes wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ___
>>>>>> macports-users mailing list
>>>>>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
>>>>>> <mailto:macports-users@lis
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> macports-users mailing list
>>>>> macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
>>>>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
>&
o/macports-users>
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you recently upgraded OS X on your computer, or uninstalled gcc48?
>>> mkoctfile is looking for Fortran, and not finding it, as gcc48 is not
>>> properly installed.
>>>
>>> BTW: octave is currently b
gt;
>
>> On Jul 4, 2015, at 9:18 AM, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>>
>> Alan,
>>
>> On Jul 4, 2015, at 8:06 AM, Alan Rakes wrote:
>>
>>> During a routine sudo port upgrade outdated, I started getting a configure
>>> error on upgrading oct
s <mailto:aara...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
>
>> During a routine sudo port upgrade outdated, I started getting a configure
>> error on upgrading octave-control. I performed a sudo port clean
>> octave-control and tried again which often works, but this time, alas
Alan,
On Jul 4, 2015, at 8:06 AM, Alan Rakes wrote:
> During a routine sudo port upgrade outdated, I started getting a configure
> error on upgrading octave-control. I performed a sudo port clean
> octave-control and tried again which often works, but this time, alas no.
>
&
During a routine sudo port upgrade outdated, I started getting a configure
error on upgrading octave-control. I performed a sudo port clean
octave-control and tried again which often works, but this time, alas no.
Here is the message when it failed.
Error: org.macports.configure for port
Hi Joerg - Can you try:
{{{
sudo port clean octave
sudo port install octave +gcc48
}}}
and see if that helps. Sometimes it does, though I kinda doubt it will
in your case. If not, then do a search <
https://trac.macports.org/search > to see if someone else has already
reported the same (o
I just did a `port selfupdate; port upgrade outdated' run under macos
10.10.3 on a mac pro. `octave' fails like this during the configure phase
(final section of main.log):
8<--
:info:configure checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77
c
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014, at 03:13 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
> Now back to my original goal, getting multiple versions of octave installed …
> if I now do the following to build version 3.6.4 of Octave …
>
> svn co -r 121949
> http://svn.macports.org/repository/macports/trunk/dports/m
>>
>> https://trac.macports.org/ticket/46040
>
> I've pushed the fix (https://trac.macports.org/changeset/129359). Please run
> a selfupdate and upgrade your installed ports before cleaning libgcc and
> trying gcc49 again.
>
> vq
Thanks, that fixed the issues I was
On Dec 10, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> On Dec 10, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
>
>> :info:build dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libedit.0.dylib
>> :info:build Referenced from: /opt/local/libexec/llvm-3.5/lib/libLTO.dylib
>> :info:build Reason: image not
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:20 AM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
> Error: org.macports.configure for port atlas returned: Atlas could not detect
> any fortran compiler. If you really don’t need the fortran interface to be
> built, please use the +nofortran option, else install a fortran compiler
> (e.g. gcc
On Dec 10, 2014, at 2:03 PM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
> :info:build dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libedit.0.dylib
> :info:build Referenced from: /opt/local/libexec/llvm-3.5/lib/libLTO.dylib
> :info:build Reason: image not found
> :info:build make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.dylib] Error 1
Sorry
gcc48 port? my setup (which I think is
pretty vanilla OS X 10.10.1)? or, more likely, me?
I don’t want to keep bothering the whole list. Is there somebody who is willing
to help me off-list and walk me through the steps to build Octave successfully
on a fresh install of MacPorts?
Thanks
in zlup1up.o
> :info:build ld: symbol(s) not found for architecture x86_64
> :info:build collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> Any suggestions on how to resolve this? I’m happy to wipe everything out and
> start over even though it takes a few hours to re-build. I’m just l
Ray,
On Dec 10, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Ray Zimmerman wrote:
> Ok, I’m a MacPorts newbie here, but it turns out I haven’t even been able to
> get the current version of Octave to build yet. This is a clean install of
> the latest MacPorts on OS X 10.10.1 with Xcode 6.1.1.
>
> I
Ok, I’m a MacPorts newbie here, but it turns out I haven’t even been able to
get the current version of Octave to build yet. This is a clean install of the
latest MacPorts on OS X 10.10.1 with Xcode 6.1.1.
I first attempted …
sudo port install octave
… which resulted in …
Error
Hi Ray - You actually want to look at the Portfile itself for the
version info. In this case, the one you want is <
https://trac.macports.org/browser/trunk/dports/math/octave/Portfile?rev=121949
> .. or, revision 121949. The next revision of this Portfile (121950)
bumps the version to
I am new to MacPorts and was hoping to use it to install the current version of
GNU Octave 3.8.2 (currently building on my machine) and some earlier versions,
such as 3.6.4. I’m finding it difficult to figure out how to do the earlier
versions, if it is even possible.
I found this page (https
>>
>> On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Jean-Francois Gobin
wrote:
>> Let’s try a last one. Could you run and provide the output of "port
rdeps octave +atlas +gcc48 +gui”?
>>
>> The following ports are dependencies of octave @3.8.2_1+atlas+gcc48+gui:
>>
put of "port rdeps
octave +atlas +gcc48 +gui”?
>
> The following ports are dependencies of octave @3.8.2_1+atlas+gcc48+gui:
> bison
> xz
> libiconv
> gperf
> gettext
> expat
> ncurses
> m4
> flex
> perl5
>
> On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Jean-Francois Gobin > <mailto:jeanfgo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Let’s try a last one. Could you run and provide the output of "port rdeps
>> octave +atlas
> On Nov 9, 2014, at 7:30 AM, Jean-Francois Gobin wrote:
>
> Let’s try a last one. Could you run and provide the output of "port rdeps
> octave +atlas +gcc48 +gui”?
>
The following ports are dependencies of octave @3.8.2_1+atlas+gcc48+gui:
bison
xz
li
Let’s try a last one. Could you run and provide the output of "port rdeps
octave +atlas +gcc48 +gui”?
Jean Gobin, Ing., CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Security
http://www.gobinjf.be/ <http://newsfromjean.blogspot.com/>
___
macports-users mailing li
On Nov 9, 2014, at 12:06 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> I have no idea why gcc47 is needed. It is the default compiler for
> GraphicsMagick, but that has already been built (using gcc48) and installed.
No, GraphicsMagick doesn't even have the option of using gcc47 or gcc48; there
would be no reason
> On Nov 8, 2014, at 8:33 PM, Jean-Francois Gobin wrote:
>
> Hello there,
>
> I tried to replicate this on my machine but no GCC47 installation. Could you
> provide the output of
>
> port -y install octave +atlas +gui
> port deps octave +atlas +gui
>
> J.
Hello there,
I tried to replicate this on my machine but no GCC47 installation. Could you
provide the output of
port -y install octave +atlas +gui
port deps octave +atlas +gui
J.
Jean Gobin, Ing., CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Security
http://www.gobinjf.be/ <http://newsfromjean.blogspot.
> On Nov 8, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 8, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>>>
>>>> $ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
>>>> ---> C
> On Nov 8, 2014, at 12:30 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
>> On Nov 8, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>>
>>> $ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
>>> ---> Computing dependencies for gcc47
>>> ---> Fetching archive for gcc4
> Le 8 nov. 2014 à 18:40, Frank Schima a écrit :
>
> It could be a dependency built with gcc47 and it is getting updated.
Yeah, I concur. That was precisely why I was asking if atlas was installed.
Vincent
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-use
> On Nov 8, 2014, at 6:49 AM, Ben Abbott wrote:
>
> I don't think this is supposed to be happening.
>
> $ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
> ---> Computing dependencies for gcc47
> ---> Fetching archive for gcc47
> ---> Attempting to fetch gc
> On Nov 8, 2014, at 10:24 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote:
>
>> $ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
>> ---> Computing dependencies for gcc47
>> ---> Fetching archive for gcc47
>
> Do you have atlas already installed or not?
>
> V.
Yes, atlas
> $ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
> ---> Computing dependencies for gcc47
> ---> Fetching archive for gcc47
Do you have atlas already installed or not?
V.
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macos
I don't think this is supposed to be happening.
$ sudo port install octave +atlas +gui +gcc48
---> Computing dependencies for gcc47
---> Fetching archive for gcc47
---> Attempting to fetch gcc47-4.7.4_2.darwin_14.x86_64.tbz2 from
http://packages.macports.org/gcc47
---> At
On Sep 30, 2014, at 7:34 AM, Kspaei wrote:
I also am on 10.9.5. I have the following variants installed for boost and
octave:
$ port installed octave boost
The following ports are currently installed:
boost @1.56.0_1+no_single+no_static+python27 (active)
octave @3.8.2_1+atlas+gcc48
Dear all,
I have Mac OS X 10.9.5 and I installed octave 3.8.2.
When I type "exit" from octave, however, I see the following:
octave:1> exit
libc++abi.dylib: terminating with uncaught exception of type
octave_interrupt_exception
panic: Abort trap: 6 -- stopping myself...
attem
On May 10, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> On May 9, 2014, at 19:42, Jerry wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Ryan. Light testing of Octave indicates that it is currently
>> working. However, at least some of the dependencies indicated in the list
>> above ("Error: Th
On May 9, 2014, at 19:42, Jerry wrote:
> Thanks, Ryan. Light testing of Octave indicates that it is currently working.
> However, at least some of the dependencies indicated in the list above
> ("Error: The following dependencies were not installed:...") are in fact not
&g
On May 9, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On May 8, 2014, at 23:14, Jerry wrote:
>
>> Octave has failed to install (once again), this time into a fresh MacPorts
>> established according to the Migration advice given at
>> https://trac.macports.or
On May 8, 2014, at 23:14, Jerry wrote:
> Octave has failed to install (once again), this time into a fresh MacPorts
> established according to the Migration advice given at
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration onto a new installation of Mavericks.
>
> I did:
> sudo p
On May 9, 2014, at 3:01 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 9, 2014, at 12:58 AM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jerry,
>>>
>>> octave isn’t building these days
>>
>> Th
On May 9, 2014, at 1:25 AM, Jerry wrote:
>
> On May 9, 2014, at 12:58 AM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
>
>> Hi Jerry,
>>
>> octave isn’t building these days
>
> This is TERRIBLE news! I would never have upgraded my OS had I known this.
>
>>
te that atlas is
> installed?
Yes, it is installed. Also the most recent version. No need to worry about that
(for now.)
> FWIW the thread there mentions gcc48 and FWIW I used variant +gcc48, as in
> sudo port install octave +atlas+docs+fltk+gcc48
>
> If you look at my origin
On May 9, 2014, at 12:58 AM, mk-macpo...@techno.ms wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
> octave isn’t building these days
This is TERRIBLE news! I would never have upgraded my OS had I known this.
> on 10.9 because of atlas [1].
I get:
$ port installed atlas
The following ports are current
Hi Jerry,
octave isn’t building these days on 10.9 because of atlas [1].
Can you verify that you’re seeing the same error?
Ticket responder Vince obviously managed to get it to run on his end, but it’s
unclear how...
Greets,
Marko
[1] https://trac.macports.org/ticket/42160
Octave has failed to install (once again), this time into a fresh MacPorts
established according to the Migration advice given at
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration onto a new installation of Mavericks.
I did:
sudo port install octave +atlas+docs+fltk+gcc48
The first attempt failed after
Hi Jerry - There is a ticket open discussing reincarnating octave-devel
as the 3.8 release series: < https://trac.macports.org/ticket/41155 >.
I haven't had time to do more than post a patch for folks interested in
trying this change out. The patch provides 3.8.0-rc1 (along with
pat
Does anyone have any idea when Octave 3.8.1 will become available? It's been
out for several weeks and as of 3.8 includes a beta version of the GUI.
Jerry
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforg
On Dec 19, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Michael Dickens wrote:
> Hi Jerry - I just updated my 10.9 boot to 10.9.1, then updated MacPorts
> to latest; Xcode did not change. Then uninstalled octave and reinstalled
> it. No issues for me. Just a guess: Your MacPorts install is out of
>
On Dec 20, 2013, at 05:01, Jerry wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2013, at 3:43 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 04:36, Jerry wrote:
>>
>>> Also: Can you comment on Michael's suggestion?
>>
>> Michael suggested you install the octave port with t
specific reason to use a different compiler, in which
> case the port will specify a specific compiler. Ports will never use just
> “gcc”.
>
>
>> Can you recommend to me how to use the correct gcc?
>>
>> Also: Can you comment on Michael's suggestion?
>
>
l?
MacPorts usually uses a compiler provided by the Xcode command line tools,
unless a port has a specific reason to use a different compiler, in which case
the port will specify a specific compiler. Ports will never use just “gcc”.
> Can you recommend to me how to use the correct gcc?
>
stand them.
>>>
>>> MacPorts bases its decision on whether -arch flags are supported on the
>>> value of configure.compiler. However ports like octave that use the new
>>> fortran recipe introduced somewhat recently do not set configure.compiler,
>>> t
1 - 100 of 363 matches
Mail list logo
