Hello,
I am looking for a contact person at Onet Poczta for mitigation request on
Op.pl
Poczta.onet.pl
Vp.pl
Onet.pl
Etc.
I am having difficulties in finding a contact form for online request.
Thanks
Marco Franceschetti
Head of Deliverability | ContactLab
M. +39 331 1717 978 | T. +39
Thanks Alex, good to know.
Tim
From: mailop [mailto:mailop-boun...@mailop.org] On Behalf Of Brotman,
Alexander
Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 9:23 AM
To: timrutherf...@c4.net; mailop@mailop.org
Subject: Re: [mailop] Comcast Feedback Loop emails that look legitimate
Tim,
Yes-ish.
Tim,
Yes-ish. We do treat the action of moving a message to the spam folder the
same as clicking the "Spam" button. This is fairly common. It can make for
mistakes if someone is dragging a message and accidentally drops the message in
the wrong place. We've seen instances where someone
Just wanted to pass some reports of 'dirty' lists noted in this weeks
reports from the auditors.. that should be reviewed..
Time to do a fall cleaning..
--
"Catch the Magic of Linux..."
Michael Peddemors, President/CEO
We see these kind of false positives all of the time from the AOL FBL. Our
front line technicians have been trained in spamfu so they generally take
care of these when they come in. But it is annoying that so many users will
mark legitimate mail as spam.
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Brotman,
Address space for IPv6 is so huge, that it's almost impossible to keep
IPv6 reputation data, and sender authentication is usually required. for
IPv6 host Under normal conditions, SPF and DKIM are used to authenticate
sender, but if you forward messages without address rewrite, all
forwarded
> 2017-11-08 21:46 GMT+02:00 Brandon Long via mailop :
>> GSuite users can also denote a host as an inbound gateway to get around this
>> problem, but I was never able to get the resources to have gmail users have
>> the same ability. It's possible this is something we could
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017, 1:29 PM Charles McKean
wrote:
> > 2017-11-08 21:46 GMT+02:00 Brandon Long via mailop :
> >> GSuite users can also denote a host as an inbound gateway to get around
> this problem, but I was never able to get the resources to
I designed a similar system to what Andris Reinman mentioned for our
outbound mail system which hosts about 80k email accounts. This is a 4 tier
system; low spam probability, medium spam probability, high spam
probability, blatant spam. After the message is scored we use postfix
header routing to
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 12:20 -0700, Warren Volz wrote:
> All,
>
> One of my users has their account setup to forward mail to Gmail.
> Recently I've started to see lots of rejects that look like the
> following:
>
> (expanded from ): host
>
Yes, forwarding spam to us is generally a really poor idea, especially over
ipv6 [image: ].
The 18 is more of a source code, ie the source of the rejection, not really
a specific error code. They're not generally useful to end users.
We've discussed before that one thing that may work best is
We at Zone.ee handle redirects to Gmail (or to any target actually) in 3
steps:
1. If the message does not get any spam points (we use Rspamd) then we
forward the message through our normal redirect IP range (3 IPs that
equally share the messages)
2. If the message gets spam points but not enough
In article <0c09bad3-14bc-cd51-9bc8-25a205273...@lscg.ucsb.edu> you write:
>I wonder if it would ever work to allow a server to forward a message
>while including headers that indicate the message had signs of spam. It
>would only work in the negative direction (this message is spam, but not
This is to be expected if you let your users forward spam.
Some systems may be able to automatically notice, but.
Aloha,
Michael.
--
Michael J Wise
Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
"Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
Got the Junk Mail Reporting
On 11/08/2017 12:35 pm, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> IMO, you really can't forward mail to Gmail; they will block you if you
> forward any spam at all.
>
> Gmail accounts can be setup to pull mail in via POP-3, that's a far better
> way for them to get their mail.
It's not my preference for sure.
Ah thats a good idea.
My issue is more with the messages that Google mis-categorizes as spam
but the local catch would fix that.
And you are right, I need to disable the forward to others option...
-Warren
On 11/08/2017 12:42 pm, Michael Peddemors wrote:
> Do what we do, if you mark a
On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 11:42:41 -0800, Michael Peddemors said:
> Besides, you want to keep the customer, not make him a gmail customer ;)
If the mail service is bundled with something else that's a profit center,
unbundling
the cost center part and handing that to Google will improve your bottom
Do what we do, if you mark a message as 'Spam' deliver it to a 'local'
IMAP folder called spam, and only forward the non-spam emails.
If they want to see it, they can log into your server to check that
account.. (and don't let them turn spam protection off)
But really, you should 'stop
Users will find a way to circumvent regardless...
Is the mail being redirected or being sent on via store and forward? If the
latter then just adding himself to the address book may be enough to let them
mail through at Gmail.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: mailop
All,
One of my users has their account setup to forward mail to Gmail.
Recently I've started to see lots of rejects that look like the
following:
(expanded from ): host
gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[2607:f8b0:400e:c04::1a] said: 550-5.7.1
[ipv6 address
I wonder if it would ever work to allow a server to forward a message
while including headers that indicate the message had signs of spam. It
would only work in the negative direction (this message is spam, but not
this message is ham).
I kind of think of in the way the courts do with
21 matches
Mail list logo