On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 19:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:04 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 13:04 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 12:39:15 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 05:18:04PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
[...]
i could manage it somewhat... one problem i had, was that after a
while the screen-saver would disable my displays and then glxgears
wouldnt hang anymore... (where to disable that?)
[...]
Some combination of:
xset -dpms
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 23:55 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51
Hi Jesse,
Am 07.03.2010 00:11, schrieb Jesse Barnes:
It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
the new scheme.
dont
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 00:24:24 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue mailingli...@openelec.tv wrote:
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:11:59 -0800
Jesse Barnes jbar...@virtuousgeek.org wrote:
It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
the
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue mailingli...@openelec.tv wrote:
looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
Subject Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?) to Mesa-dev, xorg and intel-gfx list?
i have still
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:02 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 12:55 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 05
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 13:36 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:18:07
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 08:02 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:40:27 +0200
Maxim Levitsky maximlevit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 14:10 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 11:18 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 23:48:48
looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
Subject Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel (loop?) to Mesa-dev, xorg and intel-gfx list?
i have still this issue, but i dont know what you need for informations
to fix the issues?
with ati
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue mailingli...@openelec.tv wrote:
looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
Subject Problem using an Mesa based App with recent
xorg/mesa/xf86-video-intel
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 00:05 +0200, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 22:35 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue mailingli...@openelec.tv wrote:
looks this like my problems that i have reported some days ago with
Subject Problem
It would help to know what the server is doing at this point with the
client. It may be that it put the client to sleep and hasn't woken it
up yet, or there could be something wrong with our getbuffers code in
the new scheme.
Jesse
On Sat, 06 Mar 2010 18:02:51 +0100
Stephan Raue
19 matches
Mail list logo
