, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
While this is starting to feel less like a general (80%) and more like a
vertical (20%) application/use case, having had to deal with CFPs myself,
I'm certainly sympathetic.
I'd say to start with, compile a list of URLs to examples of CFPs
Hi Mike,
While this is starting to feel less like a general (80%) and more like a
vertical (20%) application/use case, having had to deal with CFPs myself,
I'm certainly sympathetic.
I'd say to start with, compile a list of URLs to examples of CFPs on the web
so we can start to document the
I believe that Håkon Wium Lie has also looked into footnotes markup quite a
bit, as part of his work on a book microformat, AKA boom.
http://microformats.org/wiki/book-examples
Tantek
On 5/12/06 8:36 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 12, 2006, at 9:53 AM, Paul Bryson wrote:
Phil,
This is one of the best articles on microformats written to date.
I've added it to the press page:
http://microformats.org/wiki/press
I found only a couple of typos.
On page 3:
http://www.devsource.com/article2/0,1895,1961109,00.asp
1. ; instead of ,
N:Haack,Phil
Should be:
All:
I started writing this this past March when Robert Bachmann was helping with
adding hCard markup to existing conference web pages:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-authoring
This document is specifically written for web designers, web authors, who
themselves know anywhere from enough
Kevin,
Congratulations on the launch of your beta!
What microformats do AIM pages support?
It certainly seems like a natural fit for hCard and XFN.
Thanks,
Tantek
On 5/10/06 1:47 PM, Kevin Lawver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooops. http://www.aimpages.com
It's a first beta (and I do mean
microformat they want.
We're definitely planning on adding hcard and XFN, and later on, hAtom
and probably hListing when it gets a little farther along.
Cheers,
Kevin
Tantek Çelik wrote:
Kevin,
Congratulations on the launch of your beta!
What microformats do AIM pages support
I've split this half of Chris's message into a separate thread because I
think he raises some good points.
On 5/8/06 12:29 AM, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's really time that we started having some awesome examples
of microformats in use.
Chris, check out the
Welcome brush!
As someone who has typed up (and published) *numerous) meeting minutes
himself, I certainly recognize that this could be a useful microformat.
Regarding creating a new microformat, please read the following pages
thoroughly:
http://microformats.org/wiki/process
On 5/3/06 5:29 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 6:31 AM, Edward Summers wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 5:29 AM, brush wrote:
*new microformat?: hparticipants (multiple hcards plus class=role)
-- could be useful in many other circumstances
If a role could somehow
On 5/3/06 4:37 AM, Rémi Prévost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thibaud Elzière wrote:
Hello Everybody,
I am new to the list and very interesting in eveything concerning
micro-format. I would like to translate some missing parts of the wiki
in french but I am unable to create a new account via
On 5/2/06 12:33 AM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The idea of mapping between languages however is not as crazy or hard as
some of you think.
Joe, that may be, but figuring out and documenting mappings between natural
languages is a linguistics research topic far outside the focus of
On 5/3/06 11:43 AM, brush [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks, tantek and others. i will go ahead and start the wiki process
with some of the research i've done already, and will invite you to join
me!
one thought about role: is it appropriate to re-engineer the category
from what is
On 5/3/06 12:19 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 3, 2006, at 1:43 PM, brush wrote:
one thought about role: is it appropriate to re-engineer the
category
from what is apparently originally intended as a relatively static
feature (ie. sales engineer for a person or green
On 5/3/06 1:19 PM, Thibaud Elzière [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The url scheme for localized page seems to be : title-language were
language is the 2 characters language code.
Correct.
It is used for the Spanish
translation however -sp is used whereas -es would have been better
On 5/3/06 6:06 PM, Rémi Prévost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I understand. I have another question related to multi-lingual
content. For example, there's a naming convention that says XMDP
profile pages for microformat specs should be named with the name of the
spec, followed by -profile. But
Steven,
Interesting document, but it appears to only address languages in *content*,
rather than in the markup itself. Though the document refers to Language
Tags, AFAIK, those are tags in the content (similar to rel-tag perhaps),
rather than angle-bracketed tags.
If I have misread the
Ryan,
This is an excellent description of the larger problem (that goes far
beyond, and is perhaps independent of microformats).
I'd say this is worthy of an FAQ entry, as I can see this question being
raised again (I believe Karl himself raised it some time ago before).
Thanks,
Tantek
On
Brian is correct.
In addition, semantically the author isn't just a *name*, the author is a
*person*, and the microformat for a person is hCard. That's why we are
using hCard there.
If however, you wanted to reuse fn for the name of the work being cited, I
could see a case being made for
On 5/1/06 3:27 PM, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 06-05-02 à 03:24, Ryan King a écrit :
Internationalization in protocols and formats is a big problem.
Much bigger than microformats. Maybe we'll be able to advance
things in microformats, even if only a little.
I'm curious has
On 5/1/06 5:49 PM, Karl Dubost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 06-05-02 à 08:50, Tantek Çelik a écrit :
div class=citation
span class=fnThe Book of Ryan/span
span class=author vcard
span class=fnRyan Cannon/span
/span
/div
Is there a reason for not using the
- cite
On 4/26/06 10:52 PM, Steven Livingstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not sure where the redundancy comes from - you use what you want.
The redundancy in XML (and other formats as well) comes from the fact that
an element can have only one element name.
Since microformats use attributes which take
On 4/25/06 10:13 PM, Joe Andrieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I'm new to microformats and a bit confused on how one
disambiguates microformat names. It seems to be somewhat related to the
UID/URI issue.
Welcome Joe!
I'm not sure I understand all of the subtleties between the spec
On 4/25/06 8:04 PM, Edward Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
FWIW, I like Xiaoming's suggestion.
I'm glad Xiaoming expressed the case for URI so well.
Me too.
I just added it
to the uid-brainstorming [1] page. I have to admit I've seen
On 4/26/06 9:27 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 26, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Ross, if the problem you're trying to solve doesn't involve common
real
world publishing cases on the *Web*, then yes, it should be
dismissed as far
as microformats are concerned
On 4/24/06 7:56 PM, Etan Wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third, I actually see disadvantages in using URIs as a basic unit rather
than URLs.
All URLs are URIs. What have I missed?
The opposite. The fact that not all URIs are URLs. That's the point. You
can infer things about a URL in
On 4/24/06 8:09 PM, Benjamin Carlyle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:39 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alf Eaton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
How would you see that sitting inside HTML mark-up?
abbr class=uri title=urn:isbn:09507881200 9507881-2-0/abbr
On 4/24/06 7:50 PM, Etan Wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote to the Microformats Discuss mailing list on
2006-04-19 in a message with a title like ³[uf-discuss] UID, URL, live
microformats (was: Microformat auto-discovery WAS: Plazes
Microformats)² (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED
First of all, Welcome Xiaoming Liu!
On 4/25/06 8:19 AM, Xiaoming Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Ryan King wrote:
URLs, if used propertly can be sufficient for globalby unique
identifier[s]. Sure, you can mess things up by using a non-routeable address
or scheme, but
On 4/25/06 12:01 PM, Xiaoming Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Please list the specific problems you've found with UID or URL, so we can
make sure they are documented and properly explored/resolved.
Thanks for taking into consideration.
First
On 4/25/06 2:41 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think the case for ISBN is no big difference from telephone number or
zip code, etc.
The average person knows, understands, and uses telephone numbers and
zip
On 4/25/06 2:38 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tantek Çelik
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I'm very concerned that that may be an abuse of abbr; and wonder how
it will sound when read to someone using assistive software?
This is a common misconception[1
On 4/25/06 3:04 PM, Ross Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek,
Your responses and your reply about 'letting the market decide' what gets to
survive on the web makes me think that your attitude about microformats is:
Microformats are for commercial-purposes first and foremost.
Not
On 4/25/06 1:35 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 25, 2006, Tantek Çelik wrote:
We *want*
resources that can be identified by network location and thus a
system that
shows a bias *for* that is a *good* thing.
Is the proposal that UIDs SHOULD be URLs or UIDs MUST be URLs
On 4/25/06 3:25 PM, Xiaoming Liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Tantek Çelik wrote:
ISO8601 is fairly well accepted. The battle is over. So we pick the
current winner and go with it.
Whereas, as you point out, the market for abstract ids, whether ISBN,
pubmed
On 4/25/06 4:47 PM, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I like Xiaoming's suggestion.
Cool. Please add that comment (with your name/WikiAlias) to Xiaoming's
proposal on the uid-brainstorming page.
Thanks,
Tantek
___
microformats-discuss
On 4/24/06 7:42 AM, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as we extracted geo and adr from hCard to address the use cases
brought up the Geo community for a simple format for locations, perhaps we
can extract uid from hCard
Welcome Danilo!
Could you provide a URL to the page you are rebuilding or to your rebuild in
progress so we could take a look at how you're publishing the information
now?
Thanks,
Tantek
On 4/24/06 1:23 PM, Danilo Laurindo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, I'm a bit of a starter in
On 4/24/06 3:39 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alf Eaton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
How would you see that sitting inside HTML mark-up?
abbr class=uri title=urn:isbn:09507881200 9507881-2-0/abbr
Thank you.
I'm very concerned that that may be an
On 4/21/06 7:18 PM, Luke Arno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark P. is on the right track here as usual, I think.
Yes.
What has been glossed over in this convo is that
underlying the discomfort that has been expressed
on the validation front here is this:
Sure you can validate a microformat
On 4/21/06 10:08 AM, Edward Summers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:08 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
Perhaps not a microformat, in the sense used here, but I feel that
there
should be some way (or is there already?) for marking up an ISBN
number,
so that it is recognisable as such.
On 4/20/06 9:06 AM, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, I've added 'n' next to 'fn' since I broke up my name. Whether
it's really necessarily (and useful) or just something that the
previous spec called for is still up for interpretation...
Perhaps I should add this to the FAQ (or
Redirecting to microformats-dev...
On 4/20/06 12:25 PM, Bruce D'Arcus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Call me sceptical. Dedicated XML formats (like Atom) that can be
validated with standard XML tools
Bruce, you're absolutely right about the value of validation. Definitely an
area where we have
Sam, in short yes.
XHTML Basic supports the class attribute:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-basic/#s1.3.1
The div and span elements and the class attribute are supported...
Thanks,
Tantek
On 4/20/06 5:05 AM, Sam Sethi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Microformats work on a Mobile platform? Has
On 4/19/06 10:59 AM, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 18, 2006, at 6:49 PM, Sam Sethi wrote:
Thanks Eran. Also lots of back reading to do ;-) But one more quick
question do you have a pointer to the topic on why hcard's are
class=vcard
and not class=hcard? In fact why the
David, it appears you may have missed my email from this morning:
[uf-discuss] UID, URL, live microformats (was: Microformat auto-discovery
WAS: Plazes Microformats)
http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-April/003726
.html
In short, we don't want a vocabulary explosion
On 4/19/06 1:57 PM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ryan King wrote:
This is great place to continue this debate. The issue (as I
understand it) is that this optimization doesn't allow nested vcards:
span class=vcard fn[SPAM-DATA]/span
This would still be a problem
Welcome Aaron!
On 4/18/06 12:23 AM, Aaron R. Fulkerson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I¹ve searched about and have been unable to find a). a validator
There is no general/complete hCard validator yet, though Brian Suda's
excellent X2V processor does provide warnings and errors for common
mistakes.
On 4/9/06 3:53 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the end of the meeting I agreed to make a new wiki page that
summarised the previous discussion and had some examples that could
be a basis for further progress. Here's the page - feel free to edit,
particular with extending the
On 4/10/06 7:13 AM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Apr 2006, at 03:40, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 4/9/06 3:53 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the end of the meeting I agreed to make a new wiki page that
summarised the previous discussion and had some examples that could
On 4/10/06 9:01 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2006, at 10:09 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Alf, it is premature to be making recommendations when the
necessary steps
in the process have not yet been completed. More on the wiki page
itself.
I read the wiki page itself
On 4/10/06 8:13 AM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Apr 2006, at 11:09, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 4/10/06 7:13 AM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10 Apr 2006, at 03:40, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 4/9/06 3:53 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the end
On 4/10/06 11:37 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When someone looks at the hcard pages and sees no
collection of real-world publishing of contact data nor discussion of
the properties implied by such examples, I think it's far too easy to
infer that microformats come from other
On 4/8/06 7:32 PM, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems the People page is out of date...
http://microformats.org/about/people/
Should that be updated?
Good question. The right thing to do might be to simply capture the fact
that it represented the state of that information when
Great find Chris!
This would be a perfect request for the LazyWeb section of /wiki/to-do
Thanks,
Tantek
On 4/8/06 7:58 PM, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uses your Apple Address Book and turns it into the source of data for
a web server...
On 4/5/06 2:19 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Apr 2006, at 17:14, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
Alf Eaton wrote:
At the moment, microformatted URIs are generally marked up in the
href attribute of an a tag with a class of 'url' (hreview,
hcard) or 'email' (hcard). This
On 4/5/06 2:31 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Apr 2006, at 17:24, Tantek Çelik wrote:
On 4/5/06 2:19 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Apr 2006, at 17:14, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
Alf Eaton wrote:
At the moment, microformatted URIs are generally
On 4/5/06 3:03 PM, Alf Eaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 05 Apr 2006, at 17:44, brian suda wrote:
In hCard you can
do either of the following to represent a URL
a href=http://example.org; class=urlMy homepage/a
or
span class=urlhttp://example.org/span
Could you also do
abbr
On 4/5/06 6:23 PM, Chris Messina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saw a discussion about XHTML styleguides...
I think we need something equally digestible for publishers... that
makes it super super simple to get and apply microformats... Tara
and I discussed this as a Dummy's Guide but I think a
Greetings,
Since there have been several recent podcasts where microformats have been
discussed, I've created a page on the wiki to keep track of them (similar to
the presentations page)
http://microformats.org/wiki/podcasts
Please check it out, have a listen to the listed podcasts.
The page
Chris,
The perceived value that you see is exactly why this whole topic is such a
massive trap.
It is very seductive (especially to programmers) to think that you can
define a format for formats (a meta-format shall we say), *once*, then
implement *only that*, then have every specific format
Hi Drew!
On 3/18/06 3:39 AM, Drew McLellan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone seen any third-party microformat support for Dreamweaver?
I've done a bit of searching and can't find any reference to actual
implementations.
I don't know of any either.
If there's nothing out there I'll see if
Welcome Breton!
On 3/13/06 5:21 AM, Breton Blake Slivka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be clear at the start, this message is not a proposal for a new
format. (Well not yet anyway)
I am gearing up to do the redesign for an art gallery's website. I am
considering making heavy use of
In an attempt to make it easier for folks to find particular types of
implementations for each microformat, I have organized the Implementations
section of the hCalendar specification into what feels like a decent best
first guess at categories of implementations that people may be interested
in
On 3/8/06 7:42 AM, Paul Kinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have created an account and I will wait to see what happens from there.
Welcome Paul!
David/Scott, I think your right, I should research it a bit more to a) see
if it has been done before and b) how other people do it and c) if
On 3/5/06 6:08 PM, David Beach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think XML could be sufficient. But if it is, then why hasn't any of
this been done?
Indeed, it's been tried, but more with idealistic formats that attempt to
capture all information about something, rather than empirically based 80/20
Hi Brian,
On 3/4/06 8:02 AM, Brian Suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had two immediate thoughts, none of whick really effect this
idea, i just wanted to get them out there documented.
1) The current GEO property has to have sub-properties of
class=latitude and class=logitude this is
Greetings,
There are several microformats related sessions at upcoming conferences
documented here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/events
In particular I want to call your attention to ETech and SXSW sessions on
microformats:
http://microformats.org/wiki/events/2006-03-07-etech-microformats
On 2/27/06 1:56 AM, Factory Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah yeah, totally down for a mF Mashpit @ either Etech or SXSW. I'm busyish
this week, but if folks are interested, ping me and let me know and we'll
get something going.
I've created two pages to get these kicked off. pw to edit the
Hi Chris,
On 2/27/06 1:59 AM, Chris Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Beach wrote:
I'm David Beach. I work for Yahoo! in Yahoo! Shopping. I'm interested in
creating a microformat for product information. It's possible that this
could be very useful for merchants, manufacturers, and
I've been watching eagerly as hAtom has been refined quite nicely by
everyone's excellent discussions and Ryan King's and David Janes' hard work
in updating the wiki accordingly. I think it is looking quite good.
http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom
I haven't yet completed adding it to my blog
(it was a markup example). I'll go fix
it.
But you'll find more info in the notes and the IRC
discussion.
Thanks,
Tantek
On 2/25/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mark,
Please make sure that any hCalendar issues that you know of are documented
on the hcalendar-issues page sufficiently
Greetings,
I've taken the changes proposed and accepted for hReview 0.3 from the
review-brainstorming page and incorporated them into hReview:
http://microformats.org/wiki/hreview
Please take a look and review (so to speak). Follow-up to the list with any
errors / omissions / feedback /
on hListing. We have folks from Oodle, Edgeio, Technorati,
CommerceNet, and independent developer Assaf Arkin all participated in a
heated but productive discussion.
Here are some collaboratively taken (props to SubethaEdit) rough notes:
hListing meeting notes
Attendees
Tantek Çelik - Technorati
Ryan
During yesterday's f2f at mashupcamp meeting where we discussed the
finalization/resolution of outstanding issues for hAtom, hResume, hReview
0.3, it became apparent that the include technique we came up with for
hResume had utility in at least hReview and hAtom as well, and possibly
other
On 2/20/06 2:10 AM, Mark Mansour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Hi Mark!
Although there is a hCalendar meetup on Friday/Saturday on IRC (plug,
plug - see a recent post) I had a general question to ask here first
that can be highlighted with a specific example..
My general question
In short, most of these questions/suppositions are answered/discussed the
following wiki pages.
http://microformats.org/wiki/microformats
http://microformats.org/wiki/distributed-conversation
http://microformats.org/wiki/citation
On 2/14/06 6:43 AM, David Osolkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome Michael!
On 2/10/06 7:25 PM, Michael McCracken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I just found the recent conversations about a citation microformat, and
saw that the discussion slowed down around the same time someone asked about
what problem we're solving.
The conversation is still
On 2/13/06 1:08 AM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ryan
King [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
2) the resultant hCards contain out-of-date information, with a
person identified under a job title they no longer hold (except
possibly the most recent experience).
On 2/13/06 7:59 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 10, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
Again, because he is no longer has that title and org (i.e.
former), I
don't think it is appropriate to mark it up as such, because by
doing so,
you are claiming it to be a currently
On 2/10/06 10:03 AM, Paul Denning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fyi,
[1] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/incubator-pressrelease
Microformats came to mind when I read about this XG.
Indeed. I remember this when it happened.
Frankly, I think we're incubating microformats just fine out in the open
On 2/10/06 11:01 AM, B.K. DeLong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, being the OCD developer I am,
join the club. :)
I marked up a recent blog posting
with hCard - quite a lot of hCard - and need some assistance checking
if it validates. Ignore the political content and please help me
examine
Last year we held semi-irregular microformats dinners which helped introduce
a lot of folks to microformats, and provide an open forum where folks could
come to learn, to get questions answered, share ideas etc., in a more
personable setting than irc/email/wiki, and helped get a lot of
On 2/10/06 12:51 PM, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there really any point in hcarding things that have no contact
information?
Absolutely.
A smarter browser could detect these people and organizations mentioned
in pages, and perhaps connect them with entries *you already have* in
On 2/10/06 12:57 PM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote:
My first thought is early Monday evenings like 5-6pm pacific time.
We could also try one on 2/13 and see how it goes. 2/20 is during
MashupCamp, but I think enough microformatters
On 2/8/06 3:44 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Carl Beeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
One of the potholes is in my opinion the little intro text on the home
page:
What are microformats
Designed for humans first and machines second,
Note - the notion
Brian, could you add this to the FAQ?
http://microformats.org/wiki/faq
Thanks,
Tantek
On 2/9/06 7:06 AM, brian suda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The HTML HEAD Profile attribute alerts applications to the potential
presence of microformats.[1,2]
-brian
[1] - http://www.gmpg.org/xmdp/
[2]
On 2/9/06 4:04 PM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 9, 2006, at 4:55 PM, Ryan King wrote:
On Feb 9, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
meta name=microformats content=tag hAtom xFolk /
Ironically, this is exactly the sort of thing microformats are
against
using-
Welcome Patrick!
On 2/9/06 12:56 PM, Patrick Tufts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Angus McIntyre wrote:
Obviously, a robot would be free to scan any page to see if it contained
content in a format it's interested in, but a 'hint' of this kind might
allow the robot to prioritise processing of pages
On 2/9/06 8:35 PM, Ryan Cannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The XMDP Spec says very little about the content of descriptions.
Actually, it's quite explicit, see below.
Can
a term be defined with both a text description and an explicit list
of properties?
Yes.
If so, should this be marked
-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss@microformats.org
http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
--
Tantek Çelik
Chief Technologist, Technorati, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1.415.254.9656 mobile
___
microformats-discuss mailing list
On 2/7/06 5:53 AM, Mark Mansour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I've made my test cases for hCalendar publicly available. For more
details please read my blog entry http://www.lifelint.com/blog/
To try out the service go to http://www.lifelint.net/
I look forward to your feedback
1. hAtom for syndicated content
There has been tremendous progress made on hAtom thanks to everyone's
tireless efforts, in particular DavidJanes and Ryan King. The draft is
looking pretty good, and the issues document has been cleaned up a lot. I
encourage everyone who is interested in a
On 2/2/06 11:01 AM, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 8:27 AM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
Mark et al,
I appreciate the effort that has gone into this. I wonder if it
would be worth just getting together for a few hours some evening
for Microformats wiki-thon, where
On 2/2/06 10:57 AM, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 2, 2006, at 4:18 AM, Chris Roos wrote:
Hi,
I have a specific question regarding the parsing of the hreview on
this yahoo movie review[1]
The rating given in the review is as follows
dtRating/dt
dd
em3.5/5
img
On 2/2/06 1:57 PM, Christopher St John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/06, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I was saying... I don't think you can really extricate the process
from the results. Certainly the philosophy/process could be useful in
many contexts. Of course, I'd love to be
On 2/2/06 2:14 PM, David Osolkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little unclear what you mean by languishing. It seems that not a
day goes by when we (even myself personally) must reference the process to
someone either on the list or in IRC
On 2/1/06 12:04 PM, Sujata Ramchandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is my initial foray in to the world of microformats.
Welcome Sujata!
I have been asked
to provide some additional fields within hReview
Who has asked you for this? That might help understand what the problem is
On 2/1/06 2:27 PM, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tantek Çelik wrote on 2/1/2006, 12:25 PM:
On 2/1/06 12:04 PM, Sujata Ramchandran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I have been asked
to provide some additional fields within hReview
Who has asked you for this? That might help
On 2/1/06 6:53 PM, Ryan King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== Homepage (http://microformats.org) ===
...
Granted. A common criticism of http://microformats.org/ is that its
too 'spec-y.'
Writing specs is necessary, but, of course, not sufficient.
One must definitely start somewhere.
One of
301 - 400 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
