On Dec 14, 2007 6:45 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. It's not reasonable, though, to argue
(which you're not, at least not here, but which others seem to be) that
16:03 is an abbreviation of what a human (geeks aside) would gather from
the context as
On Dec 15, 2007 1:40 AM, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me 3:23 is already
machine-readable
Does 3:23 mean 3 mins 23 seconds, or 3 hours 23 mins, or 23 minutes
past three o'clock? ;-)
-Ciaran McNulty
___
microformats-discuss
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul
Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
The least that could be got away with is 00:03:23, at which point it
would be a toss up between that or PT3M23S
Both of the above formats are valid and should be accepted by parsers
as a part of the ISO 8601 time/date
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 13:36 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:21 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 12:33 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 12:18 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you could perhaps do PT3:23 ? which seems more
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ciaran
McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Dec 14, 2007 6:45 PM, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That's a reasonable argument. It's not reasonable, though, to argue
(which you're not, at least not here, but which others seem to be) that
16:03 is an
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 16:23 -0800, Tantek =?ISO-8859-1?B?xw==?=elik
wrote:
On 12/14/07 3:55 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 23:18 +, Martin McEvoy wrote:
I do NOT however believe that machine data should be displayed in a
people area such as @title, I
On Dec 15, 2007 8:21 AM, Ben Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed. I'll repost something I put into the GEO thread last week.
It's quoting directly from the HTML4 specification. This doesn't
actually need to have any concern with accessibility, or assistive
technology tools. Frankly, the
On Dec 15, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
It seems to me 3:23 is already
machine-readable
Does 3:23 mean 3 mins 23 seconds, or 3 hours 23 mins, or 23 minutes
past three o'clock? ;-)
My point is it's not productive to ask such questions outside the
context of the actual problem,
On Dec 13, 2007 3:19 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
1. 16:03 isn't an abbreviation for 12 September 2007. That's
/additional/ information. So that should be a SPAN not an ABBR.
I'd disagree with this. 16:03 in the context of your original page
*will*
Ciaran McNulty wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 3:19 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
1. 16:03 isn't an abbreviation for 12 September 2007. That's
/additional/ information. So that should be a SPAN not an ABBR.
I'd disagree with this. 16:03 in the context of
Ciaran McNulty wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007 3:19 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
1. 16:03 isn't an abbreviation for 12 September 2007. That's
/additional/ information. So that should be a SPAN not an ABBR.
That was Benjamin's comment not mine.
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Ciaran
McNulty [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Dec 13, 2007 3:19 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. 16:03 isn't an abbreviation for 12 September 2007. That's
/additional/ information. So that should be a SPAN not an ABBR.
I'd disagree with
On 14 Dec 2007, at 14:06, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
I think all of the following would be misuses of ABBR and TITLE:
| Combien d'œufs ai-je vendre? J'ai vendu abbr title=quarante-cinq
| 45/abbr aujourd'hui.
| Combien d'œufs ai-je vendre? J'ai vendu abbr title=45
| œufs45/abbr aujourd'hui.
On Dec 15, 2007 9:19 AM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 19:21 +, Ben Ward wrote:
'3:23' IS NOT an
abbreviation of the string 'PT3M23S' (hAudio).
I think you're right. It should be P3M23S instead.
A couple of us involved in the brainstorming and after,
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 10:13 +1300, Paul Wilkins wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 9:19 AM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 19:21 +, Ben Ward wrote:
'3:23' IS NOT an
abbreviation of the string 'PT3M23S' (hAudio).
I think you're right. It should be P3M23S instead.
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 23:18 +, Martin McEvoy wrote:
I do NOT however believe that machine data should be displayed in a
people area such as @title, I think machine data can be stored
elsewhere
in a document such as in the head in a list of link's or meta's
No but seriously, with my web
On Dec 15, 2007 1:36 PM, Paul Wilkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007 1:21 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hmm are you sure? 3:23 is expressed as whole plus a decimal fraction
That's if you use a comma or a fullstop. With the full colon it's
interpreted as hours and
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Ben Ward wrote:
I am going to ask that we better define the problem. That we follow
up the demand for a better pattern (regardless of whether your
personal motivation is following the spec or assistive technology).
I'd like to ask that people stop jumping
On 12/14/07 3:55 PM, Martin McEvoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 23:18 +, Martin McEvoy wrote:
I do NOT however believe that machine data should be displayed in a
people area such as @title, I think machine data can be stored
elsewhere
in a document such as in the head
Cc-ing (hopefully) interested bbc parties
Hello Andy
Long time no hear
On 12/12/07 19:02, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
Smethurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Just to say that hCalendar is used fairly extensively to describe
broadcasts on
Andy Mabbett wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
Smethurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Just to say that hCalendar is used fairly extensively to describe
broadcasts on bbc.co.uk/programmes here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/genres/music
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
I know it defeats the object semantically speaking but what are the
other arguments against putting the machine-readable date/time in the
class attribute and do they outweigh the gain in accessibility?
For example, what's wrong with this:
abbr
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
Robert O'Rourke wrote:
I know it defeats the object semantically speaking but what are the
other arguments against putting the machine-readable date/time in the
class attribute and do they outweigh the gain in accessibility?
For example, what's wrong with this:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael
Smethurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Just to say that hCalendar is used fairly extensively to describe
broadcasts on bbc.co.uk/programmes here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/genres/music
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/formats/animation
Hello!
Just to say that hCalendar is used fairly extensively to describe broadcasts
on bbc.co.uk/programmes here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/genres/music
And here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/formats/animation
And here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006qpgr/laston
And etc
25 matches
Mail list logo
