On 07/12/14 09:35, Adam Thompson wrote:
On 14-12-06 03:20 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
Okay, I'll change the name. What I'm wondering is, which mentions of
the OpenBSD name should I change? For example, you said before that
the OpenBSD name may not be removed from the license headers of source
On 07/12/14 09:05, Daniel Dickman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
1. What is OpenBSD's stance on allowing
On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 22:36:37 -0600
Theo de Raadt dera...@cvs.openbsd.org wrote:
There's something fairly weaselous about this all... this:
didn't want to notify you. You might be right about OpenSSL maintainers
(although I think you are not) - I just don't know, and can't speak for
them - but
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:35:03PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
What exactly do you mean by that?
On 12/07/14 03:35, Riley Baird wrote:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
Doesn't really make any sense why. But either way hopefully you're
not using common
On 07/12/14 19:53, Kaspars Bankovskis wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:35:03PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
What exactly do you
On 07/12/14 19:59, Brad Smith wrote:
On 12/07/14 03:35, Riley Baird wrote:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
Doesn't really make any sense why. But either way
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
Isn't it easier to just do
# cd /mnt/etc; tar czf firmware{.tgz,}; rm -R firmware
from bsd.rd after
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode included.
Isn't it easier to just do
# cd /mnt/etc; tar czf
Hi, Riley,
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 09:05, Daniel Dickman wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
I have a few questions about
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:29:48PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version without the
binary-only microcode
On 12/07/14 04:29, Riley Baird wrote:
However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they
will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware
due to the Blob-Busters marketing or b) not know where to look to
remove it should they wish to
Your
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
1. What is OpenBSD's stance on allowing derivative distros to keep the
name OpenBSD throughout the system?
It's a ton of work to change the name. I'm curious why you want to
create a
On 07/12/14 20:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:29:48PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and I would like to create a version
On 12/07/14 05:18, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:29:48PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think that OpenBSD has
excellent security, and
On 07/12/14 21:32, Brad Smith wrote:
On 12/07/14 05:18, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:52, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:29:48PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
On 07/12/14 20:20, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
Riley Baird said:
As for why I want to create the distro, I think
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
1. What is OpenBSD's stance on allowing derivative distros to keep the
name
On 07/12/14 21:51, Joel Rees wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
1. What is OpenBSD's stance on allowing
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch wrote:
On 07/12/14 21:51, Joel Rees wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:09 PM, Riley Baird
[...]
I see your point, but I'm just wondering - if you are recommending that
I get a lawyer, is that because
2014-12-06 9:45 GMT+01:00 Riley Baird
bm-2cvqnduybau5do2dfjtrn7zbaj246s4...@bitmessage.ch:
I have a few questions about OpenBSD's trademark policy. (I tried
looking, but I couldn't find a document.)
Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The USPTO doesn't list it.
FreeBSD is, though.
Best
Your changes to the system will be very small, and most of the time
you'll be just renaming 'openbsd' to something else, and syncing back
changes from upstream. If you have time for that, lucky you. But there
are more useful things to do, don't you think so?
Hi,
Miod Vallat wrote:
I can confirm the spurious segmentation faults or `double free' issues
with an SM40 module, and I am currently investigating the issue.
Fine. That means that using the SM40 instead of the SM50 won't probably
help. I will try though, just to be sure.
They are both
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 07:35:03PM +1100, Riley Baird wrote:
I agree entirely. For this reason, I think it would be best to keep
system internals (e.g. uname, includes, etc.) using the name OpenBSD
with only the main user-visible parts changed to a new name.
As for why I want to create the
At 7 Dec 2014 12:42:41 + (UTC) from Kaspars Bankovskis
kasp...@bankovskis.net:
there are more useful things to do, don't you think so?
Agree. Riley, I think you don't get the point here. The firmware blob are *not*
running on the system, but on device.
Why do you don't create just a script
Riley Baird said:
However, remember that if someone doesn't know much about OpenBSD, they
will either: a) think that OpenBSD does not contain binary-only firmware
due to the Blob-Busters marketing or b) not know where to look to
remove it should they wish to
This information is easily
Greetings,
Some days ago I installed OBSD 5.6 on my old Compaq 610 laptop (a pretty
standard CORE2 Duo 2010 machine - yes, I know that standard is a
kind of hard concept in the i386/amd64 world...), dmesg in [1].
Great hardware support, except that sound card was completely silent
(dmesg with
On 14-12-07 06:37 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The USPTO doesn't list it.
FreeBSD is, though.
The answer appears to be no, as CIPO doesn't list it, either.
My guess is that keeping the lights on (literally) was a higher priority
than paying the annual
Greetings,
With OpenBSD 5.6 release, I finally have a pretty functional (and
usable) hibernation function (not on all my hardware, but at least for
a not-so-recent HP laptop it works!).
I was digging into my scripts in order to apply some quirks before
hibernating the machine, and noticed that
On Sun, 07 Dec 2014 09:37:13 -0600
Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net wrote:
On 14-12-07 06:37 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The USPTO doesn't list
it. FreeBSD is, though.
The answer appears to be no, as CIPO doesn't list it, either.
My guess is
Hi all,
I would like to ask what is the reason for man afterboot discouraging
the usage of the space character in root passwords.
Root password
Change the password for the root user. (Note that throughout the
documentation, the term ``superuser'' is a synonym for the root user.)
Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net writes:
On 14-12-07 06:37 AM, Martin Schröder wrote:
Is OpenBSD actually a registered trademark? The USPTO doesn't list it.
FreeBSD is, though.
The answer appears to be no, as CIPO doesn't list it, either.
My guess is that keeping the lights on
Hi Adam,
Le 07/12/2014 19:30, Adam Wolk a écrit :
Hi all,
I would like to ask what is the reason for man afterboot discouraging
the usage of the space character in root passwords.
Root password
Change the password for the root user. (Note that throughout the
documentation,
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 06:05:16PM +0100, Alessandro DE LAURENZIS wrote:
Greetings,
With OpenBSD 5.6 release, I finally have a pretty functional (and
usable) hibernation function (not on all my hardware, but at least for
a not-so-recent HP laptop it works!).
Which machines don't work, and
Hi list, I've got this error and I don't what it is about.
Is something wrong with my hardware, like RAM?
Could someone point me in right direction to resolve this error?
Dec 7 11:35:33 gw /bsd: uvm_fault(0xd0a2, 0xcfc0, 0, 3) - e
Dec 7 11:35:33 gw /bsd: fatal page fault (6) in
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:30:26PM +0100, Frank Groeneveld wrote:
I might be able to find out what change caused this regression if
somebody can hint where to look. I've already crawled through most of
the intel drm code, but I think this must be somewhere in the ACPI
layer. Where should I
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 22:03, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
Dec 7 11:35:33 gw /bsd: OpenBSD 5.0 (GENERIC.MP) #59: Wed Aug 17 10:19:44
Honestly, this is way too old. There have been hundreds of bugs fixed
since then.
Am 12/07/14 um 19:30 schrieb Adam Wolk:
Hi all,
I would like to ask what is the reason for man afterboot discouraging
the usage of the space character in root passwords.
Root password
Change the password for the root user. (Note that throughout the
documentation, the term
I think the same, if running a command after installing it will make your
system free enough, what is the need of a fork? I think that if you publish a
web page with that information the OpenBSD community would not take that as an
offense.
I'm in the middle of leaving Debian after almost 15
After a private conversation with Theo, I've decided that I'm not going
to respond to any of your emails for 4-6 days. You'll still get a
response, but just not now. :)
After a private conversation with Theo, I've decided that I'm not going
to respond to any of your emails for 4-6 days. You'll still get a
response, but just not now. :)
Riley, you seem to take yourself far more seriously then the rest of us do.
Anyone had any problems getting iked to adhere to revoked certificates?
I can log in with a valid cert but can also log in using the same cert
after it's been revoked using # ikectl ca vpn certificate
xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx revoke . I tried restarting iked but it still behaved
the same. Any
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-12-02, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am more or less forced to test Squid.
OpenBSD test.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#333 amd64
I have two problems:
WARNING! Your cache is running out
On 2014/12/07 15:57, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014-12-02, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am more or less forced to test Squid.
OpenBSD test.my.domain 5.6 GENERIC.MP#333 amd64
I have
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org wrote:
On 2014/12/07 15:57, sven falempin wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Stuart Henderson s...@spacehopper.org
wrote:
On 2014-12-02, sven falempin sven.falem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am more or less
Hello Miod,
Miod Vallat wrote:
I can confirm the spurious segmentation faults or `double free' issues
with an SM40 module, and I am currently investigating the issue.
I swapped in the ol' SM40 instead of SM50 and after a make clean, build
still failed, still in tcl.
So yes, both modules are
Hi,
Jorge Gabriel Lopez Paramount wrote:
I'm in the middle of leaving Debian after almost 15 years of using it, due to
the systemd affair. And as you might guess it has not been easy, I have enough
(personal) systems and experience invested to leave Debian only for a tantrum,
but there is no
Hi,
Stefan Wollny wrote on Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:00PM +0100:
Am 12/07/14 um 19:30 schrieb Adam Wolk:
I would like to ask what is the reason for man afterboot discouraging
the usage of the space character in root passwords.
Root password
Change the password for the root user.
Hi Alexander,
[ moved back to misc@, let's not discuss such a minor issue
on source-changes@ ]
Alexander Hall wrote on Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:31:43AM +0100:
On December 8, 2014 12:05:30 AM CET, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
CVSROOT: /cvs
Module name: src
Changes by:
I did not. In fact both HDMI and Displayport outputs worked fine. I also
tried the system on a 2560x1440 monitor, that worked as well.
I did not test audio, didn't do very much desktop stuff. Firefox and xterm
work fine. I still need to spend some time on learning how to install
another
Hi,
Anyone running OpenBSD 5.6 or current on Soekris 6501-70 who
wouldn't mind sharing some through-put data for gigabit
performance.
Regards,
MH
Hi,
Since I don't know if the OpenBSD Project still providing support for these
products, I don't make a diff, sorry.
The following links are broken on http://www.openbsd.org/products.html
RTMX (http://www.rtmx.com/)
PowerCrypt (http://www.powercrypt.com/)
Core Systems (http://www.core.dk/)
I would like to be able to run ~100-120 MB/s from one NIC to the other
on this box, if possible?
Search the mailing list history. If you can't find that specific model
Soekris you'll likely be able to find information for that NIC chipset
(the Intel 82574L).
-Gene
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Martin Hanson greencopperm...@yandex.com
wrote:
Hi,
Anyone running OpenBSD 5.6 or current
Hi Martin,
On 7 December 2014 at 18:18, Martin Hanson greencopperm...@yandex.com wrote:
I would like to be able to run ~100-120 MB/s from one NIC to the other
on this box, if possible?
Take a look a look at these threads:
https://www.mail-archive.com/misc%40openbsd.org/msg133961.html
I mentioned it one of those threads, I have the 2550L2D-MxPC and one of the
NICs died after nine months of use.
I might just be unlucky, but I feel its worth mentioning.
-Gene
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 PM, jungle Boogie jungleboog...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 7 December 2014 at 18:18,
I misspoke, in both cases. It died on the 14th month.
-Gene
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Gene gh5...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned it one of those threads, I have the 2550L2D-MxPC and one of
the NICs died after nine months of use.
I might just be unlucky, but I feel its worth mentioning.
Hi Gene,
On 7 December 2014 at 20:39, Gene gh5...@gmail.com wrote:
I mentioned it one of those threads, I have the 2550L2D-MxPC and one of the
NICs died after nine months of use.
I might just be unlucky, but I feel its worth mentioning.
I probably glossed right over that post. Would you still
Hahaha. When I went to powercrypt.com it sent me to a different site tried
to get me to download an Adobe Flash installer, and not from Adobe's
website.
-Gene
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Luiz Roberto dos Santos
arrowscr...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
Since I don't know if the OpenBSD Project
On 07.12.2014 20:03, pavel pocheptsov wrote:
Hi list, I've got this error and I don't what it is about.
Is something wrong with my hardware, like RAM?
Could someone point me in right direction to resolve this error?
Dec 7 11:35:33 gw /bsd: uvm_fault(0xd0a2, 0xcfc0, 0, 3)
- e
Dec 7
Thus said Alexei Malinin on Fri, 05 Dec 2014 15:49:59 +0300:
- the question is - how and with what tools (dig, host, nslookup, or
maybe C or Perl libs) can I verify the NS glue records in the parent
zone of my ISP (zone transfers are denied)?
The entries in the ADDITIONAL SECTION below
On 12/07/14 21:18, Martin Hanson wrote:
I would like to be able to run ~100-120 MB/s from one NIC to the other
on this box, if possible?
The NICs should be fine but I'd be worried that even the -70 model
would be CPU limited for such throughput.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses
61 matches
Mail list logo
